K'ómoks First Nation members vote overwhelmingly in favour of modern treaty
Social Sharing
The chief of the K'ómoks First Nation on Vancouver Island says members have voted in favour of both a treaty and constitution, opening the door for the nation to reclaim a culture that faced eradication under the Indian Act.
The First Nation, which is comprised of just over 350 members, has four reserves on central Vancouver Island. Its main reserve is located in the Courtenay-Comox area.
Nation leadership has been working for more than three decades on a treaty to assert self-governance and full ownership of 35 square kilometres of land in the nation.
The nation says 83 per cent of the votes went in favour of ratifying the K'ómoks constitution, and over 81 per cent of members voted in favour of the treaty, which allows for co-management of wildlife, parks, water and forests in the area.
The nation's elected Chief Councillor Nicole Rempel said the treaty will allow future generations of the nation to revitalize their culture.
"To be able to determine who our K'ómoks people are in the future, and not have someone in Ottawa make that decision for us, it's really exciting," she told CBC News.
Just under 240 K'ómoks members were eligible to vote on the treaty, and there was a 91 per cent turnout on Saturday.
Rempel said the Indian Act — federal legislation that governed Indigenous affairs for decades and came to be widely criticized for its regressive approach to Indigenous peoples — was designed to essentially wipe out the nation's way of life.
"I think it's really exciting to have the opportunity to get out of the Indian Act," Rempel said.
"I think that was really what I felt the most passionate about, because our ancestors didn't have that choice. It was thrust upon them."
The treaty will now need to be ratified by the provincial and federal governments to go into effect, which Rempel estimates will take around three years.
A statement from the First Nation says work over the next three years will involve restructuring its governing bodies and developing laws, while "carefully considering the tremendous economic opportunities that lay ahead."
B.C. Indigenous Relations Minister Christine Boyle congratulated the First Nation's leadership for the successful vote on a treaty that's been in negotiations since 1994.
"I remain firmly committed to taking this path alongside the K'ómoks people," Boyle said.
Challenge from nearby First Nation
The K'ómoks treaty has faced opposition from the Wei Wai Kum First Nation, which has overlapping claims of traditional territory in central Vancouver Island.
Chris Roberts, elected chief of the Wei Wai Kum, filed an injunction application in B.C. Supreme Court last week seeking to stop the treaty vote. He told CBC News last year that the treaty would extinguish rights claimed by the Wei Wai Kum.
The court rejected the application on Friday. CBC News has reached out to the Wei Wai Kum for this story.
Rempel said the K'ómoks treaty contains provisions that prevent any impact to other nations and their rights and title.
She said she hoped to celebrate the nations' shared history.
"As a nation, we really want to work with our neighbours and build those relationships," she said.
"Because when we work together, we work really well together and we're stronger together."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Toronto Sun
44 minutes ago
- Toronto Sun
GUNTER: Carney Liberals build groundwork to blame pipeline failure on private sector
Prime Minister Mark Carney meets with all of Canada's premiers during the First Ministers' Meeting at TCU Place. Photo taken in Saskatoon, Sask. on Monday, June 2, 2025. Photo by Michelle Berg / Postmedia You don't have to look far for proof that a cross-country pipeline is more of a pipedream. The usual suspects — Quebec, the federal cabinet, the B.C. government, Indigenous activists and environmentalists — are never going to consent to one being built, even if Prime Minister Mark Carney declares one to be in the national interest. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account. Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments. Enjoy additional articles per month. Get email updates from your favourite authors. THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK. Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments Enjoy additional articles per month Get email updates from your favourite authors Don't have an account? Create Account Already, if you look closely enough, the foundations are being laid to reject a new transnational pipeline and pin the blame on investors and the oil industry for lack of interest. Oh, sure. There's some good lip service toward boosting conventional oil and gas production. In late May, new Natural Resources Minister Tim Hodgson caused sighs of relief when he told the Calgary Chamber of Commerce that the Carney Liberals' energy policy 'begins with a vision: to build Canada into a conventional and clean energy and natural resources superpower.' Early on in his tenure as PM, Carney had given the clear impression he was in favour of expansion of oil and gas, maybe even the oilsands. Then the Liberal platform came out mid-campaign and gone was any reference to oil, gas or pipelines. It was only 'clean energy,' such as wind and solar, bug burps and Tibetans prayer wheels, or whatever other trendy 'green' energy sources have mesmerized 'progressives.' Your noon-hour look at what's happening in Toronto and beyond. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. Please try again This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Even when Carney met with the 13 premiers last week, the oil-province premiers Danielle Smith of Alberta and Scott Moe of Saskatchewan left the summit believing there was a real chance a pipeline might make it onto the Liberal government's approved list of national-interest projects. Read More Forgive me for being a cynic or a pessimist but just look at what federal cabinet ministers and other premiers are saying now. Speaking Monday in Korea as part of a 10-day trade swing through Asia, B.C. Premier David Eby said its wasn't his government standing in the way of a pipeline to northwestern B.C. Rather, there's 'no proponent, no money and no project right now.' This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Like Justin Trudeau on LNG, Eby was saying there's 'no business case' for a new pipeline. The private sector has been scared off energy projects by politicians' and activists' obstructionism in the past decade. That won't change until governments re-establish credibility with pipeline companies that new projects have a decent chance being approved in a timely manner and, after approval, have a decent chance of being built without endless court challenges and protests. Otherwise, who's going to step forward with billions of dollars to risk? Remember that Justice Minister Sean Fraser said national projects could be built without full Indigenous buy-in, only to be forced by the prime minister's office to walk those words back less than 24 hours later, under pressure from the Assembly of First Nations and others. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Former environment minister (now heritage minister) Steven Guilbeault has been the most blunt. He has come right out and said there is no need for more pipelines because oil demand will soon begin declining, even though there is no proof of his claim. And Guilbeault's protege, current Environment Minister Julie Dabrusin, under questioning in the House of Commons on Monday, said while she had no definition of the 'consensus' that would be required to get a pipeline approved, 100 per cent would be a good place to start. Dabrusin would not commit to whether that meant provincial politicians and First Nations had vetoes, but the logic is not hard to follow. This is how the Trudeau government killed the Energy East pipeline — adding enough delays and regulatory changes that eventually TC Energy, the line's owner, withdrew. That allowed the federal Liberals to claim the pipeline's demise was a business decision, not a political one. And that's what I think we are being set up for now on a new East-West pipeline. The Carney government will claim to be in favour, but kowtow to special interests until investors shy away. Celebrity NHL Editorial Cartoons Toronto Maple Leafs Music
Winnipeg Free Press
an hour ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Sir John A. Macdonald statue back in view at Queen's Park after five years boarded up
TORONTO – The Sir John A. Macdonald statue outside the Ontario legislature is back in full view after spending the past five years in a box. The statue of Canada's first prime minister has been under hoarding since 2020, when it was vandalized with pink paint. The monument was one of many that were targeted across the country amid anti-racism protests and as Canadians grappled with the history of residential schools. Macdonald is considered an architect of the country's notorious residential school system, which took Indigenous children from their families in an effort to assimilate them. Progressive Conservative and Liberal members of a non-partisan board of the legislative assembly agreed earlier this month on a motion to remove the hoarding after the statue is cleaned. Speaker Donna Skelly says she recognizes the sensitivities surrounding Macdonald and welcomes Ontarians to come and share their views peacefully. This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 11, 2025.
Toronto Star
an hour ago
- Toronto Star
Major projects will be slowed by court challenges if rights are violated: B.C. chief
OTTAWA - The regional chief for British Columbia said Wednesday that governments should not speed up major projects at the expense of First Nations rights — and warned that projects will be slowed down by court challenges if First Nations are not consulted from the start. 'We're asking the government to follow your own laws,' Terry Teegee said, citing the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples that the federal government adopted. The government of Prime Minister Mark Carney introduced major economic legislation last week. The bill has two parts — one to break down federal barriers to internal trade and the other to fast-track major projects. It sets out five criteria to determine whether a project is in the 'national interest.' ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW Those criteria include the project's likelihood of success, whether it would strengthen the country's resiliency and advance the interests of Indigenous Peoples, and whether it would contribute to economic growth in an environmentally responsible way. But First Nations leaders say their interests weren't considered when the legislation was being drafted and they were given just one week to review and bring comments forward on a briefing document on the bill. 'It's probably going to take a lot longer to get approval for some of these projects because we're going to end up in court,' Teegee said. 'This is where we end up.' The national chief of the Assembly of First Nations agreed. 'It's not about the bill itself. It's about the process. And I think that ramming something through when you should be hearing from Canadians, from industry, from First Nations … is the wrong way to go,' Cindy Woodhouse Nepinak said. 'You don't want to end back up in court. You don't want to have civil unrest. Why not just invite us to the table?' First Nations leaders have warned that widespread protests and blockades are possible if governments don't obtain affected Indigenous communities' free, prior and informed consent, as required by the UN declaration. ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW The federal government has said that declaration doesn't amount to a veto — a statement Justice Minister Sean Fraser walked back last week following criticism from Woodhouse Nepinak. Teegee said 'no government has a veto, meaning that when we come to a decision, all governments come into the room to make a decision together.' 'First Nations, certainly as a part of this, need to be part of the decision-making process,' he added. Even groups that generally support development are raising concerns about the federal government's plan. Mark Podlasly, CEO of the First Nations Major Projects Coalition, said he was 'surprised' First Nations were only given seven days to review parts of the legislation before it was introduced. 'The answer will not automatically be 'no' from First Nations when a project comes along. It's just that Indigenous rights and involvement has to not only be included, but respected. That hasn't happened a lot in the Canadian past,' he said. 'There's also a question on the environment, and there's a question about who bears the impact of these projects if they're rushed through. It's going to be Indigenous Peoples, especially in parts of the country where there's mining or energy sources (on lands) that are integral to our lifestyle, our cultural practices.' This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 11, 2025. Politics Headlines Newsletter Get the latest news and unmatched insights in your inbox every evening Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. Please enter a valid email address. Sign Up Yes, I'd also like to receive customized content suggestions and promotional messages from the Star. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Politics Headlines Newsletter You're signed up! You'll start getting Politics Headlines in your inbox soon. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page.
