logo
Harvey Weinstein Judge Declares Mistrial on Rape Charge

Harvey Weinstein Judge Declares Mistrial on Rape Charge

Yahooa day ago

The judge in Harvey Weinstein's sex crimes retrial declared a mistrial on the rape charge after the jury foreperson refused to continue deliberations following an alleged threat by another juror.
The majority-female jury could not reach a unanimous verdict on the count of third-degree rape involving Jessica Mann. The jury had previously delivered its verdict on the two other charges against Weinstein: he was convicted Wednesday of committing a criminal sexual act against Miriam Haley but acquitted of sexually assaulting Kaja Sokola.
More from Variety
Harvey Weinstein Found Guilty of Sexual Assault After Tensions Explode on New York Jury
Amanda Seyfried Grossed Out She Invited 'Dictator' Harvey Weinstein to Past Sundance Premiere: 'It's Just the Way It Was - We All Needed Him'
Harvey Weinstein Says He Has 'Regrets' and 'Acted Immorally' Ahead of New York Retrial Verdict: 'But Never Illegal, Never Criminal'
After informing the jurors that he is putting an end to their deliberations and dismissing them, Judge Curtis Farber said they were 'disappointed.'
'They don't understand why the foreperson bowed out,' Farber told the attorneys inside the courtroom, adding that the other jurors were 'hopeful' they would reach a verdict on the final count.
The mistrial on Weinstein's remaining charge comes after a weeks-long trial that began in April, during which three women testified about the alleged sexual assaults committed by the former Hollywood producer. Weinstein faced two counts of committing a criminal sexual act in the first degree and one count of third-degree rape.
After the partial verdict was read on Wednesday, the jury foreperson in Weinstein's retrial revealed that the jury had reached a unanimous verdict on the charges related to Haley and Sokola on Friday of last week. Tensions remained high, though, among the jurors when deliberating the third-degree rape count.
The foreperson had spoken privately with Judge Farber and the attorneys about the situation earlier on Wednesday. Back in the courtroom, Farber summarized what was discussed during the private meeting, saying that the foreperson was 'not going to change his position — whatever that position is.'
'He did indicate that at least one other juror made comments to the effect of 'I'll meet you outside one day,' and there's yelling and screaming,' the judge said.
Weinstein was found guilty of sexually abusing Haley and Mann in his 2020 New York trial. He was serving a 23-year sentence until those convictions were overturned in April 2024. Weinstein pleaded not guilty to all charges in his retrial; both Haley and Mann testified against him again.
In their testimonies, Haley alleged that Weinstein forcibly sexually assaulted her at his apartment in 2006, while Mann accused him of raping her at a hotel in 2013.
Sokola, who did not testify in Weinstein's 2020 trial, was first identified by the prosecution during opening arguments in late April. In her testimony, Sokola described two alleged sexual assaults by Weinstein: one in 2002, when she was 16, and another in a Manhattan hotel in 2006 — the latter being the incident for which Weinstein was charged in the retrial.
Weinstein faces up to 25 years in prison after being convicted of the charge related to Haley. He is still serving a separate 16-year prison sentence following his 2022 rape conviction in Los Angeles.
Best of Variety
New Movies Out Now in Theaters: What to See This Week
'Harry Potter' TV Show Cast Guide: Who's Who in Hogwarts?
25 Hollywood Legends Who Deserve an Honorary Oscar

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

TheWrap Names USC Annenberg Journalism Graduate as 2025–26 Reporting Fellow
TheWrap Names USC Annenberg Journalism Graduate as 2025–26 Reporting Fellow

Yahoo

time20 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

TheWrap Names USC Annenberg Journalism Graduate as 2025–26 Reporting Fellow

TheWrap is proud to announce the recipient of its second annual Reporting Fellowship, presented in partnership with the USC Annenberg School for Communication and Journalism. This year's fellowship has been awarded to Casey Loving, who graduated last month with a Master of Arts in Specialized Journalism from USC Annenberg. Loving will join TheWrap's newsroom in Los Angeles for a full year beginning June 2025, working alongside seasoned journalists to hone his skills in reporting, writing, research and multimedia storytelling. 'It takes real courage to enter journalism right now — when the profession is under pressure from political division, disinformation and public distrust,' said Sharon Waxman, founder and editor-in-chief of TheWrap. 'That's why TheWrap remains deeply committed to nurturing the next generation of reporting talent. This fellowship is more than an opportunity — it's a recognition that young journalists today are stepping into a high-stakes field, where their role is not just to report the news, but to rebuild trust and tell stories that cut through the noise.' 'Our partnership with TheWrap connects the academy and industry, providing our students with meaningful newsroom experience,' said USC Annenberg Dean Willow Bay. 'Casey Loving's selection as the 2025 fellow reflects our shared commitment to preparing the next generation of multimedia storytellers.' Hailing from Maize, Kansas, Casey Loving is a graduate from USC's Annenberg School for Communication and Journalism, where he received his Master of Arts degree in Specialized Journalism following a BA in communication studies from Missouri State University (class of 2024). A lifelong devotee of film journalism and Hollywood, Loving first made inroads into the industry from the Midwest before moving to Los Angeles. At USC, he worked as an entertainment reporter for Annenberg Media — where he covered Sundance, produced documentaries and more — and he has previously written professionally for a number of entertainment web publications. He believes 'a great film or TV show can change your life — it's changed mine many times over.' Based in TheWrap's Los Angeles office, Loving will work full-time as a reporter covering a broad range of stories with a special focus on the Awards desk. He will receive daily assignments and training to develop his reporting, writing, research and multimedia skills alongside TheWrap's industry-leading journalists, reporting to deputy managing editor Benjamin Lindsay and Awards editors Steve Pond and Missy Schwartz. Loving joins TheWrap newsroom starting June 16. This initiative continues TheWrap and USC Annenberg's shared mission to prepare the next generation of reporters to meet today's journalistic challenges — with rigor, curiosity and integrity. ABOUT THEWRAP TheWrap is the leading, authoritative digital news organization covering the business of entertainment and media. Founded by award-winning journalist Sharon Waxman in 2009, TheWrap is the only independently owned Hollywood trade, serving as a reliable and trusted source of breaking news, investigative reporting, business analysis, comprehensive awards season coverage and in-depth features for 16 years. MEDIA CONTACT Emily Vogel 619-857-1664 The post TheWrap Names USC Annenberg Journalism Graduate as 2025–26 Reporting Fellow appeared first on TheWrap.

Harvey Weinstein sex crimes retrial ends in disarray as jury foreperson refuses to deliberate
Harvey Weinstein sex crimes retrial ends in disarray as jury foreperson refuses to deliberate

Yahoo

time9 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Harvey Weinstein sex crimes retrial ends in disarray as jury foreperson refuses to deliberate

Harvey Weinstein's sex crimes retrial case ended in disarray on Thursday as the jury foreperson refused to deliberate and the judge declared a mistrial on a remaining rape allegation. The ruling came a day after a split verdict on other charges in the landmark #MeToo-era case and now sets up the former studio boss for a third trial in New York. Before that case however goes ahead, the 73-year-old will face new sentencing early next month on his sexual assault conviction. The Oscar-winning movie producer denies all the charges and his lawyer says he plans to appeal. Related New York jury convicts Harvey Weinstein of top charge in #MeToo sex crimes retrial In Wednesday's partial verdict, Weinstein was convicted of one criminal sex act charge but acquitted of another. Both concerned accusations of forcing oral sex on women in 2006. Those verdicts still stand. While the jury of seven women and five men was unanimous on those decisions, it got stuck on the rape charge involving another woman, Jessica Mann. The hairstylist and actor testified at length — as she did in 2020 — that Weinstein raped her amid a years-long consensual relationship. 'I will never give up on myself and making sure my voice – and the truth – is heard," Mann said in a statement Thursday, confirming she's ready to testify yet again. Tensions and disagreements among the jury began to emerge in public last Friday as one member asked to be excused because he felt another was being treated unfairly. On Monday, the foreperson complained that other jurors were pushing people to change their minds and talking about information beyond the charges. The man raised concerns again Wednesday, telling the judge he felt afraid in the jury room because another juror was yelling at him for sticking to his opinion and suggested the foreperson would 'see me outside.' When Judge Curtis Farber asked the foreperson Thursday whether he was willing to return to deliberations, the man said said no. And with that, Farber declared a mistrial on the rape count. Two jurors disputed the foreperson's account as they left court. One, Chantan Holmes, said that no one mistreated the man and that she believed he was just tired of deliberating. 'We all felt bad. Because we really wanted to do this. We put our hearts and souls in here,' she said. Another jury member, who identified himself only by his juror number, said the deliberations were contentious, but respectful. 'What happened in that jury room was absolutely improper,' attorney Arthur Aidala said outside court. Weinstein is due back in court July 2 for discussion of retrial and sentencing dates. His first-degree criminal sex act conviction carries the potential for up to 25 years in jail, while the unresolved third-degree rape charge is punishable by up to four years — less than he already has served. He's been behind bars since his initial conviction in 2020, and he later also was sentenced to prison in a separate California case, which he's appealing. Weinstein's 2020 conviction seemed to cement the downfall of one of Hollywood's most powerful men in a pivotal moment for the #MeToo movement. The anti-sexual-misconduct campaign was fueled by allegations against him. But that conviction was overturned last year, and the case was sent back for retrial in the same Manhattan courthouse. Weinstein's accusers said he exploited his Tinseltown influence to dangle career help, get them alone and then trap and force them into sexual encounters. 'These hopeful young women were trying to follow their dreams in a world that he controlled,' Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg, a Democrat, said at a news conference Thursday. Weinstein's defence portrayed his accusers as Hollywood wannabes and hangers-on who willingly hooked up with him in the hope of getting opportunities, then later said they were victimized to collect settlement funds and #MeToo approbation. Miriam Haley, the producer and production assistant whom Weinstein was convicted — twice, now — of sexually assaulting, said outside court Wednesday that the new verdict 'gives me hope.' Accuser Kaja Sokola also called it 'a big win for everyone,' even though Weinstein was acquitted of forcibly performing oral sex on her when she was a 19-year-old fashion model. Her allegation was added to the case after the retrial was ordered.

Harvey Weinstein retrial drama: Mistrial declared after heated juror clash on rape charge
Harvey Weinstein retrial drama: Mistrial declared after heated juror clash on rape charge

News24

time10 hours ago

  • News24

Harvey Weinstein retrial drama: Mistrial declared after heated juror clash on rape charge

On Thursday, a mistrial was declared on the outstanding rape charge against Harvey Weinstein in his sex crimes retrial. Judge Curtis Farber dismissed jurors who had been unable to reach a verdict on the charge that Weinstein raped Jessica Mann. Weinstein's lawyer, Arthur Aidala, had forcefully argued that a crime had been committed against one of the jurors, but the judge dismissed the claim. The judge in the Harvey Weinstein sex crimes retrial declared a mistrial on the outstanding rape charge against the movie producer Thursday after the jury foreperson refused to return to deliberate the case amid a jury room feud. In front of packed press and public benches in the 13th-floor New York courtroom, Judge Curtis Farber dismissed jurors who had been unable to reach a verdict on the charge that Weinstein raped Jessica Mann. 'Deliberations became heated to such a degree I am obligated to declare a mistrial on the one count on which you didn't reach a verdict,' Farber declared from the wood-panelled bench, wearing a robe and reading glasses. Weinstein's lawyer, Arthur Aidala, had forcefully argued that a crime had been committed against one of the jurors, but the judge dismissed the claim. On Wednesday, the jury convicted Weinstein of sexual assault on Miriam Haley and acquitted the fallen movie mogul for allegedly sexually assaulting Kaja Sokola. The defence vowed to appeal. The prosecutor brushed off the defence's claim that a retrial on the charge of raping Mann would exert unfair pressure on the alleged victim. 'We will proceed to trial, and that is what justice would be in this case,' Nicole Blumberg said. Outside court, Aidala alleged that two jurors had indicated to his team that the panel had considered the cases of rapper Sean 'P Diddy' Combs and convicted child sex abuser R. Kelly in their discussions. '(If) they say, 'Well, look at R Kelly. Look what's going on across the street with P Diddy'... That's not what you can do, and that's what we just heard happen,' said the sharp-suited attorney. Combs is on trial at a nearby courthouse for alleged racketeering and other crimes, and the publicity of that case has largely eclipsed Weinstein's retrial. ANGELA WEISS / AFP Weinstein, 73 and wheelchair-bound by ill-health, is already in jail for a 16-year term after he was convicted in a separate California case of raping a European actress more than a decade ago. Proceedings in New York have been dogged by personal issues between jurors, two of whom have privately complained to the judge about fellow panellists. The foreman had told Judge Farber he could not continue after facing threats. 'One other juror made comments to the effect 'I'll meet you outside one day',' the judge said Wednesday quoting the foreman, adding there was yelling between jurors. After Weinstein's lawyer demanded a mistrial over the jury rupture, Weinstein himself addressed the court Wednesday, deploying a commanding voice reminiscent of his Hollywood heyday. 'Threats, violence, intimidation' 'We've heard threats, violence, intimidation - this is not right for me... the person who is on trial here,' he said. The Oscar-winner's conviction on the Haley charge is a vindication for Haley, whose complaint in part led to the initial guilty verdict in 2020. That landmark case helped spur the 'MeToo' movement that saw an outpouring of allegations from prominent women who were abused by men. Weinstein underwent a spectacular fall from his position at the top of the world of Hollywood and show business in 2017 when allegations against him exploded into public. The movement upended the film industry, exposing the systemic exploitation of young women seeking to work in entertainment and provoking a reckoning on how to end the toxic culture. More than 80 women accused Weinstein of sexual misconduct in the wake of the global backlash against men abusing positions of power. Weinstein's original 2020 conviction and the resulting 23-year prison term were thrown out last year after an appeals court found irregularities in the way witnesses were presented.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store