Northumberland quarry in doubt after legal challenge concession
Plans to build a quarry are in doubt after a council conceded to a legal challenge over how it assessed its possible impact on the environment.Last year, Northumberland County Council approved a proposal to excavate dolerite - used to produce concrete - near Kirkwhelpington, which would see almost three million tonnes of material extracted over 20 years.Law firm Leigh Day said the authority agreed to concede to a claim it "failed to assess the likely climate effects of the development" relating to soil disturbance, meaning the grant of planning permission could be quashed.The local authority declined to comment.
Those behind the quarry said it would create 20 long-term jobs.At the time, dozens of locals opposed saying the wind would blow noise, debris and grime into the village of Kirkwhelpington.The proposals were approved in November.
'Reconsider decision'
Campaigner John Winslow, represented by Leigh Day and supported by the Environmental Law Foundation, challenged the application in February.As a result, the council told Leigh Day it would concede that it did not comply with its obligations under the Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017 by failing to assess the likely climate effects of the application.Ricardo Gama, from Leigh Day, said: "The council will now need to assess those impacts and reconsider its decision to grant planning permission."Leigh Day said it was unlikely the legal challenge would be heard in court because of the concession.The developers North East Concrete have been approached from comment.
Follow BBC North East on X, Facebook, Nextdoor and Instagram.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
15 hours ago
- The Guardian
Manchester City fans take legal action against club over season-ticket policy
Manchester City supporters have taken legal action against the club over what they describe as a discriminatory new season-ticket policy. The protest relates to a system that requires fans to attend at least 10 league matches if they are to retain their ticket for the following season. A group of fans known as the Trade Union Blues, whose members are union members, have engaged the law firm Leigh Day to ask the club to review the policy, arguing that the requirement 'potentially gives rise to claims under the Equality Act of 2010'. Sign up to Football Daily Kick off your evenings with the Guardian's take on the world of football after newsletter promotion The secretary of Trade Union Blues, Chris Neville, said: 'This policy doesn't reward loyalty – it punishes people for being human. Illness, pregnancy, disability, caring responsibilities or working shifts [could] now cost you your season ticket. Many of our members have followed City through thick and thin and now face exclusion because of inflexible criteria that takes no account of individual circumstances.' The policy was announced by City last month, after season-ticket prices were frozen following consultation with the club's elected fan advisory board, City Matters. It increased the obligatory number of home league matches a season-ticket holder must attend from 14 to 16, but also mandated that only six of those games could be shared with friends or handed back to the club for resale. City believe that ticket utilisation is a growing issue for the club, having told City Matters in February that an average 8% of 37,000 season-ticket members do not attend a given Premier League game. Liverpool and Arsenal have mandatory attendance requirements for season-ticket holders, but neither cap the number of games that can be shared or resold. Arsenal exempt season-ticket holders with disabilities from the cap. Ryan Bradshaw, human rights partner at Leigh Day, said: 'The updated policy introduced by Manchester City applies a blanket requirement for personal attendance which significantly disadvantages a number of protected groups under the Equality Act. There is no indication that any meaningful mitigation procedures are in place. It disadvantages those working-class fans who are required to work shift patterns or precariously and may be unable to attend games for fear of losing their jobs.' City did not respond to a request for comment.
BBC News
7 days ago
- BBC News
A1 dualling ignored, Northumberland council leader warns
Northumberland has been forgotten, its council leader has warned, with government funding of £1.85bn for transport schemes in north-east England unlikely to revive the dualling of the half the money will be used to build a Metro line linking Washington with Sunderland and Newcastle, while other schemes include introducing integrated contactless payments across bus and rail dualling of 13 miles (21km) of the A1 between Morpeth and Ellingham was scrapped when Labour came to power last year amid suggestions it would cost £ all, the government is to award £15.6bn to areas across the UK in a move it claims will "make all parts of the country better off". As well as silence on plans for the A1 following Chancellor Rachel Reeves' speech on Wednesday, Councillor Glen Sanderson, the Conservative leader of Northumberland County Council, said he was concerned by the failure to mention other schemes in the area such as the Blyth Relief Road. "It is woefully disappointing that our A1 – now so busy it grinds to a halt regularly – is ignored."This announcement will not help Northumberland grow its economy."It also ignores the vital improvements needed for Moor Farm roundabout, which is an essential job that has to be done if the government want to keep up with the county council's ambition and incredible growth that the council has attracted."The Blyth Relief Road is also ignored." 'Just the start' The outline business case for the relief road was submitted to the Department for Transport for approval in forecasts estimate completion in 2027 with the scheme expected to cost just under £ would provide a direct dual carriageway connection between the A192 Three Horseshoes roundabout and the A193 South Beach in Blyth in a bid to reduce congestion, the Local Democracy Reporting Service said. Responding to Sanderson's comments, North East Mayor Kim McGuinness, of Labour, said there would be a "huge amount" of money for "local projects in Northumberland" with the newly announced funding "just the start" for the added: "This is money for local projects which the county council supports and which mean we can push ahead with our ambitious plans to build a fully-integrated transport network the North East can be proud of connecting people to real jobs and new opportunities." Follow BBC North East on X, Facebook, Nextdoor and Instagram.
Glasgow Times
04-06-2025
- Glasgow Times
Storing waste on Glasgow land ruled unlawful after 25 years
The site at 1151 Duke Street in the East End is an undeveloped land that has been used to store scrap metals and machinery since 2000. Now, the council ruled this use unlawful after a planning application was handed in by E G B R Dalton LLP. In the papers, the firm argued that since the area has been a home to these items for more than 10 years, it should be lawful. However, in their decision, council planning officials said the evidence submitted did not satisfy them. (Image: Sourced) (Image: Sourced) (Image: Sourced) (Image: Sourced) READ NEXT: Last-minute plea to save historic Glasgow building as decision looms We are at wits end with tragic parking in this Glasgow area The company, based in West Lothian, has owned the site since the 1980s. In 2000, a proposal was accepted to use this land as a "recycling facility for the processing of inert construction and demolition waste and the siting of a crushing unit". On pictures submitted with the application, skips, containers and train parts can be seen stored at the site. Documents added: "Since 2004 to the present day, the site has been leased and actively occupied for the purpose of storage and distribution of recycled metals, demolition waste, plant, machinery and containers recognised under Class 6 of the Use Classes (Scotland) Order 2023. "There have been no other planning uses on the site during this period. "As the use has continued without interruption or abandonment for a period of more than 20 years, it is considered that the use is lawful under Section 150 of the Town and Country Planning (Scotland) Act 1997." Despite this, the bid was rejected.
