Lousiana House Passes Legislation to Fight Weather-Controlling ‘Chemtrails'
Tinfoil hats are back out amongst Louisiana legislators. Last week, lawmakers in the House passed a bill to ban 'chemtrails' in the state. What are those, exactly? Oh, you know. The white lines left behind by aircraft that conspiracists insist are chemicals released by the government or other agencies for potentially nefarious purposes.
People's primary concern with chemtrails used to center around using chemicals to control people. Lately, though, conspiracists have honed in on chemtrails as part of a plot to control the weather. Louisiana's Senate Bill 46 aims to solve that by prohibiting the intentional dispersement of chemicals for the 'express purpose of modifying weather, temperature, climate, or sunlight.'
As of now, there aren't any actual fines involved with the ban. However, the bill would require the Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality to record chemtrail sightings and send data to the state's Air National Guard. Thankfully, lawmakers were thoughtful enough to include exceptions to the ban for specific activities like firefighting.
While defending the bill, Rep. Kimberly Landry Coates told fellow lawmakers that 'multiple people. Multiple groups, contractors,' are involved with the conspiracy. When asked by Rep. Candace Newell (D) what chemicals Coates has evidence of, she responded, 'Barium. There is a few, some with long words that I can't pronounce.'
Unfortunately for forward-thinking lawmakers like Coates, chemtrails have long been debunked as a bogus conspiracy theory. In 2016, a survey of leading atmospheric scientists 'categorically rejected the existence of a secret spraying program.' Instead, these white streaks are simply contrails formed when emissions from aircraft engines interact with water vapor at high altitudes. Basically, as the Environmental Protection Agency summarized, contrails happen under certain conditions 'for the same reason that we can see our breath on a cold day.'
Chemtrail conspiracies have existed for decades. However, MAGA enthusiasts helped drive its resurgence and give it further credibility in official discourse. Last August, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. responded to a tweet about a 'chemtrail pilot whistleblower', writing, 'We are going to stop this crime.' And during a town hall interview with Dr. Phill in April, Kennedy responded to a woman's comment about chemtrails by pushing blame onto another agency and vowing to do everything in his power to stop them.
In addition to Louisiana, lawmakers in several other states, including Florida and Pennsylvania, introduced legislation targeting chemicals and geoengineering. Although it may seem silly, these laws may hinder efforts to address climate change. While defending SB46, Coates specifically accused the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration of sending chemicals into clouds to reflect sunlight and cool the Earth.
'Wild and wacky ideas, with no basis in truth, are being raised and argued as if they were true — often with little or no media push-back,' Mark Shanahan, a professor at University of Surrey in the United Kingdom, told Newsweek. 'The president sets the tone and so far, Donald Trump has encouraged and enabled the circus of craziness. While US government is more about ratings than effectiveness, this disconnect from reality is set to continue.'
SB46 passed Louisiana's House with a vote of 58-32.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Ohio budget moves closer to doing away with elected county coroners
Jun. 6—For now, the Ohio Senate is going along on an Ohio House plan to make county coroners appointed by county commissioners instead of being elected by county voters. But, while the Senate didn't change the House's proposal in its initial draft of the state's two-year operating budget, Senate President Rob McColley, R-Napoleon, told reporters that there's still a chance the Senate could eliminate the House's proposal when it amends the budget next week. McColley said he put a request out for those in his caucus with strong feelings on the matter to weigh in. "If members feel strongly that it should go back to the way that it is under current law, then there's a possibility to see an amendment here in the omnibus," McColley told this news outlet. "We didn't see a lot of members — we saw some — but we didn't see a lot of members asking for it to be changed back." The Senate is expected to make those amendments on Wednesday or Thursday of next week. The change could be consequential in counties where county commissioners and the coroner are different political parties. In Montgomery County, for example, the elected coroner is a Republican while Democrats hold two of the three seats on the county commission. The House's primary advocate for the change, county commissioner-turned-lawmaker Rep. Brian Stewart, R-Ashville, has framed the change as necessary to solve a scarcity issue. "It's really hard to find folks that want to serve as a coroner at all, it's even harder to find folks who are willing to be the coroner and want to run a political campaign to do so," Stewart said in April. But the proposed change is opposed by Ohio State Coroners Association, whose Executive Director David Corey told this outlet that he's still hopeful that former coroners in the Ohio Senate, like Sen. Matt Huffman, R-Tipp City, will help the Senate reverse course. "Commissioners already have the authority to appoint a physician to be coroner if no one runs," Corey said. "So they already have this authority — so why subject this as a blanket on everyone?" Corey noted that commissioners also already have the authority to contract out with different county coroner offices if there's no elected coroner and the commission cannot find an in-county physician that wants to be appointed. "We don't really know what (problem) the House is trying and the Senate are trying to fix ... other than chipping away at other elected officials," Corey said. Corey said the idea is "wrought with potential problems," and speculated that coroners appointed by commissioners might be more beholden to those officials than they are to the public. He said appointees could also be fired at will, which would make it harder for a coroner to stand up to the commission in budget negotiations or other high-stakes situations. "We just think it's a horrible precedent," Corey said. Senate Minority Leader Nickie Antonio, D-Lakewood, whose home county of Cuyahoga is one of two counties in the state where the position is already appointed following a local vote, told this outlet that she didn't like the sound of applying the idea to every coroner in the state. "You want the coroner to feel like they can have a lot of pressure on them," Antonio said. "If they're appointed, then it's almost like they have an affiliation to the person that appointed them." She said this could lead to undue influence. "I think we, probably in the long run, would be better off continuing to have them be elected," Antonio said. ------ For more stories like this, sign up for our Ohio Politics newsletter. It's free, curated, and delivered straight to your inbox every Thursday evening. Avery Kreemer can be reached at 614-981-1422, on X, via email, or you can drop him a comment/tip with the survey below.
Business Insider
an hour ago
- Business Insider
Howard Lutnick says bananas — a tropical fruit — should be grown in the US
The Secretary of Commerce and a Congresswoman just clashed over whether bananas can and should be grown in the US. "There's no uncertainty if you build in America and you produce your product in America, there will be no tariff," Howard Lutnick told Rep. Madeleine Dean of Philadelphia during a House hearing on Thursday morning. Dean was saying that for her constituents in suburban Philadelphia, Trump's tariffs would cause at least a $2,000 a year price increase on goods. She specifically called out the price of bananas and said Walmart has already hiked the price of the fruit by 8%. "We can't produce bananas in America," the Democratic congresswoman responded. "The concept of building in America and paying no tariff is very, very clear," Lutnick said. "We cannot build bananas in America," Dean repeated. Large-scale banana farms are not viable in much of the US. However, bananas are grown in Hawaii and in parts of Florida, and can be grown in other parts of the Southern United States. In 2023, Hawaii produced 4.73 million pounds of the fruit, according to the Department of Agriculture. Rep. Dean's office did not immediately respond to a request for comments. The debate over bananas took place over a House hearing about trade deficits and the uncertainty Trump's tariff plan has caused since its rollout in April. Under Trump's April 2 tariffs, a 10% baseline tariff applies to all goods imported into the US, including bananas. Though additional higher tariffs on trading partners are currently on pause for a limited time, some additional tariffs apply for products from China, as well as for imports of all steel and some other categories of metals. Banana plants thrive in tropical regions with average temperatures of 80°F and a recommended relative humidity of 70 to 80%, according to EOS Data Analytics. The data company that provides crop monitoring services also wrote that farmers grow most bananas within a 30-degree range north and south of the equator. According to figures from the American Farm Bureau Federation, in 2023, Guatemala supplied 40% of bananas consumed in the US by value, followed by Ecuador and Costa Rica, each contributing 16%.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Some Republicans hope Trump, Musk mend fences after blistering breakup
Some Republicans are holding out hope that President Trump and Elon Musk will mend fences after Thursday's blistering breakup of the bromance, which captivated Washington and left the party's 'big, beautiful bill' hanging in the balance. The longing for harmony comes amid a Republican sprint on Capitol Hill to finalize the Trump megabill — which Musk trashed — and as the party looks ahead to the 2026 midterm elections, which the billionaire is threatening to shake up by suggesting he may go after lawmakers who support the package. 'I was with the president in the Oval Office yesterday afternoon as some of this was unfolding, and I can tell you, as he said in his own words, he was just, he was disappointed, and I was surprised by Elon's sudden opposition,' Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) told reporters Friday when asked if Trump has any interest in mending fences. 'I hope they reconcile,' he added. 'I believe in redemption. That's part of my worldview, and I think it's good for the party and the country if all that's worked out.' Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) — a loyal Trump ally who also chairs the House's Subcommittee on Delivering on Government Efficiency, named similar to Musk's brainchild Department of Government Efficiency — said the two should bury the hatchet in private rather than on public channels. 'I don't think lashing out on the internet is the way to handle any kind of disagreement, especially when you have each other's cell phones. So I hope this gets worked out,' Greene said. 'But I will tell you right now that people are going to be focused on making sure that we get the agenda that we voted for, and that's President Trump's agenda.' The optimism is not limited to the House: Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) called on his 70-year marriage to find advice for the two. 'I just heard Barbara Grassley say this disagreement and arguments btwn musk and Trump must end I know she loves both musk and Pres Trump. I'd advise u to follow her advice,' he wrote on social platform X. The simmering tensions between Trump and Musk blew up Thursday, solidifying the split between the world's most powerful man and the richest person on the planet. The back-and-forth began about the sprawling package — with Musk calling it 'a disgusting abomination' and Trump defending it — before spiraling into personal attacks, headlined by Musk alleging Trump is named in the Jeffrey Epstein files and the president calling the billionaire 'crazy.' 'Elon and I had a great relationship; I don't know if we will anymore,' Trump said in the Oval Office Thursday. The blowup sapped Musk of much of his clout among Republicans on Capitol Hill, with several GOP lawmakers siding with the president over the billionaire. 'I've had a lot of love and respect for you for what you've done for this country over the last several months, but you've lost your damn mind,' Rep. Troy Nehls (R-Texas), a close Trump ally, told reporters of Musk. 'You've lost your mind. Enough is enough, stop this. I don't think it's healthy.' As of now, it does not appear that the president is interested in smoothing things over. After reports surfaced overnight of a potential phone call between Trump and Musk, the president told ABC News that he was 'not particularly' interested in talking to the former special government employee, whom he called 'the man who has lost his mind.' 'I won't be speaking to him for a while I guess, but I wish him well,' Trump said to CNN. While officials close to the White House did not dismiss the idea of a conversation between the two at some point, aides indicated this week that they wanted to turn the page on the drama and remain squarely focused on getting the megabill through Congress. Musk, for his part, opened the door to some sort of reconciliation: After Bill Ackman, the CEO of Pershing Square and an ally of both Trump and Musk, urged the pair on X to 'make peace for the benefit of our great country,' adding, 'We are much stronger together than apart,' Musk responded: 'You're not wrong.' Some Trump allies, however, think peace is possible — and likely. Rep. Max Miller (R-Ohio), who worked in the first Trump White House and retains a close relationship with the president, when asked if there's any chance of reconciling the relationship between Trump and Musk said: 'I do very much.' He compared the situation to a strategy utilized by World Wrestling Entertainment (WWE) — founded by Vince McMahon and his wife, Education Secretary Linda McMahon — of getting rid of revered wrestlers only to bring them back into the fold later on, generating excitement. 'He set up this entire company to create heroes within the entire country of adult wrestling, and then he would fire that person, he would get rid of them, and then he would bring them back, and what would happen when he would bring them back?' Miller asked. 'When he would bring them back, the WWE stock price would shoot through the roof and the rating would shoot through the roof because everyone knows that that's where the excitement really is, is the reunification of these individuals.' 'So I do believe he's going to come back, I do believe we're going to sort this thing out,' he added. 'I do believe that at the end of the day this was really a bunch of nothing, and that you have a president of the United States and now a private civilian who are disagreeing with each other.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
