IRCTC case: Court reserves order on framing of charges against Lalu Prasad, Rabri Devi, Tejashwi
A Delhi court on Thursday (May 29, 2025) reserved its order on whether to frame charges against RJD president Lalu Prasad, his wife Rabri Devi, their son Tejashwi Yadav and others in a case linked to alleged irregularities in the Indian Railway Catering and Tourism Corporation (IRCTC).
Special judge Vishal Gogne reserved the order for July 23 after the arguments were concluded on the aspect of charge, while directing the accused persons to file a short synopsis of their arguments within one week.
"Limited submissions have been addressed by the counsel for the CBI in terms of the previous order. The arguments thus stand concluded on the aspect of charge. The accused persons who have not furnished written submissions are at liberty to file a short synopsis of their arguments comprising no more than six to eight pages within one week," judge Gogne said.
The judge said that since extensive arguments were advanced by the respective counsels for the 14 accused with reference to the voluminous record and the proceedings were stretched over several months even with day-to-day hearing in bulk dates, "the court shall require suitable time for pronouncing the order on charge".
Mr. Prasad, Ms. Devi and Mr. Yadav earlier refuted corruption and other charges levelled against them by the CBI in the case.
The charges include criminal conspiracy, cheating and corruption that carry a maximum jail term of seven years.
The three claimed before the court through their lawyer that the CBI lacked evidence to prosecute them in the case.
Mr. Prasad, who was railway minister during the UPA-I government, had earlier questioned the validity of sanctions obtained by the CBI to prosecute him in the case.
The agency told the court on February 28 that there was sufficient evidence to prosecute the accused persons in the case.
The case stems from alleged irregularities in the grant of operational contracts of two IRCTC hotels to a private firm.
According to the CBI chargesheet, a conspiracy was hatched between 2004 and 2014 in pursuance of which BNR hotels of the Indian Railways, located in Puri and Ranchi, were first transferred to the IRCTC. Later, they were leased to the Patna-based Sujata Hotels Private Limited for operations and maintenance.
The tender process, the agency alleged, was rigged and manipulated and the conditions were tweaked to help the private party — Sujata Hotels.
The chargesheet also names the then group general managers of IRCTC, V K Asthana and R K Goyal, and Vijay Kochhar and Vinay Kochhar, both directors of Sujata Hotels and owners of Chanakya Hotel.
Delight Marketing Company, now known as Lara Projects, and Sujata Hotels have also been named as accused in the chargesheet.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
42 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
NDPS court allows Rhea Chakraborty to travel abroad for work
MUMBAI: A special court under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act has permitted actor Rhea Chakraborty to travel abroad for professional commitments between June 1 and September 15. Chakraborty, who was booked in a drugs case linked to the death of actor Sushant Singh Rajput, has been granted leave to visit Sri Lanka, Serbia, and various European countries to shoot for a new project. In an order dated May 29, Special Judge CS Datir noted that Chakraborty had previously travelled abroad with the court's permission and had complied fully with all bail conditions. 'There is no occasion that she had infringed the bail conditions,' the court observed. Chakraborty was arrested by the Narcotics Control Bureau (NCB) on September 8, 2020, along with her brother and others, on allegations of financing and procuring drugs for Rajput's consumption. The case followed a complaint by Rajput's father, which led to a wider investigation into drug use within the film industry. The Bombay High Court granted Chakraborty bail in October 2020. In her recent application, Chakraborty stated that she was required to travel for the filming of Stepsons S1, an international production. She requested temporary release of her passport for visa processing, adding that she had travelled abroad earlier without incident. The prosecution opposed the plea, arguing that there was no documentation confirming her role in the series and raising concerns about the possibility of her absconding. However, the court rejected these concerns, stating that Chakraborty is a Mumbai resident with 'deep roots in society', and held that the likelihood of her fleeing is minimal. 'Considering her request and keeping in mind her past behaviour, I am inclined to allow her to travel abroad for the aforesaid period,' the court ruled. The actor has been directed to submit her travel itinerary, including addresses and contact details of her stay abroad. In March this year, the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) filed a closure report in the Sushant Singh Rajput death case, clearing Chakraborty of abetment charges. The CBI had taken over the probe from the Mumbai Police following Rajput's father's allegations.
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Will the US dollar continue to weaken amid economic uncertainties and rising treasury yields? Claudio Irigoyen answers
The US dollar is expected to remain somewhat soft, but not necessarily experience a sharp disorderly decline, said Claudio Irigoyen , head of global economics research at BofA Global Research . In a conversation with Himadri Buch, New York-based Irigoyen shared his views on the US dollar outlook , treasury yields , the fiscal bill and why India continues to stand out in the emerging markets pack. Edited excerpts: The US treasury yields have been rising while the US dollar is struggling to stay steady. Is there a crisis of confidence? Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Villa For Sale in Dubai Might Surprise You Villas in Dubai | Search ads Learn More Undo What we are witnessing is probably a recalibration of expectations in response to a confluence of fiscal and policy uncertainties. The uncertainty is certainly weighing on consumer and business sentiment, prompting a natural wait-and-watch approach among companies, particularly about investment decisions. However, this hesitation, when paired with the broader fiscal gap, is prompting markets to demand a higher risk premium on US assets. That is leading to a sharp rise in treasury yields. At the same time, global investors, who had been heavily overweight on US assets and underweight on European assets, have begun rebalancing their portfolios. This is contributing to the US dollar's relative weakness against the euro and other currencies. I expect the US dollar to remain somewhat soft, but not necessarily experience a sharp disorderly decline. However, this should not be misconstrued as a threat to the US dollar's reserve currency status. Do you see money moving out of the US on account of the dollar weakening? Which are the regions that could benefit? The global investor base had become significantly overweight on US assets, so some moderation was to be expected. Consumption in the US is slowing but not to a degree that signals recession. While the US outlook has softened, it remains more compelling than much of Europe, where structural challenges persist and growth remains tepid. Among emerging markets, there are bright spots. India stands out as a resilient story, benefiting from structural reforms, demographic momentum and robust domestic demand. A few others may attract flows on a relative basis, but we should be realistic — when global growth slows, as we now expect it to, very few markets are immune. In a world, where US and China, the twin engines of global demand, are slowing, capital may rotate selectively, but broad decoupling is unlikely. Live Events How are investors looking at India? Global investors continue to view India as one of the more compelling narratives in an otherwise challenging global environment. While growth expectations have moderated slightly, we still expect India's GDP to expand 6.3% in 2025. Inflation is also trending lower, creating space RBI to cut rates further. Compared to other emerging markets, India's story remains structurally solid. Your evaluation of the US tax bill? The fiscal bill is one of the key concerns for the US economy. While the bill may provide some immediate stimulus, it risks entrenching a structural fiscal imbalance at a particularly fragile juncture. Moreover, the risks are that higher rates on the back of a larger deficit abort any stimulative effect on the economy. Preliminary assessments suggest that the approved bill could validate a primary deficit of around 3.5% of GDP and a headline deficit of 6.9%, which will not be sustainable in the absence of robust revenue growth. The dynamics of fiscal policy are now more critical than ever
Hindustan Times
2 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Right to privacy not absolute: HC backsnight ban on gaming
The Madras high court on Tuesday upheld the constitutional validity of Tamil Nadu's online gaming regulations, which include Aadhaar-based verification, a midnight-to-5am gaming ban, and prohibition of minors from participating, dismissing petitions by gaming companies and ruling that the right to privacy is not absolute when weighed against public health concerns. A division bench of justices SM Subramaniam and K Rajasekar said the Tamil Nadu Online Gaming Authority (Real Money Games) Regulations, 2025, were reasonable restrictions aimed at curbing gaming addiction. The ruling reinforces state authority to regulate online gaming and could set a precedent for other states grappling with potential addiction and negative social consequences associated with real money games. The court held that the state was well within its legislative competence to enact the law in the interest of public health, public order, and regulation of trade and commerce. 'More often than not, the first right that is pleaded for in cases such as this is the right to privacy as upheld by the Supreme Court in Puttaswamy case (2017). But it must be essentially understood that the Puttaswamy case did not affirm the right to privacy as an absolute right,' the bench said. It added: 'The character of the right was transformed into a fundamental right thereby immediately bringing within its fold the reasonable restrictions that are available to all other fundamental rights. So the right to privacy carries with it, its own limitations and cannot be claimed in absolute. When put on a scale, a compelling public interest outweighs the right to privacy.' Gaming platforms including Play Games 24x7, Head Digital Works, and Junglee Games India had opposed the mandatory Aadhar verification raising concerns about privacy and questioning if the State's verification methods were compliant with adequate standards of privacy and security. They also contended online skill games were already governed under central law and that Tamil Nadu's regulations amounted to indirect prohibition of legitimate activity. Senior counsels Mukul Rohatgi and Sajjan Poovayya, representing the petitioners, contended that the state law conflicted with the Information Technology Act and intruded into the Centre's domain. The Union government through the Additional Solicitor General ARL Sundaresan, had argued that the central Information Technology Act, 2000 and the Information Technology (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Rules, 2021 already governed online gaming. It said that the central framework provides for a self sufficient regulation for the online real money games including the standards of due diligence, grievance redressal mechanisms, and age-appropriate access, etc, all of which were intended to provide a harmonised national framework for online real money games of skill. The court rejected these submissions, invoking the doctrine of pith and substance to conclude that the legislation's core objective was 'public health,' placing it within the state's domain. 'In true essence, the Online Real Money Games is a trade activity, which if left unregulated has immediate implications on the health of the public. So, the fundamental purpose of this piece of legislation is to protect public health and regulate trade within the State, which squarely falls within the legislative competence of the State,' the judgment stated. Citing expert committee findings, the court noted at least 47 suicides between 2019 and 2024 linked to online real money gaming addiction. The court observed that night hours saw higher addiction levels, with research showing increased dopamine levels and diminished self-control during that time, justifying the midnight-to-dawn ban. On Aadhaar-based verification, the bench noted such verification was a robust two-step authentication process aimed at confirming age and identity to prevent misuse. 'The scope for manipulation is comparatively lesser,' the court held. The bench said that while real money games like rummy and poker may involve skill, their digital format poses distinct risks, including anonymity, lack of physical cues, and higher potential for addiction. 'The players may not even know against whom the game is played. So it is imperative that the government take adequate steps to streamline and regulate these unexplored waters to ensure fair play and secure the physical and financial safety of the players,' the court noted. On concerns that the law was paternalistic, the court held that protecting public health and well-being is a constitutional responsibility. 'Laws and policies must be shaped with that goal at the core,' it said. The court concluded that the 2025 Regulations were a necessary response to a growing public health crisis and aligned with Article 39 of the Directive Principles of State Policy, which mandates the State to frame laws that protect people's welfare.
