logo
Opponents of Colorado immigration bill warn it will cost the state billions in federal funding: "We are sitting on a powder keg"

Opponents of Colorado immigration bill warn it will cost the state billions in federal funding: "We are sitting on a powder keg"

CBS News30-04-2025

Opponents of Colorado immigration bill warn it will cost billions in federal funding
Opponents of Colorado immigration bill warn it will cost billions in federal funding
Opponents of Colorado immigration bill warn it will cost billions in federal funding
A bill aimed at protecting undocumented immigrants in Colorado has created a firestorm at the Colorado State Capitol. Supporters say it's about protecting the constitutional rights of everyone regardless of citizenship. Opponents, including Teller County Sheriff Jason Mikesell, say it would protect dangerous criminals.
He says if the bill becomes law, his deputies will have to choose between enforcing state law and losing federal funding or enforcing federal law and facing thousands of dollars in fines.
Mikesell says lawmakers are presenting a false narrative.
"I want to dispel rumors and myths that really the legislators are presenting in testimony," he said.
He says he has worked with federal immigration agents for nearly three decades and has never seen them go into schools or target children. Instead, he says they go after the worst criminals and he says under Senate Bill 276 his deputies could no longer help them.
"If we have a known terrorist or known cartel member, am I not to give that information anymore to our federal partners? Are we to allow them to continue to prey on innocent people here in Colorado?" Mikesell said.
State Rep. Elizabeth Velasco -- one of the bill sponsors -- says local authorities could still cooperate if immigration agents have a warrant.
"We're just elevating that constitutional rights of everyone must be respected," Velasco said.
The bill prohibits all peace officers in the state from arresting or detaining a person based on an immigration detainer request, bars local governments, courts, and schools from disclosing personally identifying data -- including immigration status and visas -- to federal agents, and prevents those agents from entering non-public areas in jails, health care and child care facilities, libraries, hospitals, churches, and schools -- including colleges and universities -- without a warrant.
Employees who violate the law could be fined up to $50,000.
"We're telling you we are sitting on powder keg. It is not an option to walk away from the federal government," said Teller County Commissioner Dan Williams.
He says the bill will cost the state billions in federal funding.
Velasco says that's already happening.
"We're already in multiple lawsuits when it comes to funding. So, it's important for us to stand up to any breach of our constitutional rights and make sure our communities are safe."
The bill passed the state Senate. Debate in the state House is expected to be explosive after a committee hearing where some Democrats compared the recent immigration crackdown to the Holocaust.
Republican state Rep. Ron Weinberg, who lost his great-grandparents in the Holocaust, called the comparison disgusting.
"I'm tired of people diluting one of the biggest tragedies in the history of the world," Weinberg said.
He says he's not opposed to immigration. He and his family immigrated from South Africa and his brother is still a "Dreamer" but, he says, Colorado is spending $544 million on undocumented immigrants and the bill ignores federal laws.
"The expansion of sanctuary state has gone out of control and this bill is a further expansion that would handcuff law enforcement," Weinberg said.
A spokesperson for Gov. Jared Polis says he has concerns about the bill and has been working with lawmakers on amendments to gain his support.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Michigan House Republicans sue the secretary of state over election training materials

time41 minutes ago

Michigan House Republicans sue the secretary of state over election training materials

KALAMAZOO, Mich. -- Michigan Republicans are suing the battleground state's top elections executive over access to election training materials. The lawsuit filed Thursday is the latest escalation in a brewing dispute that began when the GOP took majority control of the state's House of Representatives last year. Since winning control of the chamber in the 2024 election, statehouse Republicans have repeatedly scrutinized the state's election processes and Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson, a Democrat who is running for governor in 2026. The conflict comes as some state Republicans echo past false claims of election fraud in Michigan, which was a prime target of President Donald Trump and his backers after his 2020 election loss. Republicans on the chamber's Oversight Committee subpoenaed Benson in April, seeking access to training materials for local clerks and staff who administer elections, including access to the Bureau of Elections' online learning portal. Benson's office released some requested materials in response to the subpoena, but not all, citing cybersecurity and physical security concerns related to administering elections and the voting process. The office has said it needs to review the online portal for 'sensitive information" and make redactions. 'Since the beginning of this saga, Secretary Benson has asked lawmakers to let a court review their request for sensitive election information that, in the wrong hands, would compromise the security of our election machines, ballots and officials,' Michigan Department of State spokesperson Cheri Hardmon said in a statement Thursday. House Republicans say the goal of reviewing the material is to ensure clerks are trained in accordance with Michigan law. The House voted along party lines in May to hold Benson in contempt for not completely complying with the subpoena. The request for training materials originally came from GOP state Rep. Rachelle Smit, who has pushed false claims that the 2020 election was stolen. Smit is the chair of the House elections committee, which was renamed to the Elections Integrity Committee with the new Republican majority. 'Secretary Benson has proven she is unwilling to comply with our subpoena and Michigan law,' Rep. Smit said in a statement Thursday. 'She's skirted the rules and done whatever she could to avoid public scrutiny. It's become overwhelmingly clear that she will never release the training materials we're looking for without direction from a court." The lawsuit asks the Michigan Court of Claims to intervene and compel Benson to comply with the subpoena. 'The public interest is best served if the constitutional order of the State of Michigan is preserved and the Legislature can properly perform its duty to regulate the manner of elections in the state and, if deemed necessary, enact election laws for the benefit of Michigan residents,' the lawsuit says. Benson gained national attention for defending the results of the 2020 election in the face of Trump's attempts to undercut the outcome nationwide and in Michigan. Multiple audits — including one conducted by the then-Republican-controlled Michigan Senate — concluded former President Joe Biden won the state in 2020 and that there was no widespread or systemic fraud. Benson has remained a subject of GOP scrutiny this year. A Republican state representative introduced three articles of impeachment against Benson on Tuesday, and several of the accusations continue to cast doubts on the results of the 2020 election. With Democrats in control of the state Senate, it's unlikely the impeachment articles will result in a conviction.

High court ruling on reverse discrimination a no-brainer: Chuck Rocha
High court ruling on reverse discrimination a no-brainer: Chuck Rocha

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

High court ruling on reverse discrimination a no-brainer: Chuck Rocha

(NewsNation) — The U.S. Supreme Court unanimously rejected legal precedent that people in a majority group have a higher standard for proving discrimination. Democratic strategist Chuck Rocha agrees with the high court decision. 'Discrimination doesn't say, 'Oh, you have to be black,' or, 'You have to be a woman,' or, 'You have to be gay.' … Discrimination means you're treating me different,' he says on 'CUOMO.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Medicaid spending in Mass. has nearly quadrupled in the past 20 years. It needs reform.
Medicaid spending in Mass. has nearly quadrupled in the past 20 years. It needs reform.

Boston Globe

timean hour ago

  • Boston Globe

Medicaid spending in Mass. has nearly quadrupled in the past 20 years. It needs reform.

Advertisement Medicaid was The cost of this is staggering. The budget for the state's Medicaid program, called MassHealth, has to over Advertisement But this explosion in the cost of Medicaid begs the question: Has all this spending led to better health outcomes? Surprisingly, Despite these findings, even modest Medicaid reform in Republican proposals before Congress — like encouraging community engagement through volunteering or work, preventing duplicate payments to insurers, and closing state-level However, it should be noted that the current proposals in Washington — which the House passed last week and are now in the Republican-controlled Senate — will result in more Medicaid spending over 10 years, not less. The bill merely slows the rate of growth. Only in Washington, D.C., is more spending decried as a cut. The fundamental issue remains: Are we prioritizing the right goals? Advertisement The evidence on the power of connection is . Past state-level experiments with work engagement in programs like food stamps and welfare cash assistance offer a promising road map. A Medicaid reform could similarly refocus state efforts on connecting enrollees with community engagement rather than solely maximizing federal funding. Encouragingly, these past reforms also saw a halving of the time individuals needed to stay on public assistance. Shouldn't we celebrate if someone like J.D. could earn enough to transition to employer-based or ACA coverage? Sadly, too often, critics characterize any transition off Medicaid as Advertisement While Medicaid reform often faces bipartisan heartburn, paradoxically there's longtime bipartisan agreement that major entitlement programs are growing unsustainably. If we can't at least slow the rate of growth, in part by delivering better outcomes, then our fiscal house of cards may fall, which hurts the most vulnerable. Our leaders must shift the debate from simply protecting the flow of federal dollars to ensuring that every Medicaid dollar genuinely improves patient health. Current inertia seems more about preserving the status quo than addressing the health impact on individuals like J.D. Meanwhile, our communities suffer as we miss out on J.D.'s contributions to society. The federal proposals provide a crucial moment to discuss opening doors of opportunity rather than defending a system that requires poverty for coverage. It's time to move beyond simply paying insurance companies for a card in J.D.'s pocket and focus on reforms that foster human thriving.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store