Conan O'Brien defends immigrants as Trump carries out aggressive mass deportation in LA: ‘They're doing all the work'
Former late-night host and comedian Conan O'Brien rebuked the Trump administration's recent mass immigration raids in Los Angeles, reminding people that people from Central and South America 'are the community' in the West Coast city.
On his podcast Conan O'Brien Needs a Friend, O'Brien spoke briefly about politics with his guest, actor Diego Luna, defedning immigrants and criticizing the administration for trying to deport anyone undocumented.
'I have empathy,' O'Brien said on Monday. 'Because if you're paying attention, you understand that it feels like 80 percent of what's getting done here to sustain our lives and our culture and our community is coming from south of the border.'
'They're doing all the work,' he added.
O'Brien's observation is one that many critics of President Donald Trump 's immigration raids in L.A. have made.
Indeed, Trump did at one stage pause raids on undocumented migrants working in the agricultural, hotel and restaurant industries, saying many of the roles they filled were 'almost impossible to replace.'
However, he soon reversed that pledge.
The president ordered his administration to detain and deport undocumented immigrants, most without criminal records, to fulfill his campaign promise of mass deportations.
But many believe the raids unfairly target innocent immigrants.
O'Brien emphasized the importance of immigrants by using examples from his own life.
'Everybody I work with, everybody who works with me, everybody who helps me in any way or helps my family in any way with everything that needs to be done – in every way, every day, I am working with people who are from Mexico or Central America or South America,' O'Brien said.
'They are the community in Los Angeles,' he added.
Luna, an actor and director from Mexico, said the administration's recent crackdown was 'quite scary.'
'You dedicate your life, work to build something, and then suddenly they tell you they're going to take that away from you instantly, just because. It's quite scary,' Luna said.
The two men bleakly recalled their 2017 interview on Conan when the late-night host went to Mexico City to conduct a show, just two months into Trump's first term. While there, O'Brien mocked Trump's desire for a border wall paid by Mexico.
While Trump attempted to crack down on immigration during his first term, the effort was nowhere near the scale and force at which he's approaching it now.
The mass deportation raids have become so aggressive that anti-immigration protests have sprung up across the country – ones that have been met with resistance by Trump.
The president invoked a rarely-used power to federalize the California National Guard, in addition to deploying Marines, to protect federal land and Immigration and Customs Enforcement Agents while thousands of citizens protested.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
28 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
EXCLUSIVE ALAN DERSHOWITZ: What hypocritical AOC is shamelessly ignoring when she calls Trump's Iran strikes 'unconstitutional'
Even as a tenuous cease-fire between Iran and Israel appears to hold, Democrats in the US Congress are falling over themselves to condemn President Donald Trump for the strikes that made this chance at peace possible. Trump's Iran attack is 'unauthorized and unconstitutional,' said the No. 2 Democrat in the House, Katherine Clark. 'Donald Trump's decision to launch direct military action against Iran without congressional approval is a clear violation of the Constitution,' added Jim Himes, the ranking Democrat on the Intelligence Committee. Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez went further, claiming Trump's action 'is absolutely and clearly grounds for impeachment.' That's absurd. The framers of the Constitution understood the difference between Congress officially declaring war, on the one hand, and the commander-in-chief of the armed forces taking military action in defense of our nation, in the other hand. The original draft of Article 1 allocated to Congress the power to 'make war.' But James Madison, the father of our Constitution, demanded that it be amended so that the president would have broader authority to take actions in defense of our country. During the subsequent two and a quarter centuries, various presidents and members of Congress have interpreted this division of authority differently, and many presidents have taken military action without declarations of war or even congressional authorization. In recent years, Democratic Presidents Bill Clinton and Barack Obama authorized significant military actions without any complaints by Democratic members of Congress, including several who have now whined about Trump having acted unconstitutionally. This is hypocrisy on stilts and reflects the extreme partisan weaponization of the Constitution, even over foreign and military policies. What President Trump did is not different in kind or degree from what previous presidents – both Democrats and Republicans – have done without congressional authorization. The last time Congress declared war was shortly after Japan bombed Pearl Harbor. There were no declarations of war over Korea, Vietnam, Iraq, Afghanistan, Granada or Panama. In fact, it is unlikely we will ever again see another declaration of war. Perhaps Congress will now do what it has done since the end of World War II: pass resolutions authorizing limited military action by the president. Though, these hybrid resolutions are not authorized by the Constitution either and it is unlikely that they carry any legal weight. Indeed, all this handwringing on the left will come to nothing. The courts, especially the Supreme Court, are reluctant to interfere with executive decisions involving military actions, even those that involve boots on the ground for considerable periods of time. So, by all means, let's continue to debate the wisdom of Trump's decision as a matter of policy, but let's not improperly weaponize a constitutional provision that was never intended to prevent presidents from taking actions deemed necessary to defend our nation, such as the surgical, one-off bombing of three Iranian nuclear facilities. As a matter of policy, a president should not be required to show his hand before ordering a surprise military attack of the kind. The consequences, both short and long term, of President Trump's bold decision remain to be seen, but he surely had the power to make that decision if he deemed it in the best interests of the country. Congress can now hold hearings, both open and closed, to assess the president's actions, but only hypocritical Democrats, and hard-left radicals afflicted with Trump Derangement Syndrome will argue that what Trump did was unconstitutional or unlawful. It was not.
Telegraph
33 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Democrats dupe Kennedy Center into hosting gay Pride concert
Democrat senators have duped the Kennedy Center into hosting a gay Pride concert after Donald Trump pledged to end its 'woke programming'. The performing arts institution in Washington, DC, which is led by a senior member of Mr Trump's administration, had apparently been told that the senators intended to put on a talent show. Instead, it was used to stage a Pride event where performers, among them the Gay Men's Chorus of Washington, sang Broadway tunes in protest against Mr Trump. Ric Grenell, whom Mr Trump installed as president of the performing arts center after replacing its board with loyalists, said they had engaged in good faith with the request but instead had been used for a 'political stunt'. Earlier this year, the US president assumed control of the Kennedy Center, denouncing its programme as too 'wokey' and pledging to bring in a 'Golden Age of arts of culture'. Numerous artists have since boycotted the venue, which recently cancelled its 'Tapestry of Pride' to celebrate Pride month. John Hickenlooper, one of the Democrat senators to host Monday's event, said: 'What's happening in the world is deeply concerning, but even in our darkest hours, we must continue to seek out the light. 'The LGBTQ community has long embodied this resilience, maintaining joy and creativity in the face of adversity.' Mr Hickenlooper, along with senators Tammy Baldwin, Jacky Rosen, Brian Schatz and Elizabeth Warren, rented out the Justice Forum lecture hall for the 90-minute 'Love is Love' concert, which explored 'gay characters, gay culture, gay music and gay Pride'. It was produced by Jeffrey Seller, the lead producer of 'Hamilton', who recently cancelled a run of the musical at the Kennedy Centre scheduled for 2026. 'This is our way of reoccupying the Kennedy Centre,' he said. 'This is a form of saying, 'We are here, we exist, and you can't ignore us'. This is a protest, and a political act.' Mr Grenell said staff working for Mr Hickenlooper had approached the centre about putting on a talent show and that it had been 'pleased to welcome them'. 'We were only later notified by the New York Times that Senator Hickenlooper's event was instead an invite-only political stunt,' he said in a statement on social media. 'Once again, the Kennedy Centre was being used by political operatives to larp as victims of intolerance in order to get a story in the Times.' He continued: 'No one has been cancelled by the Kennedy Centre; we welcome everyone who wants to celebrate the arts, including our compatriots on the other side of the political aisle. 'We especially welcome artists and audience members who come to the Kennedy Centre not for partisan political pranks but to experience excellence in the performing arts.' Earlier this month, many of the seats in the audience were filled by drag queens when Mr Trump visited for a performance of Les Misérables. One told local media they attended the musical to 'protest in our own way' by 'existing in the space that they've tried to block us from'. Ms Warren, a former contender for the Democrats' presidential nomination, said the concert was an attempt to fight the Trump administration's 'hateful attacks' with 'resilience and joy'. 'We're celebrating that joy at the Kennedy Centre with artists and stage workers for a special performance,' she said. 'I'll never stop fighting to make sure every single person is free to live exactly who they are.' Ms Baldwin, the first openly gay US senator, said the country had 'some big hills to climb' to reach 'true equality'. 'Look no further than the Trump administration's shameful attacks on the LGBTQ community and our right to live a life with dignity, respect, and free from discrimination,' she claimed. 'While this administration won't say it, we will: to all LGBTQ members of our community, we see you, we respect you, and we are proud to celebrate you.'
Telegraph
33 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Macron: Trump bombings have increased risk of secret uranium enrichment
Emmanuel Macron has warned of an 'increased' risk that Iran could try to enrich uranium secretly following US and Israeli strikes on its nuclear sites. Israel had been bombing Iran in an offensive that began on June 13, and the United States joined the attack by striking the deeply buried Fordow complex and two other sites. Donald Trump insisted that the US bombing mission was a success, but questions remain over the true extent of the damage to Iran's nuclear programme. During a trip to Norway, the French president said: 'This risk has indeed increased with what has happened recently. 'It is one of the main risks for the region and the international community... We must absolutely prevent Iran from going down this path.' Mr Macron's comments came after claims by an expert on Iran's nuclear programme that the regime has built hidden sites housing 'hundreds if not thousands' of advanced centrifuges capable of producing weapons-grade uranium. The regime also moved much of its highly enriched uranium to a secret location before the US was able to bomb the Islamic Republic's three known nuclear facilities, the expert added. It means that Tehran could still have all the capabilities to build a nuclear bomb, said Sima Shine, an expert on Iran's nuclear programme who has worked within the Israeli military establishment for more than 30 years. She said: 'I'm sure they have a hidden place somewhere with some hundreds, if not thousands of centrifuge[s] and they have material all there in several places all over Iran.' 'They cannot do anything now, tomorrow – but in the future, they have all the capabilities [to build a bomb],' the former research director at Mossad, the Israeli intelligence agency, added. 'The [known] sites in themselves, for the time being, are not a lot of threat,' she said. 'The problem is, as you know, the material and the advanced centrifuges that I'm sure they have somewhere.' The International Atomic Energy Agency estimates that Iran has 400kg (880lb) of uranium concentrated to 60 per cent purity, which would be enough for nine to 10 nuclear bombs if the material were to be enriched to weapons grade, generally said to be 90 per cent. It is not known what has become of this material, but there is widespread speculation that it was moved ahead of the American air strikes. Satellite images showed a convoy of trucks at the Fordow facility days before. During his speech, Mr Macron also said that the situation surrounding the Israel-Iran conflict remained 'unstable' despite Donald Trump's ceasefire declaration and Iran's reaction that it would respect it if Israel did. He said: 'The situation clearly remains volatile and unstable. I think it's a very good thing that President Trump is calling for a ceasefire.' Noting reports of missiles having been fired after the ceasefire announcement, the French president said that 'the last few minutes have shown that the situation remains very fragile'. On Monday, the he dubbed the airstrikes 'illegal'. Mr Macron said of the US attacks: 'It may be considered legitimate... to neutralise nuclear facilities in Iran, given our objectives. 'However, there is no legal framework, no. And so we must say it as it is: there is no legality to these strikes.' He added: 'Even though France shares the objective of preventing Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons, we have consistently believed from the outset that this can only be achieved through diplomatic and technical means. 'I say this because I hear many commentators who basically accuse you of inefficiency when you defend the diplomatic route on these issues. But when you are consistent, you can claim to be effective.' The comments were at odds with both Germany and Mark Rutte, the Nato secretary general, who said that pre-emptive US air strikes on Iran were not illegal. Sir Keir Starmer and a succession of ministers declined to explicitly state that the US president had acted within international law or in a correct manner.
