&w=3840&q=100)
Datanomics: 65 years on, Gujarat leads Maharashtra in key economic metrics
The shift is most stark in manufacturing - historically a core strength of Maharashtra
Shikha Chaturvedi New Delhi
Listen to This Article
May 1, 2025, marks 65 years since the bifurcation of the primarily bilingual Bombay State, which led to the creation of Maharashtra and Gujarat.
While the division was primarily linguistic, with Marathi and Gujarati speakers forming majorities in their respective new states, it was also politically charged.
One of the fiercest debates centred around Mumbai — the megapolis formerly known as Bombay. Though there were proposals to either assign the city to Gujarat or convert it into a Union Territory, these were firmly rejected by leaders from Maharashtra. Eventually, Mumbai was retained in Maharashtra, reinforcing its centrality to the state's
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Reunion of Thackerays: What people of Maharashtra want will happen, says Uddhav
Mumbai: Shiv Sena (UBT) chief Uddhav Thackeray on Friday added fuel to the growing speculation of a potential reunion with his estranged cousin Raj Thackeray ahead of local body polls in the state, saying that whatever the people of Maharashtra want will happen. Leaders from Raj Thackeray's Maharashtra Navnirman Sena (MNS), meanwhile, said that their party chief was waiting for a concrete proposal from the Shiv Sena (UBT) for an alliance before taking any further steps. Responding to a question on the possibility of a reunion during a press conference, Uddhav Thackeray gave a cryptic reply. 'Maharashtra's wish will be fulfilled,' he said. 'What the people of Maharashtra want will definitely happen. There is no confusion about it among our party workers and their party workers.' Earlier in the day, Shiv Sena (UBT) MP Sanjay Raut said the reunion process had started. 'Who knows, both Raj and Uddhav might have spoken with each other. Such talks don't happen by informing others. But let me tell you that the process is on and it would be fruitful,' he said. MNS leaders, however, said that Raj Thackeray will not react to any reunion talk unless the Shiv Sena (UBT) sends a formal alliance proposal. 'We know what the wish of Maharashtra is, but what's more important is what's on the mind of Uddhav Thackeray?' said MNS Mumbai president Sandeep Deshpande. 'We can come a hundred steps ahead, but they should initiate the first step.' Deshpande also pointed to previous attempts at an alliance between the MNS and the undivided Shiv Sena ahead of the 2014 assembly elections and 2017 Mumbai civic polls, which he described as 'a bad experience'. However, Raj Thackeray has held a closed-door meeting with senior party leaders to seek their opinion on the matter, according to a party insider. Several MNS leaders favoured an alliance with the Shiv Sena (UBT), but Thackeray told his colleagues not to speak on the topic without his permission, the leader added. Asked for his reaction on MNS's demand for a concrete proposal, Uddhav Thackeray said, 'Instead of giving any indications, we will give you the news directly.' Speculation of an alliance between the Shiv Sena (UBT) and MNS ahead of local body polls across the state, likely to be held after the monsoon, began in April when Raj Thackeray indicated that he was open to reuniting with his cousin nearly two decades after a bitter parting of ways. In a podcast with filmmaker Mahesh Manjrekar, he suggested that past differences with Uddhav were 'trivial' and expressed openness to reuniting for the Marathi people. Uddhav reciprocated immediately, stating he too was ready to keep aside minor differences and join hands with Raj 'to protect Mumbai, Maharashtra and Marathi'. Since then, there has been no significant development, although senior Shiv Sena (UBT) leaders have spoken in favour of the reunion. The speculation picked up pace last week after local leaders from both parties came together in Dombivli to protest against an incomplete flyover. Significantly, on the ground, there is enthusiasm among the party cadre on both sides. On Thursday, MNS leaders in Nashik invited local Shiv Sena (UBT) leaders for a get-together while inaugurating a new office. The Shiv Sena (UBT) leaders even gifted a picture of the two Thackeray brothers to the MNS office. Reacting to the speculation, the Maharashtra Congress said it would welcome the alliance between its Maha Vikas Aghadi (MVA) partner Shiv Sena (UBT) and the MNS if it is in the interest of the state. 'There has been a talk from both Shiv Sena (UBT) and MNS that they will join hands to protect Maharashtra's interests and keep the communal BJP away. If the two parties are coming together for this, we will welcome the move,' state Congress spokesperson Atul Londhe said. Maharashtra chief minister and senior BJP leader Devendra Fadnavis said it was for Raj Thackeray and Uddhav Thackeray to decide whether their parties should forge an alliance, and that he had nothing to do with it. When asked about Shiv Sena (UBT) chief's remarks, Fadnavis told reporters in Gadchiroli: 'It is for Raj Thackeray to react to Uddhav Thackeray's comments that what people want will happen. How am I connected to it? They will decide whether to have an alliance or not.'
New Indian Express
an hour ago
- New Indian Express
Thackeray tieup likely ahead of BMC elections
MUMBAI: There is growing speculation that the Thackeray cousins may unite to contest the BMC and other local body elections against their Mahayuti alliance partners. On Friday, Uddhav Thackeray of Shiv Sena (UBT) indicated that his party will align with the people's wishes. When asked about his possible collaboration with his cousin MNS chief Raj Thackeray, the Shiv Sena (UBT) president said that whatever the people desire will happen. He also said that he will soon share 'good news'. Reacting to the developments, Maharashtra CM Devendra Fadnavis said the Mahayuti would contest the election together and chose not to comment on statements unrelated to him. 'This is a matter between the two brothers. I have nothing to do with this development that the media is reporting,' he added. Senior Shiv Sena (UBT) leader Sanjay Raut expressed confidence that Uddhav Thackeray and Raj Thackeray are capable enough to speak with each other. 'I am confident that they will speak at the right time for the larger interest of Maharashtra and Marathi manoos.'
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
No boys, no meat, no logic: NRI lambasts Indian-Canadian landlords over 'embarrassing' rental advertisements
An Indian woman currently residing in Canada recently raised a critical concern about biased rental practices among Indian landlords abroad . In a widely discussed Reddit post, she conveyed her disappointment and embarrassment at encountering housing advertisements that impose exclusionary preferences rooted in caste, religion, native language, or even dietary habits. These discriminatory tendencies, she noted, are distressingly common in rental listings circulating within South Asian immigrant from her personal experiences, the woman shared how such ads frequently specify conditions like 'only Gujarati girl,' 'Punjabi-speaking vegetarian preferred,' or 'South Indian girls only—no boys allowed.' Some listings even go further, insisting tenants must be strictly vegetarian, barring even outside non-vegetarian food, or stating that only individuals speaking a specific language or following a particular religion will be considered suitable. To her, these expectations felt deeply regressive and out of place in a multicultural, law-governed society like didn't shy away from pointing out how these landlords seem to be ignoring the legal frameworks in place that prohibit discrimination in housing. Her post raised a significant question: Why do some landlords behave as though they're still operating under informal, unchecked systems from back home, despite living in a country with established human rights laws?The woman urged that if landlords are so rigid about who they want living in their properties based on language, background, or food habits, they should consider alternative arrangements—like living with family or not renting the space out at all. She argued that being a tenant does not mean one has to match the landlord's personal preferences. As long as renters respect the lease, pay rent on time, and abide by legal guidelines, their cultural background or dietary preferences should not be a post sparked a flood of responses, many echoing her sentiments. One user shared their experience in Vancouver, advising against renting from South Asian landlords due to recurring issues such as lack of privacy, unannounced visits, and poor communication. They recalled an absurd listing that offered free rent to a woman, provided she cooked daily for five male tenants—an offer that felt more like a bizarre matrimonial ad than a housing user recounted being shown a cramped room that had to be shared with a stranger, separated only by a flimsy screen, and said they've avoided Indian landlords ever since. Yet, some voices in the thread defended the landlords, claiming property owners have the freedom to select tenants who align with their personal comfort debate continues online, highlighting the urgent need for awareness, respect for laws, and a more inclusive mindset within diaspora communities.
