Iran Ready For Inspection Of Nuclear Facilities, But Wont Accept Coercion: President Pezeshkian
Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian said that his country is ready for inspection of its nuclear facilities, but does not accept coercion.
Pezeshkian made the remarks in a meeting, on Saturday, with Kazakhstan's Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister Murat Nurtleu in the Iranian capital Tehran while commenting on the ongoing indirect nuclear talks between Tehran and Washington, according to a statement published on the website of his office.
He said that Iran's nuclear activities were completely "transparent," and the International Atomic Energy Agency had confirmed it repeatedly, Xinhua news agency reported.
"As we are ready for inspections, we consider as unacceptable any deprivation of nations of knowledge, technology and scientific achievements," he said, adding that Iran was always ready to listen to logical discourse but would never accept "coercion and bullying."
The Kazakh foreign minister, for his part, expressed his country's respect for Iran's "principled and logical" positions on peaceful nuclear activities.
Nurtleu submitted a written message from Kazakh President Kassym-Jomart Tokayev to Pezeshkian. Nurtleu said he hoped the message would "open a new chapter in the two countries' relations."
The two sides agreed to promote bilateral relations in all areas, according to the statement.
The Kazakh foreign minister arrived in Tehran on Saturday morning and was welcomed by his Iranian counterpart Seyed Abbas Araghchi, the official news agency IRNA reported.
They held a meeting on bilateral and regional issues later in the day and signed a memorandum of understanding on cooperation in the field of diplomatic archives.
Iran and the United States have held five rounds of Oman-mediated indirect talks starting from April on Tehran's nuclear program and the lifting of US sanctions.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
UN nuclear watchdog board censures Iran, Tehran reacts with announcement of new enrichment site
The UN nuclear watchdog's board of governors on Thursday formally found that Iran isn't complying with its nuclear obligations for the first time in 20 years, a move that could lead to further tensions and set in motion an effort to restore United Nations sanctions on Tehran later this year. Iran reacted immediately, saying it will establish a new enrichment facility 'in a secure location' and that 'other measures are also being planned.' 'The Islamic Republic of Iran has no choice but to respond to this political resolution,' the Iranian Foreign Ministry and the Atomic Energy Organization of Iran said in a joint statement. US President Donald Trump previously warned that Israel or America could carry out airstrikes targeting Iranian nuclear facilities if negotiations failed — and some American personnel and their families have begun leaving the region over the tensions, which come ahead of a new round of Iran-US talks Sunday in Oman. In Israel, the US Embassy ordered American government employees and their families to remain in the Tel Aviv area over security concerns. Nineteen countries on the International Atomic Energy Agency's board, which represents the agency's member nations, voted for the resolution, according to diplomats who spoke on condition of anonymity to describe the outcome of the closed-doors vote. Russia, China and Burkina Faso opposed it, 11 abstained and two did not vote. In the draft resolution seen by The Associated Press, the board of governors renews a call on Iran to provide answers 'without delay' in a long-running investigation into uranium traces found at several locations that Tehran has failed to declare as nuclear sites. Western officials suspect that the uranium traces could provide further evidence that Iran had a secret nuclear weapons program until resolution was put forward by France, the United Kingdom, Germany and the United States. Speaking to Iranian state television after the vote, the spokesman for the Atomic Energy Organization of Iran said that his agency immediately informed the IAEA of 'specific and effective' actions Tehran would take. 'One is the launch of a third secure site' for enrichment, spokesman Behrouz Kamalvandi said. He did not elaborate on the location, but the organization's chief Mohammad Eslami later described the site as 'already built, prepared, and located in a secure and invulnerable place.' Iran has two underground sites at Fordo and Natanz and has been building tunnels in the mountains near Natanz since suspected Israeli sabotage attacks targeted that facility. The other step would be replacing old centrifuges for advanced ones at Fordo. 'The implication of this is that our production of enriched materials will significantly increase,' Kamalvandi said. According to the draft resolution, 'Iran's many failures to uphold its obligations since 2019 to provide the Agency with full and timely cooperation regarding undeclared nuclear material and activities at multiple undeclared locations in Iran … constitutes non-compliance with its obligations under its Safeguards Agreement.' Under those obligations, which are part of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, Iran is legally bound to declare all nuclear material and activities and allow IAEA inspectors to verify that none of it is being diverted from peaceful uses. The draft resolution also finds that the IAEA's 'inability … to provide assurance that Iran's nuclear program is exclusively peaceful gives rise to questions that are within the competence of the United Nations Security Council, as the organ bearing the main responsibility for the maintenance of international peace and security.' The draft resolution made a direct reference to the US-Iran talks, stressing its 'support for a diplomatic solution to the problems posed by the Iranian nuclear program, including the talks between the United States and Iran, leading to an agreement that addresses all international concerns related to Iran's nuclear activities, encouraging all parties to constructively engage in diplomacy.' A senior Western diplomat last week described the resolution as a 'serious step,' but added that Western nations are 'not closing the door to diplomacy on this issue.' However, if Iran fails to cooperate, an extraordinary IAEA board meeting will likely be held in the summer, during which another resolution could get passed that will refer the issue to the Security Council, the diplomat said on condition of anonymity because he wasn't authorized to discuss the issue with the media. The three European nations have repeatedly threatened in the past to reinstate, or 'snapback,' sanctions that have been lifted under the original 2015 Iran nuclear deal if Iran does not provide 'technically credible' answers to the U.N. nuclear watchdog's questions. In a joint statement to the IAEA board of governors, the three European nations said that they would 'spare no efforts to work towards a diplomatic solution' but added that without a satisfying deal, they would 'consider triggering the snapback mechanism to address threats to international peace and security arising from Iran's nuclear program.' The authority to reestablish those sanctions by the complaint of any member of the original 2015 nuclear deal expires in October, putting the West on a clock to exert pressure on Tehran over its program before losing that power. The resolution comes on heels of the IAEA's so-called 'comprehensive report' that was circulated among member states last weekend. In the report, the U.N. nuclear watchdog said that Iran's cooperation with the agency has 'been less than satisfactory' when it comes to uranium traces discovered by agency inspectors at several locations in Iran. One of the sites became known publicly in 2018, after Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu revealed it at the United Nations and called it a clandestine nuclear warehouse hidden at a rug-cleaning plant. Iran denied this, but in 2019, IAEA inspectors detected the presence of uranium traces there as well as at two other sites. Iran's President Masoud Pezeshkian, who campaigned on reaching out to the West, struck a harder line after the IAEA vote. 'I don't know how to cooperate with the outside world to stop them from doing evil acts and let the people live independently in this country,' Pezeshkian said. 'We will continue down our own path; we will have enrichment.'
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
'Due to increased regional tensions...': US Embassy in Israel restricts employees' travel
US embassy in Israel issues security alert to its employees amid rising tension in the region. The US Embassy in Jerusalem Thursday issued a fresh security alert restricting its employees from traveling amid heightening tensions in the region between Israel and Iran. 'Due to the increased regional tensions, U.S. government employees and their family members are restricted from travel outside the greater Tel Aviv (including Herzliya, Netanya, and Even Yehuda), Jerusalem, and Be'er Sheva areas until further notice,' the embassy said in a Thursday security alert. The security alert came after the Trump administration announced scaling back the number of personnel in the Middle East. Defense secretary Pete Hegseth allowed voluntary departures of military dependents across northeast Africa, the Middle East and portions of South and Central Asia. The State Department said it has ordered the departure of all nonessential personnel from the US Embassy in Baghdad based on its latest review and a commitment 'to keeping Americans safe, both at home and abroad.' The embassy already had been on limited staffing, and the order will not affect a large number of personnel. In Thursday's alert, the US Embassy in Israel stated that it 'reminds U.S. citizens of the continued need for caution and increased personal security awareness — including knowing the location of the nearest shelter in the event of a red alert as security incidents, including mortar, rocket, and missile fire, and unmanned aircraft system (UAS) intrusions, often take place without any warning.' Trump confirmed the precautionary steps that US has been taking. "They (US personnel) are being moved out because it could be a dangerous place, and we will see what have given notice to move out," he said. Trump, who has previously said Israel or the US could carry out airstrikes targeting Iranian nuclear facilities if negotiations failed, gave a less-than-optimistic view about reaching a deal with Iran, telling the New York Post's "Pod Force One" podcast that he was "getting more and more less confident about" a deal. "They seem to be delaying, and I think that's a shame. I'm less confident now than I would have been a couple of months ago. Something happened to them," he said in the interview recorded on Monday and released on Wednesday.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
3 hours ago
- Business Standard
Decoded: How Iran and Israel's decades-old conflict could explode into war
The Islamic Republic of Iran on Thursday (June 12) posted a chilling two-word message on social media platform X: 'We are ready,' amid reports that Israel is preparing to launch a strike on Iran's nuclear facilities. The United States has responded by warning that Iran may retaliate against American targets in neighbouring Iraq and has advised some US citizens to leave the region as a precaution. Tensions have surged since the breakdown of nuclear talks between Washington and Tehran. US President Donald Trump has reaffirmed his hardline stance, declaring that Iran would not be allowed to obtain a nuclear weapon. 'Very simple. They can't have a nuclear weapon. We're not going to allow that,' he said, adding that US troops are being repositioned away from parts of the Middle East 'because it could be a dangerous place.' Iran's enriched uranium stockpile nears weapons-grade threshold The trigger behind this rising tension lies in Iran's growing nuclear stockpile. According to a recent estimate by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Iran now holds over 408 kilograms of uranium enriched up to 60 per cent purity, dangerously close to the 90 per cent threshold required for a nuclear weapon. That's a nearly 50 per cent increase from earlier this year. The time it would take Iran to 'break out' and build a bomb is shrinking rapidly. Tracing the historical roots of Iran-Israel hostility Iran and Israel weren't always enemies. In fact, prior to 1979, the two countries maintained close ties. Iran was one of the first Muslim-majority nations to recognise Israel after its founding in 1948. Under Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, Iran and Israel enjoyed diplomatic, economic, and military ties. Both nations viewed Arab nationalism as a mutual threat, and Israel considered Iran a key strategic ally on the periphery of the Arab world. But this cooperation snapped after the 1979 Islamic Revolution. The new regime in Tehran cut all ties with Israel, transferred the Israeli embassy to the Palestine Liberation Organisation (PLO), and declared Israel an enemy of Islam. Ayatollah Khomeini's regime began openly supporting anti-Israel militant groups, shifting the nature of the conflict from political rivalry to ideological confrontation. Iran's proxy network intensifies regional warfare against Israel Since then, Iran has supported and armed groups such as Hezbollah in Lebanon, Hamas in Gaza, and the Islamic Jihad Movement in the Palestinian territories. This network of proxies has conducted many wars against Israel, including those in Lebanon and several Gaza conflicts from 2008 to 2024. Iran has also provided support to groups in Syria and Yemen over the years, designed to counter Israel and attack its interests. How close is Iran to developing a nuclear weapon? Iran's nuclear programme has always been at the heart of Israeli fears. Israel has long considered Iran's nuclear ambition an existential threat. Over the years, it has launched covert operations to sabotage Iran's programme, including the infamous Stuxnet cyberattack and the assassinations of Iranian nuclear scientists. These efforts have slowed but not stopped Iran's progress. Once Iran crosses the 90 per cent enrichment mark, experts warn it could produce a nuclear weapon within weeks—a scenario Israel says it will not allow. Where are the modern flashpoints in the Iran-Israel conflict? The conflict has played out across multiple theatres in West Asia. Lebanon remains a critical front. Iran's most powerful proxy, Hezbollah, is based there and has fought major wars with Israel, including the 2006 conflict. Hezbollah is believed to possess over 100,000 rockets aimed at Israeli cities. In Gaza, Iran funds and supports both Hamas and the Islamic Jihad Movement. Despite the Shia-Sunni divide, their shared hostility towards Israel unites them. Syria is another major flashpoint. Iran maintains a strong military presence there and uses the territory to transfer weapons to Hezbollah. Israel frequently launches airstrikes on Iranian assets and supply routes in Syria. Recently, Iraq has emerged as a new front. Iranian-backed militias there have carried out drone attacks on Israeli targets. In 2024, after Israel bombed an Iranian consulate in Damascus, Iran and its proxies launched a large-scale drone and missile barrage. Though most were intercepted with US and European assistance, Israel responded with strikes inside Iran and Syria. Both sides then pulled back to avoid a wider regional war. Who supports Iran and Israel in this regional power struggle? Iran's 'Axis of Resistance' includes state and non-state actors such as the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), its elite Quds Force, Hezbollah, Hamas, the Islamic Jihad Movement, Houthi rebels in Yemen, and various Shiite militias in Iraq and Syria. Iran also supports smaller militant groups in Afghanistan and Pakistan. Israel, meanwhile, is firmly backed by the United States. Washington provides billions in military aid, advanced defence systems like Iron Dome, and intelligence support. US forces also target Iranian-backed militias in Syria and Iraq. Western allies, including the UK, Germany, and Italy, assist diplomatically and through missile defence cooperation. While not formal military allies, several Sunni Arab states share Israel's concerns. Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Bahrain, and Egypt have deepened ties with Israel since the 2020 Abraham Accords. The Palestinian Authority in the West Bank remains ideologically opposed to Israel but occasionally coordinates security efforts against Hamas. Why is Iraq becoming a critical theatre in this confrontation? Iraq now serves as a launchpad for Iranian-aligned militias and a proxy battleground. Groups like Kata'ib Hezbollah under the 'Islamic Resistance in Iraq' banner have claimed attacks on Israeli military assets. These militias allow Iran to strike Israel indirectly while avoiding direct confrontation. Geographically, Iraq's proximity to Israel makes it strategically significant for weapons transfers and strikes. However, the Iraqi government under Prime Minister Mohammed Shia' Al-Sudani is under pressure to control these groups, fearing that Israeli retaliation could further destabilise the country. The US military presence in Iraq—currently around 2,500 troops—acts as a deterrent. But Washington's plan to withdraw by 2026 could reduce Iraq's resistance to Iranian pressure and shift the balance of power further. Are the conditions now set for full-scale regional war? With nuclear breakout potential, active proxy networks, and direct military exchanges, the Iran-Israel conflict is dangerously close to escalation. Iraq's emergence as a proxy front, growing Hezbollah stockpiles, increased Western involvement, and failed diplomacy are all converging. Whether this leads to an all-out war or a prolonged cycle of strikes and retaliation depends on the decisions made in the coming weeks—both in Jerusalem and Tehran, and in capitals far beyond.
