
Trump Appointee Wanted to Lock Up CIA Leaker for a Decade. The Judge Ignored Him.
A federal judge in Virginia sentenced the former CIA employee who leaked Israeli military secrets to three years and one month in prison on Wednesday, rejecting the government's request for a much harsher term.
U.S. District Judge Patricia Tolliver Giles said she had to balance the potential harm caused by Asif William Rahman's disclosure of secret analyses of Israel's plans for an attack on Iran against his swift decision to cooperate and plead guilty to two Espionage Act violations. 'For you to go from that to this — reckless, dangerous — I understand that something must have been going on.'
While the high school valedictorian and Yale University graduate sat in a green jail jumpsuit at the defense table, Giles gave credit to the defense's argument that Rahman acted both in response to soaring tensions in the Middle East and out of trauma caused in part by a deployment to Iraq.
'For someone who has lived such a law-abiding life for all these years,' she said, 'for you to go from that to this — reckless, dangerous — I understand that something must have been going on.'
In addition to his prison term, she gave Rahman two years' probation and a $50,000 fine. Rahman's sentence was significantly lower than the 9 years the government requested in a briefing last month — a sentence prosecutors said was warranted by the harm he 'could have' caused and ill will demonstrated by a list of relatively routine phone apps.
Defense lawyers responded that the request violated the spirit if not the letter of Rahman's plea agreement and that bumping the prison term so far beyond sentencing guidelines despite his cooperation was 'unprecedented.'
In the end, the defense prevailed, and Giles's sentence ended up below the statutory guideline.
The sentencing capped a relatively short and secretive legal process that began with Rahman's arrest last November in Cambodia, where he was posted with the CIA. A month earlier, the government analyses of Israel's preparations for a strike on Iran were made public on social media. Prosecutors have said that those disclosures may have briefly delayed the Israeli strike that took place later that month.
Much remains publicly unknown about Rahman's disclosures, including how many other documents he leaked and who he leaked them to. Prosecutors said the disclosures spanned multiple months.
Giles hinted, however, that the other documents Rahman leaked contained highly sensitive information.
'What is on the public record is small to me,' she said. Still-classified records that are unknown to the public, she said, 'shows how serious this conduct is, how dangerous it is, how reckless.'
In a reflection of the top-secret nature of the documents Rahman disclosed last year, the courtroom remained sealed to the public for much of the four-hour sentencing hearing.
A federal prosecutor said Wednesday that it had backed off the high end of that recommendation, without publicly disclosing the government's new request.
In court, Assistant U.S. Attorney Troy Edwards acknowledged that prosecutors had not charged Rahman with a separate offense that would have required them to show actual harm.
While acknowledging that the judge had a 'complicated' decision to make, he said she should hand down a sentence that would deter future leakers.
'When you take an oath to serve this country it means something,' Edwards said, 'and it has to mean something.'
Giles said she had completely discarded the inflammatory allegation in a declaration from a high-level political appointee at the CIA, Michael Ellis, that Rahman had caused 'exceptionally grave' damage to national security.
Defense lawyers had cried foul over that declaration, which they said was not backed up by any evidence, and over a directive — which they said came from top Justice Department officials — to seek a sentence close to the 10-year maximum despite Rahman's extensive cooperation.
They asked the judge to hand Rahman a 13-month sentence, but they and a large group of family members and supporters appeared to be satisfied with a prison term below the statutory guideline of roughly 5 to 6 years. Several family members exchanged hugs with Rahman's defense lawyers after the hearing.
Lawyer Amy Jeffress told the Intercept she did not expect to appeal the sentence.
In public court filings, the defense gave only vague explanations of the political motivations for the leaks, saying that Rahman acted out of a 'misguided' belief that he could advance the cause of peace.
The former analyst himself addressed the judge in a brief courtroom statement where he apologized to his former colleagues at the CIA and said he constantly frets that his disclosures could have endangered servicemembers in the Middle East.
'There is no excuse for my actions. I constantly reflect on the trust that I violated,' he said. 'It was an honor and a privilege to work at the CIA.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Israel says Hamas 'weaponising suffering in Gaza' as aid workers killed
Israel charged on Thursday that Hamas was "weaponising suffering in Gaza" after a US and Israeli-backed charity accused the Palestinian militant group of killing eight of its aid workers in the territory. The distribution of food and basic supplies in the blockaded and war-ravaged Gaza has become increasingly fraught and perilous, exacerbating the territory's deep hunger crisis. The Gaza Humanitarian Foundation said a bus carrying its staff to a distribution site near the southern city of Khan Yunis was "brutally attacked by Hamas" around 10:00 pm (1900 GMT) on Wednesday. The GHF said: "As of now, we can confirm at least eight fatalities, multiple injuries, and we fear that some of our team members have been taken hostage." Israel's foreign ministry said "Hamas is weaponising suffering in Gaza -- denying food, targeting lifesavers and forsaking its own people". Asked to respond to the GHF accusation, the Hamas government media office in Gaza said GHF was a "filthy tool" of Israeli forces and was being used to "lure civilians into death traps". It did not comment on the GHF's accusation. Dozens of Palestinians have been killed while trying to reach GHF distribution points since they began operating in late May, according to Gaza's civil defence agency. The agency said another 21 people were killed while waiting for aid on Thursday, adding that they were among 29 people across the territory who were killed by Israeli fire. Contacted by AFP about reports of a deadly incident near an aid distribution point close to the Netzarim corridor in central Gaza, the Israeli military said it had "conducted warning shots hundreds of metres from the aid distribution site, prior to its opening hours." Israeli restrictions on media in Gaza and the difficulties of access on the ground mean AFP is unable to independently verify the casualty tolls provided by the civil defence agency or the deaths reported by the GHF. - 'Died while waiting' - An officially private effort with opaque funding, the GHF began operating on May 26 after Israel cut off supplies into Gaza for more than two months, sparking international condemnation and warnings of imminent famine. During its first week of operations, the GHF said it distributed more than seven million meals' worth of food, but its operations were widely criticised even before the deadly shootings near its sites. The United Nations and major aid groups have refused to work with the GHF, citing concerns over its practices and neutrality. Gaza medics have said hospitals are being inundated with people wounded while trying to obtain food. At Gaza City's Al-Shifa Hospital on Wednesday, the emergency department said it had received dozens of people who had been killed or wounded while waiting for aid in recent days, including 200 in a single day. "Many Gazans went to the Nabulsi and Netzarim areas to receive aid and were shot at and shelled with tanks," said Mutaz Harara, head of Al-Shifa's emergency department. But with few medical supplies and no operating theatres, "many patients died while waiting for their turn", he said. The war has caused major damage to infrastructure across Gaza, including water mains, telecommunication cables, power lines and roads. The Palestinian Authority said internet and fixed-line communication services were down in Gaza on Thursday following an attack on the territory's last fibre optic cable which it blamed on Israel. - Aid workers deported - Meanwhile, Israel's foreign ministry said six people detained aboard a boat attempting to breach Israel's Gaza blockade were put on a plane for deportation on Thursday afternoon. They included European parliamentarian Rima Hassan, it said. "Bye-bye -- and don't forget to take a selfie before you leave," the ministry wrote on X. The UN General Assembly on Thursday adopted 149-12 with 19 abstentions a non-binding resolution calling for an immediate ceasefire in Gaza and urging "all necessary measures" to pressure Israel into ending the conflict. The US vetoed a similar push at the Security Council last week. Egyptian authorities meanwhile detained more than 200 pro-Palestinian activists in Cairo ahead of a planned march to the Gaza border, the organisers said. Egypt said while it backs efforts to put "pressure on Israel" to lift its Gaza blockade, any foreign delegations seeking to visit the border area must obtain prior approval. The Gaza war was sparked by Hamas's October 7, 2023, attack on Israel. Israel said late on Wednesday that its forces had retrieved the bodies of two hostages from southern Gaza. Prior to the latest announcement, out of 251 taken hostage during the Hamas attack, 54 were still held in Gaza, including 32 the Israeli military has said are dead. Hamas's assault resulted in the deaths of 1,219 people on the Israeli side, mostly civilians, according to an AFP tally of official figures. The health ministry in Hamas-run Gaza says Israel's retaliatory offensive has killed at least 55,207 people, the majority of them civilians. The United Nations considers the figures reliable. bur-acc-jd-lba/dv/gv


UPI
40 minutes ago
- UPI
Ex-CIA analyst gets three years in prison for sharing top secret information
Asif William Rahman, 34, of Vienna, had been a CIA employee since 2016 with a Top Secret security clearance and had access to sensitive information, officials said. File Pool Photo by Dennis Brack/UPI | License Photo June 12 (UPI) -- A former CIA analyst has been sentenced to more than three years in prison for obtaining and sending top secret Defense Department information to unauthorized recipients who then posted it on social media, the Justice Department announced Thursday. Asif William Rahman, 34, of Vienna, had been a CIA employee since 2016 with a top secret security clearance and had access to sensitive information until his termination, a release from the Justice Department said. "For months, this defendant betrayed the American people and the oaths he took upon entering his office by leaking some of our nation's most closely held secrets," John Eisenberg, assistant attorney general for national security, said. "As this case demonstrates, the Department of Justice will continue to protect our nation by vigorously investigating and prosecuting leakers who compromise our nation's security." Court documents show that Rahman accessed and printed two top secret documents about a foreign ally and its plans against a foreign adversary. "Rahman removed the documents, photographed them, and transmitted them to individuals he knew were not entitled to receive them," the Justice Department release said. "By Oct. 18, 2024, the documents appeared publicly on multiple social media platforms, complete with the classification markings." Court records show Rahman continued to access and share top secret information with unauthorized recipients until early November 2024. He then began a "deletion campaign" of work saved on his top secret workstation. Rahman was indicted by a grand jury on Nov. 7, 2024, and was arrested by FBI agents while arriving at work five days later. He pleaded guilty to two counts of willful retention and transmission of classified information related to national defense. He has remained in custody since his arrest.


CNBC
an hour ago
- CNBC
An Israeli attack on Iran could send oil prices above $100 as tensions mount
Beset by near-universal bearish outlooks just a month ago, oil prices could spike to more than $100 a barrel in the event of an Israeli attack on Iran, some analysts are warning. Crude prices spiked as much as 5% overnight — before paring gains — on fears of military escalation between Iran and Israel as President Donald Trump announced the withdrawal of some U.S. personnel from embassies and bases across the Middle East. The front-month August contract for global benchmark Brent crude was trading at $69 per barrel at 3:20 p.m. ET on Thursday, while the front-month July U.S. WTI contract was at $67.7 per barrel. "They [U.S. military personnel] are being moved out because it could be a dangerous place and we will see what happens... We have given notice to move out," Trump told reporters on Wednesday. The Pentagon has ordered the withdrawal of troops and non-essential staff from embassies in Baghdad, Kuwait and Bahrain. The jury is still out as to whether the moves are a pressure play ahead of upcoming U.S.-Iran nuclear talks, or whether the U.S., Israel and Iran are truly on the verge of conflict. The geopolitical risk premium is "already at least partially reflected in current oil prices," according to J.P. Morgan's global commodities research team, citing Brent crude trading at just under $70 a barrel, already above its model-derived fair value figure of $66 for June. "This suggests an elevated 7% probability of a worst-case scenario, where the price reaction is exponential rather than linear, with the impact on supply potentially extending beyond a 2.1 mbd (million barrels per day) reduction in Iranian oil exports," the bank's research team wrote in a note published Thursday. Iran is OPEC's third-largest crude producer. Israel appears ready to attack Iran, according to reports citing U.S. and European officials, and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has been pressing Trump to allow strikes. But the American president said in late May that he had warned Netanyahu against attacking Iran while negotiations with Washington were under way. U.S. Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff is currently set to meet with Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi in Oman on Sunday for a sixth round of negotiations. Strait of Hormuz in focus Oil traders are focusing on the potential of a wider conflict shutting down the Strait of Hormuz, a critical chokepoint through which 20% of the volume of the world's total oil consumption passes daily. The British Navy on Wednesday issued a rare warning to ships in the region, saying it had "been made aware of increased tensions within the region which could lead to an escalation of military activity having a direct impact on mariners." It urged caution for vessels transiting "the Arabian Gulf, Gulf of Oman and Straits of Hormuz." Beyond that, J.P. Morgan warned, "a more general Middle East conflagration could ignite retaliatory responses from major oil producing countries in the region responsible for a third of global oil output." "Under this severe outcome," the bank's analysts wrote, "we estimate oil prices could surge to the $120-130/bbl range." Even before the latest uptick in tensions, some oil industry watchers were already making bullish calls despite a flood of announced OPEC+ supply coming onto the market, and lower global growth and demand forecasts due to trade and tariff tensions. Josh Young, founder and chief investment officer at Houston-based Bison Interests, told CNBC in late May that physical markets are more tightly supplied than previously thought, and with several oil rigs in the U.S. shale patch coming offline just as the U.S. summer driving season begins, markets should be preparing for Brent crude at $85 a barrel. "The pure inventory versus consumption would indicate $85 [per barrel], which is way higher than where we are right now. It's almost uncomfortable to say that, but that's the current price implied by inventories," Young told CNBC's Access Middle East. He cited his forecast figure as "fair value," arguing that "typically, you go from too cheap to too expensive. So I don't think we should be ruling out $100 oil this year. And I think if there is a geopolitical risk, it could get even higher." Without the geopolitical risk premium — namely, a conflict with Iran — Young still sees crude coming up to the $80 to $85 per barrel range, particularly in the event of trade deals being reached and Trump's tariffs being lowered. The outlook is boosted by this month's forecast from the U.S. Energy Information Administration, which sees a decline in U.S. oil production for the first time since the Covid-19 pandemic due to slower drilling activity and a declining rig count. Such bullish forecasts are certainly not the norm, however. Without a military attack on Iran, J.P. Morgan's base case for oil "remains in the low-to-mid $60s oil for the remainder of 2025, and $60 in 2026." Goldman Sachs also maintains an oil price forecast in the $50 to $60 per barrel range for this and next year, despite noting an improving demand picture, downside risks to U.S. supply and geopolitical tensions. The recent rise in inventories due to OPEC+ output increases, "supports our cautious oil price forecast, with Brent expected to average $60 for the rest of 2025 and $56 in 2026," the bank's commodities team wrote. "However, small misses in OPEC+ supply suggest that lower-than-anticipated spare capacity represents an upside risk to our price forecast."