Cancer before age 50 is increasing. A new study looks at which types
Cancer before age 50 is rare, but increasing, in the United States and researchers want to know why.
A new government study provides the most complete picture yet of early-onset cancers, finding that the largest increases are in breast, colorectal, kidney and uterine cancers. Scientists from the National Cancer Institute looked at data that included more than 2 million cancers diagnosed in people 15 to 49 years old between 2010 and 2019.
Of 33 cancer types, 14 cancers had increasing rates in at least one younger age group. About 63% of the early-onset cancers were among women.
'These kinds of patterns generally reflect something profound going on,' said Tim Rebbeck of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, who studies cancer risk and was not involved in the research. 'We need to fund research that will help us understand."
The findings were published Thursday in Cancer Discovery, a journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.
How many extra cancers are we talking about?
The researchers compared cancer rates in 2019 to what would be expected based on 2010 rates.
Breast cancer made up the largest share of the excess cancers, with about 4,800 additional cases. There were 2,000 more colorectal cancers compared with what would be expected based on the 2010 rates. There were 1,800 more kidney cancers and 1,200 additional uterine cancers.
Reassuringly, death rates were not rising for most cancers in the young adult age groups, although increasing death rates were seen for colorectal, uterine and testicular cancers.
Why is this happening?
Explanations will take more research. The big databases used for the study don't include information on risk factors or access to care. Theories abound and a big meeting is planned later this year to bring together experts in the area.
'Several of these cancer types are known to be associated with excess body weight and so one of the leading hypotheses is increasing rates of obesity,' said lead author Meredith Shiels of the National Cancer Institute.
Advances in cancer detection and changes in screening guidelines could be behind some early diagnoses.
For breast cancer, the trend toward women having a first child at older ages is a possible explanation. Pregnancy and breastfeeding are known to reduce risk.
It's not a uniform trend for all cancers
This isn't happening across the board. Cancer rates in people under 50 are going down for more than a dozen types of cancer, with the largest declines in lung and prostate cancers.
Cigarette smoking has been declining for decades, which likely accounts for the drop in lung cancer among younger adults.
The drop in prostate cancer is likely tied to updated guidelines discouraging routine PSA testing in younger men because of concerns about overtreatment.
___
The Associated Press Health and Science Department receives support from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute's Science and Educational Media Group and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. The AP is solely responsible for all content.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
14 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
NASA issues urgent update on 'city killer' asteroid heading towards the moon in 2032
The 'city killer' asteroid 2024 YR4 may not be on a collision course with Earth anymore. But NASA has raised the odds of it hitting the moon in just seven years' time. According to the space agency, there's now a 4.3 per cent chance that 2024 YR4 will smash into the moon on December 22, 2032. The impact event could be visible from Earth as a bright flash of light, as lunar material is ejected into space. Only discovered at the end of last year, 2024 YR4 is somewhere between 174 and 220 feet (53 and 67 metres) in diameter – around the same size as a Boeing 747. If the space rock were to hit Earth, it would create a blast equivalent to detonating 7.7 megatons of TNT and leave a 3,000-foot-wide crater in the ground. The shockwave radiating out from the impact would wipe out an area the size of a major city, which is why it has been designated a 'city-killer'. Fortunately, the chance of it hitting Earth is effectively nil, but the new NASA observations increase the likelihood of it hitting the moon. The new odds are slightly raised from the previous 3.8 per cent chance of 2024 YR4 colliding with the moon, according to NASA. 'As data comes in, it is normal for the impact probability to evolve,' said Molly Wasser, public affairs officer for NASA's Planetary Defense Coordination Office. At more than 30 million miles away, asteroid 2024 YR4 is now too distant to detect with telescopes on Earth. So NASA has been relying on observations from the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), which is positioned in space about 1 million miles away from us. Asteroid 2024 YR4 is currently on a wide 'elliptical' (not perfectly circular) orbit around the sun, taking it even further from us before. Further updates will not be possible until 2028 when the space rock comes back around towards Earth and becomes bright enough to be detected again. Bu before it escaped from its view, JWST managed to collect one more observation of the object, made using its near-infrared camera last month. 'With the additional data, experts from NASA's Center for Near-Earth Object Studies at the agency's Jet Propulsion Laboratory in southern California further refined the asteroid's orbit,' said Wasser. Asteroid 2024 YR4 is currently on a wide 'elliptical' (not perfectly circular) orbit around the sun, while is taking it even further from us before it comes back around. This image shows the orbit 2024 YR4 in purple with the sun in the centre and orbits of planets (Mercury = cyan; Venus = yellow; Earth = dark blue; Mars = red). Note the asteroid's position (purple dot) in relation to Earth (dark blue dot) about a month before an impact might happen When it zooms back towards the inner solar system, the asteroid will reach an astonishing 85 million miles per hour (38,000 km per second). Asteroids speed up as they approach the sun because of the increased gravitational pull from the sun as they get closer – a bit like an object travelling faster the closer it gets to the ground on Earth. In the event that the asteroid did hit the moon, it would not alter our natural satellite's orbit around Earth, according to NASA. However, it would create a huge crater, ejecting rocky lunar material into space, and generating a bright flash, which should be visible from Earth. The impact event would be the first time scientists could watch a known asteroid create a lunar crater in real-time. The data gathered from this impact could help scientists understand more about other craters on the lunar surface. It is worth nothing that there is a 95.7 per cent chance that it won't hit the moon at all, as it stands – and the probability will likely continue to rise and fall. Asteroid 2024 YR4 was discovered on December 27, 2024 – and soon became a global matter of concern. 2024 YR4 set alarm bells ringing at the world's space agencies in February when its probability of hitting Earth reached a peak of one-in-32, or 3.1 per cent. Thankfully, about a week later, the odds were vastly downgraded just 0.0039 per cent, or one in 26,000. Asteroid 2024 YR4 is thought to be at least the same size as the Tunguska asteroid – which had an estimated diameter of 130 feet, according to NASA. Tunguska caused the largest impact event in recorded history when it shot through Earth's atmosphere in 1908, flattening 830 square miles (2,150 square km) of forest. Many lost consciousness and at least three people passed away as a direct consequence of the Tunguska event, according to a 2019 study. Experts are concerned that we may detect a civilization-threatening Earth-bound asteroid too late, with not enough time for a mission to knock it off course. DART is one of many concepts of how to negate the threat of an asteroid that have been suggested over the years. Multiple bumps Scientists in California have been firing projectiles at meteorites to simulate the best methods of altering the course of an asteroid so that it wouldn't hit Earth. According to the results so far, an asteroid like Bennu that is rich in carbon could need several small bumps to charge its course. 'These results indicate multiple successive impacts may be required to deflect rather than disrupt asteroids, particularly carbonaceous asteroids,' researchers said. Nuke Another idea, known simply as 'nuke', involves blowing up a nuclear explosive close to the asteroid. However, this could create smaller but still potentially dangerous fragments of rock that could spin off in all directions, potentially towards Earth. Ion Beam Deflection With Ion Beam Deflection, plumes from a space probe's thrusters would be directed towards the asteroid to gently push on its surface over a wide area. A thruster firing in the opposite direction would be needed to keep the spacecraft at a constant distance from the asteroid. Gravity tractor And yet another concept, gravity tractor, would deflect the asteroid without physically contacting it, but instead by using only its gravitational field to transmit a required impulse. Professor Colin Snodgrass, an astronomer at the University of Edinburgh said: 'There have been a few concepts suggested, such as a 'gravity tractor' to slowly tow an asteroid away instead of pushing it with a kinetic impactor. 'But the kinetic impactor is definitely the simplest technology to use on the sort of timescale that is most likely to be of concern for this size of asteroid, i.e. years to decades warning time.'
Reuters
19 minutes ago
- Reuters
US dietary guidelines expected as soon as this month, sources say
NEW YORK, June 11 (Reuters) - The U.S. Dietary Guidelines for Americans, which influence school lunches, medical advice and nutrition standards, are expected to be released as soon as June, two sources familiar with the matter said. The Trump administration is accelerating the timeline to impact meals served in the upcoming school year, starting later this summer, one of the sources said. However, it is already late for many school districts to adjust items they purchase, said Diane Pratt-Heavner, the director of media relations for the School Nutrition Association. The upcoming dietary guidelines are still being developed and nothing has been decided, a third source familiar with the matter said, adding they were expected to address saturated fat, found mainly in meat and certain oils, and ultra-processed food. Recommendations on drinking alcohol are not slated to dramatically change, the source said. The guidelines will likely modify suggestions related to dairy consumption, according to an industry source. Currently, the dietary guidelines recommend low and non-fat dairy, but the new ones may include whole fat dairy, the source said. The sources requested anonymity because they were not authorized to speak to the media. Health and Human Services and the U.S. Department of Agriculture publish the guidelines jointly every five years. Former President Joe Biden's administration began the process of drafting the guidelines. The agencies did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The guidelines are the basis for school nutrition standards, which are set by the USDA. Asked during a Tuesday press conference if the revised guidelines would include any changes to limits on saturated fats, Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins declined to provide details. "We're looking at everything right now. I don't want to make news today, but you'll be hearing a lot more on this in the coming weeks," she said, adding that her goal was to have the full guidelines out in the next month or two. U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. said last month that the guidelines would be four pages long, published by August and emphasize eating "whole food." A report commissioned by Kennedy last month said the guidelines were compromised by corporate interests, such as the meat and sugar industries. The report, named after the Make America Healthy Again social movement linked with Kennedy, also said that the current guidelines' recommendation to reduce saturated fat and sodium was problematic, and should instead focus on minimally processed food. The current dietary guidelines recommend limiting saturated fat to less than 10% of total calories consumed daily, and do not address ultra-processed food. The definition of ultra-processed food is hotly debated by the food industry while the report describes it as industrially manufactured products. The guidelines recommend limiting consumption of alcoholic beverages to one a day for women and two for men, or not drinking. The U.S. Department of Agriculture is required to set standards for school meals that align with the dietary guidelines. The guidelines also impact Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), an anti-hunger program. Doctors, nutritionists and dieticians also rely on them when advising patients. School districts may struggle to meet the recommendations of the new dietary guidelines by the time school starts. Most school districts placed orders for fall 2025 menus at the beginning of the year, Pratt-Heavner said. "Meeting mandatory changes to the nutrition standards or meal pattern would be extremely difficult given these procurement issues, but the administration could offer flexibility," such as allowing schools to offer whole milk, Pratt-Heavner said. Schools may now only offer fat-free and low-fat milk.
The Guardian
38 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Major US climate website likely to be shut down after almost all staff fired
A major US government website supporting public education on climate science looks likely to be shuttered after almost all of its staff were fired, the Guardian has learned. the gateway website for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (Noaa)'s Climate Program Office, will imminently no longer publish new content, according to multiple former staff responsible for the site's content whose contracts were recently terminated. 'The entire content production staff at (including me) were let go from our government contract on 31 May,' said a former government contractor who wished to remain anonymous for fear of retaliation. 'We were told that our positions within the contract were being eliminated.' Rebecca Lindsey, the website's former program manager, who was fired in February as part of the government's purge of probationary employees, described a months-long situation within Noaa where political appointees and career staff argued over the fate of the website. 'I had gotten a stellar performance review, gotten a bonus, gotten a raise. I was performing very well. And then I was part of that group who got the form letter saying, 'Your knowledge, skills, and abilities are no longer of use to Noaa' – or something to that effect.' Lindsey said she had been worried that might be a target of the new administration soon after the election, but when a large Noaa contract was up for renewal at the end of May, her former boss told her that a demand came 'from above' to rewrite parts of the contract to remove the team's funding. 'It was a very deliberate, targeted attack,' said Lindsey. Lindsey said the content for was created and maintained by a contracted staff of about 10, with additional contributions from Noaa scientists, and its editorial content was specifically designed to be politically neutral, and faithful to the current state of the sciences. All of those staff have now been dismissed, she said. 'We operated exactly how you would want an independent, nonpartisan communications group to operate,' said Lindsey, and noted that is housed within the science division of Noaa, not its public affairs division. 'It does seem to be part of this sort of slow and quiet way of trying to keep science agencies from providing information to the American public about climate.' Noaa has been contacted for comment. It's unclear whether the website will remain visible to the public. The site was housed within the Communication, Education, and Engagement Division of Noaa, which describes itself as 'the largest team in the federal government dedicated to climate communication, education, and engagement'. The website receives hundreds of thousands of visits per month and is one of the most popular sources of information about climate science on the internet. The fired staff believe the changes to were targeted by political appointees within the Trump administration and specifically aimed at restricting public-facing climate information. 'It's targeted, I think it's clear,' said Tom Di Liberto, a former Noaa spokesperson who was also fired from his position earlier this year. 'They only fired a handful of people, and it just so happened to be the entire content team for I mean, that's a clear signal.' The purge spared two web developers, which Di Liberto says is a concerning sign. The contractor said: 'My bigger worry, long-term, is I would hate to see it turn into a propaganda website for this administration, because that's not at all what it was.' The contractor said that while there will still be some pre-written, scheduled content posted on the site this month, there are no plans for further new content: 'After that, we have no idea what will happen to the website.' Lindsey said she also fears a 'sinister possibility' that the administration may co-opt to publish its own anti-science content. Lindsey said the administration could now 'provide a content team from the Heartland Institute, leveraging our audience, our brand, our millions of people that we reach on social media every month. That's the worst-case scenario.' ' is one heck of a URL. If you wanted to basically keep the website alive to do something with later, this is what you would do if you're the [Trump] administration,' said Di Liberto. 'It's clear that the administration does not accept climate science, so it's certainly concerning.' The cuts also mean that there is now also no one left to run social media accounts, which have hundreds of thousands of followers. Since staff in charge of did a lot of pushback on misinformation, their absence may help anti-science information flourish there more readily. 'We were an extremely well-trusted source for climate information, misinformation and disinformation because we actually, legitimately would answer misinformation questions,' said the contractor. 'We'd answer reader emails and try to combat disinformation on social media. 'We get attacked on social media by people who don't believe in climate change, and that's increased over the last six months or so as well.' The shutdown comes amid broader cuts to science funding across the government, including 'significant reductions to education, grants, research, and climate-related programs within Noaa', as stated in the 2026 'passback' budget Congress is currently deliberating. 'It seems like if they can't get rid of all the research, what they can do is make it impossible for anyone to know about it,' said Di Liberto. The contractor said they worry that what may have begun as a heavy-handed attempt by administration officials to limit public knowledge of human-caused climate change will have broader impacts on public education on the cyclical drivers of weather – as well as the results of publicly funded research conducted by Noaa scientists. 'To me, climate is more broad than just climate change. It's also climate patterns like El Niño and La Niña. Halting factual climate information is a disservice to the public. Hiding the impacts of climate change won't stop it from happening, it will just make us far less prepared when it does.'
