logo
Where do Virginia Governor Candidates Stand on Menhaden Study Bill?

Where do Virginia Governor Candidates Stand on Menhaden Study Bill?

Yahoo30-01-2025

ROANOKE, Va. (WFXR) — House Bill 2713 (HB2713) would require the Commonwealth of Virginia to conduct a study of the status of Atlantic menhaden in Virginia's portion of the Chesapeake Bay. It is a hot button issue that has been debated among conservation and outdoors groups, and the reduction fishing industry for years.
So, where do Virginia's leading candidates for governor stand on the issue?
Republican Winsome Earle-Sears has not responded to requests by WFXR for her position on the menhaden study bill.
Democrat Abigail Spanberger has not committed supporting this bill in particular, but she says she is in favor of the idea of finding out more about menhaden numbers and how various environmental and industrial factors play into their status.
'More information is always powerful and helpful in making decision,' said Spanberger. 'When it comes to digging into an issue and fully understanding, perhaps, the impacts, as an issue of principle I'm generally supportive of those efforts.'
Governor Glenn Youngkin has also not taken a position on the bill, though his office did issue the following statement:
'Since day one, the administration and the Virginia Marine Resources Commission have been engaged with all stakeholders from Virginia's commercial and recreational fishing sectors about these issues and the importance of commonsense solutions for protecting and cleaning up the Bay. Last year, VMRC adopted a Memorandum of Understanding with the menhaden industry to minimize and mitigate fish spills through strict fishing restrictions during peak public use times, geographical restrictions on harvest, and clear protocols for spill response. Cooperative approaches like this are important steps towards promoting transparency and accountability within the industry while safeguarding our marine environment for all of Virginia's users and economic activities that rely on the Bay.
The Administration and VMRC will continue to work with all users of the Bay to ensure accountability and stewardship of Virginia's natural resources. The Governor will carefully review all legislation that is sent to him during the 2025 General Assembly.'
Conservation and sportfishing groups have been critical of the industrial menhaden reduction fishery on the bay, and say local numbers have declined, leading to a decline in various fish and wildlife. Virginia is the only state on the Atlantic coast that allows industrial reduction fishing on estuaries like the Chesapeake Bay.
There is only one company practicing industrial reduction fishing for menhaden in Virginia, Reedville-based Omega Protein. Omega says menhaden stocks are solid and sustainable. They point to coast-wide studies to back that position.
However, there has been no recent localized research done to establish the population in Virginia's portion of the Chesapeake.
Delegate Paul Milde (R-Stafford) is the patron of HB2713.
'There are no modern-day studies of menhaden populations in the bay,' said Del. Milde. 'It makes sense that we need to find out where we really are with the menhaden, and if there are any connections between rockfish populations, osprey populations, and the menhaden catch.'
The bill is before the Virginia House Rules-Studies Subcommittee. That is the same subcommittee that last year killed the latest effort to pass a study bill. The proposal was tabled by a subcommittee voice vote without explanation or debate.
WFXR News has reached out to members of that subcommittee to find out their positions on the current bill, but so far has received no responses.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Riot police, anti-ICE protesters square off in Los Angeles after raids
Riot police, anti-ICE protesters square off in Los Angeles after raids

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Riot police, anti-ICE protesters square off in Los Angeles after raids

By Jane Ross and Steve Gorman LOS ANGELES (Reuters) - Helmeted police in riot gear turned out on Friday evening in a tense confrontation with protesters in downtown Los Angeles, after a day of federal immigration raids in which dozens of people across the city were reported to be taken into custody. Live Reuters video showed Los Angeles Police Department officers lined up on a downtown street wielding batons and what appeared to be tear gas rifles, facing off with demonstrators after authorities had ordered crowds of protesters to disperse around nightfall. Early in the standoff, some protesters hurled chunks of broken concrete toward officers, and police responded by firing volleys of tear gas and pepper spray. Police also fired "flash-bang" concussion rounds. It was not clear whether there were any immediate arrests. An LAPD spokesperson, Drake Madison, told Reuters that police on the scene had declared an unlawful assembly, meaning that those who failed to leave the area were subject to arrest. Television news footage earlier in the day showed caravans of unmarked military-style vehicles and vans loaded with uniformed federal agents streaming through Los Angeles streets as part of the immigration enforcement operation. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents targeted several locations, including a Home Depot in the city's Wetlake District, an apparel store in the Fashion District and a clothing warehouse in South Los Angeles, according to the Los Angeles City News Service (CNS). CNS and other local media reported dozens of people were taken into custody during the raids, the latest in a series of such sweeps conducted in a number of cities as part of President Donald Trump's extensive crackdown on illegal immigration. The Republican president has vowed to arrest and deport undocumented migrants in record numbers. The LAPD did not take part in the immigration enforcement action. It was deployed to quell civil unrest after crowds protesting the deportation raids spray-painted anti-ICE slogans on the walls of a federal court building and massed outside a nearby jail where some of the detainees were believed to be held. Impromptu demonstrations had also erupted at some of the raid locations earlier in the day. One organized labor executive, David Huerta, president of the Service Employees International Union of California, was injured and detained by ICE at one site, according to an SEIU statement. The union said Huerta was arrested "while exercising his First Amendment right to observe and document law enforcement activity." No details about the nature or severity of Huerta's injury were given. It was not clear whether he was charged with a crime. ICE did not immediately respond to a request from Reuters for information about its enforcement actions or Huerta's detention. Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass issued a statement condemning the immigration raids, saying, "these tactics sow terror in our communities and disrupt basic principles of safety in our city."

Judge says administration can dismantle the Institute of Museum and Library Services

timean hour ago

Judge says administration can dismantle the Institute of Museum and Library Services

WASHINGTON -- A federal judge on Friday denied a request by the American Library Association to halt the Trump administration's further dismantling of an agency that funds and promotes libraries across the country, saying that recent court decisions suggested his court lacked jurisdiction to hear the matter. U.S. District Judge Richard Leon had previously agreed to temporarily block the Republican administration, saying that plaintiffs were likely to show that Trump doesn't have the legal authority to unilaterally shutter the Institute of Museum and Library Services, which was created by Congress. But in Friday's ruling, Leon wrote that as much as the 'Court laments the Executive Branch's efforts to cut off this lifeline for libraries and museums,' recent court decisions suggested that the case should be heard in a separate court dedicated to contractual claims. He cited the Supreme Court's decision allowing the administration to cut hundreds of millions of dollars in teacher-training money despite a lower court order barring the cuts, saying that cases seeking reinstatement of federal grants should be heard in the Court of Federal Claims. The American Library Association and the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees filed a lawsuit to stop the administration from gutting the institute after President Donald Trump signed a March 14 executive order that refers to it and several other federal agencies as 'unnecessary.' The agency's appointed acting director then placed many agency staff members on administrative leave, sent termination notices to most of them, began canceling grants and contracts and fired all members of the National Museum and Library Services Board. The institute has roughly 75 employees and issued more than $266 million in grants last year. However, a Rhode Island judge's order prohibiting the government from shutting down the museum and library services institute in a separate case brought by several states remains in place. The administration is appealing that order as well.

Supreme Court rejects Republican bid to bar some provisional ballots in Pennsylvania

timean hour ago

Supreme Court rejects Republican bid to bar some provisional ballots in Pennsylvania

WASHINGTON -- The Supreme Court has rejected a Republican appeal and left in place a Pennsylvania court decision allowing people to cast provisional ballots when their mail-in votes are rejected for not following technical procedures in state law. The court released the decision Friday, after an 'apparent software malfunction' sent out early notifications about orders that had been slated to be released Monday. A technological error also resulted in an opinion being posted early last year. The justices acted in an appeal filed by the Republican National Committee, the state GOP and the Republican-majority election board in Butler County. Pennsylvania's top court ruled last year that the county must count provisional ballots that were cast by two voters after they learned their mail-in ballots were voided because they arrived without mandatory secrecy envelopes. Pennsylvania Democrats had urged the court to stay out of the case.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store