Google partners with Chile to deploy a trans-Pacific submarine cable
SANTIAGO, Chile (AP) — Google signed an agreement with Chile on Wednesday to deploy an undersea fiber optic cable connecting South America with Asia and Oceania, a first-of-its-kind project that aims to cement the South American country's status as a major digital hub.
The Humboldt Cable, envisioned for deployment in 2027, is a 14,800-kilometer (9,200-mile) submarine data cable that will connect Chile's coastal city of Valparaíso with Sydney, Australia through French Polynesia.
The initiative is being launched almost a decade after it was first proposed in 2016, and six years after the initial studies to determine its feasibility.
'This is the first submarine cable in the South Pacific, so it's an important commitment", Chilean Transport Minister Juan Carlos Muñoz told journalists.
Chile, home to one of Google's largest data centers in Latin America, is currently connected to the United States and the rest of the region via an undersea cable. This cable also provides Chile with a longer route to other continents.
Officials from both Google and the Chilean government hailed the project as critical infrastructure with potential to attract millions of dollars in investment from major tech companies, mining and banking firms in Chile and Australia.
'The idea of building this cable is that it can also be used not only by Google but also by other users, such as technology companies operating in Chile,' said Cristian Ramos, director of telecommunications infrastructure for Latin America at Alphabet, Google's parent company.
Although Google did not disclose its total investment, Patricio Rey, general manager of local partner Desarrollo País, a state-owned infrastructure company, estimated the cable project's value at $300 million to $550 million, with Chile contributing $25 million.
The Humboldt Cable will establish Chile as a data gateway for the Asia-Pacific, while strengthening its relations with Asian nations, especially China, its largest trading partner. It also comes as demand for undersea cables surges due to increased reliance on cloud computing services.
The next stages involve installing the submarine cable, selecting and contracting a telecommunications operator, and constructing landing stations in Chile.
The initiative could heighten tensions as Chile finds itself caught in the middle of an intensifying rivalry between China and the Trump administration. Undersea cables have long been flash points in geopolitical disputes.
____
Follow AP's coverage of Latin America and the Caribbean at https://apnews.com/hub/latin-america
Nayara Batschke, The Associated Press
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
Why the Democratic NYC mayoral candidates have housing all wrong
The Democratic primary candidates for mayor all agree: the city faces a housing cost crisis. Brad Lander says it requires declaring a 'state of emergency.' Andrew Cuomo fears losing the 'soul of our city.' Scott Stringer insists 'the housing system is broken.' Unfortunately, the solutions which they — and especially Queens Assembly member Zohran Mamdani — offer will only make matters worse. They're ignoring the financial distress of private residential property owners, many operating at a loss, which could lead them simply to walk away from their buildings and bring New York back to the 1970s days of 'the Bronx is burning.' 6 Democratic mayoral candidates Andrew Cuomo and Zohran Mamdani (second from right) present arguments as Whitney Tilson and Michael Blake look on during a Democratic mayoral primary debate this past week. AP What's more, they overlook the damage and high costs of their preferred solution: still more subsidized, rent-regulated 'affordable housing.' By far the most potentially dangerous idea is the centerpiece of the Mamdani campaign: a freeze on all rent-stabilized rents. A rent freeze would be a quick way to drive those struggling small landlords out of business altogether. That's what the city's Rent Guidelines Board, which sets the rents for nearly a million rent-stabilized buildings, heard at its April 10 meeting. They were told by Mark Willis of the Furman Center on Real Estate at NYU that owners of rent-stabilized properties in The Bronx are, on average, losing a stunning $120 per month on every apartment, such that 200,000 units, concentrated in that borough, are under 'severe distress.' Their income has simply not kept up with rising costs — property taxes and utilities, whose prices are definitely not frozen. They've been hit hard, too, by the 2019 state Housing Stability and Tenant Protection Act, which limited any rent increases even for building improvements. Yet Mamdani asserts that 'our government works for the landlords.' 6 Brad Lander says NYC housing requires declaring a 'state of emergency.' AP 6 Mayor Eric Adams has recently acknowledged the tension between tenants' costs and building maintenance. Luiz Rampelotto/ZUMA / Ann Korchak, who heads the Small Property Owners of New York, disagrees. 'The costs of everything are rising. We're not in a vacuum. A freeze would crush us. You'd see foreclosures and abandonment.' A squeeze on operating income also decreases the value of a building, and makes banks unwilling to make loans for repairs. It's a vicious downward spiral — that's already left rent-stabilized buildings in bad shape. In its 2023 New York Housing and Vacancy Survey, the Census Bureau found that rent-regulated buildings had higher rates of rodents, leaks, mold, and heating breakdowns than market-rate units. These are the real housing emergencies. Eric Adams has at least acknowledged the tension between tenants' costs and building maintenance. He's defended a potential 1.75 to 4.75% rent increase approved by the RGB as 'protecting the quality of rent stabilized homes as costs continue to rise without overburdening tenants with unreasonable rent increases.' Instead, Democratic Socialist Mamdani proposes to 'unleash the public sector' and build 200,000 new units of public housing — despite the fact that NYCHA has struggled to maintain its existing 177 properties and faces a multi-billion-dollar repair backlog. Nationwide, public housing authorities, including NYCHA, are turning to the private sector to renovate and manage their buildings, not returning to Mamdani's Stalinist housing socialism. The debt financing he'd use would drain city funds from schools, parks, and police. Even less extreme Democrat proposals threaten to perpetuate housing problems. Cuomo, Lander, and Stringer all advocate building hundreds of thousands of costly new 'affordable' units, which, in exchange for property tax abatements, will be rent-stabilized. 6 Mamdani is proposing both a rent 'freeze' and the construction of hundreds of thousands of affordable housing units. Paul Martinka As those units age, they'll face the same revenue problems as older buildings in The Bronx. And they'll distort the city's housing market in a way that locks out talented newcomers the city needs. The proposed units are also costly, at least $500,000 a piece. Per Census data, turnover in rent-regulated units is half that of market-rate units, one of the reasons the city's overall turnover is 46% lower than the national average. 6 New public housing might sound logical, but NYC can barely manage and maintain the 117 existing public housing buildings already in operation. OLGA GINZBURG FOR THE NEW YORK POST That helps explain why the city's vacancy rate is so low and young adults must double and triple up in small apartments while Boomers age in place with empty bedrooms. Then there's 'inclusionary zoning' — a centerpiece of Council Speaker Adrienne Adams' housing policy. It actually drives up rents. Requiring that 20% of units be 'affordable' means that rents must be higher for the market-rate units for construction to make financial sense. 6 Supporters were seen holding signs in Bedford Stuyvesant during Zohran Mamdani's campaign rally. MediaPunch / BACKGRID Smart Democrats are backing what's been dubbed the 'abundance' agenda, which emphasizes the importance of building, not just redistribution. They should realize we need to encourage the construction of any and all housing. More supply will bring down the price of new housing and old, and help to meet demand. That would actually solve the housing crisis. Howard Husock is a senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute.
Android Authority
2 hours ago
- Android Authority
5 AI tools I rely on more than ChatGPT
Kaitlyn Cimino / Android Authority ChatGPT is usually the first tool that comes to everyone's mind when you start talking about AI. It sure is versatile and capable of doing a lot — often better than others in many ways. Its memory feature helps it learn about you and fine-tune responses, making it more personalized than many other (even paid) alternatives. It's also the one to open the floodgates for a wave of AI tools designed for very specific tasks — the kind that even ChatGPT can't handle well. And that's exactly where the broader world of AI tools comes in. I've tried quite a few of these AI tools, and here are the ones that have truly embedded themselves into my daily workflow. I can't imagine getting through the day without them anymore. What's your go-to AI tool (besides ChatGPT)? 0 votes Gemini NaN % Perplexity NaN % Claude NaN % Something else (comment below!) NaN % Gemini Ryan Haines / Android Authority Gemini is similar to ChatGPT in many ways — and no, I don't use it to unload my life problems. But I do end up using it quite a lot, and the simple reason is its presence. Since I rely on Google products both personally and professionally, Gemini is always just there — sometimes in the sidebar, sometimes just a wake word away. On my Workspace for Business account, I often use it to check grammar, tighten language, or tweak the tone of emails. But I've also had it read contracts in Docs and point out anything working against me or take notes during Meet calls and summarize the meeting within minutes of it ending. It even handles different accents in a single meeting quite well. Perplexity Calvin Wankhede / Android Authority If I've developed muscle memory for using ChatGPT, Perplexity has quietly replaced Google Search for most of my web lookups — especially on desktop. I use it heavily for research. Instead of browsing ten websites, scrubbing YouTube videos, or combing through forums for one specific detail — like what the most popular desktop OS in Europe was in the early 2010s — I just ask Perplexity. And much like appending 'Reddit' to a search to get real user opinions instead of content written for SEO, Perplexity does that for you. It gives you a concise gist, which is handy when I'm looking for general sentiment, say, around viral news. While it saves me the search legwork, I still verify what it gives me just to make sure I'm delivering accurate information with the necessary human oversight. NotebookLM Andy Walker / Android Authority For the longest time, I avoided NotebookLM. It felt like a niche product good for only a few tasks — but that's exactly where its strength lies. And honestly, what a tool Google has made! You can create multiple notebooks and upload source documents, even on the free plan. It analyzes long documents and can surface different perspectives, themes, and patterns — like a real brainstorming partner. That's not what I personally use it for, though. NotebookLM is a true example of AI's potential — I just hope it doesn't land in the Google graveyard anytime soon. What I love is its ability to switch tone easily between 'Guide' and 'Analyst' modes, especially when I need a more conversational or direct approach. But my favorite feature is its podcast-style audio summaries. Those have helped me digest jargon-heavy, never-ending documents while driving or cooking — and suddenly, it doesn't feel like work! NotebookLM is a true example of AI's potential — I just hope it doesn't land in the Google graveyard anytime soon. Notion AI Dhruv Bhutani / Android Authority Some AI tools become part of your routine without you even realizing it — and Notion AI is one of those for me. I initially dismissed it as something Notion was forcing on its users, but I've ended up using it more than I expected. I use Notion for almost all my long-form personal writing — blog posts, short stories, you name it. One thing that's always frustrated me is the lack of autocorrect. When I'm in vomit-draft mode, I don't care about typos or grammar and cleaning them up later was always a pain. With Notion AI, I can fix all that with just a couple of clicks. I can also throw in unformatted lists (groceries, travel packing, etc.) and just ask AI to clean them up. I even use it to brainstorm multiple angles for blog ideas, helping me avoid getting stuck on one track. It's like the second set of eyes I have always wanted for my blogs. The free plan gives me limited prompts, but since I only use Notion once or twice a day, I get by just fine. Ideogram An image generation tool has been eerily missing from this list — that's because I saved the best for the last! Ideogram has been my preferred tool for that because of one big reason. It is one of the only free tools that lets you customize and control a lot of aspects of your generated images, including their size and ratio. Most AI tools generate square images that are terrible for online use as feature images or on social media. Ideogram gets you a few free credits per week and creates some fantastic AI images using its latest-generation model with whatever customization you want. And it also has something called magic prompt that uses AI to create an elaborate prompt on your behalf. We all tend to underexplain AI the exact scene we want, but Ideogram covers you for that. Specialized AI tools are far more useful companions than a chatbot that behaves like an over-eager intern who always needs direction. AI beyond ChatGPT We've had AI around us for years — from Gboard's smart suggestions to Google Assistant — but it wasn't until ChatGPT became a buzzword that we really started noticing generative AI in our everyday lives. It's honestly hard to believe it's just been a couple of years since its arrival. A lot of AI tools have emerged in such a short span, and many of them have surely become an indispensable part of my life. But most importantly, I get to use them to be more productive without fearing about AI dimming my creative spark. They are far more useful companions than a chatbot that behaves like an over-eager intern who always needs direction.
2 hours ago
Trump's tariffs could pay for his tax cuts -- but it likely wouldn't be much of a bargain
WASHINGTON -- WASHINGTON (AP) — The tax cuts in President Donald Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill Act would likely gouge a hole in the federal budget. The president has a patch handy, though: his sweeping import taxes — tariffs. The Congressional Budget Office, the government's nonpartisan arbiter of tax and spending matters, says the One Big Beautiful Bill, passed by the House last month and now under consideration in the Senate, would increase federal budget deficits by $2.4 trillion over the next decade. That is because its tax cuts would drain the government's coffers faster than its spending cuts would save money. By bringing in revenue for the Treasury, on the other hand, the tariffs that Trump announced through May 13 — including his so-called reciprocal levies of up to 50% on countries with which the United States has a trade deficit — would offset the budget impact of the tax-cut bill and reduce deficits over the next decade by $2.5 trillion. So it's basically a wash. That's the budget math anyway. The real answer is more complicated. Actually using tariffs to finance a big chunk of the federal government would be a painful and perilous undertaking, budget wonks say. 'It's a very dangerous way to try to raise revenue,' said Kent Smetters of the University of Pennsylvania's Penn Wharton Budget Model, who served in President George W. Bush's Treasury Department. Trump has long advocated tariffs as an economic elixir. He says they can protect American industries, bring factories back to the United States, give him leverage to win concessions over foreign governments — and raise a lot of money. He's even suggested that they could replace the federal income tax, which now brings in about half of federal revenue. 'It's possible we'll do a complete tax cut,'' he told reporters in April. 'I think the tariffs will be enough to cut all of the income tax.'' Economists and budget analysts do not share the president's enthusiasm for using tariffs to finance the government or to replace other taxes. 'It's a really bad trade,'' said Erica York, the Tax Foundation's vice president of federal tax policy. 'It's perhaps the dumbest tax reform you could design.'' For one thing, Trump's tariffs are an unstable source of revenue. He bypassed Congress and imposed his biggest import tax hikes through executive orders. That means a future president could simply reverse them. 'Or political whims in Congress could change, and they could decide, 'Hey, we're going revoke this authority because we don't think it's a good thing that the president can just unilaterally impose a $2 trillion tax hike,' '' York said. Or the courts could kill his tariffs before Congress or future presidents do. A federal court in New York has already struck down the centerpiece of his tariff program — the reciprocal and other levies he announced on what he called 'Liberation Day'' April 2 — saying he'd overstepped his authority. An appeals court has allowed the government to keep collecting the levies while the legal challenge winds its way through the court system. Economists also say that tariffs damage the economy. They are a tax on foreign products, paid by importers in the United States and usually passed along to their customers via higher prices. They raise costs for U.S. manufacturers that rely on imported raw materials, components and equipment, making them less competitive than foreign rivals that don't have to pay Trump's tariffs. Tariffs also invite retaliatory taxes on U.S. exports by foreign countries. Indeed, the European Union this week threatened 'countermeasures'' against Trump's unexpected move to raise his tariff on foreign steel and aluminum to 50%. 'You're not just getting the effect of a tax on the U.S. economy,' York said. 'You're also getting the effect of foreign taxes on U.S. exports.'' She said the tariffs will basically wipe out all economic benefits from the One Big Beautiful Bill's tax cuts. Smetters at the Penn Wharton Budget Model said that tariffs also isolate the United States and discourage foreigners from investing in its economy. Foreigners see U.S. Treasurys as a super-safe investment and now own about 30% of the federal government's debt. If they cut back, the federal government would have to pay higher interest rates on Treasury debt to attract a smaller number of potential investors domestically. Higher borrowing costs and reduced investment would wallop the economy, making tariffs the most economically destructive tax available, Smetters said — more than twice as costly in reduced economic growth and wages as what he sees as the next-most damaging: the tax on corporate earnings. Tariffs also hit the poor hardest. They end up being a tax on consumers, and the poor spend more of their income than wealthier people do. Even without the tariffs, the One Big Beautiful Bill slams the poorest because it makes deep cuts to federal food programs and to Medicaid, which provides health care to low-income Americans. After the bill's tax and spending cuts, an analysis by the Penn Wharton Budget Model found, the poorest fifth of American households earning less than $17,000 a year would see their incomes drop by $820 next year. The richest 0.1% earning more than $4.3 million a year would come out ahead by $390,070 in 2026. 'If you layer a regressive tax increase like tariffs on top of that, you make a lot of low- and middle-income households substantially worse off,'' said the Tax Foundation's York. Overall, she said, tariffs are 'a very unreliable source of revenue for the legal reasons, the political reasons as well as the economic reasons. They're a very, very inefficient way to raise revenue. If you raise a dollar of a revenue with tariffs, that's going to cause a lot more economic harm than raising revenue any other way.''
