Trump administration blocks Harvard University from enrolling foreign students
The Trump administration will block Harvard University from enrolling international students in retaliation for the Ivy League school's failure to capitulate to its demands.
The administration notified Harvard by letter that the university's student and exchange visitor programme certification was "revoked" after a Department of Homeland Security (DHS) investigation, according to sources with knowledge of the situation, The New York Times reported on Thursday.
The revocation means that the prestigious university can no longer enrol international students, and existing foreign students must transfer to another college or lose their legal status, the DHS said.
In April, DHS Secretary Kristi Noem asked the institution for the records of foreign student visa holders' "illegal and violent" activities.
Noem accused Harvard of fostering antisemitism and liaising with the Communist Party of China.
New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch
Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters
"This administration is holding Harvard accountable for fostering violence, antisemitism, and coordinating with the Chinese Communist Party on its campus.
"It is a privilege, not a right, for universities to enrol foreign students and benefit from their higher tuition payments to help pad their multibillion-dollar endowments.'
Harvard says the administration's move threatened both the institution and the country.
"We are fully committed to maintaining Harvard's ability to host international students and scholars, who hail from more than 140 countries and enrich the University – and this nation – immeasurably,' a Harvard spokesperson said in a statement.
'We are working quickly to provide guidance and support to members of our community. This retaliatory action threatens serious harm to the Harvard community and our country and undermines Harvard's academic and research mission."
Harvard also said that the move from DHS was "unlawful".
Escalating punishment
The Trump administration's decision follows a series of measures to restrict the university's academic freedom.
At the end of March, the Trump administration announced it was reviewing $9bn in federal funds and grants to Harvard. It said it would review more than $255.6m in current contracts and $8.7bn in grants spread over multiple years.
The administration accused the university of failing to adequately protect Jewish students on campus from antisemitic discrimination and harassment, in violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
On 3 April, the Trump administration sent an initial list of demands to 'right these wrongs', as part of its crackdown on what it calls antisemitism on campuses across the US, referring to the widespread campus protests against Israel's war on Gaza.
Then, on 11 April, the Federal Task Force to Combat Antisemitism sent Harvard an expanded list of demands.
Harvard and more than 150 universities fight back against Trump administration Read More »
In response to the expanded list of demands, the institution took a stand against the Trump administration, saying in a letter, issued by Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP and King & Spalding LLP, that 'The university will not surrender its independence or relinquish its constitutional rights'.
Harvard rejected the government's demands, including reporting foreign students for code violations, reforming its governance and leadership, discontinuing its diversity, equity, and inclusion programmes, and changing its hiring and admission policies, especially for international students.
In response, the Trump administration hit Harvard with a $2.3bn federal funding freeze, which represents 35.9 percent of Harvard's $6.4bn operating expenses.
Then, the US Department of Health and Human Services said that it was terminating $60m in federal grants to the university, saying it failed to address antisemitic harassment and ethnic discrimination on campus.
The Cambridge, Massachusetts-based institution has said it 'cannot absorb the entire cost' of the frozen grants, and that it was working with researchers to help them find alternative funding. It is also suing the Trump administration over its decision to cut grants.
The Federal Task Force to Combat Antisemitism is made up of four government agencies, including the Department of Justice, the Department of Health and Human Services, the Department of Education, and the US General Services Administration.
The task force was set up in February following Trump's executive order, Additional Measures to Combat Anti-Semitism, signed at the end of January.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Middle East Eye
an hour ago
- Middle East Eye
Islamist ‘entryism': French Muslims refuse to be labelled ‘enemies' within
There was no surprise - only dismay and frustration - among French Muslims following the publication last week of a government report highlighting the alleged influence of the Muslim Brotherhood and political Islamism in France. Commissioned last year to 'clarify the threat posed by Islamist infiltration to security and national cohesion,' the document aims to raise awareness about so-called Islamist entryism. This is "considered a separatist mode of action" that "is characterised by involvement in local life to access positions of influence and power that enable the obtaining of amendments to existing laws". On 21 May, French President Emmanuel Macron convened a Defence Council meeting to discuss the report and asked the government to formulate proposals in light of the "seriousness of the facts". For many Muslims in France, this was just another worrying step in the stigmatisation of their community. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters "After accusing us of separatism, now we are suspected of plotting to seize power,' Salwa Hamiti, a former sports coach at a community centre near Paris, told Middle East Eye. 'How far will this demonisation go, turning us into enemies to be defeated?' The 34-year-old Muslim woman became a target the moment she decided to cover her head two years ago. 'My manager didn't appreciate seeing me arrive one morning wearing a turban,' she said. 'He immediately took me aside to ask me to remove it. According to him, not only was I breaking the laicite law, but I risked influencing the young girls I was training, most of whom were of Muslim origin,' said Hamiti, who eventually resigned. 'After accusing us of separatism, now we are suspected of plotting to seize power. How far will this demonisation go?' - Salwa Hamiti, a former sports coach In France, "laicite" is a form of secularism defined as the separation between the state and religious institutions, which imposes an obligation of neutrality on the state. In 2004, the country legislated to prohibit the wearing of religious symbols or clothing in state schools, and earlier this year, the Senate adopted a similar law - that still needs to be discussed by the lower house of parliament - during all sports competitions. Today, although Hamiti has found a job as a saleswoman in a 'Muslim-friendly' store, the former coach still cannot believe she was accused of proselytising. "A kippah or a cross are fine, but not the veil, the qamis [tunic] and the beard, that are used today as a pretext for the right and the far right to fuel fear and hatred of French Muslims," she said. 'Fifth column' The report on the Muslim Brotherhood's influence in France unveiled last week highlights primarily alleged lobbying and networking practices. Interior Minister Bruno Retailleau denounced the "threat" posed by the "entryism" of the Muslim Brotherhood, whose goal, according to him, is "to push all of French society into Sharia law." For lawyer Sefen Guez Guez, this is "utterly false." And by promoting such a discourse, the authorities validate conspiracy theories about Islam, he told MEE. French president asks for measures to combat Muslim Brotherhood 'entryism' Read More » "These theories suggest that there are organisations whose goal is to destabilise the nation, while we are all witnessing a rise in Islamophobia in France," he said. According to the National Directorate of Territorial Intelligence, anti-Muslim acts have increased by 72 percent when compared to the same period last year. Dramatic as this rise is, representatives of the Muslim community believe these figures do not show the full extent of the problem as victims do not always file complaints. Guez Guez considers that "the state contributes to amplifying Islamophobia by suggesting that Muslims represent a danger and constitute a kind of fifth column, especially if they organise and succeed". "Personally, I am convinced that it is the success of the Muslim community in this country that is disturbing," he added. In recent years, the lawyer has defended several cases involving Muslim organisations targeted by banning procedures - such as the Collective Against Islamophobia in France (CCIF), dissolved in 2020 - as well as the closure of mosques and private Muslim schools. All these entities have been accused of colluding with Islamist circles and propagating their ideas. This is the case of the Averroes Muslim high school, a high-quality establishment located in the northern city of Lille, whose legal team has just obtained, on appeal, the reinstatement of public subsidies after more than a year of legal battles. '[There is] a clear desire on the part of the state to dismantle any possibility for the Muslim community to build an elite that is professionally successful and at the same time asserts its Islamic identity' - Sefen Guez Guez, lawyer In Lyon, in eastern central France, the fate of the Al Kindi high school, also renowned for the excellence of its results, is still in the hands of the courts. Last January, the local prefecture decided to terminate its contract with the state on the grounds that it "carries out a project contrary to the values of the Republic". "In court, the director of legal affairs at the interior ministry, who came to defend the case on behalf of the prefecture, said that Al Kindi's real problem was that it was training an elite that would one day be in power,' Guez Guez reported. The lawyer denounced: 'A clear desire on the part of the state to dismantle any possibility for the Muslim community to build an elite that is professionally successful and at the same time asserts its Islamic identity.' A year and a half after the promulgation of the so-called 'separatism' law in 2021 - which its detractors say discriminates against Muslims - 3,000 inspections have been carried out in Muslim establishments. As a result, 187 were closed, including seven mosques and 11 schools. After Averroes and Al Kindi, Ibn Khaldoun, a school located in Marseille, is now threatened with closure. The right-wing presidents of the region and department have just withdrawn public funding because, according to them, the establishment is part of the "Muslim Brotherhood ecosystem". "We must expect similar decisions to multiply following the publication of the report," Guez Guez warned. 'A culture of suspicion' This is also the fear of Christian Di Meglio, president of Sete Olympique, an amateur soccer club near the southern city of Montpellier that was stripped of its license a year ago for emblazoning its players' jerseys with a star and a crescent, two emblematic symbols of Islam. The club has been accused of 'communautarist' practices and 'separatism'. 'Down with the veil': Muslim athletes outraged by French bill to ban hijab in sports Read More » "Our logo had never caused any problems since the club's creation in 2016, but with the rise of the far right, we became a target,' he told MEE. Out of a total of "280 associations affiliated with the movement in a multitude of sectors that affect Muslim life', the government's report on the Muslim Brotherhood mentions 127 sports associations listed in 2020 as "having a relationship with a separatist movement". "When players pray in the locker room, they are Islamists, but when a footballer makes the sign of the cross upon entering the pitch, it doesn't bother anyone," Di Meglio said, protesting against "the development of a culture of suspicion that exclusively targets Muslims." The rector of the Grand Mosque of Lyon, Kamel Kabtane, calls it "a presumption of guilt towards Muslims." "When a Defence Council is convened, it's because the situation is serious, because there is an internal enemy, and they cite it: Islam and Islamism," Kabtane told MEE. The government report released this month claims that two mosques in Lyon and around 50 associations in the region are Muslim Brotherhood-affiliated. 'Should we consider that 400 people [...] could subvert republican institutions or even Islamise society? It's not credible' - Franck Fregosi, a researcher at the National Centre for Scientific Research The rector denies this, and denounces a very anxiety-inducing climate for Muslims in the country, which reminds him of "the way Jews were treated since 1933". "They are currently scrutinising the ways we dress, behave, and so on,' Kabtane said. Other Islamic organisations, such as the Grand Mosque of Paris and the French Council of the Muslim Faith, are concerned about the stigmatisation of Muslims in the name of the fight against Islamism. The Grand Mosque of Paris has denounced in a press release "the construction of a Muslim problem and the insidious development of an increasingly uninhibited discriminatory discourse" whose aim is to 'serve particular political agendas". Politically-motivated For Franck Fregosi, a researcher at the National Centre for Scientific Research and a specialist in Islam in France, the report serves in particular the interior minister, "whose presidential ambitions are well known". The academic, who was interviewed by the report's authors, was surprised to discover conclusions that according to him exaggerate the influence and the threat of the Muslim Brotherhood in France. "I admit I don't understand the nature of this threat. Should we consider that 400 people, who constitute the centre of the Brotherhood [according to the report], could subvert republican institutions or even Islamise society? It's not credible," he told MEE. Fregosi points out that Musulmans de France (Muslims of France), a group the report identifies as "the national branch of the Muslim Brotherhood" in the country, is actually losing ground. 'The content of this report serves to scare public opinion and then provide [the government] with the means to act with racist laws against Muslims without the French people being upset' - Kamel Kabtane, rector of the Grand Mosque of Lyon Fregosi sees the focus on the Muslim Brotherhood as a pretext to call out Muslim urban visibility, which is intolerable in the eyes of right and far-right supporters. What's more, the researcher worries that the report will be a pretext to develop new, more restrictive laws against Muslims. The fear is shared by the rector of the Grand Mosque of Lyon. "The content of this report serves to scare public opinion and then provide [the government] with the means to act with racist laws against Muslims without the French people being upset," Kabtane said. Some political leaders are already making proposals. Gabriel Attal, former prime minister and president of the presidential party, Renaissance, wants to ban the hijab for girls under 15. Meanwhile, the interior minister wants the issue of the Muslim Brotherhood 'entryism' to be addressed in the same way as terrorism, including by increasing field controls of Muslim businesses, mosques and associations and facilitating administrative obstruction measures.
Middle East Eye
2 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
Carbon footprint from Israel's war on Gaza exceeds 100 countries
The carbon footprint from Israel's war on Gaza will exceed the emissions of around 100 countries, according to new research. A study published by the Social Science Research Network, first reported by The Guardian on Friday, found that the climate cost of Israel's destruction of the Palestinian enclave, clearing debris and rebuilding the territory could exceed 31m tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent. That is more than the annual 2023 emissions of many countries, including Costa Rica, Afghanistan and Zimbabwe. The study found that Hamas' rockets and bunker fuel made up for 0.2 percent of those emissions, while the supply and use of weapons, tanks and other ordnance by Israel made up 50 percent. It found that the overall impact of Israel's wars on Gaza and Lebanon, as well as its recent military confrontations with Yemen and Iran, was equivalent to running 84 gas power plants for a year. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters It is the third such study looking into the climate cost of Israel's bombardment of Gaza. 'This report is a staggering and sobering reminder of the ecological and environmental cost of Israel's genocidal campaign on the planet and its besieged people,' Zena Agha, policy analyst for Palestinian policy network Al-Shabaka, told The Guardian. 'But this is also the US, UK and EU's war, all of which have provided seemingly limitless military resources to enable Israel to devastate the most densely populated place on the planet.' The research found that 30 percent of greenhouse gas emissions since the war began came from the US sending 50,000 tonnes of weapons and supplies to Israel. A further 20 percent was attributed to Israeli aircraft reconnaissance and bombing campaigns, as well as fuel from tanks and other military vehicles. Around 7 percent of emissions from the conflict were from diesel-guzzling generators in Gaza, which Palestinians rely on due to Israel's blockade and the destruction of solar panels and the enclave's only power plant. Before the war, solar energy made up a quarter of Gaza's electricity - one of the highest densities of rooftop solar panels in the world. Israeli forces have destroyed large swathes of that solar infrastructure. The most significant cost to the climate will come from the reconstruction of Gaza, the study finds. Rebuilding 436,000 apartments, along with hundreds of schools, mosques, clinics and other buildings - in addition to 5km of roads - will produce 29.4m tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent. Underestimate The research used open-source data, media reports, and data from aid groups and UN agencies. The actual climate cost of Israel's war is likely to be much higher than the estimates, due to Israel's media blockade masking the full extent of environmental damage to the enclave. 'This conflict in Gaza shows that the numbers are substantial, greater than the entire greenhouse gas emissions of many entire countries, and must be included for accurate climate change and mitigation targets,' said Frederick Otu-Larbi, co-author of the report and lecturer at the University of Energy and Natural Resources in Ghana. Israel's war on Gaza caused major environmental damage, UN says Read More » Currently, there is no obligation for states to report military emissions to the UN's climate body. The UN last year said that Israel's war had created a devastating environmental crisis in Gaza, destroying sanitation systems, leaving tonnes of debris from explosive devices and causing major pollution. It found that water, sanitation and hygiene systems in Gaza were almost entirely defunct, with the strip's five wastewater treatment plants shut down. Israel's war is exacerbating an already deteriorating environment in Gaza, where over 92 percent of the water was deemed unfit for human consumption in 2020. Climate change and Israel's attacks on environmental infrastructure have long plagued Gaza and other parts of occupied Palestine. After the Nakba - the ethnic cleansing and destruction of Palestinian communities in 1948 by Zionist forces - the Jewish National Fund (JNF) planted monoculture forests of pine trees, often on the ruins of Palestinian villages. The Society for the Protection of Nature in Israel revealed in 2013 that the JNF's projects had a devastating impact on local biodiversity. In 2021, Fadel al-Jadba, director of the horticulture department at the Palestinian Ministry of Agriculture, told Middle East Eye that there had been a noticeable decline in agricultural production over the past decade.
The National
2 hours ago
- The National
Israel escalates deadly attacks on Gaza after 'accepting' US ceasefire proposal
The Israeli military has intensified its bombardment of the Gaza Strip, killing more than 70 people since Thursday morning as it targets residential neighbourhoods, civilian gatherings and critical infrastructure. Dozens more Palestinians have been injured and entire apartment blocks have been levelled by the continuing air strikes in what civilians are calling a campaign of total destruction. The intensification comes after the US on Thursday said Israel had accepted a ceasefire proposal, which includes a 60-day truce, that is being studied by Hamas. Aid distribution by the US-Israeli Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) also began this week, with crowds of starving and desperate Palestinians gathering to receive parcels of food after almost three months of Israel's total blockade. According to Gaza's Ministry of Health, the death toll has reached 54,249, with 123,492 injured since the war started on October 7, 2023. Israel issued more eviction orders to the three main hospitals in Gaza's north - Al Awdah, the Indonesian hospital and Kamal Adwan - as well as in the areas of Al Atatara, Jabalia Al Balad, Al Shujaiya, Al Daraj and Al Zaytoun, claiming they were "dangerous combat zones". It demanded that thousands of people move westward immediately. But for many in the north, such as Mahmoud Dmida, moving is simply not an option. 'The shelling is relentless. People want to flee, but they can't move, the area is under constant fire,' he told The National. 'Everyone is in danger.' Desperate for peace As Gazans wait for Hamas 's response to the ceasefire proposal, the overwhelming wish on the ground is for the war to end, regardless of the cost, even though the terms of the deal reportedly fall short of the group's core demands. Survival is what matters. 'We want Hamas to accept the deal," said Montaser Hassouna, who is displaced with his family and is sheltering in Al Yarmouk playground. "This madness needs to stop. I know it's a bad deal, Israel just wants its hostages back and offers nothing in return, but we are exhausted. We need a break. Our children are starving. We just want to survive." Similarly, Alaa Mokhtar in Gaza City said he realises that the intensified Israeli bombardment is a tactic aimed at forcing Hamas to accept the proposal, but civilians continue to pay the price. "The deal doesn't guarantee anything will improve, but Hamas should take the 60-day window and use it to clean Gaza of corruption and chaos,' he said. 'We are not only dying from Israeli bombs, we're starving because of lawlessness and theft.'
