Fashion giant Shein makes surprising announcement amid backlash over alleged human rights violations — here's what's happening
Fast-fashion giant Shein is hosting its largest-ever Australian pop-up store in Sydney this month. The effort comes as the company faces mounting criticism over its environmental impact and alleged human rights violations.
Shein is opening a temporary shop in Sydney, hoping to draw more customers to its ultra-cheap clothing. The Daily Telegraph calls the pop-up "a rare chance for customers to see and try on Shein's typically online-only offerings."
The pop-up will showcase 11 of Shein's sub-labels, including a new brand called Aralina, which the company promotes as sustainable and "wellness-inspired."
A quick look at Aralina clothing online shows many items are made of polyester, a synthetic fabric commonly made from plastic, and priced similarly to the low cost of other low-quality Shein items, raising doubts about the company's eco-friendly claims.
As The Daily Telegraph notes, Shein faces mounting scrutiny over allegations of forced labor, particularly involving Uyghur workers in China. The company also faces ongoing criticism of the environmental impact of its fast-fashion business. Shein denies these allegations.
Fast fashion raises concerns around quality and ethics, affecting wardrobes and the wider world. These high-quantity, low-quality brands often rely on cheap materials and exploitative labor practices, making them a frequent target of criticism.
Environmental organizations condemn fast fashion for fueling overconsumption and excessive textile waste. Because fast-fashion garments are made as cheaply as possible, they tend to wear out quickly, encouraging a cycle of constant buying and discarding, which has a major environmental impact.
Earth.Org reports that more than 92 million tonnes (over 101 million tons) of textile waste end up in landfills each year. In the U.S. alone, the average person throws away about 81.5 pounds of clothing annually. Globally, only about 12% of used clothing is recycled.
Additionally, the environmental damage caused by fast-fashion production, such as polluted waterways, toxic chemical use, and excessive resource consumption, often impacts the health and well-being of local communities. These environmental hazards infringe on human rights by threatening access to clean water, food, and safe living conditions.
At the same time, many fast-fashion brands rely on low-cost labor in countries where worker protections are nonexistent. Garment workers endure long hours, unsafe conditions, and low wages. In some supply chains, child labor and forced labor have been documented, particularly in China.
What should be done to make home solar panels cheaper?
More tax incentives
Lower installation costs
Better loan options
They're cheap enough already
Click your choice to see results and speak your mind.
While there are growing global efforts to regulate fast fashion through government legislation and industry-led initiatives, the movement is still developing, and enforcement can be inconsistent.
Meanwhile, you can make a difference by breaking up with fast fashion. While it can seem like you are saving money while shopping fast fashion, experts estimate that you can save $200 or more a year by investing in fewer, higher-quality sustainable pieces that last longer.
If shopping high-quality, sustainable brands isn't in your budget, consider shopping secondhand. Thrifting from local stores or resale platforms such as ThredUp saves money and reduces the environmental and human impact of clothing production.
Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
an hour ago
- Forbes
SXSW London Debates: Is The Green Transition Financially Viable?
Rhian-Mari Thomas argues that the green transition is financially viable at SXSW London, referencing ... More the record amount of investment in the sector in 2024 Thought leaders across green finance and economics gathered to debate the financial viability of climate progress on day four of SXSW London. Held at the innovation and ideas festival's Climate & Nature House, a space hosted by Bellwethers to have meaningful environmental conversations, the session followed a traditional debate format encouraging a jovial air of competition. Sophie Lambin, founder and CEO of Kite Insights, and Stephen Dunbar-Johnson, president, international at the New York Times Company moderated the conversation. Lambin clarified that the debaters were tasked with addressing whether we can realistically and successfully invest our way to a green future, considering our current economic system and the state of the climate emergency, or whether we need new financial tools and a financial system. Arguing for the notion that 'the green transition is financially viable' were Rhian-Mari Thomas, CEO Green Finance Institute, Marisa Drew, chief sustainability officer, Standard Chartered Bank, and Fiona Howarth, CEO of Octopus Electric Vehicles. Arguing against the notion were Kathy Boughman McLeod, CEO Climate Resilience for All, Chaitanya Kumar, head of economy & environment at New Economics Foundation and Erinch Sahan, business and enterprise lead at Doughnut Economics Action Lab. Each debater was given three minutes to make their case. The debaters prepare their arguments on stage at SXSW London In support of the motion, Thomas started the conversation by saying that the green transition is 'economically strategic, it is socially imperative, and it is already underway.' She highlighted that a record $2.1 trillion was invested in green energy technology in 2024 according to BloombergNEF. Thomas sees this as evidence that the financial markets view green investments as smart economic strategy that not only provides financial opportunity, but protects us from the social and economic damage of the climate crisis. Howarth drew on the enormous success of her employer, Octopus Energy Group, as evidence that current investment is working. Started nine years ago, the company now employs 10,000 people and is valued at $9 billion while making green energy a viable option for consumers. She says this is thanks to 'smart innovators', and 'clever policy mechanisms'. Drew, instead, highlighted that emerging markets such as India, China, Indonesia and Middle Eastern countries have some of the fastest growing economies and are doubling down on green energy transition. 'What is Saudi Arabia doing? It is spending billions, if not trillions, on diversifying its economy. What does that tell you? The energy transition is viable, and the old way is no longer going to be the case in the not-too-distant future,' she argued. The first rebuttal came from Sahan, who highlighted that while $2.1 trillion was invested in green energy last year, the Climate Policy Initiative estimates that $6 trillion per year is needed to fund a green transition. He also argued that financial viability of a movement currently means that it is still satisfying the ROI needs of the financial market. 'These parameters are holding us back,' he said, taking off his belt to use as a symbol that financial markets are placing a straightjacket on businesses and governments to make progress on climate. He then pulled out an apple to make the point that the current green transition focuses on low hanging fruit, undermining the need for larger systemic change that picks the fruit at the top of the tree too. Chaitanya Kumar argued that the current financial system is too heavily influenced by fossil fuel ... More companies to be a fully viable solution to the green transition Kumar's speech made the point that large investment funds have interests in many of the biggest companies in the world as well as oil and gas companies, intrinsically tying them together, and creating strong lobbying power. 'Incumbent power and the political economy of the transition is still very much held by fossil fuel interests around the world,' he said. He drew on examples of the lobbying by fossil fuel companies which saw the EU label natural gas as a 'green energy' in 2022 and Microsoft's pivot on its sustainability strategy to adjust for escalating AI emissions. Finally, McLeod, highlighted the social costs, as well as the environmental costs of the current system. 'The market we have, not necessarily the market we wish to have, incentivizes pollution, devalues people and overlooks protection,' she told the audience. Addressing the plight of informal women workers who are on the frontline of the climate crisis, she said: 'This economy is chaos. We cannot maintain these expectations of return and believe that there is a green future. That is a fantasy.' The debate was declared a tie after the audience were invited to applaud the team they felt debated the best. Summarising the conversation, Dunbar-Johnson emphasised the importance of debate on these issues: 'What you did is encapsulate the complexity of the arguments in these subjects. This is a subject that we must grapple with. If the money is there, do we have the political solutions to drive that? We do have instruments to drive it, but the reality is, too much of the narrative is about the cost of the transition, not about the cost of not transitioning and the opportunities.'
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
The Trump-Musk bromance is over. So what comes next?
This post originally appeared in the Business Insider Today newsletter. You can sign up forBusiness Insider's daily newsletter here. Happy Friday! What do you get when you mix Pokémon-like trading cards with K-pop? A collectible that's big business. BI's Cheryl Teh describes the photo trading cards, known as "boy paper," as "a blood sport that's equal parts lottery and enterprise." In today's big story, the historic relationship between President Donald Trump and Elon Musk dramatically imploded. What's on deck Markets: JPMorgan just put its foot down against its new junior bankers hunting for PE jobs. Tech: At NY Tech Week, the talk of the town was … the town. Business: Inside a wild three days at the world's biggest bitcoin party. But first, no love a toddler determined to pour their own milk, the Trump-Musk relationship seemed destined to crash. On Thursday, the proverbial glass finally spilled. President Donald Trump responded to Elon Musk's ongoing attacks on his "Big Beautiful Bill," saying he had a "great relationship" with the billionaire but that, "I don't know if we will anymore." Trump suggested to reporters that Musk's motivation was self-interest, citing the bill's phase-out of the electric vehicle tax credit that could negatively impact Tesla. The billionaire quickly fired back on X that his focus was the bill fueling the country's growing deficit. The rest, as they say, is history. Both men's attacks grew increasingly hostile. Musk, who spent almost $300 million on the 2024 election, took credit for Trump's win. Trump threatened to cancel Musk's government contracts, describing it as the "easiest way to save money in our budget." Not to be outdone, Musk said SpaceX would decommission its Dragon spacecraft. Five hours later, he appeared to walk back the decision in response to an X user. Musk also went after Trump's tariffs, saying they will cause a recession later this year. As BI's Peter Kafka pointed out, much of the fight took place between the two combatants' social platforms of choice: X (Musk) and Truth Social (Trump). Regardless of what's fueling Musk (we had some theories earlier this week), the impact on at least one of his businesses is already clear. Tesla gave back much of the gains accumulated in May. On Thursday alone, the stock fell 14%. Still, there's no point crying over spilled milk. Despite the split, both men remain two of the world's most powerful people. Which raises the question: Where do we go from here? Here are three big questions in the aftermath of the Trump-Musk breakup. Who gets the "kids" in the divorce? Both men have deep fan bases whose devotion rivals just about anyone's supporters. (Yes, that includes the Swifties and the BeyHive.) But there is also plenty of overlap between Team MAGA and the Elon acolytes. If things remain contentious between the two sides, will fans of both feel forced to pick a side? And if they do, who will come out on top? Is a reconciliation still on the table? White House aides have scheduled a call on Friday with Musk, Politico reported. Bill Ackman and Ye took to X to urge the duo to end their public feud. As brutal as the attacks have been, both men have traded barbs before. Back in 2022, Trump called Musk a "bullshit artist" while Musk said the then-former president shouldn't run for reelection and instead "hang up his hat & sail into the sunset." Fighting with Trump doesn't mean the person is on the outs forever, though. Just look at Secretary of State Marco Rubio. What happens to Musk's political allegiance? If Trump and Musk can't mend their relationship, the Tesla CEO could be without a political home. The GOP remains firmly in Trump's grasp, and Democrats seem highly unlikely to welcome Musk into their ranks. (And who's to say Musk would want to join them.) Perhaps sensing his potential future as a political nomad, Musk asked his X followers if it's time for a new party "that actually represents the 80% in the middle." It appears he already has one constituent: Mark Cuban. Here's what other business leaders had to say about the fallout. 1. JPMorgan's stern warning for junior bankers. Analysts who accept a "future-dated job offer" within their first 18 months of employment will be terminated if discovered, the firm said in a memo sent on Wednesday. It's an escalation of CEO Jamie Dimon's ongoing criticism of private equity's "on-cycle" recruitment process that continues to creep earlier and earlier. 2. Three reasons to bet on Palantir. Shares of Alex Karp's software giant have soared 74% year-to-date, outpacing the broader index and tech stocks to make it the second-best-performing S&P 500 stock of the year. Government deals, AI hype, and retail bullishness have propelled it to new heights. 3. Ken Griffin doesn't get Trump's MO. At the Forbes Iconoclast conference, the Citadel founder and GOP megadonor said he didn't understand why Trump wants to bring manufacturing "jobs that'll never pay much" back to the US. "It's one thing to make Nikes, it's another thing to make F-35 fighters," he said. 1. Meta's AI-driven hiring plan revealed. The company is planning to automate key parts of its job recruitment process, like testing coding skills and assisting interviewers with question prompts, per an internal document obtained by BI. It'll also use AI to evaluate its human interviewers. 2. Googlers behind NotebookLM launch their own AI startup. Last year, NotebookLM went viral with its AI-generated podcasts. Some of the team have since split from Google to work on Huxe, which released an app that leverages users' data to generate daily audio briefings. BI got a sneak peek. 3. New York Tech Week is NYC's pitch to be the new SF. Startup culture may have found a home in the Bay Area, but AI is picking up steam in the Big Apple. For techies, the city's Tech Week happy hours were a far cry from pulling a coding all-nighter. Spicy marg, anyone? 1. Three days at the world's biggest bitcoin party. Some 35,000 attendees gathered in Las Vegas for the Bitcoin Conference, complete with free Zyn, MAGA pride, and an awkward closing keynote. Here's what it was like. 2. How creators make Patreon their podcasting goldmine. Patreon helps creators turn audiences into paying subscribers, and podcasting is the platform's biggest category. Three creators told BI how they use the platform that makes one of them six figures a month. 3. For top business executives' pay, timing is money. Some corporate leaders could be enriching themselves by timing big, market-moving announcements around their scheduled stock options grant days. BI analyzed more than a decade's worth of executive compensation data and found some eye-opening patterns. Amazon cuts jobs in its Books business, internal email shows. Leaked Microsoft org chart shows the team Jay Parikh assembled to lead CoreAI, full of fellow ex-Meta execs. Meet the 'reclusive' tech billionaire making an audacious bid to buy TikTok. Inside Citadel's most selective intern class ever, from where they go to school to what they study. 'We live in a terrarium': Larry Fink on why today's leaders should be 'more guarded.' Content karma catches up to Reddit in its fight with Anthropic. A top consulting firm rips up its traditional billing playbook for the AI era. A US Navy sailor walked BI through what it was like shooting down a small drone with a .50 caliber machine gun. Nine cocktails that will be everywhere this summer, according to bartenders and mixologists. Bureau of Labor Statistics releases monthly employment report. The Insider Today team: Dan DeFrancesco, deputy editor and anchor, in New York (on parental leave). Hallam Bullock, senior editor, in London. Grace Lett, editor, in Chicago. Amanda Yen, associate editor, in New York. Lisa Ryan, executive editor, in New York. Lina Batarags, bureau chief, in Singapore. Ella Hopkins, associate editor, in London. Elizabeth Casolo, fellow, in Chicago. Read the original article on Business Insider
Fast Company
6 hours ago
- Fast Company
Setting the standard: Understanding what it means to be a leader in your industry
What makes a company an industry leader? The simple response is the company that sells the most. Yet while sales certainly contribute to defining industry leaders, I believe leadership is more complex than this. Let's take the chemical industry as an example. It's fair to say the industry is often perceived negatively, despite the vital role chemical products play in our daily lives and the potential chemistry has to provide solutions to some of the world's biggest problems. There are many reasons for this, including its historical environmental impacts, safety concerns related to chemicals used in certain products, or even safety incidents, which still occur more often than they should. With this in mind, I want to explore what defines an industry leader in this space and how companies can stand out in an industry marked by negative perceptions. By examining leadership within the chemical industry, we can uncover universal insights into how a company's influence extends well beyond its own business environment. LEADING BY ASSOCIATION The impact a company has on the world around it goes a long way toward defining its leadership potential. From employees to customers, and local communities to the planet itself, the way a company acts will define how it's perceived and how well it operates. Impact, for me, is a company's ability to positively influence society, minimize its environmental footprint, and demonstrate care for employee well-being, while delivering impactful results for customers and shareholders. We need to do both, and we can do both. As I have already mentioned, the chemical industry has some historical perceptions to deal with, but industry-led initiatives such as the Responsible Care program, of which Syensqo is a signatory, are helping to change this. Responsible Care is designed to help chemical companies enhance their environmental, health, safety, and security (EHS&S) performance through CEO-level commitments to safety and sustainability in the communities where they operate, the products they manufacture, and the people that work for them. Membership in the right associations and programs for your company can play a significant role in defining industry leadership. Programs like Responsible Care not only hold your company to certain standards of ethics, quality, and safety, and demonstrate your company's commitment to these values, but they also keep you involved in broader industry discussions. This participation makes it easier to stay informed about industry developments, identify collaboration opportunities with peers, and advocate for both your company's and the industry's interests. It's important to note that we are not just talking about external impact or perceptions. Positive impact and leadership are driven by internal impact. If you don't have the trust, support, and confidence of your employees, you can't expect to have it from others either. For chemical companies and others, prioritizing clear and effective safety practices benefits both operations and people. It helps minimize disruptions and ensures that everyone returns home safely at the end of the day. ENSURING A POSITIVE IMPACT Committing to industry-wide initiatives puts your business on par with industry peers. It provides the foundations for leadership, but it doesn't establish leaders. To become an industry leader, you need to turn the principles promoted in such initiatives into strategic priorities that work for your business and build them into your company culture. For example, instead of viewing sustainability as something you have to do to meet regulatory requirements or other commitments, consider how it can be integrated into your business model and become an integral part of your company's identity. The Sustainable Guar Initiative (SGI) in Rajasthan, India, which was established by Syensqo (previously Solvay), in collaboration with brands such as Henkel and Procter & Gamble, and NGO TechnoServe, demonstrates how sustainability can be embedded into a company's core values. Launched in 2015, the program is celebrating its 10th anniversary this year, marking a decade of progress in building a more sustainable guar value chain. Guar derivatives, made from the guar bean, are used as a thickening agent, stabilizer, and conditioner in various industries. However, climate change has made farming more challenging, making crops such as guar more difficult for farmers to cultivate. The SGI aims to enhance the livelihoods of local farmers through training and education programs, introducing more sustainable and resilient agricultural practices. It also ensures that the businesses involved have a consistent and reliable supply of guar. SUSTAINABLE PRODUCT INNOVATION Product innovation is another good example of how sustainability and profitability can coexist. Decarbonization doesn't have to mean deindustrialization. Companies can be both sustainable and profitable—and those that manage to achieve this will have an advantage over the rest. Having the right tools, which promote transparency and validate the authenticity of your company's sustainability claims while aligning with your strategic priorities, can help with this. Evidence-based strategies, programs, or frameworks that you can adopt and adapt to your own business needs allow you to integrate this approach into the way you work and will give you credibility as a leader. In the chemical industry, the World Business Council for Sustainable Development's (WBCSD) Portfolio Sustainability Assessment (PSA) provides a framework that chemical companies can use as a starting point to develop their own portfolio sustainability management methodologies and processes. At the company I work for, our Sustainable Portfolio Management (SPM) tool, which is aligned with the PSA, provides scientific evidence of the sustainability impact of our products. At the same time, it helps guide company decisions across the board, shaping future innovation projects and strategic priorities, while ensuring we can meet more immediate objectives. Like the SGI, Portfolio Sustainability Assessment is about going beyond basic industry standards, this time by ensuring that the products that leave our factories make a positive impact on the world. There is a big difference—for your customers and the credibility of your business, as well as for the planet—between saying your products are sustainable and being able to prove exactly how they are sustainable. Leaders not only develop the evidence-based tools to do this; they integrate them into the way they work, setting their businesses up to do good, while also making a profit. A lot goes into defining industry leadership. However, for me, it's all about how we can achieve a lasting positive impact—because at the end of the day, if we don't have the support, trust, and loyalty of our employees, local communities, and customers, it's going to be a lot harder to make those sales!
