&w=3840&q=100)
Pornhub suspends porn in France over new age-verification law
This year, France has introduced requirements for all adult content websites to verify their users' age using details from credit cards or government documents read more
Pornographic websites Pornhub and YouPorn have launched a campaign against the French government
Pornographic websites Pornhub and YouPorn have launched a campaign against the French government after it introduced a law mandating the sites to take extra steps to verify users' age. Aylo, parent company of both websites, said it will stop streaming in France starting Wednesday (June 4) and instead will show a message denouncing the law.
Solomon Friedman of Aylo's owner, Ethical Capital Partners, told reporters the purpose of the move is to tell the French people 'how dangerous, how potentially privacy-infringing, and how ineffective the French law is".
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
What is France's new age verification law?
This year, France has introduced requirements for all adult content websites to verify their users' age using details from credit cards or government documents.
The law says the websites must offer a third-party 'double-blind' option that would keep the platforms themselves from seeing users' identifying information.
Aylo says move 'ineffective'
Aylo maintains the move is not only ineffective but directly puts the users' privacy at risk from bad actors, hacks or leaks.
Although Aylo executive Alex Kekesi told reporters that the company was 'extremely pro the concept of age verification", she warned that requiring platforms to verify age 'poses a very serious risk… with respect to your privacy rights.'
Meanwhile, Friedman said the onus to verify the users' age must lie with the operating system providers.
'Google, Apple and Microsoft all have the capability built into their operating system to verify the age of the user at the operating system or device level,' he said.
Their ability 'to supply an age signal to any site or app… can actually provide a solution' for controlling access to adult content without requiring users to share sensitive data with multiple websites, he argued. 'I understand that those three entities are large and they're powerful, but that is not an excuse for France to do what they have done.'
Warning from France's culture minister
Earlier on Tuesday (June 3), French Culture Minister Aurore Berge expressed her displeasure with the pornographic websites' stance and asked them to rather stop operating in the country than having to follow the new legal framework.
'There will be less violent, degrading and humiliating content accessible to minors in France,' she warned.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Print
2 hours ago
- The Print
G7 is no more than a relic of the past. India should focus more on G20, BRICS
It's worth remembering how the G7 began. A 'fireside chat'-turned-'Library Group' started by US treasury secretary George Shultz in 1970 to address currency turbulence bloomed into G6 five years later. On 15 November 1975, about five months after Indira Gandhi had imposed Emergency in India, leaders of six democracies — the US, UK, France, Germany, Italy, and Japan — met at the Castle of Rambouillet near Paris. By keeping India out, Canada has missed a golden opportunity to reset bilateral ties and make a new beginning for peace and development. The exclusion is not only unfortunate but might prove to be a great setback for the G7's own ambitions, whether it is addressing climate change and global inequality or building cooperation with emerging economies, agendas it has taken up in the last three decades or so. Canada, which took over the G7 presidency from Japan in December 2024, has made a surprising and controversial decision: to exclude India from the upcoming G7 summit. At a time when the world's economic centre of gravity is shifting towards Asia, and when India has proven its leadership on multiple global platforms — including its recent G20 presidency — this move is not just irrational, it may be self-defeating. Today, none of the leaders from the 'Summit of the Six' — James Callaghan (UK foreign secretary), Henry Kissinger (US secretary of state), Gerald Ford (US president), Takeo Miki (Japan prime minister), Helmut Schmidt (German chancellor), Jean Sauvagnargues (French foreign minister), Valery Giscard d'Estaing (French president), and Mariano Rumor (Italian foreign minister) — are alive, and most of the countries no longer dominate the global economy. The G6 became the G7 in 1976 with Canada's inclusion, and the G8 between 1997 and 2013 with Russia onboard— until Russia's suspension after the Crimea annexation in 2014. Collectively, the group expressed concern about their respective economies, donned the mantle of the 'white man's burden' to discharge their responsibilities toward the 'Third World', and decided to meet again. Fifty years later, none of the world's problems have been solved by these countries, and except for the US, the rest are no better off than the countries of the 'poor South.' Also read: India is walking a geopolitical tightrope. It can shape New Delhi's diplomatic power G7's expanding mandate, shrinking impact Over the years, G7 summits have taken on a broad agenda: gender equality, global health, climate change, and sustainable development. In 2021, the UK-led summit committed itself to a 'green revolution' and net-zero carbon emissions by 2050. Germany's 2022 presidency established a 'Climate Club' to implement the Paris Agreement, and the 2023 Hiroshima summit reaffirmed commitment to phasing out fossil fuels. India participated in all these meetings, contributing immensely to the resolution and their implementation. Ironically, it was Donald Trump-led 'G1 within G7' that derailed consensus, dismissing global warming as a 'hoax.' Now, with Trump 2.0 back in the mix and India 3.0 out, can the G7's green agenda survive? Patronising rhetoric, no real support The G7's agenda of connecting with emerging economies and adopting an inclusive approach has often rung hollow. Italy included an 'African Segment' in the 2001 summit, but without serious financial commitments and steps to resolve issues of poverty and migration. African leaders left disappointed, questioning the G7's sincerity. In contrast, India, during its G20 presidency, successfully pushed for the African Union—representing 55 African countries—to become a permanent G20 member. Who, then, is more relevant and committed to inclusive global development: the G7 or the G20? The 2021 G7 summit in London also introduced the Global Minimum Tax (15 per cent), aiming to rewrite international tax rules and discourage multinational corporations from taking undue advantage of lower taxes in smaller or developing economies. This again faced serious objections, with critics arguing that the G7 had no democratic legitimacy to act as the captain of the global economy. India: From Bandung to BRICS India's global economic role didn't begin yesterday. New Delhi has emerged as the fulcrum of Asian economic development since hosting the 1947 Asian Relations Conference and leading the Bandung Conference in 1955, where the foundation of the Non-Aligned Movement was laid. Now, it has positioned itself at the centre of South-South Cooperation. The successful Indian presidency of the G20 followed by its developmental agenda with IBSA (India-Brazil-South Africa) are proof of India's unique leadership position in the geo-economic dynamics of Asia and South Asia. It has also championed inclusive global governance in a way that the G7 often only gestures toward. Time to re-evaluate the relevance of G7 The economic, political, and cultural divides of the 1950s and 1960s are out of syllabus, phased out of academic discourse due to globalisation and rapid rise of 'Southern' economies. Between the 19th and the 21st century, there was a total metamorphosis that has left several centuries-old theories, perceptions and ideas redundant. The old binaries of the Cold War — East vs West, North vs South — have blurred into insignificance in the face of a new and emerging global economic order, necessitating a new approach to the contemporary history of global economic development. The G7, once seen as the anchor of global economic stability, is no more than a relic of the past today. India would do well to invest its diplomatic energy elsewhere: G20, BRICS, IBSA, and regional platforms that better reflect the world as it is, not as it was. Let the G7 gently go into oblivion — and take the outdated and irrelevant worldview it represents with it. Seshadri Chari is the former editor of 'Organiser'. He tweets @seshadrichari. Views are personal. (Edited by Prashant)
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
3 hours ago
- Business Standard
UNGA set to push for two-state solution to Israeli-Palestinian conflict
The United Nations chief on Thursday urged world leaders and officials attending an upcoming UN conference on ending the decades-old Israeli-Palestinian conflict to keep the two-state solution alive. Secretary-General Antonio Guterres told reporters that the international community must not only support a solution where independent states of Palestine and Israel live side-by-side in peace but materialize the conditions to make it happen. France and Saudi Arabia are co-chairing the conference, which the U.N. General Assembly is holding from June 17 to June 20 in New York. French President Emmanuel Macron will attend and other leaders are expected, but Israel will not be there. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has rejected the creation of a Palestinian state, a position that was overwhelmingly adopted by Israel's parliament in a vote last year. We won't be taking part in a conference that doesn't first urgently address the issue of condemning Hamas and returning all of the remaining hostages brutally taken by Hamas in Gaza, which along with the massacring of 1,200 Israelis and foreign nationals on Oct. 7, 2023, was what triggered this conflict to begin with, Jonathan Harounoff, the Israeli Mission's international spokesperson, told The Associated Press. Netanyahu has also opposed a one-state solution, which would reduce Israel's Jewish majority with the West Bank and Gaza's Palestinian populations. Instead, he has advocated for annexing large parts of the West Bank, without including Palestinians. Guterres said the current violence makes a two-state solution all the more necessary. My message to world leaders and delegations is that it is absolutely essential to keep alive the two-state solution perspective with all the terrible things we are witnessing in Gaza and the West Bank," Guterres said. And for those that doubt about the two-state solution, I ask: What is the alternative? the secretary-general said. Is it a one-state solution in which either the Palestinians are expelled or the Palestinians will be forced to live in their land without rights? That would be totally unacceptable. At a May 23 preparatory meeting, both co-chairs called for action, not more words. Anne-Claire Legendre, Middle East adviser to Macron, said that while the international community must support efforts to end the war in Gaza and release the hostages, it must also urgently put a political solution front of mind. Manal Radwan, an adviser to Saudi Arabia's Foreign Ministry, said action is critical because the conference is taking place at a moment of historic urgency and unimaginable suffering in Gaza. Israel's military campaign since Oct. 7, 2023, has killed more than 54,000 Palestinians, mostly women and children, according to the Gaza Health Ministry, which does not say how many of the dead were civilians or combatants. The offensive has destroyed large parts of Gaza and displaced around 90% of its population of roughly 2 million Palestinians. This conference must be the beginning of the end of the conflict, Radwan said. And Israel's occupation must end for peace and prosperity to prevail in the region. The co-chairs said in a document sent to U.N. members before the preparatory meeting that the primary goal of the conference is to identify actions by all relevant actors to implement the two-state solution and, more importantly, to urgently mobilize the necessary efforts and resources to achieve this aim, through concrete and timebound commitments. One of the aims at the conference is to increase the number of countries recognizing Palestine as an independent state. So far, more than 145 of the 193 U.N. member nations have done so. The Palestinians view their state as encompassing Gaza and the West Bank with east Jerusalem as the capital. Macron has said France should move toward recognizing a Palestinian state. "And therefore in the coming months we will,? he told broadcaster France-5 in April after he returned from a trip to Egypt, where he pressed for a ceasefire in Gaza. Netanyahu said in a statement after talking to Marcon on April 15 that he strongly objected to establishing a Palestinian state, saying it would be a huge reward for terrorism after the Oct. 7 attacks and would be a stronghold of Iranian terrorism minutes away from Israeli cities. (Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)
Time of India
4 hours ago
- Time of India
Syria's Sharaa: from jihadist to statesman
Syria's Sharaa: from jihadist to statesman (Image: AP) DAMASCUS: From wanted jihadist to statesman embraced by world leaders, Syria's interim President Ahmed al-Sharaa has undergone a stunning transformation in just six months since ousting long time strongman Bashar al-Assad. Born in 1982, Sharaa abandoned his nom de guerre Abu Mohammed al-Jolani, trimmed his thick beard and swapped fatigues for a suit and tie since his Islamist coalition of forces seized Damascus on December 8. He was proclaimed interim president the following month, and later tasked with leading his country through a five-year transitional period under a temporary constitution that experts and rights groups said concentrates power in his hands. Appearing calm and soft-spoken, Sharaa has sought to shed many of the attributes that once defined him. Gone is the shadowy persona associated with a single mugshot released at the height of the US-led war in Iraq following his capture there by American forces. Videos posted online in recent weeks have shown him, a tall man, playing basketball in a shirt and tie alongside his foreign minister. Others show him driving his car in Damascus, or eating in a working-class restaurant to cheers from passers-by. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Esta pastilla olvidada limpia las venas a un ritmo impresionante NEWSCASA Undo "I think he has succeeded in his transformation," said Jerome Drevon, a specialist in Islamist militancy at the International Crisis Group. In a matter of months, Sharaa has visited Europe and been "accepted on the whole in the (Middle East) region -- even by countries like the United Arab Emirates and Saudi Arabia that are not at all supporters of Islamists, much less jihadists", he added. The reception Sharaa has received demonstrates "a real recognition of the new authorities", he told AFP. No alternative On Sharaa's first trip to the West last month, he met French President Emmanuel Macron in Paris. Just a week later during a trip to Riyadh, he shook hands with US President Donald Trump who announced Washington would lift sanctions on Syria, a triumph for the new authorities. Trump described Sharaa as a "young, attractive guy. Tough guy. Strong past. Very strong past. Fighter." Sharaa remains under United Nations sanctions and a travel ban, and must request an exemption for all foreign trips. Drevon said that Arab and Western countries had made a pragmatic choice by supporting the young leader. "There are still security problems, there are tensions inside the country, but I think that most foreign countries recognise that right now, there is no alternative," he said. Sharaa has set up in what was once Assad's presidential palace overlooking Damascus, receiving a steady stream of senior foreign officials. During a Muslim holiday around two months ago, he and his wife Latifa al-Droubi, who now appears with him in public on occasion, welcomed Syrian orphans there. While seeking to distance himself from his guerrilla past, he has sought to extract political capital from his rebel roots. Last week, he presided over a cabinet meeting, saying: "We came to power through revolution -- we aren't used to luxurious palaces." "Until two years ago, I didn't even have an office. We used to meet in the car, on the street, under an olive tree," he added, referring to his time in the former rebel bastion of Idlib in northwestern Syria. Pragmatic radical In January, authorities announced the dissolution of all armed groups, including Sharaa's Hayat Tahrir al-Sham, which led the lightning offensive that toppled Assad. HTS was known as the Al-Nusra Front before it broke ties with the Al-Qaeda jihadist network in 2016. Sharaa is "a pragmatic radical", said Thomas Pierret, a specialist in political Islam. Born in Saudi Arabia, Sharaa is from a well-to-do Syrian family and was raised in Damascus's upscale Mazzeh district. He started studying medicine but then became associated with underground Islamist circles. Following the US-led invasion of neighbouring Iraq in 2003, he and other Syrians crossed the border to join what they saw as a resistance to foreign occupation. He joined Al-Qaeda there, and was subsequently detained for five years. In March 2011, when the revolt against Assad's rule erupted in Syria, Sharaa returned home and founded the Al-Nusra Front. A realist in his partisans' eyes, an opportunist to his adversaries, Sharaa said in May 2015 that he had no intention of launching attacks against the West -- unlike his adversaries in the Islamic State jihadist group. In 2017, Sharaa imposed a merger with HTS on rival Islamist groups in northwestern Syria, claiming control of swathes of Idlib province. HTS went on to develop a civil administration in the area, amid accusations of brutal abuses against those who dared dissent.
