logo
Texas set to mandate Ten Commandments in classrooms as ACLU vows to sue

Texas set to mandate Ten Commandments in classrooms as ACLU vows to sue

The Hilla day ago

Texas is set to become the largest state in the nation to mandate that every public school classroom display a copy of the Ten Commandments, with advocates fearing a further erosion of church and state and the legislation's sponsor making clear that's a separation she doesn't believe in.
While Gov. Greg Abbott (R) has not yet signed the measure, which comes as red states are increasingly seeking to inject Christianity into public education, he told lawmakers in early May to 'get this bill to my desk. I'll make it law.'
Under the legislation, beginning September 1, every school in Texas will be required to display a 16 inch by 20 inch poster of the Ten Commandments. While they won't be required to buy them with district funds, they will be required to display them if donated.
The legislation also effectively creates an official state version of the Ten Commandments, because only one specific iteration meets the new statute: a King James Bible-derived list of 'Thou shalt nots' that is used by many Baptists and evangelicals but not by a majority of Catholics, Jews, protestants or Eastern Orthodox Christians.
Critics argue the bill is a clear violation of the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment, which prohibits the federal government from creating a state religion.
The American Civil Liberties Union of Texas on Wednesday announced it would sue.
'S.B. 10 is blatantly unconstitutional. We will be working with Texas public school families to prepare a lawsuit to stop this violation of students' and parents' First Amendment rights,' the ACLU wrote, calling the measure 'religiously coercive.'
Supporters of the bill, meanwhile, appeal to a letter from Thomas Jefferson which seems to leave open the possibility of state regulation of religion, though so far, courts haven't agreed: A similar bill in Louisiana was blocked in November after being ruled unconstitutional by a federal judge.
The Texas bill is one of a broad array of public policy proposals pushed by an alliance of groups that seek a broader role for evangelical Christianity in public life. A prior state measure, passed in 2021, required schools to display 'in God we Trust' placards in every classroom.
Neighboring Arkansas passed its own Ten Commandments bill in April.
In a nod to the legal risks, amendments to the Texas measure require the state attorney general, currently Republican Ken Paxton, to defend at state expense any school district sued over compliance.
This week, the Texas legislature also passed a bill permitting prayer in public schools and stripping language that forbids teachers from 'encouraging' students to participate.
That measure also obligates the office of the state attorney general to help schools set up a prayer program, and — like the Ten Commandments bill — to defend any legal challenges to it at public expense.
During debates over passage, bill sponsor state Rep. Candy Noble insisted that it was not a religious measure but meant to instruct students about the historical importance she says the Ten Commandments hold in American democracy.
'This bill is about honoring our historical educational and judicial heritage with the discipline of the Ten Commandments,' Noble said in a Sunday exchange with Rep. James Talarico (D), a self-described evangelical who opposed the bill.
Over the past two months, Talarico and Noble's verbal duels over the bill have served as an intra-evangelical debate over the role of Christianity in public life.
'We established that our founding fathers wanted a separation of church and state,' Talarico began in one April committee hearing, before Noble cut him off.
'I did not establish that,' she said. 'I absolutely did not establish that. That's a historical fact that I disagree with.'
In his opposition to the bill, Talarico repeatedly argued that displaying the Ten Commandments was itself a religious violation: a contradiction of St. Paul's dictum in Romans that all the commandments could be 'summed up in this sentence, 'You shall love your neighbor as yourself.'
He argued it was not neighborly to signal to Jews, Muslims, Hindus or members of other Christian denominations that they didn't belong.
That's a read Noble emphatically pushed back on. If these people were Americans, she said, 'maybe it would make them curious about what made our forefathers tick. Maybe it will help them wonder 'How can I treat others better? Maybe it will help them ask their parents questions on 'Why should I be under your authority?'
'Maybe we can take that tack with it instead of the negative tack that you're taking with it,' she added.
In debates over the bill, Noble repeatedly argued that 'our classrooms are crying out for moral guidance,' though she went back and forth on whether teachers would be required to interpret the Ten Commandments for students.
In a viral moment from the debate, Talarico pressed her on why representatives were working over the weekend — the Jewish and Christian Sabbaths — in violation of the Fourth Commandment.
'Is that ironic or what?' Noble asked, before explaining the importance of God's decision to take a day of rest, and contending that Talarico's own opposition to the bill had pushed debate to the weekend.
'Do you think that members of the legislature should focus more on trying to follow the Ten Commandments rather than telling others to follow them?' Talarico asked.
'It is incumbent on all of us to follow God's law,' Noble said. 'And I think that we would be better off if we did.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump reignites feud with CBS over ‘deleted' Colbert interview - years after his claim was debunked
Trump reignites feud with CBS over ‘deleted' Colbert interview - years after his claim was debunked

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Trump reignites feud with CBS over ‘deleted' Colbert interview - years after his claim was debunked

President Donald Trump posted a video claiming that CBS 'deleted' his 2015 interview with Stephen Colbert, resurfacing a debunked claim against one of his favorite recent rivals. Late on Friday, the president reposted a Facebook video on his Truth Social account containing heavily edited clips of his September 2015 interview on The Late Show with Stephen Colbert. A message next to the video states: 'You are not supposed to see this video. CBS DELETED this entire episode from their official website. You will not find these segments on YouTube either.' However, a quick search on YouTube showed otherwise. Clips from the Trump-Colbert interview are still available to be watched on the official Late Show account. One video has 17 million views. The Independent has reached out to the White House and CBS for comment. Both the YouTube video and Trump's post include a portion of the interview in which Trump, then a candidate, touts his plans to build a wall, prompting the audience to cheer. 'Oh, listen to this, even with your crowd –' Trump begins. Colbert interjects: 'They love the wall. People love the wall.' Strangely, this isn't the first time that Trump has made this claim. The president appears to have reposted that same video in his first term in October 2018. Hours later, Colbert posted on X: 'I don't know why the president would take time on a National Day of Mourning to retweet something weird like this, but the original clips have always been online. 16 million views.' The comedian attached two links to YouTube clips from the episode in question. A CBS spokesperson at the time told the Associated Press that full episodes of The Late Show are only available to stream online 30 days after the initial airing. Trump's Friday Truth Social post marked the latest move in his feud with CBS. The president has repeatedly expressed his ire at CBS' 60 Minutes interview with Kamala Harris. He has sued the network for $20 million, claiming it used 'deceitful editing' to advantage the then-vice president. CBS filed a motion to dismiss the case earlier this month, arguing: 'This lawsuit is an affront to the First Amendment and is without basis in law or fact.' In response, this week Trump's lawyers claimed he suffered 'mental anguish' as a result of the interview. His legal team also accused to the network of seeking 'to wield the First Amendment as a sword, arguing that they cannot be held responsible for illegal conduct, intended to mislead the masses and undertaken in the pursuit of profit, because such conduct was the result of 'editorial judgment.''

A new Nebraska law wants to make social media less addictive for kids
A new Nebraska law wants to make social media less addictive for kids

Engadget

time3 hours ago

  • Engadget

A new Nebraska law wants to make social media less addictive for kids

Nebraska is the latest state to crack down on how kids can use social media. The state's governor, Jim Pillen, recently signed into law a package of bills aimed at restricting certain social media features that keep kids hooked on the platform. The final bill signed, called the Age-Appropriate Online Design Code Act, will require companies to offer time limits on usage, restrict certain categories of content and provide chronological feeds instead of algorithmic ones that promote infinite scrolling. The Age-Appropriate Online Design Code Act, also known as LB504, details that social media companies can only collect the minimum amount of personal data from younger users, and offers parents more tools to limit how their children use their accounts. Along with those restrictions, the law prohibits any ads related to gambling, alcohol, tobacco or drugs from reaching kids on social media. Alongside LB504, the signed package of bills includes LB140 that limits student use of smartphones in schools, LB383 that requires social media companies to verify the age of its users and require parental consent for creating accounts, and LB172 that creates criminal penalties for AI-generated pornography. "Collectively, all these bills have an incredible impact on helping our teachers and giving our schools the opportunity to teach our kids, instead of being disrupted in the classroom," Pillen said in a press release. "They also provide parents with the tools they need to protect our kids from big tech online companies and predators." The law is set to go into effect January 1, 2026, and any companies that violate these new regulations will face civil penalties. Nebraska is the latest state to restrict social media usage for minors, but Texas is also trying to pass a similar ban. With more efforts to regulate social media, NetChoice, an Internet advocacy organization whose members include Google, Meta and X, has voiced criticism of these states' efforts, arguing that they infringe on First Amendment rights and user privacy. In 2022, California signed a similar law meant to protect underage users, but it has since been in a legal battle following a lawsuit filed by NetChoice that claims a violation of free speech rights.

PBS Sues Trump Administration Over Executive Order to Cut Funding
PBS Sues Trump Administration Over Executive Order to Cut Funding

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

PBS Sues Trump Administration Over Executive Order to Cut Funding

Days after National Public Radio (NPR) sued the Trump administration over attempts to cut off its federal funding, the Public Broadcasting Service (PBS) has also filed a lawsuit, claiming that the proposed cuts violate the First Amendment. Trump signed an executive order earlier this month ordering the government 'to cease Federal funding for NPR and PBS, alleging 'bias' in their reporting. Trump has also been looking to rescind federal funding for the Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB). 'Americans have the right to expect that if their tax dollars fund public broadcasting at all, they fund only fair, accurate, unbiased, and nonpartisan news coverage,' the executive order read. On Tuesday, NPR and its member stations sued the Trump administration over the executive order, with PBS and a Minnesota public television station following Friday with a lawsuit filed at a federal court in Washington, D.C. The lawsuit objected to Trump's executive order that called PBS 'corrosive' as well as 'biased and partisan. 'PBS disputes those charged assertions in the strongest possible terms,' the lawsuit states. 'But regardless of any policy disagreements over the role of public television, our Constitution and laws forbid the President from serving as the arbiter of the content of PBS's programming, including by attempting to defund PBS.' The lawsuit continued, 'The [executive order] makes no attempt to hide the fact that it is cutting off the flow of funds to PBS because of the content of PBS programming and out of a desire to alter the content of speech. That is blatant viewpoint discrimination and an infringement of PBS and PBS Member Stations' private editorial discretion.' PBS said in a statement, 'After careful deliberation, PBS reached the conclusion that it was necessary to take legal action to safeguard public television's editorial independence, and to protect the autonomy of PBS member stations.' In response to the PBS lawsuit, a White House spokesperson accused the CPB of 'creating media to support a particular political party on the taxpayers' dime.' 'Therefore, the President is exercising his lawful authority to limit funding to NPR and PBS,' White House spokesperson Harrison Fields said in a statement (via NPR). 'The President was elected with a mandate to ensure efficient use of taxpayer dollars, and he will continue to use his lawful authority to achieve that objective.' NPR and PBS receive about $500 million annually through the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, a private, publicly funded nonprofit created by President Lyndon B. Johnson. Trump has been attacking the CPB since taking office, including by trying to fire some of its board members, prompting a lawsuit. The administration has also been looking to cut the CBP's federal funding. Trump will reportedly formally request Congress in early June to rescind the next two years of CPB funding, or $1.1 billion. More from Rolling Stone NPR Sues Trump for Trying to Strip Its Funding Trump Pumped and Dumped His Crypto Backers With Dud Dinner Party 'He Is Working to Erase Us': A Trans Activist on the Real Reason Trump's Budget Bans Trans Care Best of Rolling Stone The Useful Idiots New Guide to the Most Stoned Moments of the 2020 Presidential Campaign Anatomy of a Fake News Scandal The Radical Crusade of Mike Pence

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store