
Tariff Tracker, June 14: US-China talks restore May 12 status, World Bank forecasts slowdown
Dear reader,
Washington will host a massive military parade commemorating 250 years of the US Army on Saturday (June 14), which also happens to be US President Donald Trump's 79th birthday.
The event is estimated to cost between $25 million and $45 million, and feature over 6,000 soldiers, 128 army tanks, armoured personnel carriers and artillery, as well as an aerial display featuring 62 aircraft, according to AP reporting.
Traditionally, US military parades have been conducted at the end of a war to celebrate victory or to welcome the returning troops. The last military parade took place in 1991 at the end of the Gulf War, and was a less contentious event than Saturday's festivities.
The timing is significant as well. Over the last week, the Trump administration has initiated a new phase of its sweeping crackdown against illegal immigration. Raids by the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) in the garment district in Los Angeles resulted in a flurry of arrests, triggering protests by residents. As the standoff escalated, the US President fanned the fire further, deploying the National Guard and Marines in the city.
These moves are unprecedented – the last time a US president deployed the National Guard bypassing a state governor's mandate, it was Lyndon B Johnson in 1958 (check year) seeking to protect Civil Rights activists marching from Selma to Montgomery in Alabama.
The use of the National Guard, typically a decision exercised by the state, was challenged in court by California Governor Gavin Newsom, and a federal court ruled in his favour on Friday, ordering control of the troops to be restored to Newsom. However, this order was almost immediately stayed following an appeal by the Trump administration.
The latest round of trade talks between the US and China this week reportedly resulted in a handshake agreement between the officials of the two countries on Wednesday (June 11) in London. In a social media post, Trump wrote, 'OUR DEAL WITH CHINA IS DONE, SUBJECT TO FINAL APPROVAL WITH PRESIDENT XI (Jinping) AND ME.'
While details of the agreement are still to be revealed, reports suggest a return to the terms agreed by both countries on May 12 in Geneva. You will recall that the US and China agreed to lower their tariffs on each other by 115%, reducing US tariffs on China to 30% and Chinese tariffs to 10%.
The escalating trade war between the US and China began in February, with Trump announcing a 10% fentanyl tariff on China along with tariffs on Canada and Mexico, which was doubled to 20% in March. Unlike other nations, China did not immediately seek talks with the US president, and instead, announced countermeasures targeting Liquefied Natural Gas, coal, and farm machinery, among other products. Trump's Liberation Day tariff announcements singled out China, and in the days that followed, saw US tariffs on Chinese products reach 145%, while China charged 125% tariffs.
China also decided to hit the US (and by extension the rest of the world) where it hurts most, by announcing an elaborate licensing system to restrict rare earths exports, citing a national security risk. We explained why this move is significant in the Tariff Tracker on June 2.
The May 12 agreement had extracted an assurance from the Chinese side to resume rare earths exports. However, the Trump administration accused China of acting slowly in this regard and moved to retaliate, restricting access to a range of software, products, chemicals and technologies critical to the Chinese manufacture of advanced chips and jet engines. Ultimately the a detente became possible following a phone call between Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping last Thursday (June 5) to iron out the differences.
For now, the talks have resulted in one certain outcome – that American restrictions on exports of tech and ethane gas to China, as well as visa restrictions targeting Chinese students, would be removed. In exchange, China has agreed to grant rare earths licences to US firms, according to US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick. However, these licences would only be valid for 6 months, according to a report in The Wall Street Journal citing people familiar with the matter.
On May 29, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit stayed an order by the US Court for International Trade, which had ruled Trump's tariffs were illegal under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, 1977 (IEEPA). These pertained to two sets of tariffs – the Liberation Day tariffs, which stipulated a 10% baseline tariff for all countries and the country-specific tariffs, as well as the fentanyl tariffs on Mexico, Canada and China.
On Tuesday (June 10), the appeals court ruled that the tariffs could continue even as legal challenges against them were being heard. However, the court allowed for the cases challenging the tariffs to be expedited, and that the case will be heard on a sped-up basis by the full panel of judges at the court.
'The court also concludes that these cases present issues of exceptional importance warranting expedited en banc consideration of the merits in the first instance,' the order said.
The May 29 ruling had said that Trump had exceeded his powers as president in using the emergency powers under the IEEPA to impose tariffs on all countries, using the US's trade deficit as a rationale. In the Tariff Tracker on May 29, we explained how emergency laws have been used in the US, and how the federal court ruled thus.
In its biannual Global Economic Prospects report, the World Bank forecasted a global economic slowdown due to 'substantial headwinds, emanating largely from an increase in trade tensions and heightened global policy uncertainty.' However, this would likely stop short of a full-blown recession.
The World Bank also announced that the fallout of Trump's tariffs could lead to the weakest decade of economic growth since the 1960s, with global output expected to slow to 2.3% in 2025 from 2.8% last year. The decline would be most acutely felt by the US, with growth estimated to decline to 1.4% from 2.8% last year.
'The rise in trade barriers, heightened uncertainty and the spike in financial market volatility are set to weigh on private consumption, international trade and investment,' the report said. It also anticipated a decline in investment 'due to record-high uncertainty, the rise in financing costs, and reduced domestic and external demand.'
The World Bank also said that if the tariff rates were to be halved, global economic growth could rise by 0.2% over the next two years.
Emerging markets and developing economies would continue to outperform developed nations this year too, but the extent of growth would not be sufficient to narrow income gaps with richer countries, boost job creation, and reduce extreme poverty.
India is projected to grow by 6.3% over 2025-26, the fastest-growing large economy. In the face of global uncertainty, investments and exports would remain subdued. The number aligns with the IMF's forecast of 6.2% over the coming year in its World Economic Outlook report.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
23 minutes ago
- Time of India
No longer Canadian: Wayne Gretzky's Canadian identity questioned after Donald Trump friendship sparks controversy
Wayne Gretzky's association with Donald Trump has sparked controversy in Canada (Getty Images) Wayne Gretzky, one of Canada's most beloved sports figures, has found himself at the center of a firestorm — not for anything he did on the ice, but because of who he's standing beside politically. The hockey legend's long-standing relationship with U.S. President Donald Trump has fueled nationalistic backlash, especially as Trump continues to make inflammatory remarks about Canada. Canadian fans claim Wayne Gretzky has 'lost' his Canadian identity The controversy reached a boiling point earlier this year after Donald Trump proposed a 25% tariff on Canadian goods and even joked about Canada becoming the 51st U.S. state. During this tension, Trump publicly referred to Wayne Gretzky as a 'free agent' when it comes to choosing between the U.S. and Canada. That comment didn't sit well with many Canadians, who viewed it as both divisive and disrespectful. — daveryder (@daveryder) Matthew Iwanyk, Chief Operating Officer and host at Edmonton Sports Talk, voiced what many Canadians were feeling. 'You were a great Canadian, but now you are not,' he said in March, according to the New York Times. 'That is the majority sentiment you will get from Edmontonians. ... As much as we love hockey, we love our country more." by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Giao dịch vàng CFDs với sàn môi giới tin cậy IC Markets Tìm hiểu thêm Undo This emotional reaction underscores how deep Gretzky's influence runs in Canadian culture — and how serious the fallout can be when that identity is questioned. Wayne Gretzky responds with diplomacy, but critics remain unswayed Despite the uproar, Gretzky has made it clear he wants no part in political warfare. Speaking with Ben Mulroney on Toronto's AM-640, he said, 'I don't worry about those kind of things because you can't make everybody happy... But, trust me, I have no political power with the prime minister or the president.' Still, images of Gretzky in a MAGA hat and attending Trump events with FBI Director Kash Patel haven't helped his case in the eyes of critics. His wife, Janet Gretzky, even posted — and later deleted — a heartfelt thank-you to fellow hockey icon Bobby Orr for defending Wayne: 'It has broken his heart to read and see the mean comments.' Also Read: Throwback to when Wayne Gretzky, Michael Jordan, and Bo Jackson became animated crime-fighters in 90s cult cartoon ProStars In the end, Gretzky's silence on Trump's policies may not be enough to protect his legacy from political fallout — especially in the country he once so proudly represented.


New Indian Express
35 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
World of wars and bonfire of G7 vanities
A week is indeed a long time in geopolitics. On Tuesday, the world markets celebrated headlines about a trade deal between China and the US. On Friday, world markets plummeted following Israeli strikes on Iran. Real wars tend to make trade wars look insignificant. This week, the G7, the group of advanced economies, is observing the 50th anniversary of its origin in picturesque Kananaskis in Alberta, at the foothills of the Canadian Rockies. The theme, as always, is lofty: international peace and security, global economic stability and growth, digital transition and global challenges. The ground realities mock at the ballyhooed heft of advanced economies to sustain predictability and stability. Global trade is upended, thanks to Donald J Trump's America First tariff policies. Sure, there is a ceasefire on tariffs, a détente with China and talks about talks with other countries. Peace is in pieces. Trump's promise of peace in 24 hours is consigned to the bunker by Russian President Vladimir Putin. The ceasefire-for-hostages deal in Gaza is comatose. Newly 'liberated' Syria is haunted by sectarian killings despite a relief on sanctions—US Secretary of State Marco Rubio warned the country is weeks away from an epic civil war. On Wednesday, after US declared the 'end of bombing', the Houthis warned of attacks. This week, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu upped the ante as he authorised Israeli forces to attack Iran. With it, Trump's agenda in West Asia—and a possible Nobel honour—was washed off. In a sequence of complex manoeuvres, Israeli forces targeted the leadership of the Iranian Revolutionary Guards, nuclear scientists, military units and nuclear facilities. The sequence is instructive. The audacious attacks were executed just before officials from Iran and the US were to meet in Oman over a new nuclear deal. The US president authorised the talks for the new deal and gave a deadline of 60 days; the 2015 nuclear deal between Iran and six countries including the US took 20 months.


India Today
36 minutes ago
- India Today
Macron visits Greenland in solidarity with Denmark after Trump's annexation threats
French President Emmanuel Macron will visit Greenland on Sunday, in a show of solidarity with Denmark meant to send a signal of European resolve after US President Donald Trump threatened to take over the is a self-governing part of the Kingdom of Denmark with the right to declare independence. Both the Greenland and Danish governments say it is not for sale and only Greenlanders can determine their Donald Trump has said he wants the United States to take over the mineral-rich, strategically located Arctic island, and has not ruled out force. His vice president, JD Vance, visited a US military base there in March. Macron, the first foreign leader to visit Greenland since Trump's explicit threats to "get" the island, was invited by the prime ministers of Greenland and Denmark. He has said his visit is meant to prevent any "preying" on the territory."France has stood by us since the first statements about taking our land emerged. This support is both necessary and gratifying," Greenland's Prime Minister Jens-Frederik Nielsen wrote on Facebook days ahead of Macron's if Macron would deliver an explicit message to the United States during his visit, an adviser to Macron told reporters: "The trip is a signal in itself," without mentioning to an IFOP poll for published on Saturday, 77 per cent of the French and 56 per cent of Americans disapprove of an annexation of Greenland by the US. And 43 per cent of the French would approve using French military power to prevent a US will visit the capital Nuuk, as well as a hydropower station funded by the EU and a glacier, and discuss Arctic security and climate change with his Denmark is an EU member, Greenland is outside the bloc. The French adviser said the visit will be an opportunity to discuss how to give Greenland's association partnership with the EU a "new dimension".Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen made several visits to Paris after Trump's threats to seek French and European backing, and has placed orders for French-made surface-to-air missiles, in a shift of focus for the EU's only nuclear power is a way for Denmark, long one of Washington's most loyal allies in Europe, to project a form of hard power towards a suddenly more aggressive United States, Florian Vidal of the Paris-based IFRI think-tank said."The Trump administration's more aggressive posture is a shock that makes the French vision of Europe, one that is more autonomous, appear more reasonable for Denmark," he said. "From a Nordic point of view, France is a military power that counts."Must Watch