You may not need an iPhone 10 years from now: Apple services chief suggests
In a surprising revelation during the US Department of Justice's antitrust case against Google, Apple's services chief Eddy Cue suggested that the iPhone could become obsolete within the next decade, marking the first time a senior Apple executive has publicly entertained such a possibility. Apple is no stranger to killing its own darlings. (Aishwarya Panda-HT)
Testifying in the ongoing trial, Cue defended Apple's lucrative search engine partnership with Google—reportedly worth around $20 billion annually—but his comments quickly veered into a bigger-picture thinking about the future of technology.
'You may not need an iPhone 10 years from now, as crazy as it sounds,' said Cue, according to Bloomberg. 'The only way you truly have true competition is when you have technology shifts.'
While Cue's point was intended to underscore how AI is transforming the search landscape, the remark doubles as the first notable public suggestion from Apple leadership that the iPhone era could eventually end. Familiar pattern of self-disruption
Apple is no stranger to killing its own darlings. The iPod—once as dominant as the iPhone is today—vanished quietly, not due to competitors, but because Apple shifted its focus. The iPhone itself was the very product that ultimately replaced the iPod, folding its features into something broader and more powerful.
Cue's comments suggest Apple may be preparing for another such pivot, possibly involving AI-powered interfaces or new form factors. He also acknowledged that traditional search is being reimagined and may not survive in its current form, adding to speculation that AI-driven services could take centre stage in Apple's future ecosystem. Big tech under pressure
The testimony comes as the DOJ challenges the Google–Apple search deal, which makes Google the default engine on iOS devices. If the court rules against Google, Apple could lose billions annually, through a shift towards first-party AI search tools that might provide a new revenue stream and independence.
While it's far from a formal announcement, Cue's remarks have stirred curiosity about what's next for Apple in a world increasingly shaped by AI, ambient computing, and possibly even Apple-branded vehicles.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
27 minutes ago
- Hans India
Samsung Galaxy M36 5G Launch Today in India
The Samsung Galaxy M36 5G will launch in India today as the new model after the Galaxy M35 5G. The phone comes with a large 6.7-inch full-HD+ Super AMOLED screen and a smooth 120Hz refresh rate. It has a strong 50-megapixel main camera with image stabilization and a 12-megapixel front camera. Both cameras can record 4K videos. The phone runs on an Exynos 1380 processor with at least 6GB RAM and uses Android 15 with Samsung's One UI 7. It also includes smart AI features and Google's Circle-to-Search. The Galaxy M36 5G has a big 5,000mAh battery and supports fast 45W wired charging. It will be available in three colors: Orange Haze, Serene Green, and Velvet Black. Samsung has priced the phone under Rs. 20,000. It will be sold online on Amazon, Samsung's website, and in stores.
Hindustan Times
31 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Google Pixel 7 and Pixel 7 Pro banned in Japan, Pixel 8 and 9 at risk: Here's why
Google has had a major setback in Japan, where a court has banned the sale of its Pixel 7 and Pixel 7 Pro smartphones due to patent infringement. This ruling could soon affect the upcoming Pixel 8 and Pixel 9 models, which threaten Google's growing presence in the Japanese smartphone market. Google Pixel 7 and Pro smartphone sales have been banned in Japan due to patent infringement.(HT) The dispute centres on a technical part of 4G network communication involving the transmission of an 'acknowledgement signal' or ACK between devices and base stations. This technique is protected by Japanese patent law. Although Pantech, the patent holder, no longer makes smartphones, its remaining patents continue to hold legal weight. The Tokyo District Court ruled that Google's use of this technology violated those patents. Also read: Gemini's dramatic apologies: Why Google's chatbot sometimes says it should 'switch itself off' after failing tasks Furthermore, the judge criticised Google for what was described as an "insincere attitude" during the case. This criticism contributed to the court's decision to impose a full sales ban instead of a lesser penalty or settlement. Pixel Ban's Impact on Market Presence This ruling challenges Google's growing presence in Japan, where the Pixel brand recently became the second most popular smartphone line after Apple's iPhone. The success of the Google Pixel 7 series and the Pixel 7a helped boost the brand's market share. Also read: Could non-Nintendo chargers shorten your Switch 2's life? Here's what a user's experiment found The situation may escalate as the companies behind the patent, IdeaHub and Pantech, are pushing to extend the ban to the upcoming Google Pixel 8 and Pixel 9 models. No official ruling has been made on these devices yet, but the potential for a wider ban adds pressure on Google to resolve the legal issues quickly. Japan stands out as a strong market for Google Pixel phones outside the United States. A broader sales ban could disrupt Google's growth in the region and might also affect customer trust. Also read: Big tech's tariff troubles: Why US trade policy has Silicon Valley on edge Moreover, Google has not yet provided a detailed response to the court's decision. The company now faces choices including appealing the ruling, negotiating licensing rights, or redesigning future phones to avoid patent conflicts. Each option carries risks, especially with the Google Pixel 9 launch expected later this year. Currently, only the Google Pixel 7 and 7 Pro are banned. However, the case signals a growing trend in the tech industry, where older patents are increasingly enforced by entities that do not produce consumer products, which are creating new legal challenges for tech giants. Mobile finder: Google Pixel 8 Pro LATEST price, specs and all details
Time of India
32 minutes ago
- Time of India
Apple introduces new App Store fees in EU to avoid €500 million fine
Apple has introduced sweeping changes to its European Union App Store policies, introducing a complicated multi-tier fee system aimed at avoiding crushing daily fines that could reach €50 million under the bloc's Digital Markets Act (DMA). The company now allows EU developers to freely link customers to alternative payment methods outside the App Store without restrictive warning screens or mandatory text. However, these freedoms come with new costs through Apple's revamped commission structure. New fee framework creates multiple payment tiers Under the updated system, developers face up to three separate fees for a single app download. Apple introduced a " Core Technology Commission " of 5% on all digital purchases made outside the App Store, alongside an initial acquisition fee of 2% and variable store services fees ranging from 5% to 13%. The company also created a two-tier service structure. Tier 1 offers basic features like app reviews and fraud protection for a 5% commission, while Tier 2 provides full App Store benefits including automatic updates, marketing tools, and app insights for 13%. Small Business Program participants receive reduced rates. Apps using external payment links will pay the Core Technology Commission, while those merely referencing outside deals continue under the existing Core Technology Fee of €0.50 per download after one million installs. Regulatory standoff continues despite changes Apple's modifications follow a €500 million fine imposed in April for violating DMA anti-steering rules. The European Commission threatened additional daily penalties worth up to 5% of Apple's global revenue if the company failed to comply by June 26. "We disagree with this outcome and plan to appeal," Apple stated, maintaining its opposition to the regulatory requirements. Epic Games CEO Tim Sweeney, whose company successfully challenged Apple's US steering policies, criticized the changes as "malicious compliance" that commercially cripples competing payment systems. The European Commission will now assess whether Apple's proposals achieve genuine DMA compliance before determining if additional fines are warranted. AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now
