Pakistan to chair Taliban Sanctions Committee of UNSC
Pakistan will chair the Taliban Sanctions Committee of the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) in 2025 and serve as vice-chair of the Counter-Terrorism Committee of the 15-nation U.N. body.
According to a list of chairs of the subsidiary bodies of the UNSC, Denmark will chair the 1267 ISIL and Al-Qaida Sanctions Committee of the UNSC, while Russia and Sierra Leone will be vice-chairs for 2025.
Algeria will chair the 1373 Counter-Terrorism Committee, while France, Pakistan and Russia will be vice-chairs.
Pakistan will chair the 1988 Taliban Sanctions Committee that imposes an assets freeze, a travel ban and an arms embargo on individuals, groups, undertakings and entities associated with the Taliban in constituting a threat to the peace, stability and security of Afghanistan. Guyana and Russia will be vice-chairs of the Taliban Sanctions Committee.
Pakistan will also be co-chair of the Informal Working Groups on Documentation and Other Procedural Questions and on the General UNSC Sanctions Issues.
Pakistan is a non-permanent member of the 15-nation Security Council for the 2025-26 term. The sanctions committees of the Council comprise all 15 members of the Security Council and make its decisions by consensus.
India was chair of the UNSC Counter-terrorism Committee for 2022 during its 2021-22 tenure in the Council as a non-permanent member. India has consistently reminded the international community that Pakistan is host to the world's largest number of U.N.-proscribed terrorists and entities.
Al-Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden was hiding in Pakistan's Abbottabad for years and was killed in an operation by the U.S. Navy Seals in May 2011. China, France, Russia, the U.K. and the U.S. are the five permanent members of the UNSC while Algeria, Denmark, Greece, Guyana, Pakistan, Panama, South Korea, Sierra Leone, Slovenia and Somalia are currently in the Council as non-permanent members.
In elections held on Tuesday (June 3, 2025), five new non-permanent members of the UNSC were chosen by secret ballot for a 2-year term starting on January 1, 2026, until December 31, 2027. These are Bahrain, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Liberia, Latvia and Colombia.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
3 hours ago
- The Hindu
Focus is on enhancing diagnostic equipment in government hospitals, says Health Minister
The TDP-led NDA government in the State has evolved an action plan aimed at infusing a sense of discipline among doctors, bringing a change in their conduct towards patients and enhancing diagnostic equipment in government hospitals, according to Minister for Health, Medical Education and Family Welfare Satya Kumar Yadav. Addressing the media in Vijayawada on Saturday (June 7, 2025), the Minister took a jibe at the YSRCP, and said the NDA did not consider people who voted against them as 'back stabbers'. 'We try to fulfil the promises made to the people. We have worked with accountability and responsibility,' he said. Giving an account of the changes in the Primary Health sector, the Minister said, in recognition of the State's efforts in improving the implementation of the Centrally-sponsored schemes at the village level, the Centre sanctioned ₹100 crore for the State towards performance incentive. 'This is not a small thing. During the past five years, the Centre did not give any such incentive,' the Minister said, adding the present government secured funds, to the tune of ₹1,065 crore, from the Centre for construction of 3,318 buildings of Ayushman Aarogya Mandirs in the State. At present, many were being run in rented spaces. Pointing out that timely and reliable diagnostic confirmation of diseases was the first step in ensuring healthcare for all, he said the government procured more than 3,200 diagnostic equipment in the past one year and decided to conduct 47 types of diagnostic tests at the doorstep of the people through the '104' service vehicles. Referring to the Tirumala laddu episode, the Minister said the government was focussing on opening drug testing laboratories in Visakhapatnam, Vijayawada and Kurnool. New labs had been sanctioned for Tirumala, Eluru and Ongole. In line with Chief Minister N. Chandrababu Naidu's vision of digitising healthcare, the Minister said an MoU had been signed with the Bill Gates Foundation for setting up Digital Health Command and Care Centre, strengthening Telemedicine services, supply chain management for drugs and consumables. Giving numbers as 'stastical evidence' of the change brought in by the present government, he said the attendance of doctors and other medical staff had increased by about 7.42% to 14.20%, OP services increased by about 8%, In-Patient (IP) services saw an improvement of 4% to 17.61%, lab tests saw an increase of 7.20%. He added that various surveys had shown that the public perception regarding availability of doctors in Government General Hospitals, their attitude, supply of free medicines improved. Talking about further plans, the Minister said the universal health insurance of up to ₹25 lakh would be rolled out soon. During an interaction with the mediapersons, the Minister said the COVID situation was not alarming in the State and that there were no restrictions on gathering. 'We have N95 masks, oxygen cylinders, beds, wards ready. However, the situation is not alarming and there is nothing to worry,' he said, adding that only those with comorbidities need to be extra careful. Health Special Chief Secretary M.T. Krishna Babu and Commissioner G. Veerapandian were present.
Indian Express
4 hours ago
- Indian Express
As Pakistan fails to get into ‘expected' UNSC panels, India in talks with friends
India is working with its partners and friends on the UN Security Council to blunt Pakistan's moves, as Islamabad has been appointed to key counter-terror committees at the UNSC. Sources in New York told The Indian Express that Pakistan demanded to be the chair of the 1267 Sanctions Committee; 1540 (Non-Proliferation) Sanctions Committee; 1988 (Taliban) Committee and Chair of the 1373 Counter Terrorism Committee (CTC). Sources said the allocation of positions 'should have been undertaken by January 2025'. It is learnt that a 'lack of consensus and unreasonable demands' by Pakistan prevented a consensus being formed till June 2025. 'The Council members were not happy with this … attitude depicted by the Pakistan,' a source said. Pakistan had to be satisfied with 'only one full Chairship' — Chair of the 1988 (Taliban) Sanctions Committee [Russia and Guyana are the Vice-Chairs], sources said . The other positions are Vice-Chair of the 1373 CTC [along with France and Russia]; Sanctions Informal Working Group (IWG) [Co-Chair with Greece] and Documentation IWG [Co-chair with Denmark.] 'The… positions allocated to Pakistan is far below its… aspirations,' the source said. India also chaired the same 1988 (Taliban) Sanctions Committee during its UNSC 2021-22 term along with the Chair of the 1970 Libya Sanctions Committee. Sources said the position of Vice-Chair of 1373 CTC which Pakistan was allocated is 'not something very substantive'. 'It is… more ceremonial in nature. Pakistan… has not been able to get its way. India was the Chair of the 1373 CTC in 2022. India had earlier also, during its 2011-12 UNSC term, chaired the 1373 CTC.' For the first time in the history of the UNSC, an IWG will have two co-Chairs. This can be interpreted as a move by the Council to rein in Pakistan. Despite the Pakistani delegation's visit to the UN, the result is not something Pakistan will be happy with. This reflects Pakistan's standing and credibility in the UN, sources said. Sources said all the major terrorist attacks and networks have their origins in Pakistan. Some examples are: Sources said Pakistan's role as a state sponsor of terrorism is well known. 'Out of around 254 individuals and 89 entities designated in the 1267 Sanctions Committee (Al-Qaeda and ISIL), Pakistan has the unrivalled distinction of over 50 individuals and entities linked to it designated in the 1267 Sanctions Committee… it is Pakistan which is at unease… that more of its nationals and entities will be added to the Sanctions Committees/Regimes.' The source said India will be working 'closely with friends' in the Council. Shubhajit Roy, Diplomatic Editor at The Indian Express, has been a journalist for more than 25 years now. Roy joined The Indian Express in October 2003 and has been reporting on foreign affairs for more than 17 years now. Based in Delhi, he has also led the National government and political bureau at The Indian Express in Delhi — a team of reporters who cover the national government and politics for the newspaper. He has got the Ramnath Goenka Journalism award for Excellence in Journalism '2016. He got this award for his coverage of the Holey Bakery attack in Dhaka and its aftermath. He also got the IIMCAA Award for the Journalist of the Year, 2022, (Jury's special mention) for his coverage of the fall of Kabul in August 2021 — he was one of the few Indian journalists in Kabul and the only mainstream newspaper to have covered the Taliban's capture of power in mid-August, 2021. ... Read More
India Today
8 hours ago
- India Today
The Pakistan paradox: How the world's "terror exporter" became a counter-terrorism authority
The international community's approach to Pakistan presents one of the most glaring contradictions in modern geopolitics. While evidence continues to mount of Pakistan's systematic support for terrorism, the same nation has been entrusted with leading global counter-terrorism efforts at the United Nations. This paradox exposes not just Pakistan's duplicity, but the world's willingness to overlook state-sponsored terrorism when geopolitical convenience demands The architect of terror takes the Chair In a development that would be laughable if it weren't so dangerous, Pakistan—a country repeatedly labeled as the "global exporter of terror"—has been appointed to chair the United Nations Security Council's Taliban Sanctions Committee in 2025. Simultaneously, it will serve as vice-chair of the Council's Counter-Terrorism Committee. This appointment represents perhaps the most striking example of institutional hypocrisy in international relations, akin to appointing an arsonist as fire irony becomes even more pronounced when considering Pakistan's track record. This is the same nation where Osama bin Laden was found hiding near a military academy in Abbottabad, where he was eliminated by US forces in 2011. The discovery of the world's most wanted terrorist living comfortably in Pakistan, within walking distance of the country's premier military institution, should have been a wake-up call for the international community. Instead, it was treated as an unfortunate coincidence rather than evidence of systemic pattern of denial and deceptionPakistan's strategy in dealing with terrorism accusations follows a predictable script that has remained unchanged for decades. When confronted with evidence of harbouring terrorists, Pakistani officials invariably resort to one of three responses: outright denial, claims of mistaken identity, or calls for "neutral investigations." This pattern was on full display during former Foreign Minister Bilawal Bhutto's recent appearance at the United Nations, where he defended Hafiz Abdur Rauf, a designated Lashkar-e-Taiba photographic evidence showing Rauf leading funeral prayers for killed terrorists, and despite documentation from Pakistan's own military media wing (ISPR) that confirmed his identity matched US Treasury Department terrorist designations, Bhutto maintained that Rauf was merely a "local cleric" who happened to share a name with a sanctioned terrorist. This level of gaslighting would be impressive if it weren't so transparently evidence against Rauf is overwhelming. His computerised national identity card, shared by Pakistan's own ISPR, shows a date of birth and identification number that exactly match those on the US Treasury Department's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) list of designated global terrorists. The CNIC also confirms his affiliation with the Pakistan Markazi Muslim League (PMML), designated by the US as a front for Lashkar-e-Taiba. Yet Pakistan's representatives continue to maintain the fiction that this is all a case of mistaken decades of state-sponsored terrorPakistan's use of terrorism as a tool of foreign policy is not a recent development but a consistent strategy dating back to the country's independence in 1947. From the very beginning, Pakistan has employed proxy forces to achieve its geopolitical objectives, particularly regarding Kashmir. The tribal militia invasion of Jammu and Kashmir in 1947, Operation Gibraltar in 1965, and the Kargil infiltration in 1999 all followed the same playbook: use non-state actors to provide plausible deniability while pursuing state objectives through strategy has evolved and intensified over the decades. Pakistan has created, trained, and armed multiple terror groups including Lashkar-e-Taiba, Jaish-e-Mohammad, and others that have carried out devastating attacks not just in India but across the globe. The 2008 Mumbai attacks, which killed 166 people, stand as perhaps the most brazen example of Pakistan's proxy warfare. Despite overwhelming evidence of Pakistani involvement, including captured terrorist Ajmal Kasab's confession and intercepted communications, Pakistan has steadfastly refused to prosecute the masterminds who continue to operate freely on its pattern is consistent across multiple attacks: the 1993 Mumbai blasts whose mastermind Dawood Ibrahim is still sheltered in Pakistan, the 2001 Indian Parliament attack, the 2016 Pathankot airbase attack, and the 2019 Pulwama bombing that killed 40 Indian paramilitary personnel. In each case, Pakistan follows the same script—deny involvement, obstruct investigations, ignore legal requests for information, and eventually claim to be a victim of terrorism economic dimension of complicityPakistan's recent diplomatic breakthrough with Afghanistan, mediated by China, reveals another layer of the international community's complicity in Pakistan's terror enterprise. The agreement to reinstate diplomatic ties and invite Afghanistan to join the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) demonstrates how economic interests can override security concerns and moral role as mediator is particularly telling. Despite being well aware of Pakistan's terror connections—Chinese nationals have been repeatedly targeted by Pakistan-based militants—Beijing continues to invest billions in CPEC projects. The calculation is purely transactional: China values Pakistan's strategic location and willingness to serve as a conduit for Chinese influence more than it concerns itself with Pakistan's support for economic dimension helps explain Pakistan's immunity from serious international consequences. Countries and institutions find it easier to work around Pakistan's terror problem than to confront it directly. The result is a system where Pakistan faces minimal costs for its behaviour while reaping significant benefits from international UN's Institutional FailureThe decision to place Pakistan in leadership roles within UN counter-terrorism bodies represents a fundamental failure of institutional logic. How can an organisation committed to fighting terrorism place a known state sponsor of terrorism in charge of its efforts? The answer lies in the UN's structural weaknesses and the dominance of political considerations over principled appointment to these positions is not an oversight but a deliberate choice that reflects the international community's prioritisation of geopolitical stability over justice and accountability. By allowing Pakistan to lead counter-terrorism efforts, the UN is essentially legitimising the very behaviour it claims to combat. This sends a dangerous message to other state sponsors of terrorism: that there are no real consequences for supporting violence against persistence of plausible deniabilityPakistan's strategy relies heavily on maintaining plausible deniability—the ability to support terrorism while avoiding direct responsibility. This approach allows Pakistan to claim it is fighting terrorism even as it sponsors it. The use of proxy groups provides a thin veneer of separation between the Pakistani state and terrorist activities, which international actors seem all too willing to recent Pahalgam attack, which killed 26 civilians, followed this familiar pattern. Despite clear evidence of cross-border terrorism emanating from Pakistan-controlled territory, Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif called for a "credible, neutral probe"—the same deflection tactic Pakistan has used for decades. This response ignores the mountain of evidence linking Pakistani territory and proxies to terrorist activities while attempting to shift the burden of proof away from cost of international inactionThe international community's failure to hold Pakistan accountable has had devastating consequences. By allowing Pakistan to maintain its terror infrastructure without facing meaningful consequences, the world has enabled decades of violence and instability. The human cost has been enormous—thousands of lives lost in terrorist attacks linked to Pakistani proxies, ongoing instability in South Asia, and the persistence of non-state actors who threaten regional and global Financial Action Task Force (FATF) briefly placed Pakistan on its "grey list" for terror financing, but even this limited action was eventually reversed without Pakistan making fundamental changes to its behaviour. This pattern of limited pressure followed by rehabilitation has become the norm, reinforcing Pakistan's belief that it can continue supporting terrorism without facing serious calculated complicityChina's role in enabling Pakistan's behavior deserves particular scrutiny. Despite repeated attacks on Chinese nationals and projects by Pakistan-based militants, China continues to deepen its partnership with Pakistan through CPEC and other initiatives. This relationship reveals how major powers prioritise their strategic interests over counter-terrorism mediation between Pakistan and Afghanistan appears designed not to end terrorism but to create stability that serves Chinese economic interests. By helping Pakistan and Afghanistan reach an accommodation that allows both to continue harbouring different terrorist groups while avoiding direct conflict with each other, China is essentially facilitating a division of the terrorism market rather than its way forward: Accountability or complicityThe international community faces a clear choice: continue enabling Pakistan's behaviour through engagement without consequences, or finally demand genuine accountability. The current approach—combining harsh rhetoric with continued cooperation—has clearly failed. Pakistan continues to support terrorism because it faces no meaningful costs for doing accountability would require sustained pressure across multiple dimensions: diplomatic isolation, economic sanctions, and removal from international bodies where Pakistan can obstruct counter-terrorism efforts. Most importantly, it would require consistency—not the current pattern of brief pressure followed by world's treatment of Pakistan reveals uncomfortable truths about international priorities. Despite decades of rhetoric about fighting terrorism, major powers continue to prioritise their narrow interests over principled opposition to state-sponsored violence. This hypocrisy not only enables Pakistan's behaviour but undermines the entire international counter-terrorism emperor's terrorist clothesPakistan's appointment to lead UN counter-terrorism efforts while simultaneously supporting terrorism represents the ultimate expression of international hypocrisy. Like the emperor's new clothes, everyone can see the truth, but institutional interests prevent anyone from stating it clearly. Pakistan is not a partner in fighting terrorism—it is one of terrorism's primary the international community finds the courage to confront this reality directly, Pakistan will continue to play its double game with impunity. The victims of Pakistani-sponsored terrorism deserve better than a system that rewards their tormentors with positions of authority. The world's credibility in fighting terrorism depends on ending this charade and finally holding Pakistan accountable for its Pakistan paradox exposes more than just one country's duplicity—it reveals a system where power matters more than principles, where convenience trumps justice, and where those who enable terrorism can simultaneously claim to fight it. This is not just Pakistan's shame; it is the world' Watch
