logo
Mumbai Indians mean business, but what's wrong with Rishabh Pant in IPL 2025

Mumbai Indians mean business, but what's wrong with Rishabh Pant in IPL 2025

India Today25-04-2025

India Today Podcasts Desk
UPDATED: Apr 25, 2025 18:14 IST
Just a week ago, everyone had written off the Mumbai Indians. But with four straight wins and a squad clicking in perfect rhythm, they've roared back into the spotlight. The five-time champions aren't just winning—they're dominating, playing with the swagger and confidence of a team that knows exactly how to conquer titles. In contrast, Rishabh Pant - acquired for a record-breaking Rs 27 crore to lead Lucknow Super Giants - has looked a shadow of his once-destructive self. After nine matches this season, he has mustered just 106 runs, with 63 of those coming in a single knock against CSK.
Pant has always thrived when brimming with confidence, but at LSG, he seems jaded and weighed down by expectations. His strike rate of 96.36 is alarmingly low for someone of his caliber. Part of the issue could be his constant shuffle in the batting order, never quite settling into one role. Meanwhile, Rohit Sharma, Virat Kohli, and Ravindra Jadeja have retained their spots in the Grade A+ bracket of the BCCI central contracts despite stepping away from T20Is. We break down how the BCCI arrived at that decision.
In the latest episode of the Sledging Room podcast, Saurabh Kumar, Kingshuk Kusari, and Alan Jose John dissect the central contracts, Pant's struggles, and Mumbai Indians' roaring comeback in IPL 2025.
Produced by Prateek Lidhoo
Sound mix by Rohan Bharti

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Why renaming of Pataudi Trophy to honour Anderson-Tendulkar has sparked a row
Why renaming of Pataudi Trophy to honour Anderson-Tendulkar has sparked a row

The Print

time26 minutes ago

  • The Print

Why renaming of Pataudi Trophy to honour Anderson-Tendulkar has sparked a row

Anderson, who retired in July 2024 after a record 188 Tests and 704 wickets, and Tendulkar, who bowed out in 2013 after 200 Tests and 15,921 runs, are both widely regarded as legends of the modern game. The newly named trophy will make its debut when England and India kick off the new WTC cycle with a five-Test series starting at Headingley, Leeds, from 20 June. New Delhi: Sachin Tendulkar and James Anderson will soon be immortalised as the England-India Test series is renamed the Anderson-Tendulkar Trophy, according to a BBC report. The England and Wales Cricket Board (ECB) and the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) have jointly taken this decision, with the new trophy set to be unveiled at Lord's during the World Test Championship final which begins on 11 June. The move has sparked debate, as many question retiring the Pataudi Trophy and what it means for cricket's historic legacy. Until now, the Test series played in England was contested for the Pataudi Trophy, named in 2007 to mark 75 years since the first Test between the two nations. The trophy was titled in recognition of the Pataudi family, Iftikhar Ali Khan Pataudi—the only player to represent both England and India in Tests—and his son, Mansoor Ali Khan 'Tiger' Pataudi, a legendary Indian captain. When the series was played in India, it was known as the Anthony de Mello Trophy, after the BCCI's inaugural secretary and president, Anthony de Mello. Heated debate The change in name has sparked a debate and signifies a more profound transformation in the way Indian cricket perceives its own past. Former Indian captain Bishan Singh Bedi had described Mansoor Ali Khan Pataudi as 'the best thing to have happened to Indian cricket,' praising his role in overcoming regional divides and fostering a feeling of 'Indian-ness' within the team. Sunil Gavaskar and Erapalli Prasanna shared similar sentiments, with Gavaskar referring to him as 'the most charismatic cricketer of his generation,' and Prasanna remembering how Pataudi encouraged players to prioritise the nation over individual interests, bringing them together as Indians above all else. Writing a column in Sportstar, Gavaskar said, the decision to retire the Pataudi Trophy 'disturbing indeed,' and argued that 'this is the first time one has heard of a trophy named after individual players being retired, though the decision is entirely the ECB's, and the BCCI may well have been informed.' Gavaskar went on to say that the move 'shows a total lack of sensitivity to the contribution made by the Pataudis to cricket in both England and India'. He also expressed hope that 'if an Indian player has been approached, he will have the good sense to politely decline—not only out of respect for two former India captains but also to avoid the same fate of having a trophy named after him retired after he is gone.' The legendary cricketer passed away at the age of 70 in 2011. Gavaskar added that while the ECB is 'fully entitled to name the trophy after one of their own players,' he and 'loads of Indian cricket supporters' hope that 'any other Indian cricketer will have the smarts to decline, lest history repeats itself as it has with the Pataudi Trophy.' Seasoned cricket broadcaster Harsha Bhogle took the discussion to 'X', where he reflected on the renaming of the series. He wrote, 'Having been an admirer of Anderson the player and, as is well known, of Tendulkar, both as a player and a person, I should have been happy with the series being played for a Tendulkar-Anderson Trophy. But it misses the deep connect that Pataudi had with our countries. Both father and son played for Sussex, Sr played for both England and India, Jr set schoolboy batting records in England. There was a very nice ring to the Pataudi Trophy.' Congress leader Shashi Tharoor also expressed his disapproval, describing it as a 'disrespect' to the Pataudi family. Writing on 'X', he stated, 'The problem is how little respect the guardians of today's cricket have for the game's hallowed history. I have had the honour of watching a #PataudiTrophy Test with Sharmila Tagore — what disrespect this shows to her and her illustrious family!' Sharmila Tagore, Tiger Pataudi's wife, shared her feelings about the decision speaking to The Hindustan Times, she said, 'We haven't heard directly from the ECB, but they sent a letter to Saif (Ali Khan) regarding the retirement of the trophy.' She also reflected on the legacy aspect, stating, 'Whether the BCCI wants to preserve Tiger's legacy is for them to decide.' With the news confirmed, it appears Tendulkar had no issue accepting the honour of having a trophy named after him. The cricket boards have looked at recent examples for inspiration. The introduction of the Crowe-Thorpe Trophy for the England-New Zealand Test series in November 2024, as well as the long-established Border-Gavaskar Trophy between India and Australia, highlights this shift. The upcoming England series will be a stern test for India, which will be without the services of Rohit Sharma and Virat Kohli, after both announced their retirements from Test cricket earlier in May. The tour is set to provide a major opportunity for a new generation of Indian players to impress selectors and cement their place in the team. The India squad for the England series, as announced in June 2025, features Shubman Gill (captain), Rishabh Pant (vice-captain and wicketkeeper), Yashasvi Jaiswal, KL Rahul, Sai Sudharsan, Abhimanyu Easwaran, Karun Nair, Nitish Reddy, Ravindra Jadeja, Dhruv Jurel (wicketkeeper), Washington Sundar, Shardul Thakur, Jasprit Bumrah, Mohammed Siraj, Prasidh Krishna, Akash Deep, Arshdeep Singh and Kuldeep Yadav. (Edited by Viny Mishra) Also Read: Where Sachin was once ball boy, Pataudi last took guard—Mumbai's Wankhede stadium hits 50

Hope that rugby can become top-five sport in the country: RI president Bose
Hope that rugby can become top-five sport in the country: RI president Bose

New Indian Express

timean hour ago

  • New Indian Express

Hope that rugby can become top-five sport in the country: RI president Bose

On building an audience through RPL So we have learnt from the experiences of other leagues. Number one, I don't believe individual sports make for successful leagues. Because (in team sports) there is a sense of loyalty and a sense of getting behind a team's culture. There is a kind of fandom that individual (sport) does not (possess). So in that respect, it ticks that box. The second box it has to tick is it the best thing you are watching on television in that sport at that time? We have the best players in the world. Third and equally important thing is that your sport has to have tremendous excitement every 30 seconds. You cannot be waiting for 90 minutes for a goalless draw. You are going to have to do it. Team sport, best in the world and incredibly exciting every 30 seconds on television. On challenges the sport faces Money. Basically I have 1600 players including those from the age-groups and the seniors, both men and women. What if I give them all a lakh just for making their state team? (Rs) 16 crores? They wouldn't leave. As soon as you are getting into the state team, you would not leave. You wouldn't drop out at the district level. The second example is, if you have money, you build infrastructure. But how you use that money to build, what you use it on — you have to have a vision, and intellect to execute it. Only then does it make sense. If you look very closely at the way Indian rugby has been playing itself out in the last 3-4 years, you will begin to see this pattern. You start with 20 players and devote all the resources you can at the high performance level. And then you start to take the lessons from this and take down the system. And then you start to create this culture here very slowly and you build from here. And meanwhile, this is developing and taking on new shapes because you were doing something wrong. Nutrition was important, you ignored it. Psychology was important, you forgot about it. Now you are building those systems and you keep trickling that down. So, it's a laborious process which is why 50 years goes nowhere. So a league like the RPL is like a vitamin injection which accelerates the process and reduces the time frames from 50 to 75 years hopefully to 25 to 30 years.

As India eye future, Rohit Sharma may not stay ODI captain
As India eye future, Rohit Sharma may not stay ODI captain

Hindustan Times

timean hour ago

  • Hindustan Times

As India eye future, Rohit Sharma may not stay ODI captain

Mumbai: Indian selectors are expected to go with the same long-term vision with ODI captaincy as they did with Test leadership. The next ODI World Cup is slated for October, 2027 by when Rohit Sharma, the current captain, would be 40. It is difficult to predict if he would last the distance in terms of form and fitness, and to avoid having three separate captains across formats – Suryakumar Yadav is the T20I skipper – the selectors are known to be inclined to hand over ODI leadership also to Gill. Whether the move would be made right away would depend on how workload of the all-format players is spaced out in the lead up to the home T20 World Cup in February, 2026. Gill, 25, will be among them, and his show with the bat and as captain in the England Test series will also be assessed. It's unusual for Indian cricket to have a flux in the leadership group and the selectors want to address that. For the best part of the last ten years, captaincy across formats was held by Virat Kohli and then Rohit. Currently, Suryakumar is primarily seen as a T20I specialist. Rohit has quit T20Is and Tests. Rishabh Pant, the Test vice-captain, is not an automatic pick in the other formats. Gill too has work to do before he makes the T20I spot his own. Currently, 12 ODIs are scheduled until next year's T20 World Cup – the immediate priority. All those in a targetted group of players would be trialled under Suryakumar's leadership. India's next ODI series in Bangladesh in August is the yet to be confirmed. Then come three ODIs in Australia (Oct), and three each at home against South Africa (Nov-Dec) and New Zealand (Jan '26). 'Quite frankly, a lot of us thought Rohit wanted to move away from the ODI format after winning the Champions Trophy,' a BCCI official said. 'There have been no discussions between Rohit and the selectors since over his ODI future.' With regard to BCCI's tribute to Rohit on X' as he ended his Test career, which said he would continue to lead in ODIs, the board official said that was nothing more than a mention of the current status. Rohit's recent ODI batting template has been interesting. The 38-year-old has flipped a switch where he attacks in the Powerplay overs with the same intent as in T20Is. He was a hit in the 2023 ODI World Cup, in terms of strike rate as well as impact innings. But subsequently, sustaining such a tempo with any consistency has proved difficult. More than his age, slowing reflexes in the field, and his having to constantly battle niggles – Rohit played the Champions Trophy with a hamstring niggle and the IPL mostly as Impact Player – haven't inspired confidence. Rohit has repeatedly made it clear that he has no plans to quit ODIs. 'I'm not going to retire from this format, just to make sure that no rumours are spread going forward,' he said after winning the Champions Trophy final in March. 'I have retired from two formats, but I am still playing one format,' Rohit again said in May when he had a stand named after him at the Wankhede stadium. 'When India plays whichever team here (in Mumbai), that'll make it even more special.' While the romantics would want India to have another crack at ODI Cup glory under Rohit after the agonising defeat in the final to Australia in the 2023 campaign, the selectors are likely to take a more pragmatic call.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store