logo
J.D. Vance's Best Friend, the Canadian Politician, Has No Comment

J.D. Vance's Best Friend, the Canadian Politician, Has No Comment

Yahoo27-04-2025

J.D. Vance's best friend has no comment.
In truth, J.D. Vance's best friend really doesn't want anyone to know he's J.D. Vance's best friend — not now that he's running for Canadian parliament in an industrial city on the shores of Lake Ontario. For three consecutive days in late April, I arrive at J.D. Vance's best friend's campaign headquarters, on Division Street in the hardscrabble Ontario village of Bowmanville, and I'm told that J.D. Vance's best friend is most definitely aware of my two prior visits. From behind a locked door, a polite older volunteer informs me that if J.D. Vance's best friend has any comments to offer he will be sure to contact me.
Such is the plight of a Canadian politician named Jamil Jivani. A Yale law classmate of Vance and his wife Usha, the son of a Kenyan father and white Canadian mother and the product of underprivileged circumstances, Jivani had been parachuted into the safe district east of Toronto in good measure because of his connections to the vice president. Like Vance's Hillbilly Elegy, Jivani has written a memoir of childhood hardship, one filled with uncheckable tales of youthful illiteracy and near brushes with violence, only his book purporting to portray young male rage disappeared without a trace; both tales read like special-need pleas for preferential treatment from an Ivy League school.
A few months before my arrival, Jivani's Canada First, MAGA-adjacent Conservative party had been heading for a landslide victory, offering tax cuts and anti-woke policies, along with juvenile name calling. But then Donald Trump threatened to annex Canada and derisively referred to Prime Minister Justin Trudeau as a 'governor,' offending the entire nation. In short order, Trump imposed tariffs on Canadian automobiles and steel and aluminum, in blatant breach of the treaty Trump himself had negotiated in his first term. Casting wolfish eyes on Canada as America's '51st state,' Trump became the most despised figure in the country — along with his bearded sidekick Vice President J.D. Vance.
For reasons that seem to careen from grandiose designs on being a Mount Rushmore-worthy historical figure to schoolyard bullying, Trump thus transformed Canadian politics — and society. Trump's degrading and ridiculous attacks instantly incited a 25-point swing to the center-left Liberal party, obliterating the huge polling advantage of a Conservative leader with an uncanny resemblance to a young Richard Nixon — the slicked back hair, sly smile, bottomless grievance. By contrast, the new Liberal leader Mark Carney was a former head of the Banks of Canada and England, an economist with degrees from Harvard and Oxford and a history of dealing with the catastrophe of Brexit. His quiet demeanor and no-bullshit approach seemed to match the rising sense of outrage and defiance in Canada — or at least that is what the polls show.
Incredibly, no major American political figure came to the defense of Canada, to the dismay of my homeland, nor did business or union leaders, as American institutions cowered and curled into submission. For decades Canada has been America's closest ally and friend, but in a matter of days the country embarked on a new and astounding anti-American trajectory, one that is likely have global implications, as the image of Trump and the United States morph into a singular authoritarian, untrustworthy, impulsive, belligerent, and uniquely unappealing brand.
THE STRETCH OF EXURBIA east of Toronto that Jivani is running to represent is much like Springfield, USA, the anywhere fictional city from The Simpsons, not the unfortunate real Springfield in Ohio that Vance falsely claimed was populated by pet-eating migrants — a transparently racist statement that Vance's best friend overlooked, despite his mixed-race heritage.
The smokestack from a nuclear reactor looms over the landscape of this section of Lake Ontario, and the strip malls and row after row of new tract housing could be the outskirts of many American cities — but with an epic and telling difference. In Canada, diversity isn't a dirty word or dog-whistle slogan, at least not for the vast majority, no matter how controversial the terms DEI and 'woke' might be. The population in the city of Oshawa and nearby Bowmanville is as diverse as can be imagined, the old-school Ontario red-brick farmhouses flanked by Syrian Christian basilicas and Muslim Welfare Centers and mega-churches. Millions of immigrants have arrived in Canada in the last decade, causing an acute affordable housing shortage, but the closest a political party comes to race signaling is the unctuous Conservative leader's constant references to the 'rampant crime wave' that supposedly envelopes Canadians — fear that I failed to detect once in my fellow Canadians.
With J.D. Vance acting as Trump's attack dog, conjuring the world's lone super power as somehow a victim of scheming countries like Canada, Jivani obviously needed to downplay his close association with his best buddy. Normally an eager cultural warrior on social media, Jivani ducked the press to avoid questions about Vance, although for years the connection had been his sole claim to fame.
Along the new four-lane highways lacing the countryside, with countless plots pegged for imminent development, there are Asian supermarkets and fast-food joints and young immigrant families strolling in the new tract housing — some wearing turbans, some burqas, some Canadian flag T-shirts saying 'Elbows Up.' In Dam Foods, a Jamaican store selling goat meat and oxtail around the corner from Jivani's headquarters, the workers haven't heard of the candidate, nor has he visited the store, at least to their knowledge — but the shop is a visible minority presence in a down-on-its-luck community in the midst of a cultural transformation.
Closer to the city of Toronto, the iconic General Motors facility has been reduced to a single operating plant, a few thousand employees turning out 600 pickups every day, but Trump's tariffs threaten to destroy what remains of the Canadian automobile industry — and thereby decimate the city of Oshawa. Once, union auto workers on both sides of the border shared a brotherhood, fighting for better conditions with a common cause, but Trump has managed to turn working-class brother against brother — while billionaires receive tax cuts.
In Oshawa, the leader of the local outpost of the United Auto Workers laments the 'absolutely bizarre' tariffs imposed on the industry and notes Jivani's connection to Vance. But what most distresses the auto workers is the sense of helplessness. They have no way to catch the ear of the American government, to plead their case: Canadian auto workers are highly paid, with excellent benefits, not the low-wage workers that the car companies have migrated to as they abandoned the rust belt on both sides of the border; Canadian workers are not destroying American auto jobs, as Trump continually asserts, but part of a highly functional, integrated system — like the two nations. If only the union in Oshawa had a way of getting word of their plight to the powers that be in Washington, I'm told.
But there is someone who could make that call — their local Conservative candidate Jamil Jivani could easily pick up the telephone and call his best friend, the vice president, on their behalf, if he wanted to. But he hasn't, it would seem. Perhaps Jivani asking Vance to intervene would be pointless; perhaps he's afraid of riling up his best friend; perhaps advocating for the auto workers in Oshawa doesn't serve his personal political ambition; perhaps Oshawa is just a stepping stone for a politician with his eyes on bigger prizes as a Christian nationalist; perhaps the good people of Oshawa are on their own. Vance may well consider himself above the concerns of a few sad-sack Canadians.
The only thing that can be said with certainty is this: J.D. Vance's best friend has no comment.
'I hear he's a slippery bastard,' one worker emerging from the afternoon shift at the General Motors plant tells me when I ask what he knows about Jamil Jivani.
FRIENDSHIPS AND FAMILIES by the millions criss-cross the border, Canadian and American relationships built up over centuries of coexistence and co-prosperity and adversity. For most every American I know, Trump's incessant attacks on Canada are a kind of joke — he can't be serious, of course, they say: No one actually thinks that the United States should annex Canada. Except Trump, as the friendless president repeats over and over again. But the funny thing about dismissing a serious threat is that when no one else is laughing, it slowly becomes clear that the joke isn't really funny. It follows that laughing at your own jokes, over time, turns you into the joke.
The friendship between Jivani and Vance appears to be sincere, as does the Canadian's connection with Usha Vance, as Jivani offered a Bible reading at their wedding. When Jivani fell ill with cancer, he went to live with the Vances in Ohio, and when he was well enough to work again, his pal J.D. hired him to run his failed nonprofit that was supposed to save Appalachia. Vance also introduced Jivani to his book agent, securing a deal for his acolyte's truly unreadable and unread memoir.
When Jivani was nominated to run for parliament, the Conservative party appeared giddy at the prospect of having a member so closely connected with an American power player. But all that was long before Trump declared unilateral economic war on Canada — precisely the kind of unprovoked unilateral conflict he'd promised to avoid during the campaign, this one straining the credulity of even the most maniacal MAGA zealot.
Like J.D. and Usha Vance, Jivani is the product of a small law school circle revolving around Yale law professor Amy Chua, author of Battle Hymn of the Tiger Mother — a book that advocates authoritarian parenting in pursuit of ruthless ambition. Yale's charmed trio from the benighted class of 2013 — all ravenously hungry for power, no matter what prior beliefs they might have held, like their supremely arrogant classmate Vivek Ramaswamy — appear unburdened by personal connections or loyalty to anything other than their own aspirations. Friendship with their transgender Yale law classmate Sofia Nelson, for example, was abandoned as inconvenient by Vance.
In this way, Jivani's silence about his best friend makes sense. But now that friendship is reaching the true pressure point — for Jivani and for Vance, as it is for Canada and America. History is littered with former friendships undone by the lust for power — most particularly in Europe during the gangster 1930s, as preposterous as the analogy might sound — and so it might be for Jivani as he is forced to confront the reality that his best friend has sworn fealty to a president bent on the destruction of Canada.
FOR EXPAT DUAL NATIONALS like me, one of millions of Canadians living mostly invisibly in the United States, Trump's assault on Canada has presented a new and unwanted set of dilemmas. If America's policy is to actively harm my homeland, then what does that say about American society? There are many personal analogies for the U.S.-Canada relationship — a marriage, a friendship, differently sized siblings — but geography is destiny and there is no way to reconfigure that reality. If America First means America Only, then how is it possible to ignore the assault on my history and beliefs and basic sense of decency? Unless it is all Trump's passing fancy, as so many Americans seem to believe, like a narrative in a professional wrestling fantasy — in which case, who are the fools?
For many Canadians, Trump's mystifying admiration for Vladimir Putin takes on sinister dimensions when it is applied to Canada, as Canadian politicians confront the implications of the president's ongoing and seemingly very serious assault on the existence of the nation's sovereignty. The questions multiply: How to strike a deal with a man who breaks his word so easily? How much damage can be done in four years? What are Canadians to make of the appalling lack of allies advocating for Canada inside the American political system? Horror stories of a newly politicized border run rife in Canada, with rumors of the perils of crossing into the United States as tourists raising an unthinkable question: What if America is becoming a permanent menace?
Or, as we say in Canada, in reply to the admonition to not take Trump literally: seriously?
THE TERM OF ART in economics is this: Beggar thy neighbor. It is used to describe a predatory approach to global trade: impoverish your neighbor, the theory goes, and thus enrich yourself. The strategy was all the rage during the trade wars of the Great Depression, so that provides a sense of how it has worked historically — including the world war that followed. A variation of the zero-sum game usually ascribed to Trump, the difference is that beggaring thy neighbor requires an active and malicious campaign to harm your otherwise potentially cooperative next-door neighbor — risking the chance of retaliation, but also hazarding lasting disgust and estrangement.
For Trump, the amorality of this kind of ruthlessness is second nature. Beggaring thy neighbor is standard operating procedure in New York City real estate, with landlords getting rid of rent-control tenants or rival developers by way of relentless wars of attrition: Make your neighbor's life impossible. Don't collect the garbage. Create street noise, hire corrupt lawyers to send harassing letters, make the expense and stress seem not worth the fight — and so force surrender.
If this deliberately obnoxious thinking is applied geopolitically, Trump's belligerence adds up — and that is precisely what Liberal leader Carney describes as Trump's long-term aim with Canada, a fact that seems to be entirely ignored in the American press, even as it unfolds on a daily basis only a few miles to the north. Attacking Canada's car industry, deriding its high-quality lumber, and devaluing the entire idea of the country as a pointless charade has the cumulative effect of demeaning a nation and a society — supposedly leading to weakness and the fantasy of capitulation.
But in Canada, a nation is at stake, not a prized lot on Fifth Avenue or a casino in Atlantic City. In the last days of April, after a few weeks of blessed silence from Trump — with the Conservative party trying desperately to change the subject to a program of change — the president again casually taunted Canada only days before the vote. Once again, Trump spoke about the country becoming the 51st state — like an old mob boss shrugging and explaining the logic of extortion — assuring Time magazine that he isn't trolling Canada, a fact that Americans seem to find impossible to acknowledge, despite the obvious truth in front of their faces
The new increasingly contemptible threats issued by Trump are still covered in the press in Canada, now with more of a sense of exhaustion and resignation than fear, but underneath the eye rolls there is the unmistakable sinew of defiance. The shock is gone, replaced by disbelief that a president, now openly described in the Canadian media as a madman, would try to impose his will, despite the obvious lack of any democratic interest in Canada in being annexed. Then there is the inescapable lesson of history, one that apparently will have to be learned again, the hard way: Beggaring thy neighbor, only beggars thyself.
THE SIGNS OF economic vulnerability are evident in the older, mainly white sections of Oshawa and Bowmanville: the boarded-up storefronts, the mostly idle car plants, the political arguments of pale-faced talking heads on TV about the coming recession. But so are the signs of real vitality, in the acres of new townhouses, rising from apple orchards where I worked as a teenager, populated by people from the world over, the bored young Indian and Filipino kids, trailing behind their parents in the ethnic grocery stores, forming their own memories inside the new reality that is emerging in Canada. For those kids, the reactionary politics and the fears of the disappearing generations behind Trump's America are background noise, like the piped-in Bhangra Muzak.
'You can feel the transition everywhere,' a kid in Bowmanville's Jamaican Dam Foods store tells me, with evident relief.
As America retreats into the past — the 1950s, the 1890s, the age of the Founding Fathers, take your pick — what is emerging in Canada has the unmistakable look of the future: Demography will inevitably bring the multifaceted world to North America, like it or not, and the new nation that is emerging north of the border is developing the understanding and tolerance and appreciation of complexity that will be a foundation of the 21st century.
This week, two of America's closest allies are holding national elections centered largely on Trump's version of aggressive nationalist populism, with both Canada and Australia swinging wildly against far-right reactionaries after experiencing a few months of the president's dystopian chaos. Now, amazingly, decent, tolerant, unassuming but unafraid and unbending Canada — the friend the world never knew it had — stands on the frontline of a threat that confronts humankind. Globalism has become a pejorative term for many in America and around the world, a synonym for godless mind control or the specter of global governance or the horror of being overrun by of hordes of migrants, but in the exurbs east of Toronto, it is emerging in a society quietly but persistently redefining what it means to be a nation — a new identity that transcends nationality.
After Canada's election on Monday, J.D. Vance's best friend will almost certainly once again have no comment about Donald Trump and J.D. Vance's vision for the future — which might explain why Jivani's chances of victory have decreased rapidly. But Canada will. No matter who wins the election, the vote will have consequences that echo for generations to come. For Canada, there is no turning back. In Canada, Trump's America has never looked so small and sad — a truth that America's best friend sees with clear eyes.
More from Rolling Stone
Trump's Approval Rating Hits New Low, Capping Week of Dismal Polling
Judge Blocks Trump Administration From Its Attack on Union Rights
Justice Department Removes Protections for Journalists in Leak Investigations
Best of Rolling Stone
The Useful Idiots New Guide to the Most Stoned Moments of the 2020 Presidential Campaign
Anatomy of a Fake News Scandal
The Radical Crusade of Mike Pence

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Can Trump Tackle US ‘Chronic Disease Crisis'? Experts Weigh In
Can Trump Tackle US ‘Chronic Disease Crisis'? Experts Weigh In

Miami Herald

time5 minutes ago

  • Miami Herald

Can Trump Tackle US ‘Chronic Disease Crisis'? Experts Weigh In

Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s vow to "Make America Healthy Again" could fall short when it comes to chronic disease, experts have warned. When the MAHA Commission report on chronic disease came out in May, President Donald Trump made it clear his administration was committed to tackling the epidemic "We will not stop until we defeat the chronic disease epidemic in America, we're going to get it done for the first time ever," said Trump during a MAHA event at the White House on May . In a statement included in the press release accompanying the report, Kennedy Jr. said: "We will end the childhood chronic disease crisis by attacking its root causes head-on-not just managing its symptoms." Nearly 130 million Americans are estimated to have at least one form of chronic disease, which could be heart disease, cancer, diabetes, obesity or hypertension, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Experts told Newsweek that, while the Trump administration's ambition to "defeat" the "epidemic" is clear, whether its policies will help or hinder chronic-disease patients remains to be seen. On one hand, Kennedy Jr.'s recent MAHA report, which detailed what the administration believed to be the leading causes of chronic disease in children, indicated the aim was to reduce the prevalence of chronic conditions through public education and research. On the other hand, the proposed cuts to Medicaid funding and work requirements for eligibility to the benefits, which are set to come as part of the broader GOP budget bill, could leave many with chronic disease without access to vital care. As many as three in four adults enrolled in Medicaid report having one or more chronic conditions, and many are unable to work the hours needed to meet the new eligibility requirements, according to nonprofit health policy research and news organization, KFF. So, while some may be medically exempt, others will lose their health coverage, meaning their conditions could worsen without access to care. Newsweek has contacted the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) via email on Tuesday. Since he became health secretary, Kennedy Jr. has promised to increase research in the root causes of illness and ensure the American diet is full of high-quality foods, while limiting access to ultra-processed food and certain chemicals, which he believes are contributors to chronic disease. The report states that consumption of ultra-processed foods "has gone up at an exponential rate as share of the American diet." Earlier in the year, Kennedy, had described products from companies like Kellogg's and McDonald's as "mass poison to children." Prioritizing research on the issue is crucial, Kenneth E. Thorpe, a professor of health policy at Emory University, Georgia, and honorary chair of the Partnership to Fight Chronic Disease (PFCD), told Newsweek. "Renewed focus on chronic disease and the impact that the U.S. diet has on it-focusing on artificial or chemical ingredients in food, particularly the impact of ultra processed foods-is important," he said. He added that this was because of the fact diet has "a direct impact on the growing rates of chronic conditions like obesity and obesity-related comorbidities such diabetes, cardiovascular disease, cancers and many more." "I applaud the Trump administration's focus on addressing the number one cause of death and disability in the U.S.-chronic, non-communicable disease," said Thorpe, who has been an advocate of chronic disease prevention in the U.S. for over 30 years. "We have more people with more chronic diseases, with just 5 percent of the population accounting for 50 percent of the costs in health care." He added that it is estimated that from 2016 to 2030 the cost of chronic disease will be in excess of $42 trillion. "The time is now to focus on the prevention and better management of chronic disease," Thorpe added. While it's too early to tell if the Trump administration is heading down the right path to lower chronic disease prevalence, Dr. Adrian Hernandez, director of the Duke Clinical Research Institute at the Duke University School of Medicine, told Newsweek that "leading indicators appear to be going the wrong way." He said this was partly because of the changes being proposed to the National Institutes of Health (NIH). A proposal for the HHS, most of which was reported on in April, reduces by almost 40 percent its budget for 2026 and reveals major funding cuts for the NIH, according to CNN. Newsweek has contacted the NIH via email on Tuesday. Hernandez added that changes, such as the proposed cuts in federal funding, to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and other agencies within the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) were also going down the wrong path. Rather than cuts to these federal health agencies, Hernandez said tackling chronic disease will require "an investment" in science and health. He said that the same was needed for health care delivery models like Medicaid and Medicare-rather than making cuts to the programs, the administration should "invest in preventative health." The GOP budget bill, which is progressing through the legislative ranks, instructs the committee to reduce the Department of Health and Human Services budget by $880 billion over 10 years, which would include cuts to Medicaid alongside other measures such as implementing work requirements. Ross Brownson, director of the Prevention Research Center at Washington University in St. Louis, Missouri, told Newsweek that Medicaid cuts would "likely have a detrimental effect on chronic disease risk among the most vulnerable populations," adding Medicaid-enrolled adults have significantly higher rates of chronic disease than individuals privately insured. "The drive to defeat chronic disease stalls if Medicaid patients are placed in the backseat," Thorpe said. "Today, the federal program is far from perfect, but it is a lifeline for those who need it," Thorpe added, saying it was "often the only pathway to care" for many with chronic disease. Experts insist that chronic disease is a deeply complex issue that requires long-term solutions and attention. Brownson noted that there has been "sparse attention to physical inactivity and tobacco use," as major risk factors for chronic disease. "This is a two-edged sword," Brownson told Newsweek. He said that while "on one hand, labeling this issue a crisis implies a sense of urgency and may mobilize action." Ultimately "the jury is still out on whether they will solve the chronic disease crisis." "We often have a short attention span and with this crisis label, policy makers may think the problem can be solved quickly and then move on to a new issue. We need to think of this as a long-term challenge in need of attention," he added. Related Articles Foods That May Lower Risk of Early Death RevealedRFK Is Right-Food Additive Transparency Can Make America Healthy Again | OpinionManaging PoTS: Tips for Living with the Chronic Illness Affecting MillionsWhat to Eat When You're Living With Long COVID 2025 NEWSWEEK DIGITAL LLC.

Donald Trump's Scores Highest Approval Rating in Weeks
Donald Trump's Scores Highest Approval Rating in Weeks

Miami Herald

time5 minutes ago

  • Miami Herald

Donald Trump's Scores Highest Approval Rating in Weeks

President Donald Trump has scored his highest approval rating in two weeks. A new survey by Republican pollster Trafalgar Group, conducted May 30 to June 1, suggested 54 percent of voters approved, while 46 percent disapproved—a net approval rating of +8. Trump's approval rating has not been higher among any pollster since InsiderAdvantage's poll conducted May 17 to 19, when 55 percent of those surveyed approved and 44 percent disapproved—a net approval rating of +11. The new Trafalgar poll was conducted among 1,098 voters had a margin of error of 2.9 percentage points. This article will be updated. Related Articles Elon Musk Issues Social Security Warning Over Spending BillMortgage Rates Are Trapped in 'Groundhog Day'Kid Rock's New Restaurant Flooded With Negative Reviews: 'Trash Food'Can Trump Tackle US 'Chronic Disease Crisis'? Experts Weigh In 2025 NEWSWEEK DIGITAL LLC.

Iran Breaks Silence on U.S. Nuclear Offer
Iran Breaks Silence on U.S. Nuclear Offer

Miami Herald

time5 minutes ago

  • Miami Herald

Iran Breaks Silence on U.S. Nuclear Offer

Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi offered a critical initial response to a recent U.S. proposal to resolve the standoff over Iran's nuclear program, according to the country's semi-official Mehr News Agency. Newsweek has reached out to the U.S. State Department for comment. The remarks are the first time Tehran has commented on the content of the recent U.S. proposal, which has not made public and came after five rounds of nuclear talks over the past two months. Iran's stance falls short of President Donald Trump's recent announcement about the possibility of reaching a nuclear agreement in the near future. Trump has threatened possible military action if no deal can be reached. Araghchi said the U.S. proposal handed to Tehran by the Omani foreign minister "contains many ambiguities and questions. Many issues in this proposal are unclear," he was quoted as saying by Mehr News Agency, while on a visit to Lebanon. The two nations have been at odds over nuclear enrichment - which could be used to build nuclear weapons, but which Iran says is purely for peaceful purposes. The United States has opposed all enrichment and Iran has defended its right to it. According to an Axios report citing two sources with direct knowledge of the matter, the U.S. proposal may have a presented a more flexible approach than the U.S. zero nuclear enrichment policy-allowing it for a determined period of time but banning Iran from building new enrichment facilities. Trump has said Iran can never obtain a nuclear bomb. The proposal sent by Middle East Special Envoy Steve Witkoff was described as a "detailed and acceptable proposal to the Iranian regime," by White House spokesperson Karoline Leavitt, who added that "it's in their best interest to accept it." Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said: "Continuing enrichment on Iranian soil is our red line. This is a reality that all countries have accepted. Enrichment has now become a matter of national pride and honor for Iranians." U.S. State Department Spokesperson Tammy Bruce said in a Tuesday press briefing: "The fact is President Trump tweeted that there is going to be no uranium enrichment." Araghchi, who leads the Iranian negotiation team in nuclear meetings with the U.S., said Iran will officially respond to the deal proposal in coming days. It is unclear if talks will resume. Related Articles Iran Warns US Over Nuclear Talks as Doubts Grow on Trump DealVideo Shows Iranian Warplane Patrol Skies in Show of ForceIran Reviews US Nuclear Deal Offer Amid Rising TensionsIran's Dissident Kurds Seek US Help to Pave Way for Government's 'Collapse' 2025 NEWSWEEK DIGITAL LLC.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store