
Why Danny Dyer's Bafta win has finally broken ‘EastEnders Curse' that plagued soap for years… he's in a different league
CLUTCHING a first ever Bafta in his hand, Danny Dyer beamed 'I've earned this one' having finally been recognised for his acting talents.
And a major reason why the Londoner can feel extra chuffed about taking home the prestigious gong is he's finally broken the infamous ' EastEnders curse', which has plagued ambitious former and current Walford residents for decades.
8
8
8
Indeed, by winning a Bafta on Sunday - for his role in Sky comedy series My Bigstuff - Danny achieved the extremely rare feat of securing mainstream acting success, and now critical acclaim, after leaving Albert Square.
What it also represents is the final nail in the coffin of his relationship with the soap, which he's been critical of in recent months.
Because unlike other cast members who've tried - and failed - to go onto bigger things, he doesn't need the safety net of the soap now.
Leaving EastEnders is always a huge risk for its stars.
Many believe they have both the acting skills and pedigree within the industry to bag a major role on another platform, and make a huge name for themselves away from Walford.
It's tough as so many are typecast due to their roles on EastEnders and being watched so regularly by viewers.
It's hard to break free from that and be seen as an entirely different character, which is why so many struggle by either fading into obscurity or returning to Walford with their tails between their legs.
Danny has proven it can be done and deserves his flowers for making it happen.
Some of EastEnders' biggest names have tried and failed to make it big outside of the soap.
Out of the current crop still plying their trade on the Square, Jessie Wallace, who plays Kat Slater, featured in The Road To Coronation Street in 2010 - a BBC Four one-off drama about the creation of the ITV soap - before returning to Walford shortly after.
First look at Danny Dyer's comedy debut as he leads new show Mr Bigstuff from creator of Brassic
Lacey Turner filmed one series of BBC1 military drama Our Girl in 2013 before being replaced by Michelle Keegan and coming back to EastEnders in the same year.
Shane Ritchie, aka Alfie Moon, briefly left to star as Arthur Daley in a panned Minder reboot in 2009, while Patsy Palmer tried her luck in a BBC crime drama McCready and Daughter in 2001 which was axed after just five episodes.
And Michelle Collins, who recently returned as Cindy Beale - having been killed off in 1998 - appeared in BBC1 drama Two Thousand Acres of Sky in the early Noughties, which was binned after three series, and later turned up in rival soap Corrie as Rovers Return landlady Stella, a stint which lasted just three years from 2011 to 2014.
Historically, it was just as tough to go out alone.
Grant Mitchell actor Ross Kemp, who was regarded as the soap's biggest star in the Nineties, made a number of ITV dramas which didn't quite capture the imagination - he had better luck with his documentaries which earned him his own BAFTA.
8
Former Spandau Ballet heartthrob Martin Kemp impressed on the Square as gangster Steve Owen but also ended up in graveyard that is ITV dramas, including the (very) forgettable Daddy's Girl, Can't Buy Me Love or, ironically and Back in Business.
Tamzin Outhwaite, one of Ian Beale's many wives, Mel Owen, jumped ship for another military drama, Red Cap, which lasted just three series before she made a return to Walford in 2018, which eventually saw her character killed off.
And of course there's Martine McCutcheon (Tiffany Mitchell), who bagged a breakout film role in Richard Curtis's Love Actually opposite Hugh Grant in 2003 after a brief pop career, but has failed to hit the heights acting-wise since.
Danny left EastEnders in typically memorable style on Christmas Day in 2022.
His character, lovable Queen Vic landlord Mick Carter, was deemed 'lost at sea' after jumping into the English Channel to save estranged wife, and love of his life, Linda Carter only never to be seen again, while she managed to survive and remains on screen today.
But since packing in EastEnders, where his profile was at an all-time high, Danny has thrown himself into work on various channels to build up his brand even more.
Critics 'fuming'
He bagged a Netflix gameshow, Cheat, an E4 travel series with daughter Dani - his co-host on their popular podcast.
Live and Let Dyers - a Channel 5 drama, Heat, and Mr Bigstuff, which secured his Bafta.
Plus, he's also earned praise for his role in raunchy drama Rivals on Disney+, now about to start filming a second series, and even hosted a reality game show on Channel 4 called Scared of The Dark - and returned to the big screen in Nick Love movie Marching Powder.
His heavy-workload wasn't just taken on to cover his lost EastEnders wage packet - he was one of the highest earners - but also to heavily distance himself from the soap.
But soap insiders believe Danny's new-found success and status as one of the most-sought after actors in the business is heavily down to EastEnders, as his role showcased his acting talents in ways his previous roles could not.
Danny was hugely typecast before EastEnders thanks to his gangster Brit flick past and laughable crime documentaries.
But playing Mick allowed him to show depth for the first time, so viewers could see a softer side.
Therefore, it wasn't just young lads who were awe of him, he managed to carve out a big female fanbase, too, who have now stuck with him
Seeing him excel in sensitive storylines including supporting his son after he came out, caring for his wife after she was raped and his own character being a victim of historic sex abuse saw Danny in a new light and no doubt helped spark all these other acting offers.'
After winning his Bafta on Sunday, Danny also said many of his 'critics' will be fuming he's bagged such a big acting award.
No doubt they'll be some envious glances from the Walford area too.
8
8
8
Danny Dyer's career so far
By Conor O'Brien
Danny Dyer has played several film and TV roles across a three-decade acting career.
Here's a look back at some of his most memorable performances.
Prime Suspect (1993): Danny made his screen debut in an episode of the long-running ITV police procedural. He appeared as a character named "Martin Fletcher".
Human Traffic (1999): Danny's debut film saw him portray "Moff", a dealer. Directed by Justin Kerrigan, the coming-of-age comedy drama also featured John Simm, Andrew Lincoln and Richard Coyle.
Mean Machine (2001): An adaptation of The Longest Yard, this sports comedy also featured Vinnie Jones and Jason Statham. Danny played "Billy the Limpet".
The Football Factory (2004): Loosely based on the novel of the same name by John King. Danny led the cast of this sports drama, directed by Nick Love. He portrayed "Tommy Johnson".
EastEnders (2013-2022): Danny appeared in the London-set BBC soap opera for almost a decade. He played Queen Vic landlord "Mick Carter", opposite Kellie Bright as his on-screen wife Linda.
Rivals (2024): The actor was among an all-star ensemble cast in this Disney+ series based on Jilly Cooper's novel. Danny played the role of "Freddie Jones".

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BBC News
10 minutes ago
- BBC News
'Roman's Got Talent' at Chester House Estate's annual show
A free festival is to showcase different talents from the Roman era with a theatre performance based on the reality show Britain's Got two-day Roman Fest will be held at the Chester House Estate, near Irchester, Northamptonshire, and will include a performance of 'Roman's Got Talent'.The show will be performed by the charity Laugh Out Loud Theatre Company and will highlight talents such chariot racing and a Gladiator dance members will also be asked to participate as judges and rate the performances. The event, which is expecting about 5,000 people, will also include the opportunity to see an excavation in progress and the chance to wash real Roman objects that have been found at the Bethea, director of public health, communities and leisure at North Northamptonshire Council, said the event would highlight the "400 years of Roman history" at The Chester House said: "This event is always the highlight of the estate's calendar and provides a fun day out for the whole family, whilst also providing a great insight into the world of Roman Britain."The festival, organised in partnership with the University of Leicester's Heritage Hub, will also feature Roman-themed stalls and crafts, a pop-up archaeology lab and Roman-style military demonstrations.A pop-up exhibition of artwork by Northampton College students inspired by the Romans and objects from the Northamptonshire Archaeological Resource Centre will also be displayed, and the event will feature stalls from museums, archaeology groups and heritage Scott, professor of archaeology and director of the university's Heritage Hub, said: "This annual event is a fantastic opportunity to showcase our collaborative research and archaeological expertise through guided tours of our live excavation and an interactive pop-up archaeology lab."In addition to popular favourites, such as demonstrations from the Ermine Street Guard, you can learn the basics of osteoarchaeology, examine real archaeological finds using microscopes and uncover the surprising role of insects in archaeology and health."Roman Fest 2025 will take place on 28 and 29 June, between 10:00 and 16:00 BST. Follow Northamptonshire news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.


BBC News
40 minutes ago
- BBC News
East of England news quiz of the week 31 May to 6 June
From unusual food bank donations to angry parents after a school rule change, how much East of England news can you remember from the past seven days? Follow East of England news on X, Instagram and Facebook: BBC Beds, Herts & Bucks, BBC Cambridgeshire, BBC Essex, BBC Norfolk, BBC Northamptonshire or BBC Suffolk.


Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Why Harry's hopes for reconciliation with the King are doomed
For Elizabeth II, it was the final straw in the Megxit saga – and it happened four years ago this week. The monarch, then 95, had successfully defended her family against the Duke and Duchess of Sussex's explosive Oprah Winfrey interview with the pithy royal response that ' some recollections may vary '. She had more than enough reason to be angry. As the couple accused two unnamed royals of being racist towards their as-yet-unborn son, Archie, before a global audience of millions on March 7 2021, Prince Philip was dying in hospital. He died less than a month later, on April 9, aged 99. Astonishingly, though, it wasn't that extraordinary prime-time salvo that ended any hope of a royal rapprochement between the Sussexes and the late Queen. The fatal blow came three months later on June 4, when the Sussexes announced their newborn daughter would be named Lilibet after her great-grandmother's childhood nickname. The couple celebrated the moment on Wednesday by releasing an eye-popping video of themselves 'twerking' in their hospital delivery suite. When the couple insisted that the late Queen was 'supportive' of them using the name, the normally imperturbable monarch did something she had rarely done before. Angered by the false assertion that she had given her blessing, she instructed the Buckingham Palace powers-that-be to make it clear that her permission had not, in fact, been sought. So when the US-based couple fired off a legal letter to the BBC for an article reporting that the late Queen had not been properly consulted, the palace refused to back up their version of events. Lilibet, the pet name given to Her Majesty by her parents King George VI and the Queen Mother and used only by them, her sister Princess Margaret, Prince Philip and her closest confidantes, was one of the only things the late Queen had to herself – and Harry and Meghan had purloined it. Not only did the legal threats against BBC fail to materialise, but the incident was conspicuous by its absence from the Duke's tell-all autobiography Spare, published in January 2023, four months after Her Majesty's death. This week marks the fourth anniversary of that unedifying episode and it remains an important reminder of just how difficult it will be for the Royals to reconcile with a couple whose 'truth' has often seemed to collide with royal reality. Talk of whether relations will ever be restored between the Sussexes and the Windsors is not just a media obsession. It remains a topic of intense discussion behind palace gates where aides have been trying to map a way forward as the King, 76, continues to recover from cancer. In yet another bombshell interview, recorded after he had lost an appeal in court over his security last month, the Duke told the BBC that he wanted to heal family wounds. Some interpreted it as a 'dead cat' strategy to distract from the fact he had failed to persuade the judge that the Home Office should have maintained his taxpayer funded royalty protection. He said: 'There have been so many disagreements, differences between me and some of my family. This current situation that has been now ongoing for five years with regards to human life and safety is the sticking point; it is the only thing that's left. Of course, some members of my family will never forgive me for writing a book, of course they will never forgive me for lots of things. But you know there is…I would love reconciliation with my family. 'There's no point in continuing to fight anymore, as I said life is precious. I don't know how much longer my father has, he won't speak to me because of this security stuff but it would be nice to reconcile.' Coming just days after the King had given a poignant update on his illness, describing the experience as 'daunting' and 'frightening', the Duke's outburst understandably caused huge upset. The palace had been very careful not to discuss the details of the King's condition, stressing only that his recovery continues in a 'very positive direction, as reflected with the very full national and international diary programme'. It was an unhelpful intervention ahead of the King and Queen's very positively received trip to Canada, and some felt it set back efforts to reassure the public that he was faring well – so well in fact, that very tentative planning had begun on his 80th birthday celebrations in 2028. The talk now is that he may die 'with' cancer, but not 'of' cancer following a rigorous treatment programme. One concession to his health and advancing years that has been made, however, is that it appears unlikely he will ever move from Clarence House to Buckingham Palace after the restoration is completed in three year's time although it will remain the household's office for the rest of his reign. Equally exploratory have been discussions about if or when father and son could ever be reunited, with some mooting that the next Invictus Games could provide an opportunity when it is held in Birmingham in 2027. Mindful of the Duke's recent televised olive branch, the palace has even carried out discrete polling to find out how many people were aware of the BBC interview (over 80 per cent of Brits weren't). Yet there is an awareness that the impasse cannot continue forever, not least if it starts to reflect badly on the King. Serious concerns remain, however, about the intimate contents of any meeting ending up in the public domain, which is the main reason the King is no longer taking his youngest son's calls. The irony of the palace's predicament has not been lost on aides who had grown used to the Duke regularly complaining about stories ending up in the press he claimed had been leaked by royal staff. Eyebrows were raised when the Sussexes' spokesman briefed that they had not been invited to the King's 75th birthday celebrations in 2023 amid reports they had snubbed the event. Were there to be a public reconciliation at the Invictus Games, it is hoped it would also involve Prince Archie and Princess Lilibet who will be eight and six by then. The King last saw his youngest grandchildren during the Platinum Jubilee in 2022. The Duchess's presence remains a known unknown, with some questioning whether she will ever return to the UK for fear of a hostile reception from the public. The couple were booed on arrival at St Paul's Cathedral in London for a ceremony marking jubilee three years ago and a great deal more has been said and done since then. As ever, security remains a barrier with the Duke continuing to insist that he and his family aren't safe returning to Britain without the armed Metropolitan police bodyguards who used to protect them when they were working royals. While exasperated by the Duke's insistence that his father could have stepped in and prevented the Royal and VIP Executive Committee from downgrading his son's security, aides are believed to be looking at ways the family could be enveloped into King's security arrangements were he to make an official royal visit to the games. The Prince of Wales's involvement remains unlikely after the Duke revealed the gory details of a brotherly brawl over a dog bowl and accused his sister-in-law of questioning what the Sussexes' firstborn might look like along with the King. (Although the Duke did not name them in Spare, they were outed in Endgame, a book by the Sussexes' hagiographer Omid Scobie.) Although the heir to the throne is no longer as angry as he was, those who know him best believe there is 'no way back'. The prevailing attitude is to let sleeping dogs lie. As far as the wider Royal family are concerned, they believe they did everything in their power to make the Duchess feel welcome, and view the Duke – once nicknamed ' The Hostage ' by palace staff – to be enthralled by his wife. Some had questioned whether the marriage would go the distance but are now resigned to the fact that the Duke will never return to Britain now his children, who have US passports and accents, are being brought up in America. After it was announced in January that the Princess of Wales is in remission following abdominal surgery and chemotherapy, the Waleses are under growing pressure to increase their workload amid concerns they may be spending too much time with their immediate family instead of supporting the Firm. Alive to the need to be as visible as possible, while remaining hands on parents to Prince George, 11, Princess Charlotte, 10, and seven-year-old Prince Louis, brokering a reunion with the Duke (let alone the Duchess) would appear to be low down their list of priorities. Like the King, they are also worried about the contents of any conversations making yet more lurid headlines. As far as the Crown is concerned, the institution will never reconcile with the Duke and Duchess of Sussex. But the Royals are also a family and as the Prince joked this week: 'Some of them [relatives] might not want to see you that much. It's a mixed bag.'