Muslim Man Can Have Multiple Wives If He Treats All Of Them Equally: Court
New Delhi:
The Allahabad High Court recently observed that a Muslim man is entitled to marry multiple times as long as he treats all his wives equally. The court underscored that polygamy was conditionally permitted under the Quran for a "valid reason", but is "misused" by men for "selfish reasons".
A single bench of Justice Arun Kumar Singh Deswal made the remarks while hearing a petition to quash the chargesheet, cognisance, and summons order against a man, Furkan, issued by a court in Moradabad.
The case dates back to 2020 when a woman filed a complaint against Furkan for allegedly marrying her without informing her that he was already married to another woman. She also alleged Furkan raped her during their marriage. Following this, a case was filed at the Moradabad police station and summons were issued to three accused, including Furkan and two other people.
The counsel for Furkan, however, argued in the Moradabad court that the woman had admitted that she married Furkan after having a relationship with him. He also argued that the second marriage should be invalid to attract offence under Indian Penal Code (IPC) Section 494 - marrying a person while already being married to another.
Justice Deswal, while advocating for the Uniform Civil Code (UCC), said that the man did not commit an offence as a Muslim man is allowed to marry up to four times. He also said that there is a historical reason behind the Quran allowing polygamy, adding that all issues related to marriage and divorce should be decided according to the Shariat Act, 1937.
The Allahabad High Court, in its 18-page judgement, said that Furkan's second marriage is valid as both his wives are Muslim.
The court has listed the matter for the next hearing on May 26.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Residents welcome reduction in use of loudspeakers at mosques
Mumbai: Many residents living in densely populated areas and in the vicinity of mosques have welcomed the silence or reduced decibel levels of loudspeakers in mosques. Several residents TOI spoke to on Sunday said they felt a positive change as the mosques in their neighbourhoods either muted loudspeakers or cut down decibels to the permissible limit (55 decibels during daytime and 45 decibels at night). Tired of too many ads? go ad free now This allows elderly persons, students, and bedridden patients much-needed relief. "I stay hardly 200 metres away from a couple of mosques at Kurla Pipe Road. I don't see any decrease in the number of devotees in mosques after azaan stopped being amplified through loudspeakers. This is a relief and should be welcomed," said Mohammed Tarique. Tarique added that he is a practising Muslim who regularly prays five times a day but does not miss the sound of azaan via loudspeakers. Tarique recalled a trend of many mosques which amplified through loudspeakers not just the azaan but even Friday sermons of the imams. "What was the need to make the whole mohalla listen to sermons delivered inside mosques? ... I am glad it has stopped now that loudspeakers are muted or decibels reduced," said Tarique. Kalina resident Abraham Mathai welcomed the move. "I used to put earplugs during azaan on loudspeakers. Now it is a relief for everyone, including students and elderly people. I congratulate even those elders in the community who back this positive move," said Mathai. Khursheed Siddiqui, general secretary, Masjid and Madrassa Mohammadiya at Vikhroli, said that soon after Bombay high court observed in Jan 2025 that "use of loudspeakers is not an essential part of religions", he called for a meeting of elders and explained why loudspeakers' decibel levels needed to be brought down to permissible limit. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now "There were some who argued why only mosques needed to comply with the court's decision, but now we all see the benefits of not amplifying the azaan through loudspeakers," said Siddiqui. Mira Road resident Syed Zafar Ahmed lives in a cosmopolitan locality. "If I felt irritated at high decibels of azaan, how would non-Muslims have felt? I am glad many mosques have themselves removed the loudspeakers or are following the court's guidelines on the use of loudspeakers," said Ahmed.
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
HC quashes dowry case against Doon man, cites lack of criminal intent
Dehradun: The Uttarakhand high court (HC) has quashed all proceedings in a dowry-related criminal case against Dehradun resident Himanshu Singh, ruling that the allegations stemmed from a personal grievance rather than a cognisable offence. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The single judge bench of Justice Ashish Naithani nullified the case pending before a judicial magistrate in Dehradun that involved charges under IPC sections 498A (cruelty for dowry) and 506 (criminal intimidation) along with sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The case was registered by a Dehradun woman who alleged Singh initiated a relationship promising marriage, later harassed her, and withdrew from the commitment, causing her emotional and financial harm. She also accused Singh and his family of demanding dowry and threatening her when she refused. A chargesheet was filed in the lower court in Nov 2017 and the court issued the summoning order in May 2018. Singh later approached the HC seeking dismissal of the charges, stating he called off the proposed marriage after discovering the woman's previous relationship with a college friend and her ongoing legal proceedings under the Domestic Violence Act and Hindu Marriage Act with her former partner. He claimed this past was not disclosed to him, and that the criminal case was filed in retaliation. Singh also submitted a 2015 court judgment where the woman had acknowledged her previous marriage. In its judgment delivered on Tuesday, the court noted that the complaint revolved around emotional hurt and broken promises in a personal relationship, which alone do not amount to criminal offences unless supported by criminal intent, specific actions and material facts. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now "The contradiction between her conduct in prior litigation and the complaint filed in the present case substantially undermines the credibility of her version," the court said. Additionally, the court found no evidence of marriage or domestic cohabitation between Singh and the complainant. "In the absence of a marriage or even customary solemnisation, invoking sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act appears ex facie unwarranted," it stated. The HC observed that the complainant appeared to have misused the criminal justice system to pursue a personal grievance arising from emotional fallout and rejection. It held that the allegations did not constitute conduct falling within the scope of penal law, and quashed the proceedings initiated by the lower court in May 2018. Dehradun: The Uttarakhand high court (HC) has quashed all proceedings in a dowry-related criminal case against Dehradun resident Himanshu Singh, ruling that the allegations stemmed from a personal grievance rather than a cognisable offence. The single judge bench of Justice Ashish Naithani nullified the case pending before a judicial magistrate in Dehradun that involved charges under IPC sections 498A (cruelty for dowry) and 506 (criminal intimidation) along with sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The case was registered by a Dehradun woman who alleged Singh initiated a relationship promising marriage, later harassed her, and withdrew from the commitment, causing her emotional and financial harm. She also accused Singh and his family of demanding dowry and threatening her when she refused. A chargesheet was filed in the lower court in Nov 2017 and the court issued the summoning order in May 2018. Singh later approached the HC seeking dismissal of the charges, stating he called off the proposed marriage after discovering the woman's previous relationship with a college friend and her ongoing legal proceedings under the Domestic Violence Act and Hindu Marriage Act with her former partner. He claimed this past was not disclosed to him, and that the criminal case was filed in retaliation. Singh also submitted a 2015 court judgment where the woman had acknowledged her previous marriage. In its judgment delivered on Tuesday, the court noted that the complaint revolved around emotional hurt and broken promises in a personal relationship, which alone do not amount to criminal offences unless supported by criminal intent, specific actions and material facts. "The contradiction between her conduct in prior litigation and the complaint filed in the present case substantially undermines the credibility of her version," the court said. Additionally, the court found no evidence of marriage or domestic cohabitation between Singh and the complainant. "In the absence of a marriage or even customary solemnisation, invoking sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act appears ex facie unwarranted," it stated. The HC observed that the complainant appeared to have misused the criminal justice system to pursue a personal grievance arising from emotional fallout and rejection. It held that the allegations did not constitute conduct falling within the scope of penal law, and quashed the proceedings initiated by the lower court in May 2018.
India.com
3 hours ago
- India.com
Muslim Population in India: 97 out of 100 people follow Islam in this Indian region, but Islam Is hardly practiced in this place; it is...
India is a land of remarkable religious diversity. Many faiths are practiced, particularly Hinduism, Islam, Christianity, Buddhism, Jainism, Zoroastrianism, and Sikhism. These faiths are reflected in each community's festivals, traditions, and day-to-day customs. The Pew Research Center estimates that India is projected to have the largest Muslim population in the world, exceeding Indonesia, at 311 million by the year 2050. The Muslim population resides in almost every state in India, but their density varies from state to state. In this article, we look specifically at the distribution of the Muslim population in several Indian states. Uttar Pradesh is the most populous state in the country, and it has a sizeable Muslim population. According to the 2011 Census, Uttar Pradesh had a total population of approximately 200 million, with approximately 38.4 million Muslims – about 19.26% of the total population. Thus, Uttar Pradesh has the highest number of Muslims of any state in India. India has a Union Territory with almost the entire population practicing Islam. Well, the place is Lakshadweep. About 97 out of every 100 people living in this region practice Islam. However, although the aggregate total population is very small, there were 64,473 individuals in Lakshadweep according to the 2011 Census. Of this, 62,268 people were Muslims, making up 96.58% of the population. The Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir is the next region with a fair amount of Muslim population after Lakshadweep. According to the 2011 Census data (when Jammu and Kashmir was still a state), it had a total population of approximately 12.5 million, of which 85.67 lakh were Muslims, constituting about 68.31% of the total population. In 2019, the Government of India restructured Jammu and Kashmir, splitting it into two Union Territories and designating Ladakh as a separate entity.
