Foot Locker security guard stuck his finger in a shopper's belly button - and groped another: lawsuit
A New York City couple is suing Foot Locker after a security guard working for the chain allegedly groped the two men during a shopping excursion, twice inserting his finger into one's navel before commenting on – and pawing at – the other's 'nice booty,' according to a disquieting human rights lawsuit obtained by The Independent.
Following the 'shocked' duo's hasty exit from the store, the unnamed guard was later seen 'ogling… and harassing' another customer, the lawsuit contends.
It says plaintiffs Christian Leitch, a 38-year-old animator, and Brian Williams, a 47-year-old designer who also works in sales, contacted Foot Locker management about the incident, but never got a response.
'People need to be aware that things like this don't just happen at a club or at a bar,' Williams told The Independent. 'It's happening when you're shopping for a pair of socks.'
Leitch, for his part, told The Independent that he was left 'flabbergasted' and 'freaked out' by the creepy situation.
A Foot Locker spokesperson did not respond to a request for comment.
The 'deeply unsettling and inappropriate encounter' occurred on the afternoon of June 24, 2024, at a Foot Locker in Harlem, according to Leitch and Williams's complaint, which was filed Thursday in New York State Supreme Court by attorney Robert Wisniewski.
The two 'are a gay couple [whose] interactions and demeanor made their relationship readily apparent,' says the complaint.
Williams had a family reunion coming up, and he and Leitch 'were out and about doing some shopping,' he told The Independent.
A Foot Locker security guard in Manhattan, the company's careers site shows, earns $16.00 to $18.75 an hour to 'act as a customer-friendly visual deterrent to crime.' Duties include the ability to 'stand in a professional position (for up to an entire shift),' and to 'observe and report suspicious activities and persons on property.'
However, upon entering the crowded West 125th Street store, which sits diagonally across from the world-famous Apollo Theater, Leitch and Williams were promptly subjected to the 'unwarranted attention' of a security guard identified in court filings as 'John Doe,' the complaint goes on.
It says Doe, who is described as 'an African-American male, approximately 5'10' to 5'11' with a slender build, wearing a bucket hat and a navy/black jacket,' forced himself on both Leitch and Williams 'in a manner that was both intrusive and inappropriate.'
Williams, who is Black, told The Independent that he and Leitch, who is also Black, noticed Doe staring intently at them but that they 'didn't pay it any mind, because that's what security guards do.'
He said he was browsing the footwear section when Doe made 'several inappropriate comments towards me.' According to the complaint, Doe told Williams 'that he had a nice booty,' and 'touched him without his consent.'
'He repeated this action three times while no other employee was around,' the complaint states.
Doe then turned his attention to Leitch, who told The Independent that he was waiting to try on a pair of Nikes when the guard walked over and 'pounced on me.'
'Without any provocation or justification, John Doe lifted Leitch's shirt and began to touch his stomach and stuck his finger in his belly button, repeating this action twice,' the complaint alleges.
Leitch and Williams were 'initially too shocked to fully process the incident,' according to the complaint. It says the couple then 'immediately left the store because they felt unsafe around John Doe's presence.'
The two, neither of whom have any sort of criminal record, were wise in removing themselves from the scene, according to Wisniewski.
'The choice is either to get into a confrontation or walk away,' he told The Independent. '[They] would have been arrested.'
Once the two had managed to grasp what had occurred, Leitch and Williams returned to the same Foot Locker so they could snap a photo of John Doe in order to report him, the complaint continues.
While there, the complaint maintains, Leitch and Williams 'observed John Doe ogling at and harassing a… male customer.'
Doe was 'literally on top of him,' Leitch claimed.
That evening, Williams penned an email about Doe's alleged behavior and sent it to Foot Locker's Customer Care department, which never got back to him, according to the complaint.
'I contacted Foot Locker that very day, and I did receive an automated reply saying, 'Thank you for your message,' and then nothing else ever happened with it,' Williams told The Independent. 'I didn't want to have to take legal action, but here we are.'
Leitch and Williams's lawsuit argues that the 'sexual nature of John Doe's assault and harassment,' along with his 'ogling of other men,' is evidence that Doe targeted them 'because of their sex, gender, and sexual orientation.'
Foot Locker, the suit asserts, should have been aware of Doe's 'propensity to commit sexual harassment and/or assault' against customers, and failed to stop him from doing so. Leitch and Williams say they have sustained 'emotional suffering and distress,' along with 'mental anguish,' and claim they will 'continue to suffer same in the future.'
Foot Locker's roughly 2,400 stores can be found in 20 countries across North America, Europe, Asia, Australia, and New Zealand. Although the footwear and apparel retailer reported worldwide sales of $8 billion in 2024, it reported a net loss for the first quarter of 2025, due in no small part to concerns over U.S. President Donald Trump's proposed tariff regime. On Thursday, Dick's Sporting Goods announced it would be acquiring Foot Locker in a $2.4 billion cash-and-stock deal.
Leitch and Williams are demanding a jury trial, along with compensatory damages and punitive damages 'to deter similar behavior in the future.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Post
5 hours ago
- New York Post
Miranda Devine: Jill Biden's ‘work husband' Anthony Bernal may have played a key role in covering up Joe's cognitive decline
There are few doubts in the White House about Jill 'Lady Macbeth' Biden's role in covering up her husband's cognitive deficits as she urged him to run for re-election. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt made that point crystal clear from the press room podium Thursday, saying the former first lady 'needs to answer' for 'lying to the American people' and 'shielding her husband away from the cameras.' For the normally circumspect Leavitt, it was a damning indictment. 'I think, frankly, the former first lady should certainly speak up about what she saw in regards to her husband and when she saw and what she knew,' she told reporters at a White House briefing. 'Anybody looking again at the videos and photo evidence of Joe Biden with your own eyes and a little bit of common sense can see this was a clear cover-up, and Jill Biden was certainly complicit in that coverup.' Some, like Leo Terrell, a senior counselor in the DOJ's civil rights office, went so far as to say Jill was guilty of 'elder abuse.' Of course, Joe Biden's delusional ambition is most at fault. He knew what he was doing when he ran for president in 2019 but needed teleprompters to recite a basic stump speech he used to know by heart. He knew what he was doing when he decided to run again in 2024, despite his health problems. 'Wizard of Oz-type' What is becoming clear is that the social-climbing former first lady and the aide she calls her 'work husband,' Arizona-born former child actor Anthony Bernal, played a bigger role in this con job than previously has been acknowledged. David Hogg, recently ousted as vice chair of the Democratic National Committee, and Deterrian Jones, a former Biden White House staffer, point the finger at Bernal as the chief puppeteer in a new undercover video from Project Veritas released last week. Bernal had 'an enormous amount of power,' said Hogg. Jones described Jill's diminutive gay factotum as 'scary . . . like a Wizard of Oz-type figure. The general public wouldn't know what he looked like, but he wielded enormous power.' According to Jake Tapper and Alex Thompson's new book, 'Original Sin,' Jill was one of the most powerful first ladies in history, and that gave her Rasputin-like senior adviser outsized influence among the 'Politburo' that controlled her husband. When Biden was hidden away during the 2020 campaign in his Delaware basement using the COVID pandemic as an excuse, Bernal was one of only two staffers allowed to move to Wilmington to tend to their daily needs. When Biden was holed up at his vacation home in Rehoboth Beach last year, wrestling with the decision to abandon his campaign after his disastrous debate performance, Bernal was one of only four aides allowed by his side. Bernal, who boasted the title of 'special assistant to the president' and reportedly earned the maximum White House salary, began working for Jill during the 2008 presidential campaign when he was hired to help her transition into the role of second lady. While he was obsequious with the Bidens, he was loathed and feared by other White House staffers: 'He would not be welcome at my funeral,' a longtime Biden aide told the authors. Another said Bernal was 'the worst person they had ever met.' Bernal enforced a strict culture of loyalty, interrogating aides he felt didn't measure up, and using his power to cast out 'potential heretics.' 'Bullied colleagues' He worked with Jill to keep score of 'who was with them and against them,' chose her wardrobe, orchestrated her multiple Vogue covers, and planned glamorous overseas trips they could take together on Air Force One. This should come as no surprise to Post readers since White House correspondent Steven Nelson broke the story last March that Bernal 'bullied and verbally sexually harassed colleagues over more than a decade' but is considered 'untouchable' because Jill adores him. Bernal repeatedly speculated about 'the penis size of colleagues,' according to Nelson's sources. 'They talk a big game about integrity, decency, and kindness but when you work for the Bidens, you experience anything but that,' said one former staffer. The Bidens told us 'decency' was on the ballot. It was, but not in the way they meant. As Joe faded and disappeared from view toward the end of his presidency, Jill's rival court took charge as she commandeered Air Force One and a big Secret Service contingent for a frenetic round of solo campaigning, always accompanied by the indispensable Bernal. Her priority over then-candidate Donald Trump for Secret Service resources at a dinner she attended in Pittsburgh on the day of his rally in Butler, Pa., was blamed in part for Trump being inadequately protected when he was shot during an attempted assassination. Bernal was by Jill's side when she swanned into Hunter's gun trial in Wilmington last year to project presidential power to the jury, which nonetheless convicted her wayward 55-year-old stepson. He joined Jill on Air Force One when she jetted back to France for 24 hours at taxpayer expense to join her husband on an official visit for D-Day commemorations in the middle of the trial, before they returned together to the courtroom. If Jill is guilty of hiding the Bidens' many secrets, she had a willing accomplice in Bernal. We may learn more about his role in coming weeks as House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer (R-Ky.) probes the cover-up of Joe's cognitive decline and whether the president was fit to authorize the use of an autopen for his signature on executive orders and pardons. 'Historic scandal' Comer sent letters about what he calls the 'historic scandal,' demanding transcribed interviews from Bernal and four other former Biden aides, including Dr. Kevin O'Connor, Neera Tanden, Annie Tomasini, and Ashley Williams, all of whom have hired lawyers, he told Fox News' Maria Bartiromo on Sunday. O'Connor's interview is set for the end of June. Comer also is considering subpoenas for Jill and Hunter. 'These executive orders were many meant to Trump proof this White House,' Comer told Bartiromo. 'If we can find information that would lead us to believe that Joe Biden had no knowledge of those executive orders being signed in his name, then I think that the Trump administration could get them thrown out in court, and then Trump would be able to execute his agenda a whole lot easier without all the Trump-proofing that happened with the auto pen at the end of the Biden administration.' The American people do deserve to know who was running the White House the last four years. But it may not be so easy to prove that Joe was out of it. The former president showed he still has fight in him last week when he showed up at a veterans' memorial event in Delaware and snarked at questions from reporters about his cognitive and physical health: 'You can see that I'm mentally incompetent and I can't walk,' he said, sarcastically.
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Trump offers no rest for lifelong US activist couple
They've lost count of how many times they've been arrested, but even with a combined age of 180 years, American couple Joseph and Joyce Ellwanger are far from hanging up their activist boots. The pair, who joined the US civil rights rallies in the 1960s, hope protesting will again pay off against Donald Trump, whose right-wing agenda has pushed the limits of presidential power. "Inaction and silence do not bring about change," 92-year-old Joseph, who uses a walker, told AFP at a rally near Milwaukee in late April. He was among a few hundred people protesting the FBI's arrest of Judge Hannah Dugan, who is accused of helping an undocumented man in her court evade migration authorities. By his side -- as always -- was Joyce, 88, carrying a sign reading "Hands Off Hannah." They are certain that protesting does make a difference, despite some Americans feeling despondent about opposing Trump in his second term. "The struggle for justice has always had so much pushback and difficulty that it almost always appeared as though we'll never win," Joseph said. "How did slavery end? How did Jim Crow end? How did women get the right to vote? It was the resilience and determination of people who would not give up," he added. "Change does happen." The couple, who have been married for more than 60 years, can certainly speak from experience when it comes to protesting. Joseph took part in strategy meetings with Martin Luther King Jr -- the only white religious leader to do so -- after he became pastor of an all-Black church in Alabama at the age of 25. He also joined King in the five-day, 54-mile march from Selma to Montgomery in 1965, which historians consider a pivotal moment in the US civil rights movement. Joyce, meanwhile, was jailed for 50 days after she rallied against the US military training of soldiers from El Salvador in the 1980s. Other causes taken up by the couple included opposing the Iraq war in the early 2000s. "You do what you have to do. You don't let them stop you just because they put up a blockade. You go around it," Joyce told AFP. - 'We'll do our part' - Joseph admitted he would like to slow down, noting the only time he and his wife unplug is on Sunday evening when they do a Zoom call with their three adult children. But Trump has kept them active with his sweeping executive actions -- including crackdowns on undocumented migrants and on foreign students protesting at US universities. The threats to younger protesters are particularly concerning for Joyce, who compared those demonstrating today to the students on the streets during the 1960s. "They've been very non-violent, and to me, that's the most important part," she said. Joyce also acknowledged the couple likely won't live to see every fight to the end, but insisted they still had a role to play. "We're standing on the shoulders of people who have built the justice movement and who have brought things forward. So, we'll do our part," she said. Joyce added that she and Joseph would be protesting again on June 14 as part of the national "No Kings" rally against Trump. "More people are taking to the streets, we will also be in the street," she said. str/bjt/nl/mlm


New York Post
7 hours ago
- New York Post
Ukraine's surprise strike deep in Russia — an excellent way to push Putin to talk peace
Hand it to the Ukrainians: They're not only fighting heroically on, more than three years after Moscow launched its savage and utterly unprovoked war to destroy their nation, they're fighting with cheek and style. The latest, of course, is Sunday's surprise drone strikes on airbases deep inside Russia, targeting strategic warplanes that have been pummeling mostly-civilian targets in Ukraine. It counts as an intelligence coup, too: The drones were infiltrated to near their final targets over months, with Vladimir Putin's massive internal-surveillance agencies left utterly in the dark. Advertisement Then again, Vlad's secret police were caught clueless back when the Wagner Group launched its aborted coup two years back: Putin should be losing sleep over what else his minions might be missing. And any Russian patriots looking to save their country from his disastrous misrule can only be emboldened. Nor can Moscow complain that Kyiv launched these strikes on the eve of a fresh set of peace talks: Putin is the one who's refusing any kind of ceasefire, and he's had his forces in overdrive ever since President Donald Trump launched his diplomatic drive to stop the slaughter. Advertisement Kyiv was entirely right not to let Washington know these strikes were coming, by the way: As the Israelis will tell you, the DC defense establishment has a recently-proven track record of broadcasting our friends' war plans against even mutual enemies like Iran. A single American loose lip could've alerted Moscow to the operation — turning it into from a Russian humiliation into a bitter loss for Ukraine. Adding to Kyiv's panache points here, the damaged planes — $7 billion worth, the Ukrainians estimate even as the Russians of course claim the whole thing failed — included many of the strategic bombers central to Moscow's ultimate 'doomsday' deterrent. Advertisement That is: Putin and his spokes-toads have spent the last three years pointedly hinting they'd go nuclear if the West helps Ukraine 'too much'; it's pure poetic justice if his refusal to make peace has now left Russia vulnerable to a nuclear first strike. It's more clear than ever that Putin won't make peace unless and until continued his warmaking threatens him. Ukraine's audacious attack had done just that; the Senate should double down on the message by passing the bipartisan secondary-sanctions bill ASAP. Make Putin fear for his own survival; it's all he truly cares about.