Elon Musk Suffered Humiliating West Wing Tongue-Lashing: ‘F*** You! F*** You!'
Further details have emerged about the shouting match between Scott Bessent and Elon Musk at the White House, showing just how fed up the Treasury Secretary was with the tech mogul.
A profile from The Atlantic detailing the rapid rise and fall of Musk's influence in President Donald Trump's world opens with a dramatic quote that Bessent is alleged to have yelled at Musk during a heated exchange last month over who should lead the Internal Revenue Service (IRS).
'F--- you! F--- you! F--- you!' Bessent reportedly shouted at Musk. In retaliation, Musk squared up to Bessent and accused him of running two failed hedge funds. 'I can't hear you,' Musk said. 'Say it louder.'
The fiery confrontation, believed to have taken place within earshot of Trump, was first reported by Axios in April. One unnamed witness who saw the near-physical altercation described it as 'two middle-aged men thinking it was WWE in the hall of the West Wing.'
The dispute reportedly stemmed from Bessent being furious that Musk had gone behind his back to push for Gary Shapley to be named acting commissioner of the IRS. Bessent wanted Deputy Treasury Secretary Michael Faulkender for the job, who eventually replaced Shapley after just three days.
The Atlantic framed the incident as another example of Musk burning bridges inside the Trump administration while essentially heading up the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE).
For months, Musk's leadership of the federal cost-cutting mandate made him arguably the most influential person in Trump's orbit. So much so that people began asking if the billionaire, who regularly appeared at Cabinet meetings and press events alongside Trump, was the real president.
But following a string of setbacks, including Musk's heavily endorsed candidate getting trounced in the Wisconsin State Supreme Court election and polling suggesting he's increasingly unpopular, it appears Musk is retreating from his government role.
He's also far behind on his original goal to slash $2 trillion from federal spending through DOGE. According to his own department's website, the figure stands at around $170 billion after months chaos, gutting of agencies and mass firings.
In April, Trump announced that Musk would be 'going back home to his cars' and shifting focus to companies like Tesla over his work in the White House.
Musk's official designation as a 'special government employee' requires him to step down after 130 days regardless. But Rushab Sanghvi, general counsel for the American Federation of Government Employees, suggested that Musk's unpopularity helped speed up his exit.
'We kicked him out of town,' Sanghvi told The Atlantic. 'If he had stayed in the shadows and done his stuff, who knows how bad it would have been? But no one likes the guy.'
Matt Calkins, CEO of software company Appian, which has worked with the federal government for decades, said Musk's approach to running his tech companies didn't translate well in Washington.
'He came with a playbook that comes from outside government, and there were mixed returns on that,' Calkins said.
'He comes in with his idealism and his Silicon Valley playbook, and a few interesting things happened. Does the 'move fast and break things' model work in Washington? Not really.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
31 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Think your return to the office was rough? Musk faces some big challenges
NEW YORK (AP) — Elon Musk is leaving Washington after a short but turbulent stint in government and getting back to his numerous businesses, each with their own set of issues for the billionaire to address. Start with his electric car company Tesla. While how much Musk accomplished in his role as President Donald Trump's chief cost-cutter is up for debate, it's clear his association with right-wing politics damaged Tesla's brand and tanked sales. Musk's social media platform X, formerly Twitter, needs to rebuild its advertising base; his aerospace company SpaceX appears to be financially promising but has seen some recent setbacks; and it's unclear if his satellite business Starlink can keep striking deals without Trump nearby. Here's a look at the state of some key Musk businesses. Tesla trouble Profits plunged 71% at Tesla in the first three months of the year right after a Chinese competitor claimed the mantle as the world's biggest electric car seller. The big question now: Will Musk's leaving Washington help lure buyers back? The answer is crucial to reviving profits because so much else is uncertain. Tesla's lineup of cars is aging and its foreign rivals have become much more competitive. They would be taking market share from Tesla even in the best of circumstances. Tesla's decision to close down factories as it retooled its best-selling Model Y, among other temporary problems, contributed to its struggles in the first quarter. But the blowback from Musk's time in Washington has some analysts and investors worried. In a note to clients, JP Morgan warned of 'unprecedented brand damage.' Wedbush Securities said at one point, 'This is a full blown crisis." And a group of smaller investors just Wednesday wrote to Tesla's board demanding it require Musk to spend at least 40 hours a week repairing its 'plummeting global reputation' among other problems. News earlier this week from Europe doesn't bode well: Sales in April plunged by half. Taxis with no driver Another big test for Musk: Will Tesla's launch of its first ever driverless taxis prove successful? Musk has been talking about robotaxis for more than a decade, but next month they may finally hit the road. He has promised to test 10 or 20 robotaxis in Austin, Texas, then ramp that up to hundreds of thousands by the end of next year. 'Can you go to sleep in our cars and wake up at your destination?' the billionaire asked investors in a conference call last month, then answered, 'I'm confident that will be available in many cities in the U.S. by the end of this year.' Investors are convinced Musk will deliver, judging by the 50% jump in Tesla stock since he made that statement. But he faces many challenges, not least is whether technically the taxis will work without hitting things — or people. Federal safety regulators last month requested data from Telsa on how the robotaxis will perform in low-visibility conditions. That request comes after an investigation into 2.4 million Teslas last year equipped with Full Self-Driving software after several accidents, including one in which a pedestrian was killed. Even if the Austin test goes off without a hitch, Musk faces another challenge: Waymo. The driverless taxi company owed by Google parent Alphabet just logged its ten-millionth trip and is now operating in San Francisco, Los Angeles, and several other cities. Ad rebound at X? After Musk bought Twitter in 2022 and opened it up to all manner of conspiracy theories, long-time advertisers began to flee. Then Musk made the situation worse when he threatened to 'name and shame' them, and sued them. Now advertisers are inching back, though maybe not for a good reason. 'Some big brands resumed spending on X in part to curry favor with the Trump administration, or to avoid potential retaliation by Musk,' said e-marketer analyst Jasmine Enberg,. 'But fear is not a sustainable motivator, and most were spending less than they were previously.' She expects X's ad business will rebound this year, but still be smaller than it was before Musk bought the company. Rockets red glare It's not clear how well Musk's rocket company SpaceX is faring because the private company doesn't disclose its finances. That said, news headlines point to both troubles and triumphs. First the bad development, which came just this week with a spinning explosion of one of the company's Starship mega rockets over the Indian Ocean. That followed explosions of two other Starships earlier this year that sprayed flaming debris across the Caribbean Ocean. Undeterred, Musk is vowing several more tests soon but the stakes are high and the clock is ticking. NASA hopes to use Starship for future missions to the moon, including one next year that will attempt a lunar orbit and then send the four astronauts aboard back home. The good news is that investors who have gotten a peek at SpaceX's finances apparently are excited. A private financing round for the company a few months ago followed by a private sale of shares recently have reportedly valued SpaceX at $350 billion, a big jump from a $210 billion estimated value just a year ago. It's business, not politics — or is it? A SpaceX satellite internet subsidiary called Starlink also has been striking deals to set up in foreign countries. But it's not clear how much is the result of cold business calculation and how much is due to politics, an advantage that could disappear as Musk leaves Washington. Accompanying Trump on his trip to Saudi Arabia earlier this month, Musk announced that the country had approved Starlink service for aviation and maritime use. That followed a decision to grant approval for the service by regulators in Bangladesh, whose garment industry would be devastated by Trump's threatened 37% tariff, along with a string of other deals in India, Pakistan and Lesotho in recent months. Next up: South Africa, maybe. Earlier this month, following Trump's Oval Office dressing down of that country's president, regulators in the country loosened a rule in a way that could help Starlink win a foothold in the country. Musk had called the rule requiring Black partial ownership of any new foreign venture 'openly racist." The country denies that politics influenced its decision. —- AP Writer Barbara Ortutay contributed to this story from San Francisco.
Gizmodo
44 minutes ago
- Gizmodo
This Ugreen 4-Port USB-C 65W Charger Is Now Almost Free, Amazon Clearing Stock at All-Time Low Price
Carrying a tangled mess of chargers and cables in your bag can get very annoying, especially when you have multiple devices that are trying to stay charged throughout the day. Whether you are traveling on business or just trying to stay productive at home, you know you need a dependable and flexible charging option. That's where Ugreen comes in – a brand that's established a presence for quality and innovation with charging options. Right now, Amazon is offering the premium Ugreen 65W USB-C/USB-A 4-Port charger at the lowest price ever: At only $29, which is a 30% off the list price of $42, this small but mighty charger is a no-brainer. The deal is so good that Amazon is rapidly clearing out its stock, so you need to make sure you get it before it runs out of stock. See at Amazon Perfect Charger For All Your Devices The Ugreen 65W USB-C (and USB-A) charger is a real asset if you have multiple devices you manage. Whether you are charging a MacBook Pro, iPhone, iPad, Galaxy S25 or even a Steam Deck, this charger will work. With 65W of charging power, you can charge a MacBook Air to 51% in a quick 30 minutes so it's great for a quick charge as you're heading out the door. With three USB-C ports and one USB-A port simultaneously charge four devices, so there is no need for a tangly mess of chargers littering your workspace or travel bag. This Ugreen charger uses GaN (Gallium Nitride) technology instead of traditional silicon: GaN is a smaller, more efficient and safer material than its silicon-based counterparts. Not only does GaN provide faster charging speeds, but it also has built-in overcurrent and overheating protection so your devices stay safe while charging. The foldable plug design also provides a more compact way to store the charger in your bag or pocket. With dimensions of 2.64 x 1.65 x 1.5 inches, that's small enough to fit in your hand but strong enough to withstand every day. If charging needs have you working from home, on a commute or traveling, this charger checks all the boxes as an appropriate charging solution. With folding prongs, you can use it on a desk in your office, in a hotel room, or anywhere else you need to charge devices. Plus, it works with any device that can be charged via USB, so you will never have charging compatibility concerns. Considering its price on Amazon at an all-time low, this is best deal you will find at this time. See at Amazon
CNN
an hour ago
- CNN
Republicans want to add work requirements to Medicaid. Even some recipients with jobs are concerned
Without Medicaid, Joanna Parker would have a much tougher time holding down a job. The Garner, North Carolina, resident works for a local home goods store up to 20 hours a week, typically. But she also suffers from degenerative disc disease in her spine and relies on Medicaid to cover her doctor's visits, physical therapy and medication that helps her manage the pain so she can get out of bed in the morning. 'If I lose my insurance, I lose my ability to work,' said Parker, 40, who was uninsured for about a decade until North Carolina expanded Medicaid to low-income adults in December 2023. That's why Parker is so worried about the sweeping Republican tax and spending cuts package that's now making its way through Congress. The bill that narrowly passed the House last week would impose the first-ever work requirement on Medicaid enrollees like her. The Senate will put its stamp on the measure, which aims to fulfill President Donald Trump's agenda, in coming weeks. Though she's employed, Parker fears she could be stripped of her health insurance if she's not able to work enough hours every month or gets tripped up in reporting her time on the job to the state – should the work mandate become law. 'I feel it will be so easy to lose your coverage if you do the reporting the wrong way and you can't fix it,' said Parker, who has applied for full-time jobs over the past 18 months but said she hasn't received responses. The House GOP's 'big, beautiful bill' would mandate that many Medicaid expansion enrollees ages 19 to 64 work, volunteer, go to school or participate in a job training program at least 80 hours a month to obtain or maintain coverage. The requirement, which would go into effect by the end of 2026, would not apply to parents, pregnant women, medically frail individuals and those with substance-abuse disorders, among others. The provision would help achieve Republicans' longstanding goal of introducing work requirements into Medicaid. It's part of an unprecedented set of cuts the House GOP would make to the nation's safety net program. Proponents say the mandate would prompt enrollees who could – and should, in supporters' view – work to get jobs and, eventually, move off of Medicaid. Also, they argue, it would preserve the program for the most vulnerable Americans and reduce spending on the low-income adults who gained coverage through the Affordable Care Act's expansion provision, a frequent target of congressional Republicans. 'If you are an able-bodied adult and there's no expectation of you to work or train or volunteer in any way, there's going to be a large number who don't,' said Jonathan Ingram, vice president of policy and research at the Foundation for Government Accountability, which promotes work requirements in government assistance programs. But many Medicaid enrollees and their advocates fear millions of people would lose their coverage under the proposed measure, including many who already work or qualify for an exemption but would get stuck in red tape. An estimated 4.8 million Medicaid recipients would be left uninsured over 10 years because of the work mandate, according to a preliminary Congressional Budget Office analysis, though that figure could grow due to last-minute changes to the House bill that accelerated the start date of the requirement. (The Senate, which will now consider the bill, is expected to also make changes to the legislation – though any adjustments to its Medicaid provisions remain to be seen.) Many adults with Medicaid coverage have jobs, though the estimates vary. Some 38% of adult enrollees had full-time jobs in 2023, most of them for the full year, according to KFF, a nonpartisan health policy research group that looked at folks ages 19 to 64 without dependent children who did not receive disability benefits or have Medicare coverage, which insures people with disabilities. Just over 20% worked part time, up to 35 hours a week. Another 31% reported that they did not work because they were caregivers or in school or had an illness or disability, all of which might qualify them for exemptions from the work requirements under the House bill. Only 12% of the enrollees said they were not working because they couldn't find jobs, had retired or reported another reason, according to the KFF analysis, which is based on US Census Bureau data. 'Most people are doing the things that they're expected to do in terms of qualifying activities or things that could qualify them for an exemption,' said Michael Karpman, principal research associate at the Urban Institute. 'But people have a lot of difficulty navigating the process for reporting their exemptions, or if they're not exempt, reporting their work activities.' He pointed to Arkansas, the first state to temporarily implement work requirements during Trump's first term before the effort was halted in federal court. More than 18,000 Medicaid enrollees lost their coverage over several months – even though the state automatically exempted about two-thirds of those subject to the mandate. Many beneficiaries in Arkansas did not understand the work requirements or did not realize it applied to them, a 2019 Urban Institute report found. Participants tend to move frequently so their contact information may have been outdated. Others had difficulty using the online reporting portal, especially if they did not have access to computers and internet service. 'That population has all kinds of challenges with interacting with a system like that,' said Bill Kopsky, executive director of the Arkansas Public Policy Panel, a social and economic justice advocacy group. He noted that many enrollees didn't receive mailed notifications from the state or didn't realize they had to take action. What's more, the mandate was not associated with an increase in employment, though the uninsured rate did rise among low-income residents in the affected age group, said Karpman, who analyzed Census data in a recent report. That finding is in line with a previous study from Harvard University researchers, which was based on telephone surveys. Ingram, however, challenges the assertion that the effort did not spur Medicaid recipients to find work. He noted in a recent report that more than 9,000 enrollees found jobs during the time the work requirement was implemented. Some 99% of them were in the age group subject to the mandate, according to a prior foundation report that cited state data. Katrina Falkner knows what it's like to be stuck in a Medicaid paperwork morass. The Chicago resident, who cares for her elderly father and other family members with disabilities, said she was disenrolled from the program in 2023 after the state Department of Human Services lost the paperwork that she had spent days organizing. The agency told her that it reinstated her, she said. But when she went to the hospital, she found out she was still uninsured. It took several visits to multiple agency offices before the issue was resolved the following year. The department told CNN that such scenarios are 'extremely rare' and it works to 'ensure timely review and enrollment' for all applicants eligible for Medicaid. Falkner, 43, volunteers with several community organizing groups at least 20 hours a week and works every other Saturday as a Head Start ambassador for the Chicago Early Learning program. She also suffers from asthma, anemia, vertigo and other conditions, which can make it hard for her to work or volunteer at times. Being able to meet the reporting requirements concerns her, especially since her electricity and internet access are sometimes cut off. 'If I lost my Medicaid, it would cause me a whole lot of struggles,' she said, noting that the program covers her nebulizer and other health care needs. 'If they don't have the right documents, I won't be able to be in existence because I can't breathe.' Although Dana Bango of Zionville, North Carolina, has dealt with state social service agencies for years, she still 'sweats it every time.' There are many strict deadlines and hoops to jump through, so she has to remain vigilant, she said. The potential work mandate fills her with 'dread' since she's worried that she could fall through the cracks and lose her Medicaid coverage – even though she works 20 hours a week at the North Carolina Christmas Tree Association and delivers for Door Dash 10 hours a week. A cancer survivor who still needs follow up care, Bango is concerned that she may not get the help she could need from state workers to log her hours if the mandate takes effect. 'I've been uninsured before. I don't want to go back there. It's a scary thing,' she said.
