&w=3840&q=100)
Big blow for Thailand's PM as Bhumjaithai Party exits coalition over leaked call, border tensions
Thailand's Bhumjaithai Party on Wednesday withdrew from Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra's government in a major blow to the embattled premier, leaving her ruling coalition with only a slim majority read more
Thailand's Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra speaks during a press conference at the Government House, in Bangkok, Thailand, on May 19, 2025. Reuters File
Thailand's Bhumjaithai Party withdrew from Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra's government on Wednesday, delivering a significant blow to the embattled leader and reducing her ruling coalition to a fragile majority.
The party, which holds 69 seats and is the second largest in the coalition, cited the fallout from a leaked phone call between Paetongtarn and former Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Sen.
The leak comes amid rising tensions between the two countries over a disputed border area, and Bhumjaithai said the incident had compromised national interests.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
'Bhumjaithai will work with all Thai people to support the army and officials who safeguard the sovereignty, territorial integrity and interests of Thailand in all ways,' Reuters quoted Bhumjaithai as saying in a statement.
The exit of the Bhumjaithai Party has left PM Shinawatra's government on shaky ground, with a razor-thin majority and waning public support.
Her government is also grappling with a sluggish economy and the looming threat of steep US tariffs if ongoing trade negotiations fail.
At 38, Paetongtarn — the daughter of former Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra — is Thailand's youngest-ever premier. She was propelled into office less than a year ago after her predecessor was removed by court order, but her leadership now appears increasingly vulnerable.
The focus has now turned to the remaining 10 coalition partners, as speculation grows over whether more defections could follow.
Meanwhile, tensions with Cambodia over a disputed border region have escalated, with troops mobilised on both sides. Paetongtarn has come under criticism for her more measured diplomatic approach, which stands in contrast to the Thai military's hardline stance.
Despite the backlash, the prime minister has reaffirmed her commitment to a peaceful resolution, while insisting that Thailand will take all necessary steps to protect its sovereignty.
In a leaked phone call dated June 15, Paetongtarn told former Cambodian leader Hun Sen that she was under intense domestic pressure and urged him not to heed 'the other side' in Thailand — a reference believed to be aimed at a vocal Thai general commanding forces in the disputed border area.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
'Bhumjaithia has called on Prime Minister Paetongtarn to show responsibility for making the country lose its integrity, honor, to the people and the army,' the party said.
With inputs from agencies
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Today
28 minutes ago
- India Today
Ayatollah's nephew calls for regime's fall: No peace without disappearance
As the Israel-Iran war enters its second week, one voice from within the ruling family of Iran is offering a shocking perspective to dismantling the regime — by any means Moradkhani, the exiled nephew of Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, said in an interview on Wednesday from his home in northern France that while he is no supporter of the war, he believes the collapse of the Islamic Republic is the only path to real that makes this regime disappear is necessary," Moradkhani said. "Now that we are at this stage, it has to be done." Moradkhani, who fled Iran in 1986 and has remained a vocal critic of his uncle's authoritarian rule, added that the military confrontation with Israel is regrettable — but inevitable under a regime unwilling to bend or reform, reports Reuters."I am deeply sad, and I regret that it has come to this... but will killing Khamenei make the regime disappear immediately? That's another question," Moradkhani said he had lost contact with his network in Iran due to an internet blackout but believed 'many Iranians were happy' to see signs of the regime weakening. "The sooner this is finished, the better," he said. "It has to end with the disappearance of the Islamic Republic. Otherwise, it will be a useless defeat, and I still think this regime will take revenge," Moradkhani escalated further as US President Donald Trump demanded Iran's 'unconditional surrender' and openly mused about killing Khamenei in social media posts. Aides say the president has privately approved military options targeting Iranian nuclear infrastructure, though he has withheld a final PRINCE REZA PAHLAVI CALLS KHAMENEI A FRIGHTENED RATEarlier, Reza Pahlavi, son of the late Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, had issued a call for regime change in Tehran, declaring that Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei has "gone into hiding underground" and that the Islamic Republic is "in the process of collapsing.""The Islamic Republic has reached its end," Pahlavi said in a social media post. "What has begun is irreversible. The future is bright, and together, we will pass through this sharp turn in history."He portrayed Khamenei as a weakened, panicked leader: "Khamenei, like a frightened rat, has gone into hiding underground and has lost control of the situation.""The end of the Islamic Republic is the end of its 46-year war against the Iranian nation," Pahlavi and Iran traded missile strikes at each other for the seventh consecutive day. Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei rejected Trump's demand for unconditional surrender and Iranians jammed highways out of the capital Tehran, a city of 10 million people, as residents sought sanctuary from intensified Israeli InMust Watch
India Today
28 minutes ago
- India Today
Putin refuses to discuss possible killing of Ayatollah Khamenei by Israel or US
ST PETERSBURG, Russia, June 19 (Reuters) - President Vladimir Putin on Thursday refused to discuss the possibility that Israel and the United States would kill Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and said the Iranian people were consolidating around the leadership in Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has openly speculated that Israel's military attacks could result in regime change in Iran while U.S. President Donald Trump said on Tuesday that the US knew where Khamenei was "hiding" but that Washington was not going to kill him "for now".advertisementAsked what his reaction would be if Israel did kill Khamenei with the assistance of the United States, Putin said: "I do not even want to discuss this possibility. I do not want to." When pressed, Putin said he had heard the remarks about possibly killing Khamenei but that he did not want to discuss it."We see that today in Iran, with all the complexity of the internal political processes taking place there is a consolidation of society around the country's political leadership," Putin told senior news agency editors in the northern Russian city of St said all sides should look for ways to end hostilities in a way that ensured both Iran's right to peaceful nuclear power and Israel's right to the unconditional security of the Jewish was speaking as Trump kept the world guessing whether the U.S. would join Israel's bombardment of Iranian nuclear and missile sites and as residents of Iran's capital streamed out of the city on the sixth day of the air said he had been in touch with Trump and with Netanyahu, and that he had conveyed Moscow's ideas on resolving the conflict while ensuring Iran's continued access to civil nuclear NUCLEAR FACILITIESQuestioned about possible regime change in Iran, Putin said that before getting into something, one should always look at whether or not the main aim is being achieved before starting said Iran's underground uranium enrichment facilities were still intact."These underground factories, they exist, nothing has happened to them," Putin said."It seems to me that it would be right for everyone to look for ways to end hostilities and find ways for all parties to this conflict to come to an agreement with each other," Putin said. "In my opinion, in general, such a solution can be found."Asked if Russia was ready to provide Iran with modern weapons to defend itself against Israeli strikes, Putin said a strategic partnership treaty signed with Tehran in January did not envisage military cooperation and that Iran had not made anyh formal request for Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov said on Wednesday that Moscow was telling the United States not to strike Iran because it would radically destabilise the Middle East.A spokeswoman for the Russian Foreign Ministry also warned that Israeli strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities risked triggering a nuclear said that Israel had given Moscow assurances that Russian specialists helping to build two more reactors at the Bushehr nuclear power plant in Iran would not be hurt in air said that Moscow had "a very good relationship with Iran" and that Russia could ensure Iran's interests in nuclear has offered to take enriched uranium from Iran and to supply nuclear fuel to the country's civil energy programme."It is possible to ensure Iran's interests in the field of peaceful nuclear energy. And at the same time, to address Israel's concerns about its security," Putin said. "We have outlined them (our ideas) to our partners from the USA, Israel and Iran."Must Watch
India Today
an hour ago
- India Today
Trump faces backlash from MAGA base over potential US strike on Iran
WASHINGTON, June 18 (Reuters) - The prospect of a US strike against Iran has exposed divisions in the coalition of supporters that brought President Donald Trump to power, with some of his base urging him not to get the country involved in a new Middle East of Trump's most prominent Republican allies, including top lieutenant Steve Bannon, have found themselves in the unusual position of being at odds with a president who largely shares their isolationist one of many influential voices from Trump's "America First" coalition, on Wednesday urged caution about the U.S. military joining Israel in trying to destroy Iran's nuclear program in the absence of a diplomatic deal. "We can't do this again," Bannon told reporters at an event sponsored by the Christian Science Monitor in Washington. "We'll tear the country apart. We can't have another Iraq."The anti-interventionist part of the Republican Party is watching with alarm as Trump has moved swiftly from seeking a peaceful diplomatic settlement with Iran to possibly having the United States support Israel's military campaign, including the use of a 30,000-pound "bunker buster" criticism shows the opposition Trump could face from his right-leaning "Make America Great Again" flank should he join the fight, a step that Iran has warned would have big consequences for Americans without specifying what that might decision by Trump to enter the conflict would be a sharp departure from his usual caution about foreign entanglements. It could impact his campaign to foster good relations in the Gulf and could be a distraction from his efforts to negotiate an end to the war in Ukraine and make tariff deals with countries around the MAGA coalition propelled Trump into office in the 2016 and 2024 elections and remains critically important to him even though he is prevented by the US Constitution from running for a third that base could erode Trump's popularity and factor into whether Republicans hang on to control of Congress in the 2026 midterm CANNOT HAVE A 'NUCLEAR WEAPON'Asked about the rift on Wednesday, Trump appeared unconcerned that some in his base could be turning its back on him, at least on this issue."My supporters are more in love with me today, and I'm in love with them more than they were even at election time," Trump told reporters at the White House. "I only want one thing: Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon."He said some of his supporters "are a little bit unhappy now" but that others agree with him that Iran cannot become a nuclear not looking to fight. But if it's a choice between them fighting or having a nuclear weapon, you have to do what you have to do," Trump Short, an ally of former Vice President Mike Pence who served as Trump's legislative director during his first term, called the division over Iran within Trump's party a "pretty large rift." He said he thought Trump's base would stay with him despite the differences, however."The divisions are obviously coming out in the open in this moment, but ultimately I think that most of the president's followers are loyal to him more so than any worldview," he said standing with Israel could help Trump politically, too. Traditionally conservative voters favor standing by Israel. In a Reuters/Ipsos poll conducted in March, 48% of Republicans agreed with a statement that the U.S. should use its military power to defend Israel from threats no matter where the threats come from, compared to 28% who disagreed. Among Democrats, 25% agreed and 52% experts believe Iran has been intent on developing a nuclear weapon, despite Tehran's denials, and Israel believes it would be at risk as a result. US officials believe if Iran possessed an atomic weapon it would trigger an nuclear arms race in the Middle NEED TO GET JOB DONEBannon, host of the popular "War Room" podcast, said "the Israelis need to finish what they started" and that Trump should slow down deliberations over U.S. involvement and explain his decision-making."This is one of the most ancient civilizations in the world, okay, with 92 million people. This is not something you play around with. You have to think this through at this level, and the American people have to be on board. You can't just dump this on them," he influential MAGA voices with similar messages of worry include former Fox News Channel host Tucker Carlson and U.S. Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene, a Georgia Republican and long-time Trump ally."Anyone slobbering for the US to become fully involved in the Israel/Iran war is not America First/MAGA," Greene said in a social media post on Sunday. "We are sick and tired of foreign wars. All of them."The rift was on full display when Carlson, on his streaming program, clashed with Republican Senator Ted Cruz of Texas late on clip from Carlson's interview with Cruz went viral with Carlson strongly criticizing the senator for seeking regime change in Iran, and Cruz expressing support for the president."You don't know anything about Iran!' Carlson told Cruz.'I am not the Tucker Carlson expert on Iran,' Cruz fired back.'You're a senator who's calling for the overthrow of the government,' Carlson President JD Vance tried to tamp down talk of a rift on Monday with a social media post defending the president."People are right to be worried about foreign entanglement after the last 25 years of idiotic foreign policy. But I believe the president has earned some trust on this issue," he allies and opponents are waiting on Trump's decision-making process. The president said on Wednesday afternoon he had some ideas on how to proceed but had not made a final decision.
