3 Indians go missing in Iran; Delhi ‘strongly' raises issue with Tehran
Three Indian nationals have gone missing in Iran, prompting urgent diplomatic engagement by the Indian government to ensure their safe recovery. The Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) confirmed to media houses that the missing individuals—identified as Yogesh Panchal, Mohammad Sadeeque, and Sumeet Sud—had travelled to Iran for business purposes between December 2024 and early January 2025.
On Wednesday, Indian Embassy in Iran issued an official statement saying, 'Family members of 3 Indian citizens have informed the Embassy of India that their relatives are missing after having traveled to Iran. The Embassy has strongly taken up this matter with the Iranian authorities, and requested that the missing Indians should be urgently traced and their safety should be ensured. We are also keeping the family- members regularly updated of the efforts being made by the Embassy.'
According to official statements quoted by Economic Times, Yogesh Panchal and Sadeeque arrived in Tehran under Iran's 15-day visa waiver programme, intended to facilitate tourism and business exchanges.
Yogesh Panchal, notably, had recently established an export firm specialising in dry fruits and apples and was exploring commercial opportunities in Iran. The three men were last known to be residing in Tehran's Baherestan area, but contact with them was lost shortly after their arrival.
Families of the missing Indians in Iran have expressed grave concern, fearing possible detention by Iranian security forces.
The Indian Embassy in Tehran, in close coordination with the MEA, has taken up the matter with Iranian authorities, requesting urgent assistance to trace the missing nationals and guarantee their safety.
External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar raised the issue directly with Iranian Deputy Foreign Minister Majid Ravanchi during a recent diplomatic engagement in New Delhi, the ET report added.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
38 minutes ago
- Time of India
Local languages to be medium of instruction in higher edu: Min
Indore: In the coming years, Indian and local languages will become the primary medium of instruction in higher education, said Union education minister Dharmendra Pradhan while chairing the second meeting of the Consultative Committee of Parliament for the Ministry of Education in Indore on Thursday. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The meeting, focused on "Promotion of Education in Bharatiya Bhasha in Higher Education," resulted in renewed commitment toward multilingual education as a foundation for Viksit Bharat by 2047. Pradhan underscored the govt's comprehensive efforts under the National Education Policy (NEP) 2020 to strengthen mother tongue education. He said that the inclusion of Bharatiya Bhashas in higher education will enhance cognitive development, promote inclusivity, and preserve cultural heritage. "Technology and AI will play a pivotal role in translating academic content and enabling students from rural or economically disadvantaged backgrounds to learn in their preferred language," he added. Members of Parliament appreciated initiatives like Bhasha Sangam, which introduces students to 100 basic sentences in 22 Indian languages. They also welcomed the integration of AI tools such as Anuvadini and UDAAN for translation and multilingual content delivery. Senior officials, including School Education Secretary Sanjay Kumar and Higher Education Secretary Dr Vineet Joshi, briefed the Committee on various initiatives, including the Bharatiya Bhasha Pustak Pariyojna, promotion of regional languages in IITs, and events like Matribhasha Diwas and Kashi Tamil Sangamam. They shared that India identified 1,369 mother tongues grouped into 121 languages, with 22 officially recognised in the Constitution. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Institutions like the Central Hindi Directorate, Central Institute of Indian Languages, and classical language Centres of Excellence are playing a critical role in realising this vision. The recent recognition of Marathi, Pali, Prakrit, Assamese, and Bengali as classical languages was also highlighted as a milestone in India's linguistic journey.
The Print
39 minutes ago
- The Print
Manish Tewari on Congress's Narender Surrender jibe—‘nature of politics, back-channel talks nothing new'
'So whenever there is a crisis, and if that crisis is between two nuclear weapon states, obviously, the rest of the world does not or cannot ignore it. So there are active conversations which take place in the back channel,' Tewari said Thursday, pointing out that under US President Donald Trump, such talks have been foregrounded. In an interview to ThePrint, Tewari said the Congress leadership's position that the Modi government bowed to the US pressure could be an outcome of the 'bitterly contested' nature of the Indian politics where 'nobody is prepared to give any quarter'. The Chandigarh MP travelled to Egypt, Qatar, Ethiopia and South Africa as a member of the delegation headed by NCP (SP) MP Supriya Sule. New Delhi: Former Union minister Manish Tewari, who travelled as part of an Operation Sindoor multi-party delegation, has downplayed the Congress party leadership's claim that the US President forced India to 'surrender' during May's four-day military conflict with Pakistan, saying back-channel conversations during such tense events were nothing new. 'It has been going on since 1990 as I documented with the Robert Gates mission when Pakistan started flashing the N (nuclear) word even eight years before its nuclear test in response to some fantasized Indian buildup in the western deserts, to Operation Parakram in 2001, to the Mumbai terror outrage in 2008, to Uri to Pulwama, and to Pahalgam and its aftermath. The only difference is while earlier back channeling was a quiet process, but now you have an incumbent in the White House who believes that back channeling is front channeling,' Tewari said. His remarks assume significance against the backdrop of Congress leader Rahul Gandhi's 'Narender Surrender' jibes, suggesting that Prime Minister Narendra Modi gave in to US pressure to call off the military operation against Pakistan on 10 May. Gandhi reiterated his allegation Friday while addressing a rally in Bihar. Tewari, who is also a lawyer, suggested that Trump's claims that his administration played the role of a mediator was likely to be a stretch as that was a completely different format altogether. In contrast, the UN's attempt to resolve the Kashmir dispute in 1948 at the insistence of New Delhi was an attempt at mediation, Tewari said. 'Mediation has a more structured connotation to it, but, fortunately or unfortunately these terms keep getting used alternatively. And therefore it leads to a certain sense of ambiguity. But as I was earlier pointing out that when we took the dispute to the United Nations in 1948, the Jammu and Kashmir question at that point in time in pursuance of the UN resolution, there was the UN group on India and Pakistan on Kashmir. 'There was an attempt at a structured mediation. You see, a mediation or an arbitration or an alternative dispute resolution is when two parties agree to the terms of reference of a dispute, which then they allow an arbitrator or a mediator to try and adjudicate,' said Tewari. Asked about the Congress's official position, Tewari said it could be the reflection of a 'bitterly contested political space' where 'nobody is prepared to give any quarter' to the other side. 'In fact, even when the delegation was traveling, the kind of rhetoric which was being articulated by certain sections of the NDA/BJP establishment, was also something which was completely avoidable. But that unfortunately is the nature of our politics, whether you like it or not,' said Tewari, serving his third term as a Lok Sabha MP. However, Tewari added, there needs to be consensus on the fact that Pakistan has been a chronic sponsor of low-intensity conflict which needs to be exposed in the court of global opinion, 'as against whatever may be your internal dynamics or the questions that you may have surrounding the events of 7th 8th of May, the night of 7th, 8th of May till the 10th of May.' 'I, for one, understand and appreciate that distinction, and that's why we were completely focused on exposing Pakistan and trying to tell our interlocutors that this is not only a threat to the stability of South Asia, this is a threat to the stability of the world, given the very nature and the the chronic disposition of that state to use violence as a means of trying to achieve its senses,' he said. Responding to a question on the Congress leadership being upset over the Centre picking leaders like him, Shashi Tharoor, Salman Khurshid for the delegations instead of the names suggested by Gandhi and party chief Mallikarjun Kharge, Tewari said such things do not bother him. 'Honestly, we have been in this contested, politically acerbic, bitter space for 25 years. And there is a larger national interest, which is at play, and that larger national interest is proscribing Pakistan, which uses terror as an instrument of state policy. And to me, that was the objective. And the rest of it, for someone who has been a card-carrying member of this noise for the last two-and-a-half decades, it's really no skin off my back,' he said. (Edited by Tony Rai) Also Read: Ex-Congress minister who worked with Indira, Narasimha Rao, heads to RSS HQ to 'bridge Sangh-tribals gap'
New Indian Express
39 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
Pakistan writes fourth letter to India, requests revival of Indus pact amid water crisis
Pakistan has written to India for the fourth time, requesting it to reconsider its decision to put the Indus Waters Treaty (IWT) on hold, according to multiple reports. The IWT was suspended following the April 22 Pahalgam terror attack that resulted in the death of 26 civilians. Pakistan is on the verge of a water crisis and appears to be desperate, according to reports. Reports stated that Pakistan wrote to India on the IWT even after Operation Sindoor. Prime Minister Modi had earlier underlined the government's uncompromising position that "water and blood cannot flow together" and "terror and talks cannot happen at the same time". According to government sources, India is currently not interested in holding talks with Pakistan on this issue, and the treaty will remain suspended. The four letters sent by Syed Ali Murtaza, Secretary of Pakistan's Ministry of Water Resources, were addressed to the Ministry of Jal Shakti, which has since then forwarded them to the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA), sources indicated. In the letters, Murtaza has urged India to reinstate the agreement. Invoking its national security powers, India has stated that the treaty will stay suspended until Islamabad "credibly and permanently" stops supporting cross-border terrorism. This decision was approved by the Cabinet Committee on Security (CCS), the highest body for strategic matters. This marks the first time New Delhi has paused the World Bank-backed agreement.
