Now SNP face ANOTHER gender legal fight… this time for failing to give guidance on Supreme Court trans ruling
The SNP Government faces ANOTHER legal challenge after failing to update public sector transgender guidance in the wake of a watershed court ruling.
In April, John Swinney 's government was left humiliated when the UK's highest court ruled against it on the legal definition of a woman.
It stipulated it was 'biological sex' which determines a person's rights under the 2010 Equality Act, not gender choice or a gender certificate.
The ruling meant women-only spaces such as changing rooms are off-limits to biological males who identify as women.
Despite the ruling, SNP ministers have so far failed to update guidance on single-sex spaces for the public sector.
They have also repeatedly claimed they are waiting to see the final position of the European and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) before going ahead with any changes.
Now, the group behind the successful Supreme Court challenge, For Women Scotland, have said they are speaking to lawyers about taking the Scottish Government to court AGAIN to force them into action.
The organisation's Susan Smith told a fringe event at the Scottish Conservative conference in Edinburgh yesterday: 'We've spoken to the Scottish Government.
'They are still reluctant to withdraw things like the transgender guidance for schools, which was unlawful even before this Supreme Court ruling.'
She added: 'There's resistance within organisations, and so we are possibly going to have to go back to court in order to get some of the government policies, especially policies of prisoners and schools, sorted out.'
Speaking to reporters later, she said: 'We really do need some action, and they [the Scottish Government] are telling us they have to wait for the EHRC revised guidance and we don't believe this is true.'
Ms Smith also said statements by Baroness Faulkner and Akua Reindorf KC of the EHRC had made the situation clear.
She added: 'And in fact, obviously Baroness Faulkner and Akua Reindorf KC and others have said: 'No, you need to start to act now.'
Asked if Ms Smith had a timeline for possible legal action, she said: 'No, we're still talking through things and talking through things with our lawyers as well. We haven't got anything like that but we are exploring options.'
Ms Smith suggested the delay could be because Scottish ministers fear if they change the guidance, they face a legal challenge from transgender activists who were unhappy with the clarification over equalities law given by the Supreme Court.
At the centre of the successful For Women Scotland challenge against the Scottish Government was the question of whether a 'woman' could include trans women in law.
The legal fight was sparked by the Scottish Government's Gender Representation on Public Boards Act, which aimed to get more women onto public bodies, but could include those who had been born men.
Five justices handed down a unanimous verdict against the Scottish Government's position and said sex was 'binary' and a person was 'either a woman or a man'.
It sent shockwaves across Scotland's public sector organisations including the prison service.
The Scottish Prison Service (SPS) has 16 transgender inmates, according to latest figures, with current rules allowing trans women to be housed in the female estate.
Meanwhile The Mail on Sunday has told how a number of councils in Scotland have failed to adapt schools in line with the ruling.
That is despite parents winning a separate legal fight over single-sex facilities at the new £16.6 million Earlston Primary School in Berwickshire.
Judge Lady Ross, KC, said she would issue a court order to make legal obligations on all Scottish state schools clear.
Ms Smith said: 'The Scottish Government tell us that the Scottish Prison Service set their own policy, that they're an arms length organisation, but any case would be taken against the Scottish ministers.
'So I think we need to start to step up and take a bit of responsibility, because these things are under their remit.
'And we've heard that they can't do anything about the NHS guidance, they can't do anything about the prisons…actually, I'm starting to think, well, what is the point of the Scottish government if they have no responsibility for any of these things that actually they do control?'
A Scottish Prison Service spokesperson said: 'We have received the Supreme Court's judgement and are considering any potential impact it may have.'
A Scottish Government spokesman said: 'As the judgment relates specifically to the guidance issued under the Scottish Government's Gender Representation on Public Boards 2018 Act and stated that it was incorrect in relation to the definition referred to of 'woman' under the Equality Act, the guidance has now been removed and will be updated shortly to reflect the judgment.
'The Scottish Government has already begun work on implementation. We have established a Short Life Working Group to ensure support and consistency across Government.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
9 minutes ago
- BBC News
Sweeping changes to 'archaic' Jersey family laws urged
Jersey deputies are being urged not to have a "knee-jerk reaction" to updating the island's parenting Colley, a legal assistant in family law at Viberts, said a "wholesale review" of parenting laws was needed to remove "outdated" Affairs Minister Deputy Mary Le Hegarat proposed changing Jersey's parenting laws so children born out of wedlock were no longer considered "illegitimate".Several islanders considered illegitimate by law told the BBC they were unaware of the legal status. Ms Colley said a strategic review was needed to prevent further changes being introduced in the future and, if changes were made to the Legitimacy (Jersey) Law 1973, it would have to be "done carefully"."In practical terms I do not think that the change in the law will have any real impact on families," she said."However, the concept of an illegitimate child is very outdated and there does need to be a wholesale review of all the legislation that makes reference to this term."There are laws currently that even mean that if a child is born to a couple who are still married and the husband is not the biological father of the child, it is still the case that the child is his child until that child is illegitimised, for example. "This has probably been an outdated legal concept for decades and has never been reviewed by legislators."In the UK, the Family Reform Act 1987 removed all remaining legal distinctions between children born to married and unmarried parents. 'Modernise the laws' Ms Colley said there were also issues with children born to unmarried parents prior to the law change in 2016."The fathers of these children do not have parental responsibility for their child, even if they subsequently marry the child's mother," she said."This is why it is important not just to have a quick knee-jerk reaction to this issue and take time to properly modernise the laws relating to the island's children."The BBC spoke to many islanders about the proposal who were unaware of their legal status. 'Archaic concept' Dylan Rawlinson said it had not affected him but added the law was "a very archaic concept".Other islanders who did not want to be named said they had experienced some said people thought her surname was her father's, not her mother's, which she took at said their parent's had "a nightmare" when trying to change their surname "when they did eventually get married" - saying it "cost thousands".One mother said her children had "never once been referred to as illegitimate on anything or [by] anyone since they were born". Proposing the changes, Le Hegarat had said Jersey's law was "out of step with policy developments over the last few decades"."The option of abolishing the status of legitimacy is strongly preferable, as it is no longer reflective of modern family life," she said."Only children whose parents are married and in a mixed-sex relationship are currently provided with the status of being 'legitimate' at birth."
BBC News
9 minutes ago
- BBC News
Telford father's 'dad guilt' for being at work after birth
Joel Priddey feels "dad guilt" for not being around as much as he could have when his family needed him of being with his partner and baby daughter following a really difficult birth over Christmas, Joel said he was forced back to work because they needed the law entitled him to two weeks of paid leave on about £184 a week [now £187.18]. But with bills to pay and a new mouth to feed, it was not enough to support the household."Statutory pay would have covered the rent and nothing else," said Joel, who lives in Telford. "All my savings had been depleted. We'd been a single-income family for nine months because of a horrific pregnancy, so I either had to dig myself into a load of debt or bite the bullet and return to work."I spent a lot of time at work worrying about what was going on at home." Joel's employer gave him three days off work on full pay when his baby was born, and he took a further five days off using his annual employers offer extended paternity benefits, including additional weeks off work on full pay, but most do not.A first-of-its-kind protest, attended by about 200 people, was held in London this week by a campaign group calling for better paternity Dad Shift wants fathers and other birthing partners to receive a minimum of six weeks' leave on 90% of their wages, paid for by government as part of a new statutory package. "The system makes it so hard for fathers to be present, and this is the first time that we're aware of where dads have come together to strike to be more involved in their kids' lives," said Alex Lloyd-Hunter, co-founder of The Dad Shift."So many mums are just left to cope on their own - often after really difficult births involving operations."Mothers can't be expected to shoulder everything alone when there are dads that want to be more involved."The Dad Shift campaign has the backing of Joel's Labour MP, Shaun Davies, who has represented Telford since he won the seat last summer. He held a debate about paternity law in Parliament in November, which was well-attended by many working-parent said that "British dads have the worst deal in the whole of Europe, with paid leave at the rate of just half the living wage".The government has said it will be carrying out a review into the parental leave system, including the pay and length of leave available to fathers and birth partners.A spokesperson for the Department for Business and Trade added it was already in the process of ensuring men no longer needed to be employed for 26 weeks to be entitled to paternity leave. The Shropshire Chamber of Commerce, which represents businesses in the county, has welcomed the growing conversation about paternity rights, but has warned that extending leave and pay could "unintentionally make things a lot harder" for smaller executive Ruth Ross said businesses were already battling with rising costs and tight wants the government to take into account the financial and operational pressures that businesses are currently under when it considers updating the law. Follow BBC Shropshire on BBC Sounds, Facebook, X and Instagram.
The Guardian
28 minutes ago
- The Guardian
UK government rollout of Humphrey AI tool raises fears about reliance on big tech
The government's artificial intelligence (AI) tool known as Humphrey is based on models from OpenAI, Anthropic and Google, it can be revealed, raising questions about Whitehall's increasing reliance on big tech. Ministers have staked the future of civil service reform on rolling out AI across the public sector to improve efficiency, with all officials in England and Wales to receive training in the toolkit. However, it is understood the government does not have overarching commercial agreements with the big tech companies on AI and uses a pay-as-you-go model through its existing cloud contracts, allowing it to swap through tools as they improve and become competitive. Critics are concerned about the speed and scale of embedding AI from big tech into the heart of government, especially when there is huge public debate about the technology's use of copyrighted material. Ministers have been locked in a battle with critics in the House of Lords over whether AI is unfairly being trained on creative material without credit of compensation. Its data bill allowing copyrighted material to be used unless the rights holder opts out passed its final stage this week in a defeat for those fighting for further protections. The issue has caused a fierce backlash from the creative sector, with artists including Elton John, Tom Stoppard, Paul McCartney and Kate Bush throwing their weight behind a campaign to protect copyrighted material. A freedom of information request showed the government's Consult, Lex and Parlex tools designed to analyse consultations and legislative changes use base models from Open AI's GPT, while its Redbox tool, which helps civil servants with everyday tasks such as preparing briefs, uses Open AI GPT, Anthropic's Claude and Google Gemini. Ed Newton-Rex, the chief executive of Fairly Trained, who obtained the FoI and is campaigning against AI being trained on copyrighted material, said there was the potential for a conflict when the government was also thinking about how this sector should deal with copyright. He said: 'The government can't effectively regulate these companies if it is simultaneously baking them into its inner workings as rapidly as possible. These AI models are built via the unpaid exploitation of creatives' work. 'AI makes a ton of mistakes, so we should expect these mistakes to start showing up in the government's work. AI is so well known for 'hallucinating' – that is, getting things wrong – that I think the government should be keeping transparent records of Humphrey's mistakes, so that its continuing use can be periodically reevaluated.' Shami Chakrabarti, the Labour peer and civil liberties campaigner, also urged caution and to be mindful of biases and inaccuracies such as those seen in the Horizon computer system that led to the miscarriage of justice for post office operators. Whitehall sources said Humphrey tools all worked in different ways, but users could take different approaches to tackling 'hallucinations', or inaccuracy, and the government continually publishes evaluations about the accuracy of technology in trials. An AI playbook for government also sets out guidance to help officials make use of the technology quickly and offers advice on how to ensure people have control over decisions at the right stages. The costs of using AI in government are expected to grow as Humphrey is further rolled out but officials say prices of AI per-use in the industry have trended downwards, as models become more efficient. Whitehall sources said big projects such as the Scottish government's use of AI to analyse consultation responses had cost less than £50 and saved many hours of work. Using the government's AI Minute software to take notes for a one-hour meeting costs less than 50p and its early data shows that it saves officials an hour of admin each time. A spokesperson from the Department for Science, Innovation and Technology said: 'AI has immense potential to make public services more efficient by completing basic admin tasks, allowing experts to focus on the important work they are hired to deliver. 'Our use of this technology in no way limits our ability to regulate it, just as the NHS both procures medicines and robustly regulates them. 'Humphrey, our package of AI tools for civil servants, is built by AI experts in government – keeping costs low as we experiment with what works best.' When the Guardian asked ChatGPT what base models were used for the Humphrey AI toolkit and if Open AI was involved, it replied that the information was not available. At the time the tool was announced earlier this year, the government said its strategy for spending £23bn a year on technology contracts would be changed, boosting opportunities for smaller tech startups.
