Oilers try to end Canada's NHL title drought by dethroning Panthers
A tension-packed Canada-United States rivalry reaches an emotional high starting Wednesday when the Edmonton Oilers try to become the first Canadian club since 1993 to win the Stanley Cup.
The Oilers, powered by superstar Connor McDavid, will face defending champion Florida in the NHL's best-of-seven championship series in a rematch of last year's final, won by the Panthers in seven games.
Not since the Montreal Canadiens in 1993 has a Canadian team captured the trophy, but in what has been an intense US-Canada rivalry year, the Oilers have a chance to end the epic drought and US possession of the Cup.
"It's going to be an incredible battle again," Panthers forward Sam Reinhart said. "They're playing some pretty dominant hockey, so we're excited for the challenge. We've got to be ready for it."
A US-Canada grudge match fueled by political overtones could be in the making when the series begins on Wednesday in Edmonton.
US President Donald Trump began the tensions by calling for Canada to become the 51st state, even calling former prime minister Justin Trudeau "governor" as if he were only in charge of a US state not a nation. Tariffs against the border neighbors didn't help either.
It all boiled over in the NHL's Four Nations Faceoff tournament when the United States played Canada at Montreal in a round-robin game on February 15 and fans booed the pre-game singing of the US national anthem.
Once the puck was dropped, there were three fights in the first nine seconds as the crowd roared. A hard-hitting contest followed with the Americans winning 3-1.
Five nights later, the USA and Canada met in the tournament final at Boston, where microphone-wearing referee Gord Dwyer said, "Let's get ready for an epic battle," before dropping the puck.
Only one penalty was called and the teams delivered a world-class contest with McDavid scoring the winning goal for Canada in a 3-2 overtime triumph.
"You can't take our country and you can't take our game," Trudeau posted on X moments after the finish.
Heated emotions remain in US-Canada relations. Canadian hockey legend Wayne Gretzky faced backlash at home over his support for Trump.
Travel from Canada to the United States has dipped dramatically and new Canadian prime minister Mark Carney had a minor confrontation in a White House visit with Trump.
Carney told Trump Canada would never be for sale, with the US leader replying, "Never say never."
That is the backdrop for the Oilers and Panthers rematch, the 12th time the same two teams meet in consecutive Cup finals, the first since Pittsburgh beat Detroit in 2009 after losing to the Red Wings the previous year.
No NHL team has beaten the same rival in back-to-back finals since Montreal beat Boston in 1977 and 1978.
McDavid and German teammate Leon Draisaitl lead all NHL playoff scorers and Edmonton goaltender Stuart Skinner has rebounded after losing his starting job earlier in the playoffs.
The Panthers seized a 3-0 lead in last year's final before the Oilers pulled level only to fall in game seven.
"I think we were better for going through last year. It was a great learning experience and it has really driven us all year," McDavid said.
"This run has felt different than last year. It has felt very normal. It hasn't been as emotional. We haven't had the highs and we haven't had the lows. It has just kind of been steady and I think that has put us in a good position."
Florida makes a third consecutive finals appearance, having lost to Vegas in 2023 before winning last year.
The Panthers are sparked by Finnish forward Alexander Barkov, who has six goals and 11 assists to lead Florida in this playoff run. Sam Bennett has a playoff-best 10 goals for the Panthers and right wing Matthew Tkachuk, who started one of the early fights in the US-Canada Four-Nations slugfest, brings an emotional lift to the trophy holders.
Russian 36-year-old goaltender Sergei Bobrovsky is 12-5 in the playoffs with a 2.11 goals-against average for Florida.
js/iwd
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
34 minutes ago
- Mint
Why Elon Musk turned against Donald Trump and his ‘One Big Beautiful Bill' - Here are the 5 reasons
Once close allies, now at odds: Elon Musk's once-robust relationship with Donald Trump appears to be crumbling amid growing policy clashes, public criticism, and mounting fallout for Musk's companies. The turning point seems to be Trump's so-called 'Big Beautiful Bill,' a sweeping Republican legislative package that Musk claims undermines innovation and economic discipline. Here's a breakdown of the key reasons behind the falling out: Elon Musk's sharp break from Donald Trump finds its most immediate pain point in Tesla's bottom line: the proposed elimination of federal electric vehicle (EV) tax credits. Under current policy, buyers of new EVs are eligible for up to $7,500 in federal tax credits, with an additional $4,000 available for used EVs. These credits, part of the Biden-era Inflation Reduction Act, have been a critical incentive driving EV adoption—and by extension, Tesla's sales. But Trump's so-called 'Big Beautiful Bill,' backed by GOP lawmakers, aims to gut those incentives entirely for manufacturers that have already sold over 200,000 qualifying vehicles between 2009 and 2025. Tesla, by far the EV market leader, is directly in the firing line: the company sold over 336,000 vehicles in just Q1 of 2025 alone. According to JPMorgan analyst Ryan Brinkman, the removal of these credits could represent a $1.2 billion headwind for Tesla—a significant blow as the company battles slumping demand, falling profits, and political backlash from Musk's government role. So, Musk became increasingly vocal in criticising Trump's massive federal spending bill—nicknamed the 'Big Beautiful Bill.' Musk called the bill 'a disgusting abomination' and accused GOP lawmakers of abandoning fiscal responsibility. 'I was disappointed to see the massive spending bill, frankly… which increases the budget deficit… I don't know if a bill can be big and beautiful,' Musk told CBS previously. Musk's discontent escalated after Trump abruptly withdrew the nomination of private astronuat and his ally Jared Isaacman—as NASA Administrator. Trump cited 'prior associations' in his decision, which Musk might have seen as a betrayal. Isaacman had broad support in the space community and was seen as Musk's pick to align NASA policy with SpaceX's interests. His removal coincided with Musk's own exit as a 'special government employee' running the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). 'It is rare to find someone so competent and good-hearted,' Musk said in support of Isaacman, signaling the depth of his frustration. Elon Musk's foray into federal governance as a 'special government employee' under the Trump administration has left a lasting dent in his personal and public image. What began as a high-profile effort to 'streamline government efficiency' quickly turned into a political and reputational minefield for the billionaire CEO. As head of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), Musk was tasked with cutting what the Trump administration called 'wasteful spending.' But the resulting actions—including mass layoffs in federal departments, rumored threats to Social Security and Medicare programs, and abrupt budget slashes—sparked widespread backlash. Despite Musk's repeated clarifications that DOGE had no authority over entitlement programs, public anger snowballed. 'It's a bit unfair because DOGE became the whipping boy for everything,' Musk told CBS. 'I've had people think DOGE is going to stop them from getting their Social Security check, which is completely untrue.' The political blowback triggered a sharp decline in Musk's public approval. Protests, online campaigns, and lawsuits followed, along with a string of death threats and acts of violence targeting both Musk and Tesla facilities. As public anger grew, Tesla became a target: Showrooms were vandalised Tesla vehicle sales plummeted Shares fell 50% from record highs Net worth dropped by $100 billion Musk lamented being made the scapegoat: 'DOGE became the whipping boy for everything... People thought it would stop their Social Security checks.' His candid remarks reflect a man caught between two identities—visionary entrepreneur and political appointee. 'I don't want to speak up against the administration,' he said, 'but I also don't want to take responsibility for everything this administration is doing.' Musk recently escalated pressure on the FAA to drop Verizon's $2.4 billion contract for air traffic control upgrades, claiming the system is failing. He offered Starlink as an emergency solution, suggesting the FAA should shift the contract to SpaceX. But critics flagged this as a possible conflict of interest—especially since Musk had been advising on federal spending.
First Post
36 minutes ago
- First Post
Israel Kills Over 50 in 24 Hours in Attacks Across Gaza Vantage with Palki Sharma
Israel Kills Over 50 in 24 Hours in Attacks Across Gaza | Vantage with Palki Sharma | N18G Israel Kills Over 50 in 24 Hours in Attacks Across Gaza | Vantage with Palki Sharma | N18G At least 51 civilians were killed by Israeli attacks across Gaza - with a humanitarian aid centre being targeted. The UN and aid groups have condemned the latest strikes. They say Israel targeted Palestinians searching for food aid near US-backed distribution sites. This comes as Egypt and Qatar announced fresh efforts to secure a ceasefire deal. It is based on a US-supported proposal for a 60-day truce and the entry of humanitarian aid. See More
Time of India
39 minutes ago
- Time of India
Trump's sweeping bill to cut taxes by $3.75 trillion but will burden millions of Americans. Check details
President Donald Trump's major legislative proposal currently moving through Congress is projected to cut taxes by $3.7 trillion while increasing the federal deficit by $2.4 trillion over the next ten years, according to a report released Wednesday by the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO). The CBO also estimates the bill would result in 10.9 million more people without health insurance, including 1.4 million undocumented immigrants currently covered under state-funded programs. Additionally, the package is expected to reduce federal spending by $1.3 trillion over the same period. This analysis arrives at a pivotal time, as Trump is urging lawmakers to finalize the legislation in time for him to sign it by the Fourth of July. As the official legislative scorekeeper for Congress, the CBO's assessment will be closely scrutinized by both lawmakers and analysts trying to grasp the full fiscal implications of the sweeping bill, which spans over 1,000 pages. In anticipation of the report, the White House and Republican leaders launched a preemptive effort to discredit the CBO's findings and cast doubt on its conclusions. It is estimated that 8.6 million people will lose health coverage due to Medicaid changes. SNAP (food stamp) participation would drop by 4 million monthly. ALSO READ: Under Trump's 'big, beautiful' bill, over 10 million more Americans projected to lose insurance Live Events Elon Musk calls bill 'disgusting abomination' Billionaire Elon Musk blasted the massive tax and immigration bill at the heart of President Donald Trump's agenda on Tuesday, calling the measure 'a disgusting abomination' that would burden the country with 'crushingly unsustainable debt.' Although Musk — who stepped down Friday as head of the US DOGE Service, part of Trump's cost-cutting initiative — had earlier voiced mild criticism of the bill, his recent posts on X, the social media platform he owns, marked his most pointed rebuke of the Trump administration to date. For months, Musk had acted as the president's close ally, often appearing alongside Trump in the Oval Office and urging the administration to rein in government spending. 'This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination,' Musk posted on X. 'Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it.' He wrote minutes later: 'It will massively increase the already gigantic budget deficit to $2.5 trillion (!!!) and burden America citizens with crushingly unsustainable debt.' That post appeared to confuse the annual deficit with the overall increase to the debt over 10 years. ALSO READ: Elon Musk attacks Trump's 'big, beautiful bill': Tesla CEO's sudden outburst explained Shortly after that, he wrote, 'In November next year, we fire all politicians who betrayed the American people.' The bill would extend tax cuts enacted during Trump's first term and make good on new campaign promises — including no taxes on tips or overtime wages — while devoting hundreds of billions of dollars in new spending to defense and immigration enforcement. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt dismissed Elon Musk's recent comments. 'The president is well aware of Musk's stance on the bill,' she said. 'It hasn't changed his perspective. This is a strong, ambitious piece of legislation, and he's fully committed to it.' ALSO READ: Elon Musk's DOGE army left 'drugs, roaches and rats' in 'trashed' offices: Bombshell report amid Ketamine claims The proposed law would roll back much of the Biden-era Inflation Reduction Act, which provided major federal tax incentives for electric vehicles, battery production, and solar energy — key areas for Musk's businesses. Tesla, in particular, has taken a hit amid declining enthusiasm for Musk's DOGE initiatives, reporting a 71% drop in profits in the first quarter. House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-Louisiana) pushed back on Musk's criticism. 'With all due respect, my friend Elon is terribly wrong about the One Big Beautiful Bill,' Johnson told reporters. ALSO READ: Social Security Fairness Act big update given on expanded benefits. Here's how it will impact millions of Americans The speaker said that he and Musk talked about the legislation and other topics for 20 minutes Monday and that the two appeared to end the phone conversation on common ground. 'Elon is missing it, okay?' Johnson added. 'And it's not personal. I know that the EV mandate [is] very important to him; that is going away because the government should not be subsidizing these things as part of the Green New Deal. And I know that has an effect on his business, and I lament that. … But for him to come out and pan the whole bill is, to me, just very disappointing, very surprising, in light of the conversation I had with him yesterday.' Economic Times WhatsApp channel )
