
Major twist as judge acts after shock tip-off about one of the jurors in the Erin Patterson trial
The Erin Patterson trial has suffered the surprise loss of a juror mid-trial after the judge was given new information about him.
Justice Christopher Beale discharged a male juror on Thursday after the judge was alerted that the man had been discussing the trial outside of court.
Bringing the jury in late, Justice Beale explained why the juror would no longer be seated alongside them for the duration of the trial.
'I'm not going to ask you questions, I just want to give you some information,' he said.
'Under Section 43 of the Juries Act I have the power to discharge a juror if it appears to me a juror should not continue to act as a juror.'
The jury was told the juror would not be coming back.
'A few moments ago, I discharged juror 84, I did so because, and as I explained to him, I received information that he had been discussing the case with family and friends, contrary to my instructions,' Justice Beale said.
He told the jury the information he received about the juror seemed 'credible' and therefore had no choice but to let him go.
'I was of the view that it was, at least, a reasonable possibility that the information I received was credible,' he said.
Justice Beale reminded the jury to refrain from talking about the trial to anyone other than other jurors.
'I want to remind you of my directions that you should only discuss the case with your fellow jurors in the privacy of the jury room (and) not discuss it with anyone else, it's vital to the administration of justice,' he said.
Justice Beale described the incident as an 'unhappy note' and urged the jurors to continue to perform their jobs diligently.
'I hasten to add that I have not made a positive finding that juror number 84 discussed the case with family and friends but neither could I dismiss the possibility that he had.
'As I said, I was of the view that it was a reasonable possibility that he had breached my instructions,' he said.
'I've directed him not to contact any of you, directly or indirectly, and I likewise give you the similar direction.
'You are not to contact him directly or indirectly whilst this trial is continuing, alright, on that unhappy note we're now ready to resume the trial.'
JURIES ACT 2000 - SECTION 43
A judge may, during a trial, discharge a juror without discharging the whole jury if:
(a) it appears to the judge that the juror is not impartial; or
(b) the juror becomes incapable of continuing to act as a juror; or
(c) the juror becomes ill; or
(d) it appears to the judge that, for any other reason, the juror should not continue to act as a juror.
The original 15-person jury had been selected from a pool of 120 people from in and around the Gippsland area where the trial is taking place.
While the loss of the juror comes as a major inconvenience, the trial needs just 12 jurors to make it until the end.
The remaining jurors will then be balloted off.
When the trial recommenced, the jury heard from child protection practitioner Katrina Cripps.
Ms Cripps told the jury she believed Patterson had eaten 'half' of her portion of beef Wellington during the fateful lunch.
Ms Cripps had spoken to Patterson in the days after the lunch.
'I don't believe she ate it all,' Ms Cripps said.
Ms Cripps said Patterson told her the lunch guests chose their plates and she took the last one.
Patterson also indicated she put two plates aside for her children.
Patterson has pleaded not guilty to murdering her estranged husband Simon Patterson's parents Don and Gail Patterson, and Gail's sister, Heather Wilkinson.
They died after consuming death cap mushrooms served in a beef Wellington during lunch at her Leongatha home in the state's east.
Pastor Ian Wilkinson was the only guest to survive the toxic lunch.
He appeared in court on Thursday seated at the front of the court room after concluding his own evidence in the opening days of the trial.
Ms Cripps said she visited the children and Patterson's estranged husband Simon at the Monash Children's Hospital on August 2.
The jury heard Ms Cripps said she spoke to Patterson at 2.55pm - which was the first time she had ever talked to her.
She said Patterson told her she had the children during the week and Simon had them on weekends.
Patterson told Ms Cripps the children talked about not wanting to stay at their dad's on weekends anymore because he was 'sleeping a lot'.
Patterson said Simon had become 'mean and nasty' after an issue with child support was raised, the jury heard.
Ms Cripps said Patterson told her Simon had been 'controlling and emotionally abusive', which caused her to doubt her ability as a mother and dented her self-esteem.
The jury also heard from Doctor Dimitri Gerostamoulos, head of forensic science at the Victorian Institute of Forensic Medicine and the state's chief toxicologist.
Dr Gerostamoulos told the court just three table spoons of death cap mushrooms would be enough to kill an adult weighing 70kgs.
The jury heard the devastating effects death caps had on the body once consumed.
Dr Gerostamoulos said poisoning victims would experience vomiting, diarrhoea and progressively get worse without treatment.
He told the court that the body was unable to process the toxin as it would a normal drug.
Dr Gerostamoulos told the jury no trace of the toxin had been found in Patterson or her children.
Nor was it found in Heather Wilkinson or Gail Patterson.
However, it was found in Don and Ian Wilkinson.
The jury was shown images of two beef Wellington's retrieved from Patterson's home after the lunch.
An analysis of the contents found mushroom paste within the paste-sized Wellingtons found traces of beta-amanitin - the calling card of death cap mushrooms.
Several samples from the dehydrator tested positive for both alpha and beta amanitin.
The trial continues.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Insane $100,000 trail of destruction left behind after driver allegedly leads police on wild pursuit
A driver has faced court after allegedly ramming shopfronts and causing $100,000 worth of damage during a meth-fuelled rampage that ended after a police pursuit. Daniel Young, a 47-year-old from Rosemeadow, fronted Downing Local Court on Wednesday following the alleged pursuit from Campbelltown, southwest Sydney, to Sydney International Airport, in the city's inner-south. NSW Police allege Young mounted the footpath on Queen Street, Cambelltown, in a Ford ute at about 1.50am on Wednesday. Officers saw the ute enter the carpark of Campbelltown Police Station a short time later, but the driver took off. Police attempted to stop the ute when it returned to Queen Street and a pursuit was initiated when it failed to pull over. Young allegedly sped down the Hume Highway and M5 Motorway for 50km until he reached the airport in Mascot. 'The vehicle has then allegedly entered a restricted Sydney International Airport area controlled by a boom gate before the driver allegedly rammed the gate - causing significant damage,' NSW Police said in a statement. 'The vehicle stopped and the driver was arrested by officers attached to Highway Patrol - assisted by the dog squad. 'He was subject to a roadside drug test, allegedly returning a positive detection to methamphetamine.' Methamphetamine was also allegedly found inside Young's phone. Young was taken to Mascot Police Station and underwent a secondary oral fluid test, which has been sent for further testing. He fronted court later on Wednesday where he was charged with police pursuit - not stop - drive dangerously, enter/remain on major facility cause damage to facility, exceed speed greater than 45 km/h, destroy or damage property greater than $15000, possess prohibited drug, and breach of bail. It's understood about 20 stores were damaged in Campbelltown with the bill expected tor each $100,000. Hannah Moy, owner of the newly-opened Enchanted Trove, shared photos of her damaged store and asked customers to be patient as online orders may be delayed. 'I will handle this with humour, but please send love because we are pretty gutted,' she wrote. Eat Shop Love also sustained massive damage to its storefront after its owners had recently repaired its glass doors following a robbery last week. Young's lawyer, Tia Marlo, sought bail for her client. She argued he had a limited criminal history and needed urgent rehabilitation for an alleged drug addiction. The application was denied with the magistrate noting Young was already on bail at the time of the alleged offence and allegedly cam close to driving on airport grounds. Young is expected to return to court on June 17.


The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Federal watchdog finds ‘no corruption' in $2.4m settlement to Brittany Higgins following alleged rape
The federal anti-corruption watchdog has found there was 'no corruption issue' regarding the $2.4m settlement paid to Brittany Higgins following her alleged rape within Parliament House. The National Anti-Corruption Commission released the findings of its preliminary investigation into the matter on Thursday, concluding there was 'no inappropriate intervention' by the Labor government. In December 2022, Higgins signed a deed of settlement with the commonwealth when Labor's Mark Dreyfus was the attorney general. The former Liberal senator Linda Reynolds later accused Dreyfus of 'seeking to silence' her for not allowing her to defend herself against Higgins' claims. The Nacc found there was 'no material difference' in legal advice received by the former Coalition government before the May 2022 election and advice subsequently received by the newly elected Albanese government. The Nacc concluded: 'There was no inappropriate intervention in the process by or on behalf of any minister. The then attorney general approved the settlement in accordance with the departmental advice.' 'There is no evidence that the settlement process, including the legal advice provided, who was present at the mediation, or the amount, was subject to any improper influence by any Commonwealth public official,' the anti-corruption watchdog said in a statement. 'To the contrary, the evidence obtained reflected a process that was based on independent external legal advice, without any inappropriate intervention by any minister of either government. There is therefore no corruption issue.' Guardian Australia reported in September 2024 that Reynolds had referred the matter to the Nacc in October 2023 and was provided commonwealth assistance to fund the referral. The deed, released during Lehrmann's failed defamation case in December 2023, compensated Higgins for her loss of earning capacity, legal costs, medical expenses, domestic assistance and '$400,000 for hurt, distress and humiliation'. As part of Higgins' claim, she alleged the commonwealth had breached its duty of care because Reynolds and her staff mishandled the matter and did not adequately support her. The Nacc's finding comes as the WA supreme court prepares its judgment on Reynolds' defamation case against Higgins over a series of social media posts, published in July 2023, which the former minister claims damaged her reputation. In court in August 2024, Reynolds accused Dreyfus of 'seeking to silence' her. Sign up to Morning Mail Our Australian morning briefing breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters after newsletter promotion She said the claims that she had not given Higgins adequate support after her alleged rape in March 2019 were 'utterly defendable'. 'My defence was to be no defence … I was outraged.' Reynolds is separately suing the commonwealth over Higgins' settlement for taking over her defence in the mediation, which she publicly claimed amounted to 'egregious conduct'. Higgins alleged that she was raped by Bruce Lehrmann in the ministerial suite of the then defence minister, Reynolds, in 2019. The accusation spawned more than a dozen legal cases. In a criminal trial in 2022, Lehrmann pleaded not guilty to one charge of sexual intercourse without consent, denying that any sexual activity occurred. The trial was aborted after a juror obtained information outside the evidence presented in court and, in December of that year, prosecutors dropped charges against him for the alleged rape of Higgins, saying a retrial would pose an 'unacceptable risk' to her health. A federal court judge overseeing a defamation case launched by Lehrmann against Network Ten found in 2024 that Higgins was, on the balance of probabilities, raped by Lehrmann in the office. Lehrmann is appealing that verdict.


Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
BREAKING NEWS Corruption watchdog makes massive call about Brittany Higgins' $2.4MILLION taxpayer-funded compensation payout - as she gets job after 'medically unfit to work' claims
There was 'no corruption issue' found with the $2.4m taxpayer-funded compensation payout handed to Brittany Higgins after just one day of deliberation, the corruption watchdog has reported.