logo
Putnam Zoom meeting interrupted by racial slurs and porn videos

Putnam Zoom meeting interrupted by racial slurs and porn videos

Yahoo19-03-2025

Putnam — Local officials are reexamining live-stream protocols for public meetings after the Board of Selectmen and Mayor fell victim to a racist and pornographic 'Zoombombing' attack Monday night.
Roughly eight hackers hijacked the Zoom portion of Monday night's selectmen's meeting, causing 50 seconds of confusion and chaos as they spewed racial slurs, played pornographic videos and blared loud music.
The vulgar episode finally ended when the board voted to go into recess and shut down the Zoom.
Town Administrator Elaine Sistare said the incident was reported to local police, who have opened an investigation and notified the FBI. Sistare said the perpetrators could be charged with a cybercrime, breach of peace or multiple offenses.
'Once we get more information from our IT people and the police, we'll bring it to the selectmen and see if they want to address this issue in regards to … any safeguards we can put in effect to prevent this in the near future,' Mayor Barney Seney said.
This kind of attack, known as Zoombombing, spiked during the COVID-19 pandemic when bad actors began exploiting technology in new ways as the world moved online, according to the Bureau. The offenders, who either work alone or coordinate group attacks on virtual forums, search the web for public Zoom links to disrupt video conferences, municipal meetings and virtual classrooms with pornography, hate speech and threats.
Sistare said the town started live-streaming meetings on Zoom during the pandemic. After the pandemic ended, the Board of Selectmen continued the practice to make meetings more accessible for the community. Aside from one instance years ago where an individual displayed images of guns, Sistare said this is the first time the town has experienced this kind of attack.
'It's a valuable tool,' Sistare said. '(It's) unfortunate that it can be abused, but but our goal is ultimately to make it easy and accessible for our (community) members, our town of Putnam taxpayers and others to legitimately join in our government meetings.'
Sistare said meeting links are posted publicly on the town's website. While virtual attendees first enter a virtual waiting room before a moderator individually admits them into the Zoom meeting, Sistare said the town does not check names to verify the identities of participants.
Sistare said the selectmen could decide to modify the town's Zoom settings to automatically disable the audio, video and screen-sharing abilities of participants. Audience members could request for the moderator to unlock the controls using the virtual hand-raising function.
'I think everything will be on the table,' Sistare said. 'We've got some measures that have been in place all along — we may tighten up the measures even more — but it's up to the Board of Selectmen and mayor to have a discussion about the potential changes altogether. … It is an unfortunate episode but we'll try to learn and improve from it.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Bessent says US may 'roll the date forward' for some after 90-day tariff pause ends
Bessent says US may 'roll the date forward' for some after 90-day tariff pause ends

Yahoo

time17 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Bessent says US may 'roll the date forward' for some after 90-day tariff pause ends

(Reuters) -U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent on Wednesday said the Trump administration is prepared to "roll the date forward" with trading partners negotiating in good faith if the deadline marking the end of the 90-day pause on President Donald Trump's reciprocal tariffs is reached with no deal. "It is highly likely that those countries - or trading blocs as is the case with the EU - who are negotiating in good faith, we will roll the date forward to continue the good-faith negotiations," Bessent told the House Ways and Means Committee. "If someone is not negotiating, then we will not." Bessent's remarks, in response to a question from a Democratic lawmaker, marked the first time a Trump administration official has indicated some flexibility around the expiration date for the pause. That date - July 8 - is now just four weeks away, and so far the White House has struck only one preliminary deal with a major foreign trading partner affected by the pause, Britain. A deal struck on Tuesday in London with China to de-escalate that bilateral trade war is proceeding on a separate track and timeline. The White House did not immediately respond to a question about whether Trump shared Bessent's view. Trump announced the pause on April 9, a week after unveiling "Liberation Day" tariffs against nearly all U.S. trading partners that proved to be so unexpectedly large and sweeping that it sent global financial markets into near panic. The S&P 500 Index plunged more than 12% in four days for its heftiest run of losses since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in early 2020. Investors were so rattled they bailed out of safe-haven U.S. Treasury securities, sending bond yields rocketing higher. The dollar sank. Markets started their recovery on April 9 when Trump unexpectedly announced the pause. A further leg up in the recovery followed in early May when the Trump team reached a preliminary deal to dial back the triple-digit tariff rates it had imposed on goods from China. The events have given rise to what some on Wall Street have parodied as the "TACO" trade - an acronym for Trump Always Chickens Out. "The only time the market has reacted positively is when the administration is in retreat from key policy areas," Democratic Representative Don Beyer of Virginia told Bessent before pressing him on what should be expected at the end of the next deadline next month. "As I have said repeatedly there are 18 important trading partners. We are working toward deals with those," Bessent said before going on to signal a willingness to offer extensions to those negotiating in good faith. (Reporting By Dan Burns; Editing by Chris Reese and Daniel Wallis)

A 3-Year-Old Girl Vanished and Her Mom Claimed She Was Abducted — But Now Cops Say That Was a Lie
A 3-Year-Old Girl Vanished and Her Mom Claimed She Was Abducted — But Now Cops Say That Was a Lie

Yahoo

time25 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

A 3-Year-Old Girl Vanished and Her Mom Claimed She Was Abducted — But Now Cops Say That Was a Lie

New Castle County police in Delaware have canceled an AMBER Alert for 3-year-old Nola Dinkins The case is now being investigated as a homicide by Maryland State Police Police claim the girl's mother falsely reported her daughter missing Authorities have canceled an Amber Alert for a missing 3-year-old girl after police in Delaware say the case is now being investigated as a homicide. Nola Dinkins was reported missing on Tuesday, June 10, by her mother, who police now allege gave false information to investigators when they initially responded to a Newark, Del., home around 7:15 p.m. that evening, according to a statement from the New Castle County Police Department. 'Nola's mother advised that she had pulled over after Nola became upset and was attempting to comfort her when an unknown White male armed with a handgun approached the vehicle and took Nola,' the statement reads. The mother further claimed that the suspect fled in a dark-colored SUV driven by a White female, according to police. An Amber Alert was then issued for Nola, and police, along with the FBI, investigated throughout the night. 'As a result of that investigation, detectives determined the initial account of the incident given by the mother was false,' police said. 'The Amber Alert is now canceled, and there is no danger to the public." Want to keep up with the latest crime coverage? Sign up for for breaking crime news, ongoing trial coverage and details of intriguing unsolved cases. Police said the case is now being treated as a homicide investigation by the Maryland State Police. No suspects have been identified and further details surrounding the girl's location have not been released by police. 'There has not been any confirmation of a homicide as investigators are still actively searching for leads and in areas of Cecil County where police believe the child resides,' Elena Russo, the spokesperson for the Maryland State Police tells PEOPLE in a statement. "Additional information will be released as it becomes available." Anyone with information relevant to the investigation is urged to contact the Maryland State Police North East Barrack at 410-996-7800. Read the original article on People

Miyares breaks with Trump over pardon of convicted ex-Culpeper sheriff
Miyares breaks with Trump over pardon of convicted ex-Culpeper sheriff

Yahoo

time25 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Miyares breaks with Trump over pardon of convicted ex-Culpeper sheriff

Culpeper Sheriff Scott Jenkins speaks to the crowd at the pro-gun rally in 2020. (Ryan M. Kelly for the Virginia Mercury) Virginia Attorney General Jason Miyares is pushing back against President Donald Trump's decision to pardon former Culpeper County Sheriff Scott Jenkins, saying the ex-lawman's federal bribery conviction was well-founded and the pardon misguided. 'I have to authorize any state investigation into any elected official. And so I was aware of a lot of the facts at that time,' Miyares told The Mercury in an interview Tuesday. 'Given what I know, I would not have pardoned him.' The rare public break from Miyares, a Republican and rising star in Virginia politics who is seeking a second term this year, comes just weeks after Trump issued the controversial pardon in late May. The president portrayed Jenkins — a longtime supporter who campaigned for Trump in both 2016 and 2020 — as the victim of political persecution. 'Sheriff Scott Jenkins, his wife Patricia, and their family have been dragged through HELL,' Trump wrote in a Truth Social post announcing the pardon. He blamed the case on 'an overzealous Biden Department of Justice' and claimed Jenkins had been 'left for dead' by 'Radical Left monsters.' But prosecutors, a jury and residents in Jenkins's own hometown paint a far different picture. In March, Jenkins was sentenced to 10 years in federal prison after a jury found him guilty of accepting over $75,000 in bribes in exchange for issuing auxiliary deputy sheriff appointments and law enforcement credentials to wealthy businessmen and undercover agents. None of the recipients were trained, vetted, or expected to perform any actual law enforcement duties. They offered Jenkins cash and campaign contributions. The appointments came with official Culpeper County Sheriff's Office badges, identification cards, and in some cases, the ability to carry concealed weapons in jurisdictions where they otherwise may not have had permission to do so. Jenkins, 53, was convicted in December 2024 on 12 federal counts — including conspiracy, four counts of honest services wire fraud, and seven counts of bribery concerning programs receiving federal funds. 'Scott Jenkins violated his oath of office and the faith the citizens of Culpeper County placed in him when he engaged in a cash-for-badges scheme,' said Acting U.S. Attorney Zachary T. Lee in a statement after sentencing. 'We hold our elected law enforcement officials to a higher standard of conduct … and this case proves that when those officials use their authority for unjust personal enrichment, the Department of Justice will hold them accountable.' FBI officials echoed that assessment. Stanley Meador, Special Agent in Charge of the FBI's Richmond Division, called Jenkins's actions a betrayal of his badge. 'Every law enforcement officer takes an oath to serve and protect the community — that includes following the law they've sworn to uphold,' Meador said. 'I am proud of the diligent work our investigative team did on this case to bring Jenkins to justice.' Court documents showed that Jenkins accepted bribes from at least eight individuals, including co-defendants Rick Rahim, Fredric Gumbinner, and James Metcalf — all of whom pleaded guilty — as well as two undercover FBI agents posing as wealthy donors. In return, Jenkins appointed them as auxiliary deputy sheriffs and issued official law enforcement credentials. In one instance, Jenkins pressured Culpeper County officials to support a petition falsely claiming that Rahim — a convicted felon — resided in the county, in order to have his firearm rights restored. The petition, later revealed to contain misleading information, was central to the government's case in proving Jenkins's abuse of power. Assistant U.S. Attorney Melanie Smith, along with Trial Attorneys Celia Choy and Lina Peng from the Department of Justice's Public Integrity Section, led the prosecution. Despite the evidence and jury verdict, Trump's decision to intervene and grant clemency to Jenkins sparked outrage — even in conservative Culpeper County, where Trump won more than 60% of the vote in the 2024 presidential election. According to NPR, which interviewed more than two dozen Culpeper residents following the pardon, all but one person expressed disapproval of the pardon — and the lone supporter refused to go on record. 'That's a terrific mistake,' Ken Green, a retired entrepreneur and three-time Trump voter, told the reporter as he sat at the counter of Frost Café on Culpeper's Main Street. 'It's a failure of our justice system. He was guilty as could be. He needed to go to jail, and he didn't. So what kind of signal does that send?' For Miyares, the issue isn't Trump's constitutional authority — which he acknowledges — but whether that authority was exercised responsibly. 'I think it is clear the Constitution gives the president incredibly broad pardon powers, as we have seen,' Miyares said in the interview. 'And regardless of who's in the White House, these pardons can be controversial at times.' He added, 'Clearly the White House is privy to facts that I'm not aware of, but with the facts that I am aware of, I would not have pardoned him.' Miyares's criticism adds to a growing chorus of Republicans what they view as Trump's increasingly personal use of the pardon power. While presidents have long granted clemency for controversial figures, Jenkins's case stands out because of the sheer volume of evidence, the jury's unanimous verdict and the betrayal of public trust by a sitting sheriff. 'You're scared. Honestly, you're scared,' Jenkins said of his sentencing. 'You may have been a cop all your life but you're sitting here going, 'They want to put me in prison for life.'' Whether Trump's decision will have political consequences remains to be seen, but the fallout in Virginia — especially among conservative voters who also value law-and-order policy— is still unfolding. As Miyares put it, 'I don't agree with that.' SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store