‘A job in itself': The red tape to access food, housing, and help holds back Mass. families
'It's exhausting, it's stressful,' Delarosa said. 'It's like a job in itself.'
Millions of low-income people in Massachusetts — often women and families of color — have to navigate a labyrinth of red tape to eat, access health care, and stay housed. Making a mistake or missing a deadline means a delay in services, or losing vital access altogether.
Get Starting Point
A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday.
Enter Email
Sign Up
the bureaucracy on their own, or coach each other through the grueling process even as they face evictions and food insecurity.
Advertisement
Across the country,
systems in which people get access to benefits through one universal application.
'If we have programs that are, by design, not responsive to people's needs, that reinforces that pattern of inequality and who's represented in democracy,' said Carolyn Barnes, an associate professor at the University of Chicago.
Advertisement
In Massachusetts,
Researchers who study administrative burden break it down into three categories: compliance costs, which include printing and mailing documents and attending agency interviews to access services; learning costs, which involve figuring out eligibility for different programs and how to actually apply for them; and psychological costs, or the shame and frustrations that come with asking for help.
'You have to open your whole life up to feel like you qualify for this crap housing,' said Marcia Boston, 74, who lives in state subsidized housing in Arlington that she said has mice and is too cramped.
Boston was on a centralized state wait list through the Common Housing Application for Massachusetts Programs, or CHAMP, for eight years in hopes of being able to move to Northampton. She was checking in every few months when she received an email from the state that she was removed from the list. She is still not sure why.
In 2022, then-Governor
Charlie Baker
state programs into one common application similar to the existing common housing application. Agencies would share information,
allowing people to apply once, rather than repeatedly fill out various forms to find out what they're eligible for.
The Department of Transitional Assistance is working to build a centralized hub that would do just that, but a spokesperson for the office declined to commit to a timeline, explaining that the office is in final contract negotiations with a vendor.
Advertisement
Officials said
the first iteration of the tool would not come until after 2025 and would not initially include affordable housing programs. Instead, it will focus on SNAP and cash benefits for children, older adults, and people with disabilities, and it would leverage federal dollars to partially fund its creation.
Those funds are pending federal approval but state officials said they expect them to come through.
But as Trump
administration officials eye cuts to programs such as
Medicaid and Social Security, advocates and families who rely on those benefits are nervous about the potential impact. Even if the tool is finally created, budget cuts could mean longer wait times as fewer staff are available to process applications or support ailing families.
Melinda Delarosa reached over to help her son, Edison, as they prepared lunch together at home.
Jessica Rinaldi/Globe Staff
Social safety net programs are used by all sorts of people. In Massachusetts, 45 percent of SNAP recipients, for example, are white people, 23 percent identify as Latino or Hispanic, and 14 percent are Black. Many programs, especially federal programs, also require participants to be US citizens to be eligible for benefits.
The largest
Several residents who use social benefits told the Globe they've had to coach each other on how to apply or handle a rejection notice. One Facebook
Researchers admonish that this loss of trust ripples out to other parts of civic engagement
such as elections, and can lead to lower voter turnout, according to Meredith Dost, a fellow at the Institute for Research on Poverty at the University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Advertisement
Among all 50 states, Massachusetts is in the middle of the pack when it comes to creating accessible health insurance, she said.
For people who struggle to access technology, those who don't speak English, and people with disabilities, applying for services is particularly challenging.
Carolyn Villers, executive director of the Massachusetts Senior Action Council, has watched as older adults struggle with MassHealth's
On average, she said it takes people an hour and a half to fill out the paperwork if they're getting help from an assistant. If long-term services are needed, the application then requires five years' worth of documentation.
'It's a really high burden and as you can imagine, a lot of people get overwhelmed with the process and give up totally,' she said.
What is also troubling to Villers is the burden to staff: 'It's silly for people in three different agencies to be processing the same paperwork for one person.'
Often, individuals
who need affordable housing could also benefit from state insurance, subsidized transportation, or heating and energy assistance.
More than a decade ago, Colorado unveiled a one-stop-shop digital tool called the Program Eligibility and Application Kit,
or PEAK, to help residents apply to state and federal programs all at once, with automatic renewals in some cases.
'They did it on a shoestring budget. A lot of people volunteered out of their regular roles,'
said Mike West, the product owner of PEAK who manages a staff of seven that keeps the tool working smoothly. The original cost for the tool was around $600,000 state officials estimate.
Advertisement
'Our job at PEAK is to make that look seamless and make that look friendly in the space of a smartphone screen,' West said.
Back in Massachusetts, Delarosa keeps a close eye on her mail and email. Inevitably, it will be time again to file another application. Up next is a renewal for Transitional Aid to Families with Dependent Children, a cash program for very low-income families, due in May.
The paperwork never gets easier, Delarosa said, but, 'What else are you supposed to do?'
This story was produced by the Globe's
team, which covers the racial wealth gap in Greater Boston. You can sign up for the newsletter
.
Esmy Jimenez can be reached at
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
38 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump's ‘Big Beautiful Bill' Would Slash Medicaid & SNAP: 3 Moves Retirees Should Make Now
President Donald Trump's 'one big beautiful bill' has passed in the House and is now awaiting Senate approval. If passed, Trump's signature bill would extend the tax cuts granted by the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act and add additional tax cuts. While this might be welcome news to many, the bill also includes changes to Medicaid and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) that could threaten seniors' access to these programs. Find Out: Read Next: 'The 'one big beautiful bill' passed by the House of Representatives, if it were passed into law today, would cut Medicaid and SNAP by a combined $1 trillion,' said Chris Orestis, president of Retirement Genius. 'In addition, because of the increase to federal debt of as much as $5 trillion, the bill would trigger an automatic reduction in Medicare funding of $500 billion,' he continued. 'This would represent the largest cut to social services and health insurance for the poor, disabled, children and the elderly in U.S. history.' Here's a look at the changes retirees can make now to secure care and avoid benefit disruptions if the bill were to pass. Before changes go into effect, check with your healthcare providers to ensure there won't be any interruption to your care if there are cuts to Medicaid. 'Check with your healthcare provider to see if they might cut back on services or cease accepting Medicaid-funded patients, and contact any nursing home where you or a loved one may reside to find out if they will be reducing the number of patients they can support — or even [if they are] possibly planning to close,' Orestis said. Knowing this ahead of time will allow you to find alternative care providers before it's too late. Learn More: If you are reliant on SNAP, start searching for alternatives that may be able to provide food assistance in the event your benefits are reduced or cut. 'Make sure you know where there are local support services through community or faith-based organizations to replace lost access through SNAP,' Orestis said. Many retirees plan to 'spend down' their savings so that they qualify for Medicaid to pay for their long-term care. However, this may no longer be a viable option. 'If you are considering going onto Medicaid for long-term care and are preparing to engage the 'spend down' process to impoverish yourself and get below the poverty level to qualify, you may want to reconsider that strategy, and instead look to leverage private pay resources to pay for your care,' Orestis said. 'If you are on Medicaid, you will primarily be reliant on nursing homes for your care, and their ability to withstand these cuts will be very challenging and up in the air,' he continued. 'If you are private pay, you are in control and can decide where and when you will receive care, such as at home or an assisted living community not funded by Medicaid.' Strategies to stay private pay for long-term care would include long-term care insurance, annuities, a life insurance settlement, a reverse mortgage or VA benefits. Editor's note on political coverage: GOBankingRates is nonpartisan and strives to cover all aspects of the economy objectively and present balanced reports on politically focused finance stories. You can find more coverage of this topic on More From GOBankingRates Clever Ways To Save Money That Actually Work in 2025 This article originally appeared on Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' Would Slash Medicaid & SNAP: 3 Moves Retirees Should Make Now
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
UH program that helps struggling ʻohana on federal chopping block
HONOLULU (KHON2) — A University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa program aimed at helping struggling ʻohana and kūpuna is on the federal chopping block as the U.S. Congress looks at cutting its funding. UH's SNAP-Ed program, which is run by the College of Tropical Agriculture and Human Resilience, receives federal funding for its operations, which includes teaching ʻohana how to prepare healthy and affordable meals. Early morning vehicle collisions hospitalize two 'Our college has been working with local families and kūpuna through SNAP-Ed for more than 20 years,' SNAP-Ed Program Director Jean Butel said. 'Our SNAP-Ed program has become a trusted community partner that helps about 15,000 community members across Hawaiʻi every year. We meet people where they are: public schools, farmer's markets, senior care facilities and other community gathering places.' In addition to teaching people how to make healthy meals, the program also helps families budget for their groceries and even shows them how to grow their own produce. According to UH, 91% of participants in the program improved their diet, 83% learned how to budget better and 40% said they could afford more food for their ʻ for the SNAP-Ed program has been completely cut from the budget, which is currently being debated by the federal legislature, which puts local families at risk of losing a vital resource, UH said. 'We are grateful that Hawaiʻi's Congressional delegation fully supports SNAP-Ed,' said college Dean Parwinder Grewal. 'With our geographic isolation, high cost of living and ongoing food insecurity, full funding is essential for Congress to continue supporting Hawaiʻi's SNAP-Ed families and kūpuna.' Should the federal government approve of the cuts, the program will expire on Sept. 30, potentially further hurting already struggling locals. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
A New Social Security Garnishment Is Set to Begin This Summer -- but There Are 2 Legal Ways Most Retirees Can Avoid It
Getting as much as possible out of Social Security isn't a luxury for most retirees -- it's an absolute necessity. This summer, the Trump administration will begin garnishing up to 15% of Social Security benefits for delinquent federal student loan borrowers. Two perfectly legal solutions exist that may allow a majority of tardy federal student loan borrowers to avoid having their Social Security checks garnished. The $23,760 Social Security bonus most retirees completely overlook › For most retirees, Social Security isn't just income that's deposited into their checking or savings account on a monthly basis. It represents a financial lifeline that many would likely struggle to make do without. In 2023, Social Security was responsible for lifting 22 million people above the federal poverty line, some 16.3 million of whom were adults aged 65 and above. Meanwhile, 23 years of annual surveys from national pollster Gallup find that up to 90% of retirees require their monthly benefit, to some degree, to make ends meet. Getting as much out of Social Security isn't a luxury -- it's often a necessity. But beginning sometime this summer, select retirees can expect their Social Security checks to shrink by up to 15%. For some of these beneficiaries, it's income they simply can't afford to lose. For well over six decades, the federal government has played a role in subsidizing and guaranteeing student loans. As of April 2025, the U.S. Department of Education (DOE) notes that 42.7 million Americans had a cumulative $1.6 trillion in federal student loans outstanding. However, the collection of federal student loan repayments was halted during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic (March 2020) and was simply never lifted. According to the DOE, more than 5 million borrowers haven't made a payment in 360 days, and another 4 million are between 91 and 180 days late on their monthly payments. While higher education student loans may sound like something that affects relatively younger Americans, they've become a prominent issue for retirees. Whereas the aggregate number of student loan borrowers under the age of 62 has declined by 1% from 2017 to 2023, the number of student loan borrowers aged 62 and above has surged 59% to approximately 2.7 million over the same period, based on data from the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB). Per the CFPB, an estimated 452,000 of these senior borrowers have defaulted on their federal student loans and are likely receiving Social Security benefits. Since President Donald Trump took office in January, his administration has targeted perceived government fraud and is aiming to make federal operations more efficient. One of the many changes under Trump, vis-à-vis the Social Security Administration (SSA), is the reimplementation of Social Security garnishments for delinquent federal student loan borrowers. Beginning "sometime this summer," per Trump's administration, tardy borrowers receiving a Social Security benefit -- this applies to all types of beneficiaries (retired workers, survivors of deceased workers, and workers with disabilities) -- could see their payouts garnished by up to 15%. The one caveat to this garnishment is that recipients must be left with at least a $750 monthly Social Security benefit. Thus, if your normal payout is $825 per month, the maximum garnishment would be $75 per month instead of the flat 15%. Additionally, the Trump administration isn't planning to offer delinquent federal student loan borrowers a 65-day warning prior to potential garnishment, as has been customary in the past. Rather, communications sent out provide just 30 days' notice that garnishments are possible if borrowers are still in default. According to the CFPB, 37% of the Social Security beneficiaries who have a federal student loan outstanding (delinquent or not) currently rely on their monthly check from America's leading retirement program for 90% (or more) of their income. Even a 15% garnishment for defaulted borrowers in this category has the potential to be financially devastating. It goes without saying that the easiest way to avoid this new garnishment by the Trump administration is to not be in default on your federal student loan(s). But for the roughly 452,000 Social Security retirees set to be impacted by this change in policy, there are two under-the-radar yet perfectly legal solutions that should allow a majority to avoid having their payouts garnished. To begin with, some of these defaulted borrowers may qualify for the Total and Permanent Disability (TPD) discharge program, which cancels federal student loans and stops forced collections. As the CFPB pointed out in a January research report, the DOE entered into a data-matching agreement with the SSA in 2021 to automate the TPD eligibility and federal student loan cancellation processes for beneficiaries who become disabled prior to reaching full retirement age (currently age 67 for anyone born in or after 1960). However, this TPD application process is failing Social Security beneficiaries who become permanently disabled after they reach full retirement age. The CFPB notes that the onus of applying for a TPD discharge of their federal student loans and/or garnishment falls onto aged beneficiaries. Census survey data shows that approximately 22% of Social Security recipients with federal student loans report having a permanent disability, per the CFPB's report. Social Security retirees currently in default on their federal student loan(s) can also potentially avoid having their monthly check garnished by applying for a financial hardship with the DOE. Defaulted borrowers will be required to provide documentation of their income and qualifying expenses to the DOE. If an individual's qualifying expenses are larger than their documented income -- especially pertaining to a possible 15% garnishment of their Social Security payout -- the DOE will likely grant a financial hardship exemption. Based on data from the Federal Reserve Board's Survey of Household Economics and Decisionmaking, the CFPB estimates that a whopping 82% of Social Security beneficiaries currently in default on their federal student loans would qualify for the hardship exemption -- in other words, their qualified expenses would exceed their documented income. Yet, a 2015 Government Accountability Office report found that fewer than 10% of Social Security recipients with forced federal student loan collections applied for a hardship exemption. If delinquent borrowers were to simply apply for this financial hardship with the DOE, a majority would likely be granted it. If you're like most Americans, you're a few years (or more) behind on your retirement savings. But a handful of little-known could help ensure a boost in your retirement income. One easy trick could pay you as much as $23,760 more... each year! Once you learn how to maximize your Social Security benefits, we think you could retire confidently with the peace of mind we're all after. Join Stock Advisor to learn more about these Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. A New Social Security Garnishment Is Set to Begin This Summer -- but There Are 2 Legal Ways Most Retirees Can Avoid It was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data