logo
Nightmare neighbour sets FIRE to next-door's £70k conservatory because ‘good Samaritan' cut his grass without permission

Nightmare neighbour sets FIRE to next-door's £70k conservatory because ‘good Samaritan' cut his grass without permission

The Sun6 days ago

A 'GOOD Samaritan' had his garden room burnt to a shred after kindly cutting his neighbour's lawn when he was in prison.
Jack Suddaby, 34, of Hull, has be sentenced to three years and nine months after admitting an offence of arson and putting others lives at risk.
2
2
The prosecution told Grimsby Crown Court that the neighbours had previously been amicable but when Suddaby returned to his home after a short stint in prison he saw red when he noticed his lawn had been cut.
Believing the gesture of goodwill to be a form of "intrusion", enraged Suddaby started a bonfire and began to drink heavily by the flames.
The court heard that, within hours, the fire grew out of control and his neighbour - who had gone to bed in the garden room - rushed out to try and stem the blaze.
However, despite his best efforts, the fire spread and savaged his outdoor home, worth tens of thousands of pounds.
Another resident's garden fence was also destroyed in the blaze.
Fire rescue teams were called at about 9:30pm and discovered a mixture of white vinegar and bleach chemicals on the pit.
The court heard the neighbour suffered from shock as a result of the events of the night.
Richard Butters, defending Suddaby, told how his client had been heavily drinking that night and how he "regrets dreadfully" what he did.
He said: "He regrets dreadfully what he did. He feels horrible about it and he is showing genuine remorse."
Judge Richard Woolfall concluded there was "no rhyme or reason for it" and Suddaby was jailed for three years and nine months.
What is arson?
In legal terms, arson is the act of deliberately setting fire to property - including buildings and vehicles.
The crime falls under the Criminal Damage Act 1971, s.1(3).
Depending on how serious the fire is, arson can either be dealt with in a magistrates or crown court.
There are different types of arson.
These are:
Arson with intent to endanger life
Arson with intent to cause criminal damage
What is the punishment for arson?
Sentencing varies depending on the type of arson and where the case is dealt with.
Anyone convicted of arson where minor damage was caused will be given a fine and a community order.
But if the arson is more significant or a person died, they could be sentenced to life in prison.
But most defendants will be charged with manslaughter if someone died in the fire.
This comes as a couple were left fuming after being ordered to rip down their home gym after neighbours' "ludicrous" complaints.
Emma Woodley and Paul Willis forked out tens of thousands of pounds for the structure on their driveway in Basingstoke, Hants,.
Paul, who runs his own personal training business, believed he would be able to build the single-storey structure without planning permission.
But the pair have seen their dream work-out space axed after locals moaned it would create parking chaos on the estate.
The home gym was erected in one of the two spaces on their £440,000 property, which sparked fear among neighbours the road would be clogged with cars.
Complaints resulted in councillors rejecting the pair's retrospective application on the grounds it would "set a precedent".
Worst cases of arson
John Thompson, 42, set fire to a building on Denmark Place in central London on August 16 1980 after a row over drinks prices - at least 37 people perished at an illicit drinking den called The Spanish Rooms and a salsa dance club called El Dandy
The same year arsonist Peter Dinsdale admitted killing more people than the Yorkshire Ripper - 15 in total - who was himself still on his murder spree at that time
Gordon Thompson, a looter in the 2011 London Riots, was jailed for eleven and a half years for starting a huge fire that destroyed the 140-year-old House of Reeves furniture in Croydon
Four children were killed in a suspected arson after the perpetrators were accused of pouring a flammable liquid through the letterbox and torching a family home in Salford, Greater Manchester, in the early hours of Monday, December 11, 2017.
Nottingham train station was engulfed by a fire on Friday, January 12, 2018 with British Transport Police are treating the situation as arson. Sixty firefighters were involved in tackling the blaze which broke out in a block of toilets before spreading to the main concourse and roof.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Handbag burglars tunnel into shop in £250k heist
Handbag burglars tunnel into shop in £250k heist

BBC News

time26 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Handbag burglars tunnel into shop in £250k heist

About £250,000 in luxury handbags has been stolen from a store by thieves who gained access through a hole they created from the property next Police said the three suspects appeared to have access the shop via the chimney at St James House in New Road, Prestbury, Cheshire, at about 23:40 BST on are thought to have entered a disused building adjacent to the shop an hour before, and created a hole in the adjoining wall which led to the next door store through the chimney. Det Con Clare Slattery appealed for helping trying to track down those behind the burglary and "the whereabouts of the items that were stolen". The force said the offenders stole a number of high-value designer handbags, with a total estimated cost of around £260, Con Clare Slattery said: "Our enquiries are ongoing, and we would urge anyone who witnessed this incident or saw anything suspicious to get in touch with us."The same goes for anyone with dashcam footage or CCTV which might aid our investigation." Listen to the best of BBC Radio Manchester on Sounds and follow BBC Manchester on Facebook, X, and Instagram. You can also send story ideas via Whatsapp to 0808 100 2230.

Surrey Police makes four arrests over two day Epsom Derby
Surrey Police makes four arrests over two day Epsom Derby

BBC News

time26 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Surrey Police makes four arrests over two day Epsom Derby

Police made four arrests over the two day Epsom Derby weekend in what the Surrey force said was its "largest pre-planned operation" Police said it worked closely with The Jockey Club to ensure the event at Epsom Downs on 6-7 June was carried out Supt Graham Barnett said "no two years are ever the same" when policing the high profile horse had been granted increased powers ahead of the event after Epsom council adopted a Public Space Protection Order (PSPO). 'Disruptive' for residents The PSPO was designed to give police the ability to tackle anti-social behaviour without the need to immediately resort to Surrey force said it used specialist resources such as planning, intelligence, drones, and public order, to "support the safe running" of the four arrests, which were made in and around the racecourse, included:a 45-year-old man from North Cheam arrested and cautioned for being drunk and disorderlya 63-year-old man arrested for the same thing and given an informal, out-of-court disposala 20-year-old man from Worcester Park arrested on suspicion of assault and released with no further actiona 24-year-old man from Redhill arrested on suspicion of assault and sexual assault by touching, who has since been bailed Ch Supt Barnett said: "Our teams worked tirelessly to prevent and respond to reports of crime and anti-social behaviour related to the Derby."We appreciate this event can be disruptive for Epsom residents and those travelling through the area."I'd like to thank the local community for their understanding and patience."The Derby, which has been described as the richest flat race in Britain, has come under pressure in recent years as the number of paying spectators fell from 48,000 in 2004 to 27,000 last year.

Gloucestershire school cannot take sacked woman to Supreme Court
Gloucestershire school cannot take sacked woman to Supreme Court

BBC News

time26 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Gloucestershire school cannot take sacked woman to Supreme Court

A school cannot take its case against a teacher who shared social media posts criticising teaching about LGBT+ relationships to the Supreme Higgs, a Christian mother of two, was sacked from her role at Farmor's School in Fairford, Gloucestershire, in 2019 for sharing Facebook posts criticising teaching about LGBT+ relationships in February, she won a Court of Appeal battle related to her dismissal, with judges finding the decision to sack her was "unquestionably a disproportionate response".The school sought to appeal against the ruling at the Supreme Court, but three justices refused to give the school the green light to challenge the decision. In a decision on Thursday, which was published on Monday, Lord Reed, Lord Hamblen, and Lady Simler said that the school had asked for the go-ahead to appeal against the ruling on four they said that the Supreme Court "does not have jurisdiction" to hear three of the grounds, and the fourth "does not raise an arguable question of law".In response to the decision, Mrs Higgs said: "I am relieved and grateful to the Supreme Court for this common-sense decision."Christians have the right to express their beliefs on social media and at other non-work-related settings without fear of being punished by their employer."Mrs Higgs, who worked as a pastoral administrator and work experience manager at the school, shared two posts on a private page under her maiden name in October 2018 to about 100 friends, which raised concerns about relationship education at her son's Church of England primary either copied and pasted from another source or reposted the content, adding her own reference in one post to "brainwashing our children".Pupils were due to learn about the No Outsiders In Our School programme, a series of books that teach the Equality Act in primary a judgment, Lord Justice Underhill, sitting with Lord Justice Bean and Lady Justice Falk, ruled in Mrs Higgs' favour in February, stating: "The dismissal of an employee merely because they have expressed a religious or other protected belief to which the employer, or a third party with whom it wishes to protect its reputation, objects will constitute unlawful direct discrimination within the meaning of the Equality Act."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store