logo
S'poreans looking to pursue studies in US can still submit visa applications: US Embassy

S'poreans looking to pursue studies in US can still submit visa applications: US Embassy

New Paper4 days ago

Singaporeans keen to study in the US can continue to send in their visa applications, said the US Embassy in Singapore on May 28, following news that the Trump administration has directed overseas missions to stop scheduling new appointments for student and exchange visa applicants.
US Secretary of State Marco Rubio had said in an internal cable reported by Politico on May 27 that the State Department intends to review the screening and vetting of such applicants, with plans to issue guidelines on "expanded social media vetting".
In the meantime, appointments that have already been scheduled can continue to proceed, although available appointments not taken up yet should be taken down.
When asked about the latest directive, a spokesperson for the US Embassy in Singapore said: "The US Embassy's interview appointments system is dynamic and reflects the time required for consular officers to adjudicate cases in full compliance with US law.
"At this time, applicants may continue to submit applications, as the consular section constantly adjusts schedules to allow for sufficient time to vet cases before them."
It did not disclose if it has received an influx of queries from applicants since news about the internal cable was published, although it said that social media vetting has been a longstanding part of the US visa application process.
The spokesperson said: "Since 2019, the Department of State has required visa applicants to provide social media identifiers on visa application forms, and we use all available information in our visa screening and vetting."
Recounting her own experience, a Singaporean student, speaking on condition of anonymity, said she had to submit her social media account handles when she applied for a student visa in 2022.
The 22-year-old, who is currently pursuing a bachelor's degree in history at a liberal arts college, said she thought it was better to play safe then and disclose information about all her accounts, even though she doubted that any checks would be conducted.
In recent times, however, she has become more cautious about what she says or does, both online and in person.
This follows news of US President Donald Trump's recent campaign against elite US colleges, which he is trying to pressure into making a wide range of policy changes such as removing diversity, equity and inclusivity initiatives.
On May 22, the Trump administration terminated Harvard University's right to host and enrol foreign students and scholars, leaving nearly 6,800 international students there in limbo. This follows its cancellation of billions of dollars in grants and funds for the school as well as other elite institutions such as Columbia University.
"I used to be more involved in political activism on campus, but now I'm just trying to stay unnoticed," the Singaporean student said, citing how clampdowns on international students, coupled with the looming thought that her social media account information remains in the US authorities' hands, have made her fearful.
Originally drawn to the US because of its ideals in areas such as freedom of speech, she said that at present, "the hypocrisy is just so striking".
Although she initially planned to commence postgraduate studies in the US immediately after receiving her bachelor's, recent developments have made her reconsider.
"With all the twists and turns, I think I'm likely to return to Singapore afterwards instead, which wasn't my plan at all, even six months ago."
Another Singaporean student pursuing his postgraduate studies in the US said his devices and social media accounts were not screened whenever he passed through US Customs.
However, he noted that there has been an increase in questioning by border agents, including about his career and family situation.
While the 27-year-old does not plan to cut back on travelling, he has stopped posting or sharing content related to the US and its politics on his social media accounts.
He said: "I am also extra careful with whatever I text friends if it concerns US politics."
A 26-year-old Singaporean, who is heading to University College London for a master's degree, had contemplated pursuing one in public health either at Columbia University or the University of California, Berkeley.
Having witnessed the uncertainty in the US and taken other things like costs into consideration, the analyst at a market research firm said she was relieved to have pivoted to Britain instead.
The current US administration, as well as Mr Trump's stance on immigration as outlined in Project 2025, further cemented her decision.
Describing applying to the US for her studies as a "huge gamble", she said she had considered waiting for things to settle, but upon reflection, she realised her options did not necessarily have to be limited to American institutions.
University admission consultancy Crimson Education has been sharing the variety of available options with students keen to study abroad.
Ms Joanne Gao, its regional manager for Singapore, Malaysia, the Philippines and Myanmar, said it will continue to encourage students to "explore a wide range of university options around the world - not just in the US".
She added: "This way, students avoid putting all their eggs in one basket and have more chances to find the right university for them."
So far, four families have contacted Crimson Education as a result of the latest developments in the US, but she said that students already accepted into top US universities are planning to proceed with their plans.
Ms Gao said the consultancy has also contacted the US Embassy to clarify the situation, which would enable it to "properly support" its students. The Straits Times also contacted two other educational consultancies, but they were unable to comment.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

How Trump's trade war is upending the global economy, World News
How Trump's trade war is upending the global economy, World News

AsiaOne

timean hour ago

  • AsiaOne

How Trump's trade war is upending the global economy, World News

US President Donald Trump's tariff decisions since he took office on Jan 20 have shocked financial markets and sent a wave of uncertainty through the global economy. Here is a timeline of the major developments: Feb 1 - Trump imposes 25 per cent tariffs on Mexican and most Canadian imports and 10 per cent on goods from China, demanding they curb the flow of fentanyl and illegal immigrants into the United States. Feb 3 - Trump suspends his threat of tariffs on Mexico and Canada, agreeing to a 30-day pause in return for concessions on border and crime enforcement. The US does not reach such a deal with China. Feb 7 - Trump delays tariffs on de minimis, or low-cost, packages from China until the Commerce Department can confirm that procedures and systems are in place to process them and collect tariff revenue. Feb 10 - Trump raises tariffs on steel and aluminium to a flat 25 per cent "without exceptions or exemptions". March 3 - Trump says 25 per cent tariffs on goods from Mexico and Canada will take effect from March 4 and doubles fentanyl-related tariffs on all Chinese imports to 20 per cent. March 5 - The president agrees to delay tariffs for one month on some vehicles built in Canada and Mexico after a call with the CEOs of General Motors and Ford and the chair of Stellantis. March 6 - Trump exempts goods from Canada and Mexico under a North American trade pact for a month from the 25 per cent tariffs. March 26 - Trump unveils a 25 per cent tariff on imported cars and light trucks. April 2 - Trump announces global tariffs with a baseline of 10 per cent across all imports and significantly higher duties on some of the US' biggest trading partners. April 9 - Trump pauses for 90 days most of his country-specific tariffs that kicked in less than 24 hours earlier following an upheaval in financial markets that erased trillions of dollars from bourses around the world. The 10 per cent blanket duty on almost all US imports stays in place. Trump says he will raise the tariff on Chinese imports to 125 per cent from the 104 per cent level that took effect a day earlier. This pushes the extra duties on Chinese goods to 145 per cent, including the fentanyl-related tariffs imposed earlier. April 13 - The US administration grants exclusions from steep tariffs on smartphones, computers and some other electronics imported largely from China. April 22 - The Trump administration launches national security probes under Section 232 of the Trade Act of 1962 into imports of both pharmaceuticals and semiconductors as part of a bid to impose tariffs on both sectors. May 4 - Trump imposes a 100 per cent tariff on all movies produced outside the US May 9 - Trump and British Prime Minister Keir Starmer announce a limited bilateral trade agreement that leaves in place 10 per cent tariffs on British exports, modestly expands agricultural access for both countries and lowers prohibitive US duties on British car exports. May 12 - The US and China agree to temporarily slash reciprocal tariffs. Under the 90-day truce, the US will cut the extra tariffs it imposed on Chinese imports to 30 per cent from 145 per cent, while China's duties on US imports will be slashed to 10 per cent from 125 per cent. May 13 - The US cuts the low value "de minimis" tariff on China shipments, reducing duties for items valued at up to $800 to 54 per cent from 120 per cent. May 23 - Trump says he is recommending a straight 50 per cent tariff on goods from the European Union starting on June 1. He also warned Apple it would face 25 per cent tariff if phones it sold in the US were manufactured outside of the country. May 25 - Trump backpedals on his threat to slap 50 per cent tariffs on imports from the EU, agreeing to extend the deadline for talks between the US and the block until July 9. May 28 - A US trade court blocked Trump's tariffs from going into effect in a sweeping ruling that the president overstepped his authority by imposing across-the-board duties on imports from US trade partners. The Trump administration said it would appeal the ruling. May 29 - A federal appeals court temporarily reinstates the most sweeping of Trump's tariffs, saying it was pausing the lower court's ruling to consider the government's appeal, and ordered the plaintiffs in the cases to respond by June 5 and the administration by June 9. May 30 - At a rally in Pennsylvania, Trump says he plans to increase tariffs on imported steel and aluminium to 50 per cent from 25 per cent. [[nid:718546]]

China rejects Trump's accusation that it breached Geneva trade deal, World News
China rejects Trump's accusation that it breached Geneva trade deal, World News

AsiaOne

time2 hours ago

  • AsiaOne

China rejects Trump's accusation that it breached Geneva trade deal, World News

China said on Monday (June 2) that US President Donald Trump's accusations that Beijing had violated the consensus reached in Geneva trade talks were "groundless", and promised to take forceful measures to safeguard its interests. The comment by the commerce ministry was in response to Trump's remarks on Friday that China had breached a bilateral deal to roll back tariffs. The ministry said China had implemented and actively upheld the agreement reached last month in Geneva, while the US had introduced multiple "discriminatory restrictive" measures against China. Those measures included issuing guidance on AI chip export controls, halting sales of chip design software to China and revoking visas for Chinese students, the ministry added. "The US government has unilaterally and repeatedly provoked new economic and trade frictions, exacerbating uncertainty and instability in bilateral economic and trade relations," the ministry said in a statement. It did not elaborate on what forceful measures it might take in response. Beijing and Washington agreed in mid-May in Geneva to pause triple-digit tariffs for 90 days. In addition, China also promised to lift trade countermeasures that restricted its exports of the critical metals needed for US semiconductor, electronics and defence production. Trump on Friday also announced a doubling of import tariffs on steel and aluminium to 50 per cent. While China is the world's largest steel producer and exporter, it ships very little to the United States after a 25 per cent tariff imposed in 2018 shut most Chinese steel out of the market. China ranks third among aluminium suppliers. [[nid:717864]]

Trump moves to lift Biden-era curbs on Arctic oil drilling
Trump moves to lift Biden-era curbs on Arctic oil drilling

Straits Times

time2 hours ago

  • Straits Times

Trump moves to lift Biden-era curbs on Arctic oil drilling

Utqiagvik, Alaska - The Trump administration is moving to repeal Biden-era curbs blocking oil drilling across most of the mammoth petroleum reserve in Alaska that is home to an estimated 8.7 billion barrels of recoverable oil. Interior Secretary Doug Burgum announced the planned policy shift late on Sunday at a townhall meeting in Utqiagvik, a village on the Chukchi Sea coast, as he and fellow members of President Donald Trump's Cabinet visit Alaska to promote energy development in the region. The measure would open up new opportunities for oil and gas development in the 23 million acre (9.3 million ha) National Petroleum Reserve-Alaska (NPR-A), an Indiana-size parcel in the north-west of the state that was set aside as a source of energy for the navy a century ago. The action responds to a directive that Mr Trump issued after his inauguration in January, when he signed an executive order compelling a host of policy changes meant to expand oil, natural gas and mineral development in Alaska. The reserve holds an estimated 8.7 billion barrels of recoverable oil, according to a 2017 assessment by the US Geological Survey. And its production is set to skyrocket, with the development of recent discoveries. Alaska has forecast that crude production from the reserve will climb to 139,600 barrels per day in fiscal year 2033, up from 15,800 barrels per day in fiscal year 2023. Mr Trump's measure would repeal a 2024 rule imposed under former president Joe Biden, who designated 13 million acres (5.25 million ha) of the reserve as 'special areas', limiting future oil and gas leasing, while maintaining leasing prohibitions on 10.6 million acres (4.3 million ha) of the NPR-A. The rule has complicated future oil drilling and production in the reserve where companies including ConocoPhillips, Santos, Repsol and Armstrong Oil & Gas have been active. ConocoPhillips is developing its 600-million-barrel Willow project in the refuge, and is expected to start producing commercial volumes of crude oil there in 2029. Mr Burgum's announcement was greeted with applause inside a heritage centre in Utqiagvik, where local residents had gathered to speak with officials from the Trump administration, as well as Senator Dan Sullivan and Alaska Governor Mike Dunleavy, about resource development. Mr Burgum, who leads the National Energy Dominance Council, was joined by the panel's vice-chairman, Energy Secretary Chris Wright, and Environmental Protection Agency administrator Lee Zeldin. Mr Wright said he anticipated increased oil development in Alaska – possibly quadrupling oil output on its prolific North Slope – and decried years of policies he said were 'smothering' the region's potential. Mr Rex Rock Sr, the head of the Arctic Slope Regional Corporation, one of 13 Alaska native regional corporations created under federal law, said that the 2024 rule restricting energy development in the far north did not have the backing of the region. Environmentalists had argued that Mr Biden's rule was essential to protect a large stretch of unspoiled land in the Arctic, a vast region of tundra and wetlands that teems with wildlife. And, they insisted, in a warming world, there is insufficient justification for burning the large cache of oil the reserve contains. The new proposal will give the public 60 days to comment, setting the stage for a potentially rapid reversal and new leasing in the reserve. Conservationists who cheered the original protections could seek to challenge the pivot in federal court. Bloomberg Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store