Poll suggests support for better end-of-life care over assisted dying Bill
The polling, commissioned by a group opposed to assisted dying being legalised, 'blows apart the arguments that the public are desperate' for a change in the law, a campaigner claimed.
Bill sponsor Kim Leadbeater said last week that MPs should not have to choose between supporting assisted dying or palliative care as it is not an 'either/or' conversation for dying people.
She said palliative care and assisted dying 'can and do work side by side to give terminally-ill patients the care and choice they deserve in their final days', and urged MPs to support 'all options available to terminally ill people'.
An amendment to the Bill, requiring the Health Secretary to publish an assessment of the availability, quality and distribution of palliative and end-of-life care one year after the Bill passing into law, could be voted on on Friday.
Friday is also set to be the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill's third reading stage, which is likely to see the overall Bill voted on for the first time since November's historic yes vote, when a majority of 55 supported the principle of assisted dying for England and Wales.
The latest polling, commissioned by Care Not Killing and carried out by British Polling Council member Whitestone, saw 2,089 UK adults surveyed online between May 30 and June 1.
Respondents, who are said to have been weighted to be a representative sample, were told of concerns raised by the Royal Colleges of Physicians and Psychiatrists and the Association for Palliative Medicine about the Bill in its current form as well as opposition from disability campaigners.
In this context, they were asked about replacing the Bill with a plan to improve and invest in palliative care – to which 69% agreed, and about a Royal Commission being set up to consider and make recommendations for a holistic end-of-life and palliative care service – with which 61% agreed.
Almost two thirds (65%) said the Government's priority should be sorting out palliative and social care before changing the law – down very slightly from 66% last year.
Gordon Macdonald, chief executive of Care Not Killing, said: 'This major new poll blows apart the arguments that the public are desperate for a so-called assisted dying law.
'The public want the Government and MPs to focus on fixing the NHS and palliative care which they know are broken. After all one in four Brits who would benefit from palliative care aren't currently receiving it, while in many places services are piecemeal, part-time or facing cuts.'
It comes as former prime minister Gordon Brown repeated his opposition to assisted dying.
Writing in the Guardian, he said: 'It has become clear that whatever views people hold on the principle, passing the terminally ill adults (end of life) bill into law would privilege the legal right to assisted dying without guaranteeing anything approaching an equivalent right to high-quality palliative care for those close to death.'
He said MP's personal preferences 'cannot be separated off from the duties they have as members of a community to ensure that the way we treat the dying reflects the values of a decent, compassionate country'.
He added: 'That should mean upholding the role of the medical professions as care-givers, and exclusively care-givers; avoiding the possibility of private profiteering by legal-medical consortiums which might well commercialise assisted dying as a lucrative business; safeguarding vulnerable people about whose fate the royal medical colleges have all expressed concern; preventing unacceptable coercive pressures that can be brought to bear on disabled people, and those who are incapacitated or mentally stressed; and thus showing that as a society we value life above death.'
Dozens of Labour MPs called for Friday's overall vote to be delayed, asking for more time to scrutinise a Bill they brand as 'perhaps the most consequential piece of legislation that has appeared before the House in generations'.
Writing to Commons leader Lucy Powell, they said: 'We implore you as the Leader of the House to allocate more Parliamentary time to the scrutiny of this Bill, the valid concerns that members have about its implementation, and the consequences it could have on vulnerable populations.'
A Government spokesperson said: 'This Bill has been brought as a Private Members' Bill. The amount of time for debate is therefore a matter for the House.'
The Bill's sponsor, Labour MP Kim Leadbeater, has repeatedly stated that her proposed legislation has been strengthened since it was first introduced last year, insisting it is subject to robust safeguards.
Medical staff are among some of the MPs who back the Bill.
As it stands, the proposed legislation would allow terminally-ill adults in England and Wales, with fewer than six months to live, to apply for an assisted death, subject to approval by two doctors and a panel featuring a social worker, senior legal figure and psychiatrist.
MPs are entitled to have a free vote on the Bill and any amendments, meaning they decide according to their conscience rather than along party lines.
Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer voted in favour of the Bill last year, but said the Government remains neutral on the issue.
Both Health Secretary Wes Streeting and Justice Secretary Shabana Mahmood voted against.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald Scotland
an hour ago
- The Herald Scotland
Revealed: SNP plan to cut £1 bn of public sector 'waste'
A major review of civil service is also understood to be under consideration with the Scottish Government's 55 directorates potentially facing a restructure and a reduction in their number. It is expected that the cash-saving proposals will highlight too the possible need to "consolidate" Scotland's 130 quangos with mergers between bodies potentially being undertaken to save public cash. The announcement, to be made by public finance minister Ivan McKee in a statement to Holyrood later this week, comes as the First Minister seeks to refocus on public service delivery. READ MORE: SNP takes over Dumfries and Galloway council from Conservatives John Swinney comments after trans killer's record 'wiped' John Swinney has discussed indyref2 with PM, says senior SNP minister Addressing public sector leaders in Glasgow yesterday John Swinney said Scotland's public sector will inevitably shrink as services look to innovations like AI. The First Minister told leaders in the public and third sector his government plans to embark on a 'renewal' of public services by harnessing new technologies. He also noted the findings of the Commission on the Future Delivery of Public Services in Scotland, chaired by Dr Campbell Christie in 2011, which had been tasked by Mr Swinney with examining the long-term challenges facing public services—including budget pressures, demographic change, rising demand and persistent inequalities. The Commission's report called for community-driven, preventative and collaborative approaches to address these systemic challenges. Key recommendations included prioritising prevention to reduce long-term costs, enhancing performance through technology, and closer working across sectors. Mr McKee's strategy to be unveiled on Thursday comes a week ahead of the Scottish Government's publication of its medium term fiscal strategy and follows warnings of a challenging financial landscape for John Swinney's administration. In its latest five-year outlook last month the fiscal watchdog, the Scottish Fiscal Commission, forecast that the country's public finances will come under increasing strain over the next five years, due to rising welfare costs, sluggish economic growth and an £851 million income tax black hole. Public finance minister Ivan McKee will unveil the strategy on Thursday (Image: Scottish Government) The SFC said that while overall funding for the Scottish budget is forecast to grow, much of the increase will be absorbed by the rising cost of devolved welfare benefits, public sector pay settlements, and new policy commitments — such as the permanent scrapping of peak-time rail fares. Last weekend the Scottish Conservatives promised they would cut back on public sector spending to save taxpayers £650m a year. Addressing his party's conference in Edinburgh leader Russell Findlay promised to cull quangos, bring in business leaders to find cutbacks and slash red tape in the NHS and other public bodies. But the Scottish Government is aiming to save more cash than the £650m a year pledged by Mr Findlay. It is understood that ministers anticipate the proposals they are suggesting would save up to £1bn a year by 2029/30, with savings gradually increasing over the next five years as the programme gets underway. Mr McKee said in February that the Scottish Government was willing to make "radical" reforms to the public sector and said ministers were focusing on reducing so-called "back office" costs in favour of frontline service delivery. Mr McKee said: "We are very proud of the fact we have more doctors, more nurses, more police officers in Scotland and that we pay them quite a bit more." He said the government was focused on reducing so-called "back office" costs. "That's why the Scottish Government's head count went down last year, it's going to go down this year and it's going to do down next year by not hiring as many people," the minister told the BBC. "We've saved upwards of £200m over the last two years in more efficient procurement across the public sector and there's plans to extend that further." The Scottish Government has committed to 'doubling down on reform and efficiencies' as part of its 10-year Public Service Reform (PSR) programme. In its year's budget, Shona Robison set aside £30m for an Invest to Save fund in 2025–2026 'to catalyse efficiency, effectiveness and productivity projects". The programme — which is being led by Mr McKee — aims to ensure that public services 'remain fiscally sustainable' by cutting costs and reducing demand. The public sector accounts for about 22% of Scotland's workforce, compared to about 17% in the UK as a whole. Average public sector salaries are also around £2,000 higher in Scotland. The government's core workforce shrunk by 3% between 2023 and 2024, though the civil service headcount rose by more than 80% between 2015 and last year. Scottish Conservative shadow finance secretary Craig Hoy said: 'John Swinney's empty pledge is actually a damning indictment of his own SNP government. 'He's freely admitting that the SNP are wasting £1billion of public money every year, at the same times as imposing ever-increasing taxes on hard-working Scots. "The idea that the man who has presided over Scotland's bloated public sector and expanding quango culture can now be trusted to reverse it is laughable. 'The Scottish Conservatives have been pointing out for years that the SNP's burgeoning client state was unsustainable and we have outlined clear measures to take an axe to public-sector waste. 'In contrast, John Swinney is paying lip service to public anger. He's addicted to frittering away taxpayers' money and can't be trusted with the nation's finances.' Public spending watchdog Audit Scotland said in a report in November 2023 that reform of "the public sector is needed to deal with longer-term financial pressures". It said: "The Scottish Government needs to work with its partners to clearly set out how the design and delivery of public services will need to change. Understanding the overall assets and liabilities within the Scottish public sector would support this. But the Scottish Government has made no progress on developing a devolved public sector account, despite this being a commitment since 2016." The Scottish Government was approached for comment.
Daily Record
an hour ago
- Daily Record
Brits urged to follow this 30-second rule as pollen levels soar
Brits urged to follow this 30-second rule as pollen levels soar Parts of the UK are set to see "very high" pollen levels this week, spelling misery for millions Many Brits have been suffering with hay fever symptoms in recent weeks due to high pollen counts (Image: getty ) An expert has shared a simple 30-second rule to help alleviate frustrating symptoms of hay fever. This quick and easy trick could help remove pollen from your home. It is thought that around 13 million Brits suffer from hay fever, which is an allergic reaction to airborne allergens such as pollen. Also known as allergic rhinitis it can cause uncomfortable symptoms such as sneezing, itchy eyes and headaches. This year the Met Office has frequently warned of high pollen counts across the UK, including later this week when the south west and east of England, the west midlands, and Wales have a 'very high' pollen alert in place. While there are treatments and remedies for hay fever available from pharmacies such as antihistamines, there are also some simple hacks you can try at home to minimise your exposure to pollen. With this in mind, Nigel Bearman, home cleaning expert and founder of Daily Poppins, shared an easy way to do just this. 'Forgetting to wipe your windowsills after leaving the windows open all day is one of the biggest mistakes I see,' he said. 'It's unrealistic to say, 'Don't open your windows' in summer, but not wiping the sills afterwards is basically inviting pollen to settle and linger in your home.' Luckily, the fix is surprisingly simple. He advised: 'Just use a damp microfibre cloth once a day. Article continues below 'It takes 30 seconds, costs nothing, and can genuinely reduce your hay fever flare-ups indoors.' He warned that pollen particles can settle quickly on smooth surfaces like sills, frames, and blinds, especially when windows are left open during peak times. Once indoors, they get wafted back into the air every time you open or close the window, draw the curtains, or even just walk by. Wiping them away before they have the chance to spread prevents them from drifting onto other surfaces like bedding, sofas and carpets, which are much harder to clean daily. Taking 30 seconds to wipe down your windowsills with a damp cloth every day can help limit your exposure to pollen (Image: Getty ) Other ways to reduce pollen indoors While this habit can make a big difference, pollen can still find its way inside, especially on warm, breezy days. Here are a few extra steps Nigel recommends to keep symptoms under control. Wash bedding weekly at 60C. This removes pollen, dust mites, and other allergens that build up overnight. Avoid drying laundry outside. As tempting as it is when the sun's shining, clothes left on the line can pick up pollen and carry it straight into your wardrobe. Wipe down pets after walks. If your dog loves rolling in the grass, keep a damp cloth near the door to give their fur and paws a quick wipe before they come inside. Symptoms The NHS lists symptoms of hay fever as: Article continues below Sneezing and coughing A runny or blocked nose Itchy, red or watery eyes Itchy throat, mouth, nose and ears Loss of smell Pain around the sides of your head and your forehead Headache Feeling tired The health body says: 'Symptoms are usually worse between late March and September, especially when it's warm, humid and windy. This is when the pollen count is at its highest.' If you are struggling with symptoms, the NHS advises speaking to a pharmacist. They might recommend antihistamine drops, tablets or steroid nasal sprays.
The Herald Scotland
2 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
What's behind the drive to cut public spending 'waste'?
Why does the Scottish Government need to cut spending in this way? Mr Sousa explained: "The Scottish Government is not allowed to borrow cash to fund any day-to-day spending, so it must make sure that its spending matches its funding. "This includes the block grant, as well any additional tax revenues from devolved Scottish taxes (including income tax) and the transfer of funds for social security devolution. "The Scottish Government's more generous pay policy in recent years means that the average wage of public sector employees in Scotland is about 5% higher than the UK average. READ MORE: "Coupled with Scotland's larger share of employment made up of public sector workers, this creates significant pressure for the Scottish Government. "The Scottish Government's social security system is also forecast to cost £2 billion a year more than the block grant adjustments [from the UK Government], between both devolved payments and payments without an equivalent outside of Scotland. This must be paid from a Budget that is only modestly growing year-on-year. "If we project recent growth rates for expenditure on some of the largest areas – pay, procurement, funding for local government – and even under conservative paybill arrangements relative to recent years, spending would exceed the projected funding (using data from the SFC and applying that to the Spending Review settlement) by well in excess of £1 billion. "And that's before we take account – for example – of any grants to third sector organisations or subsidies to public and private companies in charge of delivering transport." How can the Scottish Government cut back on 'public sector inefficiencies'? Mr Sousa: "If the Scottish Government doesn't want to change social security or tax, that would mean discretionary [or reduced] spending. "It could mean fewer public sector employees – be it through redundancies or not filling vacant posts, although that runs the risk of not having the right skills to deliver the Scottish Government's priorities. "It could also mean a less generous public sector pay policy, although that of course means more difficulty in avoiding industrial action. It could also mean cutting back on procurement spending, which has been growing – even if we abstract from the pandemic peak – by 7% a year in cash terms in recent times. And it could also mean less funding available for councils – although given the pressures in local government, that might mean difficulties in delivering services and pressure on council tax." Is the Scottish Government's objective to cut waste by up to £1bn a year by 2029/30 doable? Mr Sousa: "Every government always want to cut inefficiencies and not impact on service delivery. "And of course there are things that could be better. Last week, the Fraser of Allander Institute highlighted that the UK Government's targets on efficiency stretch credulity in the Spending Review, and the Scottish Government's appear headed the same way. "It's inconceivable that the exact same services will be delivered by spending £1 billion less. Rather, the Scottish Government will need to prioritise what really is important. "To govern is to choose, and choices will be coming down the track. In some sense, the limits on borrowing the Scottish Government is subject to will make this hard to avoid by the end of the decade. The timetable doesn't seem impossible – but it'll take time to implement, and no doubt will mean real decisions about what to do and crucially what not to do."
