
We sat wrapped in blankets and drained our savings last year – the Winter Fuel Payment u-turn took too long
LAST winter Jim Whitehouse, 66, and his wife sat shivering on their sofa wrapped in blankets rationing their energy.
They drained some of their small £5,000 savings pot to help pay their gas and electricity, after Rachel Reeves announced Winter Fuel Payment would be axed for 10million pensioners unless they claimed Pension Credit.
1
Now, a year later the government has confirmed a massive u-turn - it WILL pay the benefit to anyone earning £35,000 or less without having to claim pension credit.
For Jim, who lives in a small cottage in Shopshire, with his wife, 59, who is unable to work due to health reasons, it's welcome news - but it's taken too long.
"For many £200 doesn't seem like much, but for us it's the difference between a slightly warmer winter and a downright miserable one," Jim said.
He added: "That unnecessary stress put a massive strain on my health and left us either draining our savings to stay warm or sitting on the sofa wrapped in blankets to get through the cold."
"It means we won't have to choose between heating and putting food on the table."
"It's common sense, isn't it? People who've worked hard all their lives shouldn't be left to freeze.
"I'm glad someone's finally seen sense, even if it took them long enough."
Jim, a retired landscape gardener, was one of the thousands of pensioners who called our Winter Fuel SOS helpline last year, as we helped provide support for readers who were worried about their energy bills.
The couple receive an £800 monthly state pension, which meant they were just over the threshold for support last year, missing out the payment.
Jim said: "We drove 40 miles to apply for Universal Credit together, only to be told £800 a month is enough for us to live on… It was baffling."
Jim, who suffers from a chronic heart condition and has had three stents fitted, called the eligibility process "shambolic" and said the stress of it all took a toll on his health.
The £200 extra this winter will allow him to buy logs to heat his small cottage for eight weeks during the cold winter months.
Today, Rachel Reeves will reiterate an embarrassing U-turn on her harsh Winter Fuel cuts as part of her spending review.
The reversal, costing £1.25 billion, was first revealed on Monday.
Under the new rules, all pensioners earning £35,000 or less will now qualify for this year's Winter Fuel Payment.
"I sat in the cold last winter after losing the winter fuel payment"
LAST winter Richard Barton, 70, says he 'literally sat in the cold' after he lost the £300 Winter Fuel Payment.
The retired electrical engineer from Fareham, Hampshire, has just £200 a month after paying his bills as his state pension doesn't stretch far enough.
He still wasn't eligible for the Winter Fuel Payment after it was axed for 10million last year.
To cope with the cold last winter, Richard relied on a fan heater, a thermal blanket, and a hat, confessing that he "literally sat in the cold."
"I only have enough to survive on and I have to rely on savings for bills - this is no way to live your life at my age," he said.
And while he will now get the payment, the lifelong Labour supporter said: "Labour's cuts have quite literally left me out in the cold."
They might have reversed the changes for some of us now, but they've lost my vote for good."
Another couple hit by the payment cull were Norah, 85, and Michael, 81, who after decades of hard work and paying into the system they were forced to endure a freezing winter.
The couple contacted The Sun's Winter Fuel Payment SOS helpline last year.
Michael, a retired foundry engineer who worked until he was 75, and Norah, a former auxiliary nurse and carer, are still struggling with bills.
They have just £300 a month after bills and Michael, who is battling cancer, faces frequent hospital visits for scans, radiation, and chemotherapy, which have added significantly to their monthly outgoings.
Despite owning their home outright and having no debts, the couple have no savings to fall back on.
"We were cold all winter," Norah admitted, explaining how they huddle under blankets to avoid turning on the heating - a situation that worsens her COPD and is far from ideal for her husband's fragile health.
"What upsets us is we've never, ever put in for anything," she said.
"We're not asking for much - we've paid into the system for decades."
The Sun's Winter Fuel S.O.S Campaign
THE Sun's Winter Fuel SOS Campaign was set up to support households following the government's cutbacks.
Around ten million pensioners lost out on the £300 Winter Fuel Payment in Winter 2024.
When we opened out phone lines to thousands of pensioners in October, we provided dedicated tips and advice on how affected households could stretch their finances further.
We also partnered with the poverty charity Turn2Us to launch a free benefits checker, helping ensure that everyone is claiming all the benefits they are entitled to.
Don't miss our latest Sun Money coverage, which includes essential information on key deadlines, applying for support, and everything you need to know about the latest Winter Fuel Payment changes.
If you have a story to share or wish to get in touch with our team, please email us at money-sm@news.co.uk.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Guardian
41 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Revealed: More than 24,000 factory farms have opened across Europe
American-style intensive livestock farms are spreading across Europe, with new data revealing more than 24,000 megafarms across the continent. In the UK alone, there are now 1,824 industrial-scale pig and poultry farms, according to the data obtained by AGtivist that relates to 2023. The countries with the largest number of intensive poultry farm units are France, UK, Germany, Italy and Poland in that order. For poultry farming alone, the UK ranks as having the second-highest number of intensive farms at 1,553, behind France with 2,342. The top 10 countries for intensive pig and poultry farms combined are Spain, France, Germany, the Netherlands, Italy, UK, Denmark, Poland, Belgium and Hungary, according to information obtained from the European Commission, and country-specific regulatory agencies and colleges. Intensive livestock units are farms where 40,000 or more poultry, 2,000 or more fattening pigs, or 750 or more breeding sows are being held at any one time in the EU and the UK. The increase in so-called megafarms across Europe comes as the number of small farms has reduced dramatically, and the income gap between large and small farms has increased, according to Guardian research. The rise in intensive farming has coincided with a decline in birds, tree species and butterfly numbers. In the Severn and Wye Valleys, a UK hotspot for intensive poultry farming, there are 79 chickens per human, the Guardian has revealed. Across Europe the rise in large intensive poultry units is a key driver of river pollution. Chicken droppings contain more phosphates – which starve fish and river plants of oxygen – than any other animal manure. In the UK the number of intensive farms grew from 1,621 in 2017 to 1,824 in 2023, and according to data released under freedom of information laws to Terry Jermy, the MP for South West Norfolk, megafarms in England have breached environmental regulations nearly 7,000 times since 2015. The data shows that the Environment Agency carried out about 17 inspections of intensive livestock units a week in which 75% of those inspections found breaches. The breaches include slurry pits in disrepair, causing them to leak and pollute the local environment, and a serious case in which a site of special scientific interest was polluted by animal effluent. There were also some serious air pollution incidents and numerous breaches involving the over-stocking of animals. When serious breaches were found, action against the farms was rare. For the most serious breaches (category 1 and 2), more than half received either no further action, 'advice/guidance' or a warning. Fewer than half of the incidents received further action such as a formal warning, and less than 1% received a 'recommended' prosecution. Jermy said: 'These shocking numbers alongside the severity of the litany of offences clearly show that the huge increase to US-style factory farms since 2017 is harming our land and jeopardising our climate targets and sustainability ambitions moving forward. 'In my constituency farming is our lifeblood, as is the environment, and therefore, we must have a serious conversation as to what kind of farming we need moving forwards. It must be one that protects our communities, agriculture and nature, while furthering animal welfare standards as well as harnessing food security.' An Environment Agency spokesperson said: 'Environmental permitting provides a consistent, robust form of regulation, which identifies all non-compliances and requires them to be addressed, regardless of severity. In the past two years 98% of intensive pig and poultry farms have been scored in the highest bands for compliance, meaning they present a very low risk to the environment. This follows ongoing high levels of compliance over previous years. 'The vast majority of non-compliances identified are low risk, and we work with farmers to achieve compliance. Any high-risk non-compliances, or farms that fail to bring themselves into compliance, will face enforcement action.' Norfolk has been dubbed the 'megafarm capital of Europe' with statistics from Compassion in World Farming showing there are now 122 megafarms in the county and 25,748,309 factory-farmed animals. A megafarm in Jermy's constituency that would have reared almost 900,000 chickens and pigs at any one time was recently blocked by councillors over climate and pollution concerns. There were objections raised over air pollution and the impact on a water-depleted area. Revelations about the scale of livestock megafarms across Europe should be a wake-up call in Brussels, said Reineke Hameleers, the CEO of Eurogroup for Animals. '[It] goes against promises to improve animal welfare and move toward more sustainable farming. It's important that the European Commission makes smart, informed choices about the future of farming. Funding should go to farming systems that are truly sustainable, competitive, and resilient.'


Sky News
2 hours ago
- Sky News
India plane crash live: Ahmedabad to Gatwick flight carrying 242 people crashes; British national reportedly survived
15:26:40 British national survived Air India plane crash - NDTV report A British man who claims to have survived the crash in Ahmedabad has described the moment the plane went down. According to Sky News' partner network NDTV, Ahmedabad's police commissioner said one passenger survived the crash. NDTV names him as British-Indian man Vishwash Kumar Ramesh. Speaking to the Hindustan Times newspaper, Ramesh said he heard a "loud noise" around 30 seconds after take-off before the plane went down. "It all happened so quickly," he said, adding he had received "impact injuries" on his chest, eyes and feet. "When I got up, there were bodies all around me. I was scared. I stood up and ran. There were pieces of the plane all around me. Someone grabbed hold of me and put me in an ambulance and brought me to the hospital." He told Indian media he had lived in London for 20 years. He said that his brother Ajay was seated in a different row on the plane. Separately, footage shared on social media showed a man limping away from the crash site and being led towards emergency services. 15:20:01 Reason landing gear was still out 'remains a mystery' - and why Boeing may ground planes Paul Edwards, an aviation security analyst and fellow at the Royal Aeronautical Society, told Sky News the footage of the plane going down is difficult to watch. "There are two things that are needed for an aircraft take-off. One is adequate airspeed and the other one is a rate of climb," he said. "And that had neither." He added that normally pilots retract the aircraft's landing gear so that the plane can be more aerodynamic, and it's not clear why this wasn't done in the case of Air India Flight 171. "It could have been he (the pilot) just didn't have time. Or it could be that perhaps he thought he could control it, go round again on land or even land straight ahead." "We can't second-guess it," Edwards added. "So that remains, if you like, a mystery." He was also asked if the tragic crash raises questions about the type of plane - a Boeing 787 Dreamliner. "Well, they've got an impeccable safety record so far, but there will be massive impetus to get to the bottom of this in case there is a factor that could be applied to other aircraft within the fleet," he said. "In which case, they may have to ground them in, they may have to modify them." 15:12:30 'Injured passengers taken to hospitals', Air India boss says Campbell Wilson, the boss of Air India, has released a video statement expressing his "deep sorrow" following the plane crash in Ahmedabad. "This is a difficult day for all of us at Air India," he says. "Our efforts now are focused entirely on the needs of our passengers, crew members, their families and loved ones." He says the "injured passengers have been taken by local authorities to the nearest hospitals". "Investigations will take time, but anything we can do now, we are doing," Wilson adds. 15:07:01 Plane's path to crash - what tracking data and imagery tells us By Tom Cheshire, data and forensics correspondent Authorities quickly confirmed that Flight AI 171 crashed shortly after take-off - this is what tracking data and imagery of the crash can tell us. The plane took off on the usual flight path for this airport, bound for Gatwick. Watch below: Flight route shows plane's path This is based on incomplete tracking data - Flightradar24 has updated its findings, saying: "Additional processing confirms #AI171 departed using the full length of Runway 23 at Ahmedabad. RWY 23 is 11,499 feet long. The aircraft backtracked to the end of the runway before beginning its take-off roll." The crash location is only a couple of kilometres from the runway. There appear to be two main locations of plane debris. The initial crash, where the tail of the plane separated. And then further wreckage as the plane continued into apartment blocks, where the main fire broke out. The buildings it landed on appear to be the Atulyam 3 residential block and the Royal Mess food hall. Reviews online say that: "Atulyam is basically a series of flats and buildings for [medical] students of the civil hospital, Ahmedabad and an attached group of hospitals." 14:58:09 Air India's owners to offer victims' families around £86,000, company says Air India's owners, Tata Group, will offer around £86,000 to the families of each person who died in the Ahmedabad plane crash, the company said. A statement attributed to Natarajan Chandrasekaran, the chairperson of Air India, says the medical expenses of those injured will also be covered. "We remain steadfast in standing with the affected families and communities during this unimaginable time," it adds. 14:57:01 UK sending air accident inspectors to India The UK is deploying a team of four air accident inspectors to Ahmedabad to assist their Indian counterparts, a special adviser for the Department for Transport says. The team, from the UK's Air Accidents Investigation Branch, will depart from London this evening and arrive on site tomorrow afternoon. A liaison official is also being sent to Gatwick, where a reception centre for relatives is being set up. 14:50:01 Portuguese and Canadian leaders share messages in response to crash Among the 242 passengers on board, seven were Portuguese nationals and one was Canadian. Their conditions are not yet known. The leaders of each country have expressed condolences for the families of victims. Luis Montenegro, Portugal's prime minister, wrote in a post on social media: "It was with deep dismay that I learned of the tragic aviation accident in India, in which 7 citizens of Portuguese nationality were involved. "On my behalf and that of the government, I wish to express condolences and profound solidarity with the families of the victims." Mark Carney, Canada's prime minister, said he was "devastated" to learn of the crash. "My thoughts are with the loved ones of everyone on board," he wrote on social media. "Canada's transportation officials are in close contact with counterparts and I am receiving regular updates as the response to this tragedy unfolds." 14:43:01 Several fatal crashes in Air India's nine decades of operation Air India, which started operations in 1932, and its subsidiary Air India Express, have suffered several fatal crashes over the years. According to Aviation Safety Network (ASN), the most recent fatal crashes were: May 2010: Boeing 737-800 (Air India Express) overshot the runway at Mangalore, India, and crashed into a gorge, killing 158 people. August 2020: Boeing 737-800 (Air India Express) after landing in Karipur, India, the aircraft left the runway, rolled down an embankment and broke up, killing 21 people. Here are some recent non-fatal incidents, according to ASN, which references various sources: September 2024: Boeing 737-8HG (Air India Express) suffered engine problems after taking off from Delhi, which was confirmed by the airline, and the aircraft returned to the airport. October 2024: Boeing 737-8HG (Air India Express) declared an emergency immediately after take-off due to a hydraulic issue in Tamil Nadu, eventually landing safely, which a local minister said had affected the landing gear. December 2024: Airbus A320-251N started the take-off roll (the start of building up speed to take off) on a taxiway instead of the runway at Goa, according to the aviation safety regulator, but stopped when alerted by a tower controller. December 2024: Boeing 737-86N (Air India Express) returned to land at Kochi after tyre debris was found on the runway, according to Onmanorama, a local news outlet in Kerala. January 2025: Airbus A320-251N suffered an engine shutdown after departing Bangalore and landed safely at the same location, according to the Times of India.


Telegraph
2 hours ago
- Telegraph
Residents' fury as council saves ‘Jack and the Beanstalk' tree
Residents in Winchester have said they are 'extremely angry' after a council voted to protect a 'Jack and the Beanstalk' oak tree they say is dangerous. People living on one of the Hampshire city's most prestigious roads called the decision to issue a preservation order on the 45ft tree 'grotesquely irresponsible' and 'ludicrous'. Officials unanimously approved the order after hearing of the 'biodiversity value' the oak has to Canon Street, which is near Winchester Cathedral. Dr Sandra Steel, who lives nearby, spoke for residents at the Winchester city council planning meeting on Wednesday. According to the BBC, she said the tree's spreading roots 'cause structural damage', adding that 'our historic houses are particularly vulnerable'. On hearing the verdict, Dr Steel said: 'You are waiting for our houses to fall down, I guess.' She said [residents] all 'feel extremely angry' and called the decision 'quite ridiculous', adding: 'An oak tree belongs to an open area or a forest, not in gardens of historic houses.' The o ak tree was planted about 50 years ago and grew by 6ft last year. Residents have said it is 'out of proportion' to the surrounding properties and dominates the small garden in which it sits. When the current homeowners applied to have the tree felled, the council put a preliminary protection order on it, saying it was 'appreciated' by residents on a neighbouring street and was nice to look at. Mark Pocock, another resident, previously called the decision to protect the tree 'ludicrous', adding: 'If it were to fall and damage properties or persons, I would say the responsibility would be entirely with the council – not the owners of those properties. 'I think putting a tree protection order on it is grotesquely irresponsible. It could be a danger to property and life.' Nick Goff, who moved into his property on an adjacent road just over a year ago, added: 'The issue is that in 10 years that will be double the height and double the width. It put on 6ft last year, and it's going to put on another 6ft this year. 'Some guy planted this as something to do 40 years ago. Now, we have got Jack and the Beanstalk. It's not a historic tree – it's a silly mistake.' During the planning meeting, John Bartlett, the local authority's tree officer, said the oak was 'one of the last remaining significant trees' in that area. He told councillors: 'It has a significant biodiversity value supporting many different species. A mature oak tree can support up to 2,300 species, possibly more, when it reaches maturity, and its importance is only increased by the fact that it's in this urban landscape.'