Opinion: Utah lawmakers voice strong opposition to Medicaid cuts
Dear Senator Lee, Senator Curtis, Representative Moore, Representative Owens, Representative Maloy and Representative Kennedy,
As Congress looks for budget cuts in Medicaid at the federal level, we wanted to let you know that we oppose indiscriminate large cuts that would damage the Utahns who are served by Medicaid.
Medicaid is a life-saving and essential health care program. It covers thousands of Utah's children, people with disabilities, people in long-term care and people with low income. This program plays a pivotal role in Utah's health care system. It reimburses hospitals and health care providers for providing dental care, prenatal care and other vital health care services. Utah's Medicaid program has been carefully tailored and structured by the Utah State Legislature and successive Utah governors. It is a program that strengthens Utah families and helps ensure that our state remains one of the healthiest and most economically successful states in the nation.
If there are abrupt large reductions in the federal government's commitment to Medicaid, it will surely result in a loss of care for some of these Utahns, who do not have anywhere else to turn. In addition to injury that can occur when basic health care is not available, this loss of coverage will also cause emergency rooms to be burdened with providing uncompensated care when their health finally deteriorates to a breaking point. The cost of this care falls on our hospitals first and then is passed on to other Utahns in the form of higher insurance premiums. Hospitals (especially rural hospitals) and health care providers who are already stretched thin would face even more serious financial shortfalls.
If cuts to Medicaid are needed to ensure the program's longer-term viability, we would ask that the cuts be done in such a way that coverage for basic medical services will still be available to poor Utahns. If work requirements are to be considered, please remember that a substantial number of Medicaid recipients have some significant situations in their lives that make employment difficult or unrealistic, such as duties to care for children, elderly parents or disabled family members. Some of them have a significant disabling medical condition but have not yet made it through our multi-year process to claim a formal disability designation. If work requirements are instituted, we hope they would be simple enough to follow and broad enough in definition to avoid resulting in loss of medical care for these kinds of individuals.
There are also other cost saving measures that can be instituted, such as indexing co-pays with inflation (which has not happened in many years) or implementing differential co-pays for emergency room visits versus urgent care visits — similar to what other private insurers do to help incentivize care to take place in appropriate medical settings — that could result in savings to the program while still getting people the basic care they need to stay healthy. Every area of the program should be looked at to see if there are overpayments or if there are services that are 'nice to have' but not necessary for basic health, and those areas can and should be reduced while keeping essential care intact — but that means that the people doing the cutting need to be knowledgeable about the services provided and to still value the provision of basic medical care itself.
Utah voters chose to strengthen Medicaid in 2018, and Utah's state government and Legislature have worked diligently to create a Medicaid program unique to Utah. Medicaid serves approximately 340,000 Utahns (almost exactly 1 in 10), half of whom are children. This means that almost everyone in Utah has benefited personally from being on Medicaid at some point in their life, or has family members or personal acquaintances who are currently benefiting from the program. Utah has the lowest percentage of people on Medicaid of any of the 50 states, but for those who have it, it is a vital lifeline to health care. Public opinion polls consistently show that both Republicans and Democrats support Medicaid and don't want to see people they care for get cut off from access to medical care.
Damaging Medicaid with indiscriminate large reductions will not make America or Utah healthy or economically stronger. We urge you to oppose sweeping cuts and instead focus on targeted savings and a refocusing of the program to keep in place the basic medical services that Medicaid has successfully provided for so many years.
Representative Ray Ward
Representative Ariel Defay
Representative Cheryl Acton
Representative Christine Watkins
Representative Clint Okerlund
Representative Jim Dunnigan
Representative Logan Monson
Representative Steve Eliason
Representative Stewart Barlow
Senator Evan Vickers
Senator Todd Weiler

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Boston Globe
12 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Nebraska Republican says he won't follow GOP ‘off the cliff'
Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up In an interview in his office last week, Bacon, at 61 serving his fifth term in Congress, would not say whether he voted for Trump last year. He also likened members of his party to people following someone off a cliff, compared himself to Winston Churchill speaking out against Adolf Hitler in the 1930s and criticized billionaire tech tycoon Elon Musk, who has bankrolled many of his Republican colleagues. Advertisement 'I sort of blame him for that disaster,' he said of Musk, referring to Musk exhorting Republicans late last year to tank a spending deal that was intended to avert a government shutdown. Advertisement On one level, Bacon is making a fairly obvious statement: Musk did play a crucial role in killing the spending bill. But it is the kind of obvious statement that most Republicans on Capitol Hill are not willing to make these days, for fear of jeopardizing their political futures as Musk threatens retribution against anyone who fails to vote the way he believes they should. In the coming weeks, Bacon, who represents a center-leaning district in the otherwise deeply red state of Nebraska that both former President Joe Biden and former Vice President Kamala Harris won by more than 4 percentage points, plans to announce whether or not he will seek a sixth term in Congress. His retirement would be welcome news for Democrats, who have long viewed Nebraska's 2nd Congressional District as one of their best opportunities to pick up a seat. They have consistently been denied because of Bacon's strong independent brand and unique electoral strength. Last month, a Democrat unseated a three-term Republican in the Omaha mayor's race. The morning after that race was called, Rep. Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., the minority leader, told the House Democratic Caucus that they were officially on 'Don Bacon retirement watch,' and the room erupted in cheers, according to a person familiar with the meeting. Bacon would not discuss his plans, but his recent record of criticizing Trump and Musk suggests that he does not have a reelection campaign in mind. Still, in the interview, he said he had not given up on politics or on the Republican Party. 'I'd like to fight for the soul of our party,' Bacon said, sitting in his office as Trump and Musk's high-stakes alliance dissolved in real time on social media. 'I don't want to be the guy who follows the flute player off the cliff. I think that's what's going on right now.' Advertisement He also has no interest in taking the path of former Reps. Adam Kinzinger of Illinois or Liz Cheney of Wyoming and making a clean break with a GOP that no longer reflects many of his values. 'You can't be anti-everything,' he said. 'I like what the president has done on the border, so I have no problem with that.' He also likes being a negotiator. 'I don't like voting 'no,'' he said. 'I like fixing things.' At the moment, he is pressing Republican leaders to reject a proposal from the Trump administration to claw back $400 million for the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief, the global health program started by President George W. Bush that is credited with saving more than 25 million lives worldwide. The proposal is part of a $9 billion package of spending cuts the White House sent to Capitol Hill last week, which House GOP leaders plan to bring to a vote this week. 'I told them I'm a no,' Bacon said of the bill. 'I just want to make sure we're funding the medicine. We want to prevent AIDS; it's a noble program; it's George Bush's legacy. I put the marker out there. We'll see.' Bacon, a mild-mannered Midwesterner with a permanent half-smile on his face, is too much of a traditional conservative to have ever voted for Harris. But he would not say whether he voted for Trump. This is not a normal pose for a Republican in 2025. But Bacon has grown more confident over the years, as he has consistently fended off both right-wing challengers and Democrats to hold onto his seat, that he can remain fairly independent and suffer no political consequences. Advertisement House leaders have begged him to keep more of his opinions to himself, telling him to, as Bacon puts it, 'quit kicking President Trump in the nuts.' In response, Bacon said he has assured them: 'I'll do it only when I think it's needed.' That is becoming more and more often. In the interview, Bacon said he was disappointed in Hegseth, because 'I expect leaders to take responsibility.' He got his back up about Vice President JD Vance's claims that Denmark has 'not been a good ally' to the United States. 'The Danes have lost more people per capita in Afghanistan than any other country,' he said. 'And to call them not a good ally? They were all in with us, and it wasn't fair.' He said he opposed Trump's decision to take away deportation protections for thousands of Afghans in the United States. 'These guys fought by our side; we have a compact with those guys,' he said. 'To me, it's not a morally right decision.' And he warned that if Russia overruns Ukraine, it will define Trump's entire legacy. 'President Trump will always be known as the president who had Ukraine fall,' he said. He is also unwilling to let some of the less important stuff slide, breaking with some of his Republican colleagues who, he said, have tried to persuade him to pick his battles. On renaming the Gulf of Mexico, he said: 'I thought it was dumb. That's what people told me -- they said, 'It's so dumb; just vote for it.' That argument didn't work on me.' Advertisement In an alternative universe where there was more appetite for a Republican willing to break with Trump, Bacon has the kind of temperament and resume that could prompt dreams of running for president. Raised on a farm in Illinois, Bacon served for nearly three decades in the U.S. Air Force, earning the rank of brigadier general and specializing in electronic warfare and intelligence. The self-described Reaganite Republican has served in the House for eight years, consistently winning a district that centers on Omaha, the 'blue dot' in an otherwise red state. Bacon said he does think about running for president, drawing a comparison between his own fairly independent position in a tribal party and Churchill's during the 1930s, when the British government was pursuing a policy of appeasement toward Nazi Germany. 'You never know; things change,' he said. 'Right now, probably not. But Winston Churchill, who is one of my heroes, he was very unpopular 1932 through '40 because he was anti-Nazi. But in 1940, they go, 'Who was the only guy that knew what was going on?' ' Bacon said his dream job would be to serve in a Republican administration in a Cabinet-level role. 'If I had a perfect lane, someday I'd love to work in an administration, as director of intelligence, or secretary of defense or Air Force.' That's exceedingly unlikely in the current administration. But if his independent streak costs him such opportunities, Bacon said he would be just fine with that. 'I'd rather go down in history as being on the right side of this stuff,' he said. Advertisement This article originally appeared in


Newsweek
12 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Cory Booker Says He Won't Take Money From Elon Musk
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Senator Cory Booker, a New Jersey Democrat, said during an appearance on NBC News on Sunday that he would not accept campaign donations from billionaire Elon Musk, but added that he would "welcome" the Tesla CEO getting involved in politics "in a more substantive way." Newsweek has reached out to Booker for comment via email on Sunday. Why It Matters Musk led the cost-cutting task force known as the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) until the end of May. He served as a close adviser and key ally to President Donald Trump, and helped bankroll his 2024 campaign with more than $250 million in donations. On Tuesday, he turned against the administration, speaking out against the One Big Beautiful Bill spending proposal, calling it a "disgusting abomination." Musk's public rebuke marked a notable and apparent departure from the Trump administration's legislative agenda. The Trump-backed reconciliation package passed the House last month following weeks of negotiations in which House Speaker Mike Johnson, a Louisiana Republican, wrangled votes from the ultraconservative and more centrist factions of the GOP. While Trump praised the measure in its current form, Senate Republicans have made it clear they plan to make significant changes to it before it passes the upper chamber. What to Know NBC News' Meet the Press host Kristen Welker asked Booker, an opponent of Trump's spending bill, if he would accept money from Musk for a potential reelection campaign. He is up for reelection next year. Booker replied: "I will partner with anyone like I did in the last Congress," arguing that the bill is "an American issue. And I welcome Elon Musk, not to my campaign, I welcome him right now, not to sit back and just fire off tweets, to get involved right now in a more substantive way and putting pressure on Congress people and senators to not do this." Welker asked again if Booker would ever accept campaign funding from Musk, Booker said, "I would not accept money from Elon Musk for my campaign, but I would be supportive of anybody, including Elon Musk, putting resources forward right now to let more Americans know" about the bill. Following Musk posts on his social media platform X, formerly Twitter, calling the bill a "massive, outrageous, pork-filled" piece of legislation that is a "disgusting abomination," Representative Ro Khanna, a California Democrat, told Politico that the party should try to welcome Musk. "We should ultimately be trying to convince him that the Democratic Party has more of the values that he agrees with," the congressman said. On Saturday, Trump told NBC News that Musk will face "very serious consequences" if he starts to fund Democrats. He did not specify what actions he could take against Musk. When asked if he has any desire to repair the relationship between the pair, Trump simply said "No," adding that he "would assume" their relationship is over after the very public dispute. Musk posted a series of messages criticizing the bill, Trump and the Republican Party and some of its leaders. At one point, he posted a poll asking followers whether they support the creation of a new political party, dubbed "The America Party." Of the more than 5.6 million users who responded, 80 percent said yes. Senator Cory Booker, a New Jersey Democrat, is seen on May 14 in Washington, D.C. Inset: Elon Musk attends a news conference in the Oval Office of the White House on May 30 in Washington,... Senator Cory Booker, a New Jersey Democrat, is seen on May 14 in Washington, D.C. Inset: Elon Musk attends a news conference in the Oval Office of the White House on May 30 in Washington, D.C. More AP Photo/Evan Vuccifor Student Borrower Protection Center What People Are Saying Representative Thomas Massie, a Kentucky Republican, wrote on Wednesday on X: "The Big Beautiful Bill is a debt bomb ticking. It's also the biggest missed opportunity conservatives have ever had to put our country back on a track of fiscal sanity. If we defeat this bill, a better one can be offered that won't bankrupt our country." White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told Newsweek on Thursday: "This is an unfortunate episode from Elon, who is unhappy with the One Big Beautiful Bill because it does not include the policies he wanted. The president is focused on passing this historic piece of legislation and making our country great again." Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene, a Georgia Republican, told reporters on Tuesday: "I have to agree with [Musk] on one hand. I always love it when Americans are angry at the federal government and express it. I think that should've been happening for years now. I mean, we're $36 trillion in debt for a reason." President Donald Trump posted to Truth Social on Thursday: "I don't mind Elon turning against me, but he should have done so months ago. This is one of the Greatest Bills ever presented to Congress. It's a Record Cut in Expenses, $1.6 Trillion Dollars, and the Biggest Tax Cut ever given. If this Bill doesn't pass, there will be a 68% Tax Increase, and things far worse than that. I didn't create this mess, I'm just here to FIX IT. This puts our Country on a Path of Greatness. MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!" Senator Bernie Sanders, a Vermont independent, wrote in a X post on June 3: "Musk is right: this bill IS a 'disgusting abomination.' We shouldn't give $664 billion in tax breaks to the 1%. We shouldn't throw 13.7 million people off of Medicaid. We shouldn't cut $290 billion from programs to feed the hungry. Let's defeat this disgusting abomination." Senate Majority Leader John Thune, a South Dakota Republican, told reporters on Tuesday: "We obviously respect everything that Elon did with DOGE. On this particular issue, we have a difference of entitled to that opinion. We're going to proceed full speed ahead." What Happens Next Trump gave Senate Republicans a July 4 deadline to pass the bill and get it to his desk.


Hamilton Spectator
39 minutes ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Mike Johnson downplays Musk's influence and says Republicans will pass Trump's tax and budget bill
With an uncharacteristically feistiness, Speaker Mike Johnson took clear sides Sunday in President Donald Trump's breakup with mega-billionaire Elon Musk. The Republican House leader and staunch Trump ally said Musk's criticism of the GOP's massive tax and budget policy bill will not derail the measure, and he downplayed Musk's influence over the GOP-controlled Congress. 'I didn't go out to craft a piece of legislation to please the richest man in the world,' Johnson said on ABC's 'This Week.' 'What we're trying to do is help hardworking Americans who are trying to provide for their families and make ends meet,' Johnson insisted. Johnson said he has exchanged text messages with Musk since the former chief of Trump's Department of Government Efficiency came out against the GOP bill. Musk called it an 'abomination' that would add to U.S. debts and threaten economic stability. He urged voters to flood Capitol Hill with calls to vote against the measure, which is pending in the Senate after clearing the House. His criticism sparked an angry social media back-and-forth with Trump, who told reporters over the weekend that he has no desire to repair his relationship with Musk. The speaker was dismissive of Musk's threats to finance opponents — even Democrats — of Republican members who back Trump's bill. 'We've got almost no calls to the offices, any Republican member of Congress,' Johnson said. 'And I think that indicates that people are taking a wait and see attitude. Some who may be convinced by some of his arguments, but the rest understand: this is a very exciting piece of legislation.' Johnson argued that Musk still believes 'that our policies are better for human flourishing. They're better for the US economy. They're better for everything that he's involved in with his innovation and job creation and entrepreneurship.' The speaker and other Republicans, including Trump's White House budget chief, continued their push back Sunday against forecasts that their tax and budget plans will add to annual deficits and thus balloon a national debt already climbing toward $40 trillion. Johnson insisted that Musk has bad information, and the speaker disputed the forecasts of the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office that scores budget legislation. The bill would extend the 2017 Trump tax cuts, cut spending and reduce some other levies but also leave some 10.9 million more people without health insurance and spike deficits by $2.4 trillion over the decade , according to the CBO's analysis. The speaker countered with arguments Republicans have made for decades : That lower taxes and spending cuts would spur economic growth that ensure deficits fall. Annual deficits and the overall debt actually climbed during the administrations of Ronald Reagan and George W. Bush, and during Trump's first presidency , even after sweeping tax cuts. Russell Vought, who leads the White House Office of Budget and Management, said on Fox News Sunday that CBO analysts base their models of 'artificial baselines.' Because the 2017 tax law set the lower rates to expire, CBO's cost estimates, Vought argued, presuming a return to the higher rates before that law went into effect. Vought acknowledged CBO's charge from Congress is to analyze legislation and current law as it is written. But he said the office could issue additional analyses, implying it would be friendlier to GOP goals. Asked whether the White House would ask for alternative estimates, Vought again put the burden on CBO, repeating that congressional rules allow the office to publish more analysis. Other Republicans, meanwhile, approached the Trump-Musk battle cautiously. 'As a former professional fighter, I learned a long time ago, don't get between two fighters,' said Oklahoma Sen. Markwayne Mullin on CNN's 'State of the Union.' He even compared the two billionaire businessmen to a married couple. 'President Trump is a friend of mine but I don't need to get, I can have friends that have disagreements,' Mullin said. 'My wife and I dearly love each other and every now and then, well actually quite often, sometimes she disagrees with me, but that doesn't mean that we can't stay focused on what's best for our family. Right now, there may be a disagreement but we're laser focused on what is best for the American people.' —- Associated Press journalist Gary Fields contributed from Washington. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .