
The 28 Most Populous Cities in the U.S. Are All Sinking
All 28 of the most populous cities in the U.S. are sinking, worsening risks of flooding and damage to urban infrastructure, a new study finds. One of the main culprits is the extraction of groundwater to quench the thirst of growing populations and commerce.
The research, published Thursday in Nature Cities, shows this subsidence is 'ubiquitous—people should be looking everywhere' for it, says Cornell University geophysicist Matt Pritchard, who was not involved with the study.
People have long known that certain cities around the world are sinking, particularly coastal ones. In the U.S., New Orleans has been perhaps the most famous example. This subsidence can have both natural and humanmade causes, such as ground that continues to respond to the retreat of the ice sheets, dams that prevent sediment from replenishing river deltas and buildings that weigh a city down.
On supporting science journalism
If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.
A few detailed studies have been conducted on some particular cities, such as Miami, but otherwise data have come from sparse, on-the-ground measurements that don't reveal the nuance needed to properly gauge risks to infrastructure. To get granular data, the researchers behind the new study turned to interferometric synthetic aperture radar (InSAR) measurements taken from satellites. Study co-author Leonard Ohenhen, a postdoctoral researcher at Columbia University's Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, explains that InSAR is akin to bouncing a ball at a steady rate against a wall. If the wall moves away from you, the ball takes longer to bounce back. If the wall moves closer, the ball returns more quickly. Similarly, in the new research, the pulses sent out by the InSAR device were able to detect upward and downward deformations of Earth's surface down to the millimeter scale in grids made up of 28-meter squares.
The team found that in all 28 cities examined in the study—which each have populations of more than 600,000—at least 20 percent of their area was sinking. In 25 of them, at least 65 percent was subsiding. Nine cities—New York City, Chicago, Houston, Dallas, Fort Worth, Columbus, Seattle, Denver and Detroit—had an area-weighted average rate of subsidence of more than two millimeters per year. Houston, Fort Worth and Dallas had the highest rates of any of the cities, with an average of more than 4 mm per year. In fact, more than 42 percent of Houston is sinking faster than 5 mm per year, and 12 percent is sinking by more than 10 mm per year.
Those numbers may sound small, but measurements began around 2015, meaning 'it's been 10 years at that rate—and that starts to add up,' Pritchard says. Also, damage can occur even with small displacements. 'The value here is in detecting things before they get worse or at smaller more subtle scales,' he adds.
This is particularly true when there are different rates of sinking across a city, or even areas where some ground is sinking and some is rising. The study showed how ground deformation varied across the cities—for example, the area around LaGuardia Airport is sinking much faster than most of the rest of New York City. These different rates can cause buildings to tilt and can lead to other infrastructure damage. 'We have buildings that collapse from this type of ground deformation,' Pritchard says, citing conditions that might have played a role in the 2021 collapse of a condominium in the Miami suburb of Surfside, Fla.
Of the 5.6 million buildings in the cities examined in the study, about 29,000 are in areas of concern. That doesn't mean those buildings will necessarily be damaged; factors such as soil type, construction methods and building age can come into play. But it does show where a more detailed analysis should be done, Pritchard and Ohenhen say.
Another subsidence-related concern is flooding. When you have areas of sinking in a city, it can create a 'subsidence bowl,' Ohenhen says. 'Where the land was flat, [water] could easily flow from one place to the other,' but now it gets trapped in that bowl instead.
The reasons for the subsidence vary from city to city, and even within a city, but the team found that 80 percent of the sinking was associated with groundwater extraction. That points to the need to balance demand for water with maintaining aquifers to avoid collapse. Cities in drought-prone regions, such as Texas, should be particularly concerned because when drought sets in, 'you a have a really, really high probability' of further subsidence as aquifers become more depleted, Ohenhen says.
Pritchard says the study shows that subsidence is a problem outside of previous poster cities such as New Orleans—and that 'we really we should be looking at this everywhere, not even just in large cities.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Epoch Times
a day ago
- Epoch Times
Fusarium Graminearum: The Fungus Allegedly Smuggled by Chinese Researchers—and Its Risks
A fungus called Fusarium graminearum has made headlines after two Chinese researchers were charged by the FBI for allegedly smuggling it into the United States as a potential agroterrorism agent. But what exactly is this fungus—and what risks does it pose to U.S. agriculture and public health? A Common Cause of Crop Disease F. graminearum is a concerning fungus, as it can contribute to billions of dollars in agricultural losses, Gary Bergstrom, professor emeritus at Cornell University specializing in plant pathology, told The Epoch Times.
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Gene-hacked microbe pulls rare earths and traps carbon 58x faster than nature
In the war for clean energy and climate survival, scientists have found an unlikely ally: a metal-eating microbe. Tiny but tenacious, Gluconobacter oxydans is being reprogrammed to replace heavy machinery and toxic chemicals in the extraction of rare earth elements. But this microbe isn't just pulling metals from stone. It's also accelerating the Earth's natural ability to trap carbon dioxide, offering a two-for-one deal in the fight against climate change. Armed with genetic tweaks that turbocharge its acid production and unlock hidden biochemical abilities, G. oxydans is proving to be more efficient than new research, scientists at Cornell University boosted its rare earth extraction power by up to 73 percent—without the environmental damage of traditional mining. The same microbe can also accelerate natural carbon capture by 58 times, transforming ordinary rocks into long-term CO₂ storage systems. 'More metals will have to be mined in this century than in all of human history, but traditional mining technologies are enormously environmentally damaging,' said Buz Barstow, associate professor of biological and environmental engineering in the College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, in a release.'Currently, the U.S. has to obtain almost all of these elements from foreign sources, including China, creating a risk of supply-chain disruption.' Metals like magnesium, iron, and calcium naturally react with carbon dioxide to form minerals that lock the gas away for good. Cornell's engineered microbes supercharge this process by breaking down rock faster, exposing more metal to CO₂, and turning the Earth itself into a carbon trap. 'What we're trying to do is take advantage of processes that already exist in nature but turbocharge their efficiency and improve sustainability,' said Esteban Gazel, the Charles N. Mellowes Professor in Cornell Engineering. To push the microbes' potential further, Cornell scientists dug into its genetic blueprint. In one study, they discovered that with just two genome edits, G. oxydans could become far more effective at dissolving rock—one tweak increased acid production, while the other removed internal limits, dramatic increasing rare earth recovery. But acid wasn't its only tool. A second study revealed that the microbe uses other, previously unknown pathways to extract metals. By knocking out genes one by one in a high-performing strain, researchers identified 89 genes tied to bioleaching—68 of which had never before been linked to the process. That breakthrough helped boost extraction efficiency by more than 100 percent. In parallel, a third paper showed that G. oxydans can speed up natural carbon capture without relying on high temperatures, pressure, or harsh chemicals. As it breaks down magnesium- and iron-rich rocks, those elements bind with carbon dioxide to form solid minerals like limestone, permanently locking the carbon away.'This process can occur in ambient conditions, at low temperature, and it doesn't involve the use of harsh chemicals,' said Joseph Lee, a Ph.D. student and lead author. 'It naturally draws down CO2 and stores it permanently as minerals. We're also recovering other energy-critical metals like nickel as byproducts. It's a two-fold solution.' With funding from the National Science Foundation, the Department of Energy, Cornell Atkinson, and alumni donors, the work is now moving from the lab to the real world. The research, published in Communications Biology and Scientific Reports, was led by Alexa Schmitz, now CEO of REEgen, an Ithaca-based startup working to commercialize the technology.
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
The Ancient Star That Could Explain Where Gold Comes From
Tucked away in a stellar graveyard known as the Gaia Sausage, scientists have discovered a cosmic oddity with a potentially huge impact: a rare actinide-boost star called LAMOST J0804+5740. While the name may not be catchy, what's inside it could help explain one of the biggest lingering questions in modern astrophysics—how the universe formed its heaviest elements, including gold, uranium, and thorium. This star's unique chemical signature points to a history forged in some of the most violent conditions the cosmos has ever seen. According to researchers revealed that LAMOST J0804+5740 contains unusually high amounts of radioactive actinides, which are typically only produced in extreme events like neutron star collisions or exotic supernovae. That process, called the r-process (short for rapid neutron capture), is responsible for creating roughly half the elements heavier than iron. But there's a mystery: the few known cosmic events capable of fueling it are far too rare to explain the sheer volume of heavy elements found across the universe. That's where this weird star comes in. What makes J0804+5740 particularly interesting is its blend of high actinide levels and high metallicity, an unusual combo that defies expectations. Most actinide-rich stars are metal-poor and ancient. This one? It's old, but chemically rich, suggesting it may have originated in a now-merged dwarf galaxy outside the Milky Way. The leading theory? A violent, magneto-rotationally driven supernova—one of the most intense known cosmic explosions—could be the source. If confirmed, that would mark a major breakthrough in our understanding of the r-process and the birth of the elements that make up planets, people, and, yes, precious metals. "This means we don't yet have the complete picture," said Columbia University researcher Anirudh Patel. "Future observations […] will reveal more about the nature of r-process sites in the universe," Patel said. "Along with new and advanced theoretical models, this will be essential to resolving the r-process mystery and completing our understanding of the origin of the elements."The Ancient Star That Could Explain Where Gold Comes From first appeared on Men's Journal on Jun 5, 2025