Judge who granted Palestinian family asylum made wrong call, says Keir Starmer
A judge who granted a Palestinian family the right to live in the UK after they applied through a scheme originally meant for Ukrainian refugees made the wrong decision, Keir Starmer has said.
A family of six seeking to flee Gaza were allowed to join their brother in the UK after an immigration judge ruled that the Home Office's rejection of their application breached their human rights, it emerged on Tuesday.
Starmer said he did not agree with the decision and the Home Office intended to close the loophole. The family had made their application through the Ukraine Family Scheme.
Hugo Norton-Taylor, an upper tribunal judge, allowed the family to come to the UK on the basis of their right to a family life under article 8 of the European convention on human rights (ECHR).
'We conclude that the respondent's (Home Office's) refusal of the collective human rights claim does not, on the particular facts of these cases, strike a fair balance between the appellants' interests and those of the public.
'On a cumulative basis, the weight we attach to the considerations weighing on the appellants' side of the scales demonstrates a very strong claim indeed. Put another way, there are very compelling or exceptional circumstances.
'Accordingly, the appellants' appeals are allowed,' he said.
He said that the youngest children, now aged seven and nine, were 'at a high risk of death or serious injury on a daily basis' and that it was 'overwhelmingly' in their best interests to be in a safer environment with their parents and siblings.
Answering the Conservative leader, Kemi Badenoch, during PMQs on Wednesday Starmer said: 'I do not agree with the decision. She is right, it is the wrong decision. She hasn't quite done her homework because the decision in question was taken under the last government.'
Starmer said it 'should be parliament that makes the rules on immigration, it should be the government that makes the policy, that is the principle and the home secretary is already looking at the legal loophole which we need to close in this particular case'.
As first reported in the Daily Telegraph, the Palestinian family – a mother, father and four children aged seven to 18 – had seen their home destroyed by an airstrike and were living in a Gaza refugee camp with daily threats to their lives from Israeli military attacks.
Sign up to Headlines UK
Get the day's headlines and highlights emailed direct to you every morning
after newsletter promotion
They applied using the Ukraine scheme's form in January last year on the basis that it best fitted their circumstances and their situation was so 'compelling and compassionate' that their application should be granted outside its rules.
The scheme, set up in March 2022, allowed Ukrainian nationals and their family members to come to the UK if they had a relative who was a British citizen or had settled in the country. About 72,000 visas were issued before it closed last February.
The family's claim was initially rejected by an immigration tribunal on the grounds it was outside the Ukraine programme's rules and that parliament decided which countries would benefit from resettlement schemes.
Downing Street said the government's solution to closing the 'legal loophole' in the family case would be announced in the 'coming weeks'.
The prime minister's official spokesperson declined to say whether the government would be appealing against the judge's decision.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Edinburgh Reporter
an hour ago
- Edinburgh Reporter
Lessons must be learned after publication of Day report
Lessons 'must be learned' after the publication of a report spelling out the council's handling of sexual harassment allegations against former leader Cammy Day, according to city councillors. The report found that Edinburgh council needed to improve its safeguarding measures, and that a 'prevalent' culture of hospitality needed to be looked at by the council. But it found that council officers had acted appropriately in handling complaints made to them. It also said that people who had complained about the behaviour of the former council leader experienced a 'significant perceived power imbalance' when making complaints about him. Council leader Jane Meagher said the report was 'largely reassuring' – but that recommendations made in the report needed to be carried out 'swiftly and comprehensively'. Kevin Dunion, former chair of the Standards Commission for Scotland, carried out the third party investigation that resulted in the report, which itself was commissioned by the council. Mr Dunion's investigation came after recent and historic complaints about alleged sexual harassment by former Labour council leader Cammy Day came to light. Councillor Day resigned in December 2024 soon after the first allegations were published in the press, and he was suspended from the Labour Party soon after. Multiple Ukrainian refugees said Cllr Day had sent them unsolicited images and messages on social media, even after being asked to stop. In one historic incident, which took place in 2010 and was reported in 2018, a then 15-year-old boy said he was sexually harassed online by Cllr Day. Since his resignation, a police investigation into his behaviour has found no evidence of criminality, with the former leader claiming he is the target of a political witch hunt. SNP group leader, Councillor Simita Kumar, said: 'It is imperative that lessons must be learned. 'A common thread throughout this report is that staff and complainants felt unable – or unwilling – to raise concerns due to the power and influence of the accused. 'We must establish better systems to support and protect those who come forward or the risk of abuse by those in positions of authority will persist.' Mr Dunion's report found that leaks of information about alleged leaks by councillors had impeded the city's whistleblowing process. Councillor Ed Thornley, leader of the Liberal Democrat group, said: 'I want to thank Kevin Dunion for his report and the work that's gone into it. He's highlighted several issues with the way the Council's processes aren't working correctly and the gaps in them. 'It's clear reading the report that where Council officers have been aware and informed, they acted appropriately and gave sound advice in line with the agreed processes. That is not the case for councillors. 'The two leaks of confidential information by councillors seriously undermine the integrity of the systems in place, and call into question the judgement of the individuals responsible. 'Such leaks represent a deliberate and blatant breach of the Councillors' Code of Conduct. The Lib Dem group will consider Mr Dunion's recommendations thoroughly over the coming days.' Edinburgh Council's leader, Labour councillor Jane Meagher said: 'I want to thank Mr Dunion for leading this review, and for his report. 'While I'm largely reassured by Mr Dunion's findings about how recent complaints have been handled by officers, clearly, there are elements of this report which are of serious concern to us as elected members and we must act on his recommendations swiftly and comprehensively. I have already taken practical steps to begin to change the culture in the City Chambers. 'Our priority must be to nurture positive working relationships throughout the Council where colleagues feel able to speak up if something isn't right, they know and trust the channels open to them and they feel safe and supported in doing so. 'I'm fully committed to taking Mr Dunion's recommendations forward and, subject to approval by councillors next Thursday, look forward to agreeing concrete actions when officers bring a further report back in August outlining our proposed actions in response to Mr Dunion's recommendations.' Independent councillor Ross McKenzie, who was part of the Labour group until 2023, said: 'It's now up to the Labour Party to decide whether they are comfortable with Cammy Day being a Labour councillor. 'The report contains details of an extraordinarily serious allegation made in 2018 and a pattern of sexual harassment allegations since. 'If Labour are serious about safeguarding then they will have conducted an exhaustive investigation into all of these allegations.' By Joseph Sullivan Local Democracy Reporter Like this: Like Related
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
British and Spanish PMs agree Gibraltar deal unlocks 'huge opportunity'
LONDON, June 11 (Reuters) - British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, in a phone call with Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez, agreed that a deal on the status of Gibraltar unlocked the opportunity for both countries to advance bilateral relationship, Starmer's office said on Wednesday. "Prime Minister Sánchez congratulated the Prime Minister on his leadership," a Downing Street spokesperson said. "Both leaders also agreed that this development unlocks huge opportunity to advance the bilateral relationship between the UK and Spain, on behalf of the British and Spanish people." Starmer also spoke to Chief Minister of Gibraltar Fabian Picardo, the spokesperson said, adding that they both agreed the agreement would allow them to "plan for the long-term while protecting British sovereignty."
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Spending review: will Rachel Reeves's huge fiscal gamble yield electoral dividends?
Rachel Reeves has gambled billions of pounds of infrastructure spending on 'renewing Britain' ahead of the next election but faces a battle to convince voters that Labour can deliver change amid deep cuts to everyday spending. The chancellor admitted that 'too many people in too many parts of our country' were yet to feel the benefits of the change they voted for when Labour was swept to power with a huge majority last year. With many Labour MPs already feeling unsettled about the electoral threat of Reform UK, she has already launched a charm offensive to persuade them that her spending review on Wednesday was not a return to austerity. Economists warned that mounting pressures on spending, including the U-turn on winter fuel payments for pensioners and Labour MPs' backlash against disability benefit cuts, meant that Reeves could be forced to raise taxes or look for more savings in the autumn. There could also be other tax increases ahead, with the Treasury's calculations being based on assumptions that local authorities will put up council tax by the maximum 4.99% a year for three years to fund services, including adult social care. Writing in the Guardian , Keir Starmer said that departmental budgets, which will grow by 2.3% a year in real terms, showed the government had 'entered a new stage' in its efforts to transform the country. 'It is an investment in Britain's renewal, so working people have more money in their pocket, more pride in their community and more hope for their children's future,' he added. The NHS and defence were the big winners of the spending review, with 90% of the increase in the day-to-day budget over the next three years going to health and 80% of the boost in capital spending going to defence, according to the Resolution Foundation. However, it means that other Whitehall departments, including the Home Office, Ministry of Housing Communities and Local Government, and the departments of culture, transport and environment all face real terms cuts to their everyday budgets, as well as the Foreign Office, mainly as a result of aid cuts. Ministers have been chastened by polls which suggest that Labour's decision to increase spending overall at the autumn budget has not yet filtered through to voters, after a bumpy first year in power and contentious decisions over welfare cuts and a national insurance for employers. A growing clamour for change has been reflected in a surge in support for Reform UK. In her statement to MPs, Reeves reminded them that Nigel Farage, the party's leader, had described Liz Truss's disastrous mini budget as 'the best Conservative budget since the 1980s'. She added that Reform UK was now 'itching to do the same thing all over again' and had already racked up £80bn in unfunded spending commitments since the last election. 'They are simply not serious,' she said. In what will be interpreted as a response to a threat from the right, the chancellor made a high-stakes promise to cut spending on asylum hotels by the end of the parliament, which she said would save £1bn. There was also £280m more a year for the new Border Security Command. But the Home Office will receive a budget cut which will extend beyond the asylum savings, causing alarm from police officers and the London mayor Sadiq Khan. The government also set out its own version of Elon Musk's 'Doge' efficiency pledges, suggesting they would make cuts of £14bn to through operational improvements, digital transformation, cutting consultants and AI. Despite free school meals being expanded to at least 500,000 more pupils, lifting 100,000 out of poverty, schools budgets will be squeezed. Teachers will get a 4% pay rise next year, with additional funding of £615m. But schools will still have to fund about a quarter of it themselves. The spending review marked the culmination of months of discussions between Reeves and her cabinet colleagues, with negotiations with home secretary Yvette Cooper going down to the wire. In the days running up to the announcement, ministers announced £15bn for transport outside London, £14.2bn to build a new nuclear power station and an almost doubling of government spending – nearly £40bn – on affordable housing over the next 10 years. After months of speculation over the government's commitment to the net zero agenda, Reeves confirmed that ministers would not cut Labour's landmark £13.2bn fund to fix draughty homes. Reeves drew a comparison with the 2.9% cut in the austerity years under the Conservative-Liberal Democrat coalition – a retort to her critics who have accused her of a return to austerity. 'Austerity was a destructive choice for the fabric of our society, and it was a destructive choice for our economy too, choking off investment and demand,' she said. 'Creating a lost decade for growth, wages and living standards that is their legacy. My choices are different. My choices are Labour choices.' Paul Johnson, director of the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) hailed the 'genuinely big sums,' the chancellor has set aside for investment projects; but warned that some departments' day-to-day spending plans look tight. 'The funding increases for health and defence are substantial. The corollary, of course, is a less generous settlement elsewhere,' he said. Reeves changed her fiscal rules in last autumn's budget to pave the way for a £113bn uplift in investment spending, and Wednesday's statement set out details of where this funding will be allocated – much of it aimed outside London and the South East. Beneficiaries include green energy, social housing and transport. The Treasury hopes such projects will create jobs, including in deprived areas, and help to make the UK's sluggish economy more productive and kickstart growth. As well as changing Treasury rules to support investment in England's regions, the spending review would provide £52bn for Scotland, £20bn for Northern Ireland and £23bn for Wales. 'We are renewing Britain. But I know that too many people in too many parts of our country are yet to feel it,' Reeves said. 'My task as chancellor and the purpose of this spending review is to change that. To ensure that renewal is felt in people's everyday lives, in their jobs, and on their high streets.' With the chancellor insisting she would stick to her 'fiscal rules' – including meeting day-to-day spending through tax receipts – experts warned that any economic shock could push her plans off course. Andrew Goodwin, chief economist at consultancy Oxford Economics, said, 'considering the government's recent U-turn on winter fuel payments could be a precursor to higher government spending in other areas, it looks increasingly likely that substantial tax increases will be needed'. Ruth Curtice, director of the Resolution Foundation, said, 'after a summer of spending, the budget this autumn will be far more challenging. The economic outlook is looking weaker – not stronger – since the spring, and that will require more tax rises or welfare cuts for the chancellor to meet her fiscal rules'. Shadow chancellor Mel Stride said 'this is the spend-now, tax-later review' adding that Reeves 'knows she will need to come back here in the autumn with yet more taxes and a cruel summer of speculation awaits'.
