Thames Water Has Just Two Rescue Bids With Equity Deadline Hours Away
(Bloomberg) -- Today marks the deadline for investors to submit rescue bids for Thames Water but uncertainty over the emergency restructuring of the company is overshadowing the equity raise process.
Nice Airport, If You Can Get to It: No Subway, No Highway, No Bridge
Sin puente y sin metro: el nuevo aeropuerto de Lima es una debacle
The Forgotten French Architect Who Rebuilt Marseille
In New Orleans, an Aging Dome Tries to Stay Super
How London's Taxi Drivers Navigate the City Without GPS
By the end of last week, only Castle Water Ltd. and infrastructure investor Covalis Capital had confirmed their interest, according to people familiar with the matter. The lack of clarity is keeping potential investors like KKR & Co. and CK Infrastructure Holding on the sidelines, the people said, asking not to be named because the talks are private.
Thames Water, Castle Water, Covalis, KKR and CKI all declined to comment on the equity raising process.
The UK's largest water and sewage company has been looking to raise new equity after its existing shareholders declared the business 'uninvestible.' The utility is set to run out of cash by next month and risks being plunged into special administration — a state-supervised process akin to insolvency for businesses that provide critical services.
The judge in charge of a restructuring plan for Thames Water is not expected to come up with a formal decision on a £3 billion ($3.7 billion) emergency loan from senior creditors before Feb. 14. Equity investors are hesitant to commit to a rescue bid until that has been decided, according to the people.
Class B debt holders object to the plan, claiming it would effectively allow senior creditors to exert control over the company, and proposed a deal they say is better and cheaper.
The current attempt to attract an investor follows a previous round in December that received a lukewarm response. With hours until the second equity raise process is due to expire, the situation could still change.
Another uncertainty is whether Thames will decide to go to the Competition and Markets Authority until Feb. 18 to challenge industry regulator Ofwat's decision on how much money companies would be allowed to invest and hike bills over the next five-year period.
Both water firms and the government say higher bills are necessary to fund an infrastructure upgrade, following a groundswell of public ire over chronic leaks and sewage spills.
Potential Bidders
Castle Water, a firm backed by William Pears Group that bought Thames' non-household water and sewerage retail business in 2016, is looking to own a majority stake in the utility, Bloomberg previously reported. It's seeking to ultimately list Thames on the stock exchange.
The company made a fully funded offer to inject £4 billion into Thames Water to help turnaround the utility, according to one of the people familiar with the process. William Pears, a financing and real estate company, would help provide some of the funding.
The other confirmed submission was a £5 billion bid from Covalis to inject around £1 billion upfront, before raising another £4 billion from asset sales, refinancing and the listing, another person said.
The bid involves plans to review Thames' business, which may involve selling assets, before listing the remainder on the stock market, the person added. The government would hold a so-called golden share, granting it additional rights including a seat on the board. Covalis is also looking to bring operational partners on board, including France's Suez.
But the rescue bidder has expressed doubts about the feasibility of finding new equity for Thames by April in a letter to the High Court in London, as reported by Bloomberg News on Friday.
Covalis, which has also some exposure to the Class B debt, said in the letter that to progress it would need 'significantly more information and greater engagement with Thames Water management than has been provided to date.'
Neither the chair or chief executive officer of Thames Water attended the most recent meeting for prospective equity investors, Covalis said in the letter.
--With assistance from Lucca de Paoli, Swetha Gopinath and Vinicy Chan.
Trump's Tariffs Make Currency Trading Cool Again After Years of Decline
The Reason Why This Super Bowl Has So Many Conspiracy Theories
Believing in Aliens Derailed This Internet Pioneer's Career. Now He's Facing Prison
Orange Juice Makers Are Desperate for a Comeback
Business Schools Confront Trump Immigration Policies
©2025 Bloomberg L.P.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
10 hours ago
- Yahoo
Litecoin Price Struggles Despite ETF Optimism as War Tensions Rattle Market
Litecoin LTC fell more than 4.3% over the past week, and is down more than 14% for the last 30-day period, with the latest sell-off coming as part of a wider risk asset sell-off. That sell-off came after Israel attacked Iran in a bid to put an end to its nuclear program and harm its missile capabilities, and Iran later retaliated with a salvo of missiles. The conflict has spooked global markets, reducing the total cryptocurrency market capitalization by more than $150 billion. LTC was severely affected by the sell-off. As the dust settled, Litecoin attempted a fragile rebound, climbing back above $86. But the recovery has stalled under mounting technical resistance. The $97.80 level, coinciding with the 23.6% Fibonacci retracement according to to CoinDesk Research's technical analysis data model, has proven difficult to breach. Momentum indicators like RSI at 43.46 and a flat MACD histogram show limited energy behind the move, suggesting a phase of consolidation. Volume tells a similar story. Litecoin's trading activity dropped 42% following the initial plunge, even as it briefly surged through the $85.90 resistance level during a high-volume spike late Friday. That breakout, however, was quickly met with profit-taking that brought it back down to $85. Looming in the background is hope for a spot litecoin ETF. Bloomberg ETF analysts Eric Balchunas and James Seyffart estimate a 90% chance of approval. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


Bloomberg
11 hours ago
- Bloomberg
Gundlach Is Latest to Sound Corporate Debt Alarms: Credit Weekly
DoubleLine Capital has its lowest-ever allocations to speculative-grade bonds now, because valuations just don't reflect the risks. The money manager has been gradually cutting its high-yield bonds and other sub-investment-grade debt over the past two years, Jeffrey Gundlach, chief executive officer, said at the Bloomberg Global Credit Forum in Los Angeles this week. There are myriad risks, including inflation and tariffs, and investors aren't getting paid for them, he said.


Newsweek
13 hours ago
- Newsweek
Putin's Oil Empire Gets Double Boost
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The U.S. will not back an EU proposal to impose a price cap on Russian oil that seeks to curb revenues for Russian President Vladimir Putin's war machine, according to Bloomberg. Russia could also benefit from the spike in oil prices following Israel's attack on Iran, a major producer of the commodity. Newsweek has contacted the White House for comment. A fuel tank farm of Russian oil pipeline giant Transneft on December 13, 2023. A fuel tank farm of Russian oil pipeline giant Transneft on December 13, It Matters Revenues from fossil fuels form the core of Russia's fiscal planning. As well as targeting Russia's natural gas, the European Commission's 18th sanctions package proposed lowering the cap on seaborne Russian oil from $60 to $45. The EU measures, which also target Russian businesses and banking, requires the backing of all 27 members. The proposal on Russian oil would need the support of the G7, which meets later this month. Bloomberg's report that Washington will not back the move deals a blow to Western hopes of limiting Moscow's means to fund its aggression in Ukraine, especially after oil prices rose following hostilities between Israel and Iran. What To Know The G7 introduced the $60-a-barrel cap that restricts the price Russia can earn from its seaborne oil. But it has not been effective in curbing the Kremlin's revenues since coming into effect in February 2023, partly because of Moscow's sanctions-busting "shadow fleet" of older vessels and a slump in oil prices. The European Commission proposed this week to drop the cap to $45, with High Representative Kaja Kallas suggesting that because Russian oil mostly transits the Baltic and Black Seas, U.S. support for the measure is not essential. An accord involving all G7 nations would be more effective because of the strength of U.S. enforcement, but the U.S. opposes dropping the price cap, Bloomberg reported, citing unnamed sources. Russian President Vladimir Putin at the St. George's Hall of the Grand Kremlin Palace on June 12. Russian President Vladimir Putin at the St. George's Hall of the Grand Kremlin Palace on June 12. Oil prices surged following Israel's strikes against Iran, and West Texas Intermediate crude futures advanced by more than 7 percent to settle near $73 a barrel, the biggest one-day jump since March 2022. The Institute for the Study of War said on Friday that the oil price rise may increase Russian revenue from oil sales and improve Russia's ability to sustain its war effort in Ukraine, delivering a boost to Putin. The Washington, D.C., think tank said Moscow might be able to leverage sudden oil price rises to weather economic challenges and finance a protracted war in Ukraine. This is notable given the concerns Putin previously voiced that any reduction in the oil price would likely risk destabilizing Russia's economy. Nikos Tzabouras, a senior market analyst at told Newsweek that although prices are set to rise, sustained hikes would require disruption to supply chains, and the U.S.'s denial of involvement in Israel's strikes keeps hope alive for a contained conflict, keeping downward pressure on oil. A sustained upside would require actual disruptions to physical flows, such as damage to Iran's oil infrastructure or a blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, a key global chokepoint, Tzabouras added. What People Are Saying The Institute for the Study of War said in a report on Friday: "Oil price increases following Israeli strikes against Iran may increase Russian revenue from oil sales and improve Russia's ability to sustain its war effort in Ukraine." Nikos Tzabouras, a senior market analyst at told Newsweek: "The U.S. denial of involvement offers a possible off-ramp, keeping hopes alive for a contained conflict and continuation of nuclear talks, which could pressure oil." Allen Good, the director of equity research at Morningstar, told Newsweek: "We expect, absent a wider war, today's rise in prices will likely prove to be a sell-the-news event. Oil markets remain amply supplied with OPEC set on increasing production and demand soft." What Happens Next The G7 summit is expected to discuss the oil price cap proposal when it meets in Alberta, Canada, from Sunday. The EU may try to proceed with the measure even if the U.S. rejects the proposal. U.S. President Donald Trump and his officials will make the final decision, Bloomberg reported. Meanwhile, markets continued to eye the effects the hostilities between Iran and Israel are having on oil prices.