Handcuffed Senator Calls BS on ICE Barbie's Lies About Him
Senator Alex Padilla has called out Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem's spin about the news conference chaos that landed him in handcuffs.
Noem—nicknamed 'ICE Barbie' for her love of cosplaying as an Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agent for immigration raids, among other bizarre publicity stunts—had claimed that Padilla had failed to identify himself and said he 'lunged' at the podium, after which he was forcibly removed and arrested. Not so, Padilla said in an interview with Pod Save America released Friday.
'Anybody who's seen the video knows I repeatedly introduced myself,' Padilla said. 'They knew who I was. I was not lunging at the secretary.'
Padilla said that not only had he introduced himself, he was escorted in by FBI and National Guard personnel and was wearing a U.S. Senate polo. Video of the altercation backs up his claims.
Padilla, 51, also refuted Noem's claim on Fox News that he 'burst' into the briefing room to interrupt her.
Instead, Padilla said that he was escorted into Noem's briefing by an FBI agent and a National Guardsman, and that he initially stood quietly in the back. He claimed that Noem's rhetoric about demonstrations in Los Angeles eventually became 'too much' for him, so he walked forward and began asking a question to call her out.
'They claim that Donald Trump and Secretary Noem are here to 'liberate the people of Los Angeles' from the governor and from the mayor,' he said, referencing Noem's statement from the podium. 'That's when I spoke up, right? I had a question to ask. [I] want to call them out on their misinformation.'
That is starkly different from how Noem described the ordeal on Thursday evening.
'This man burst into the room, started lunging towards the podium, interrupting me and elevating his voice, and was stopped,' she told Fox News. 'He did not identify himself and was removed from the room. So, as soon as he identified himself, appropriate actions were taken.'
A clip shared by a Padilla staff member showed that 20 seconds passed between him identifying himself as a senator and Noem's security detail ordering him to lie on his stomach so he could be put in handcuffs.
The Department of Homeland Security did not immediately return a request for comment from the Daily Beast regarding Padilla's latest remarks.
Padilla alleged that the Trump administration has lied about what happened in the news conference encounter, just as it has inflated the severity of anti-ICE demonstrations in Los Angeles, his hometown.
'I'm not hearing anyone talk about being scared of the protests or the protesters,' he told Pod Save America, 'But I'm hearing, I personally know people, and I have a lot of friends, who are terrified about the impact ICE is having on communities.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fox News
an hour ago
- Fox News
BROADCAST BIAS: Media's LA riot coverage relies on a sneaky trick to look less one-sided
Democrats and their publicity partners at the broadcast TV networks have often preached about how President Donald Trump's actions – like his pardons – are an affront to the "rule of law" in America. But when it comes to Trump's attempt at mass deportations, the media-Democrat alliance lines up fiercely against any attempt to remove immigrants who have ignored the rule of law. Riots broke out on June 6 after several immigration raids in the Los Angeles area by U.S. Immigrations and Custom Enforcement enraged the left, as so-called "peaceful protesters" tried to block entrances and exits for the Edward R. Roybal Federal Building downtown, where detainees were being processed. In a legal sense, it is not merely a "protest" to obstruct law enforcement. It's a crime. It is not "protest" to throw bricks at ICE agents or police, or set cars on fire. But the broadcast coverage of this unrest sounded disturbingly like the excuse-making for the George Floyd riots of 2020, when violent mobs were described as a "racial reckoning." Once again, the TV networks used the mantra that the protests are "mostly peaceful," like it was a tiny sideshow, and Trump calling out the National Guard to quell the violence was treated as a provocation that worsened the crisis. The original, radical "idealism" of these protests – that ICE shouldn't be deporting anyone, like deportations were tyrannical – served as the rhetorical underpinning of the biased coverage. Any idealism from the Republican side – favoring that "rule of law" and for protecting law enforcement personnel from violent attacks – was dismissed as Trumpian blather. By Monday morning, the network morning shows kicked into anti-Trump gear. ABC "Good Morning America" host George Stephanopoulos warned viewers that Trump's ordering in the National Guard "is the first time since 1965 that a president's ordered troops in over the objections of the governor," and "California Governor Gavin Newsom condemned the action as inflammatory, called on the administration to rescind it, said they were manufacturing a crisis." When Democrats can't keep control of their cities, pointing it out is "manufacturing a crisis." It's like Stephanopoulos never stopped being a Democrat press spokesman. It's subtle wordplay, but the networks have a sneaky habit of not putting the party label on Trump's Democrat opponents. One might say their party should be obvious from their opposition, but in a setting of violent action, the avoidance of party labels was far too common, especially at ABC. On Wednesday night, June 11's "World News Tonight," reporter Matt Gutman announced "in an emotional press conference, 37 mayors coming together" against Trump, no party labels needed. Arturo Flores, the mayor Huntington Park, was described as "a combat veteran, appealing to the military." Flores bizarrely argued about illegal immigrants: "These are Americans." As a legal matter, that's untrue, but ABC put that concept on screen: "Officials: 'Remember, You Are Dealing With Americans." That's just "Officials," no party ID needed. Flores also lit into Trump as "a dictator" and "a tyrant." Nobody ever fact-checks politicians who call Trump a dictator. Gutman then added Newsom attacking Trump for calling out the National Gard, without the party label. On Thursday night, ABC evening anchor David Muir repeated the tactic. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem was abruptly interrupted at a press conference by "California Senator Alex Padilla," and he was forced to the ground and handcuffed. This transparently partisan stunt was treated as deadly serious, complete with a Padilla soundbite full of quavering moral outrage about how Latino farm hands and cooks are treated by the feds, with no mention of party. It's subtle wordplay, but the networks have a sneaky habit of not putting the party label on Trump's Democrat opponents. Late in that Thursday story, ABC reporter Matt Rivers did highlight the party when "Democratic Governors" lectured House Republicans at a hearing about their laxity on illegal immigration. New York Gov. Kathy Hochul told Viewers that Trump engaged in a "flagrant abuse of power." ABC did not show Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz being pressed in that hearing about his smears in a recent commencement speech where he accused ICE agents of being "Trump's modern-day Gestapo." Nobody "fact checks" that, and no Republican question or concern from that hearing was mentioned by ABC. This is why Republicans and independent voters are shunning ABC, CBS and NBC as talking-point assembly lines for the Democrats.
Atlantic
an hour ago
- Atlantic
Trump Has Turned Deportations Into a Spectacle
From the beginning, Donald Trump's approach to deportations has been about both removing people from the country and the spectacle of removing people from the country. If any doubt lingered about the president's commitment to the cause, he erased it in Los Angeles, where his response to the widespread protests against a series of ICE raids—he has dispatched roughly 4,000 California National Guard troops and hundreds of Marines, all against the wishes of the state's governor—has been an extraordinary (and extraordinarily excessive) demonstration of force. Trump's message has been clear: No matter who or what tries to get in the way, his administration will push forward with deportations. L.A. is 'the first, perhaps, of many' military deployments in the United States, Trump said earlier this week. The spectacle part, Trump has down. The president has ushered in one of the most aggressive immigration campaigns in recent American history. The ICE raids in L.A. are just the latest of many high-profile instances in which federal law-enforcement officials have antagonized and rounded up suspected undocumented immigrants—some of whom are citizens or legal residents. Hundreds of immigrants have been swept away to what functionally is a modern Gulag in El Salvador, and the administration has recently tried to send others to South Sudan, which is on the verge of civil war. Enforcing immigration policy does not have to be inhumane, but the Trump administration is gloating in the very barbarity. Amid all the bravado, however, the administration much more quietly has been struggling to deliver on Trump's campaign promise to 'launch the largest deportation program of criminals in the history of America.' So far, deportations have not dramatically spiked under Trump, though daily rates have been on the rise in recent weeks. According to government data obtained by The New York Times, the administration has deported more than 200,000 people since Trump's return to office, well below the rate needed to meet the White House's reported goal of removing 1 million unauthorized immigrants in his first year in office. If the pace over the first five months of Trump's presidency continues through the end of the year, total deportations would only slightly exceed that of President Barack Obama in fiscal year 2012. The discrepancy is surprising. Given the visibility of Trump's efforts, you'd be forgiven for believing deportations were unfolding on a never-before-seen scale. The actual numbers don't diminish the cruelty of Trump's approach or the pain his administration has caused to those it has targeted. But they do reveal Trump's ever-increasing mastery of bending perceptions of reality. The administration's immigration tactics are so shocking, callous, and inescapable that they have generated the appearance of mass deportations. Paranoid rumors of ICE agents hovering around playgrounds, waiting to arrest noncitizen nannies, have spread. Some immigrants have opted to self-deport instead of subjecting themselves to the potential horrors of ICE detainment and deportation. No reason exists to think the White House has been deliberately falling behind on its deportation promise. The administration has run into several challenges: The easiest migrants to deport are those who have just crossed the border, and unauthorized immigration has dropped significantly since Trump took office. (Trump's deportation approach and rhetoric has, in other words, seemingly been successful at keeping people out of the country in the first place.) At times, ICE has faced detention space constraints, and some of the administration's deportations have been stymied in the courts. In an email, the White House spokeswoman Abigail Jackson wrote, 'President Trump has already secured the border in record time and is now fulfilling his promise to deport illegal aliens.' The administration plans to use a 'full-of-government approach to ensure the efficient mass deportation of terrorist and criminal illegal aliens.' In Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' that is working its way through Congress, Republican lawmakers are set to give ICE a massive funding injection to help the agency finally carry out mass deportations. 'If that money goes out, the amount of people they can arrest and remove will be extraordinary,' Paul Hunker, who was formerly ICE's lead attorney in Dallas, told my colleague Nick Miroff. For now, Trump is faking it until he makes it, with his administration doing everything it can to draw attention to its immigration tactics. Yesterday, federal agents handcuffed and forcibly removed Senator Alex Padilla of California just after he interrupted an immigration press conference featuring Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem. In March, Noem had generated a previous viral moment when she traveled to the El Salvador megaprison where the administration has sent hundreds of supposed gang members, and gave remarks in front of shirtless, tattooed prisoners. The administration has even brought along right-wing media figures for its ICE arrests, producing further images of its immigration enforcement. Phil McGraw—the former host of Dr. Phil, who now hosts a show for MeritTV, a right-wing network he founded— was at ICE headquarters in L.A. the same day of the immigration sweeps in the city that prompted the protests last week. Consider, too, the shocking ways in which the administration has discussed the deportation campaign on social media. On Wednesday, the Department of Homeland Security posted an ima ge styled like a World War II propaganda flyer, urging Americans to 'report all foreign invaders' to a DHS hotline. The White House's X account has created a meme about a crying woman in ICE custody, and uploaded a video of a deportee boarding a plane in clanking shackles with the caption 'ASMR: Illegal Alien Deportation Flight.' In one sense, all of this is just classic political spin. Instead of admitting that it's falling behind on one of its core promises, the White House is attempting to control the narrative. But the scale of reality-warping going on in this case is hard to fathom. Trump's actions are part of a larger way in which he has come to understand that he can sway the nation with the right viral imagery. When he was indicted on racketeering and other charges and forced to take a mug shot in 2023, Trump glowered into the camera instead of looking embarrassed or guilty, generating an image that became the subject of viral memes and campaign merchandise—and seemingly inspired his second presidential portrait, in which he strikes the same glowering pose. When he came within inches of dying during the assassination attempt in Pennsylvania last summer, he had the instincts to produce one of the most significant images in modern American history. The series of videos, pictures, and aggressive actions his administration has taken regarding deportations are of the same genre. Trump takes the reality in front of him and does what he can to create a perception closer to what he wants: in this case, one of fear and terror. This is authoritarian behavior. Trump is marshaling propaganda to mislead Americans about what is really happening. Other recent strongmen leaders, such as Rodrigo Duterte in the Philippines and Viktor Orbán in Hungary, have used a similar playbook. If Trump can't remove as many immigrants as he promised, the president can still use his talent for warping perceptions to make it feel as though he is. Laws don't need to change for free speech to be chilled, for immigrants to flee, and for people to be afraid.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Which California Dem Did Trump More Successfully Bait This Week, Newsom or Padilla?
Sign up for the Surge, the newsletter that covers most important political nonsense of the week, delivered to your inbox every Saturday. Welcome to this week's edition of the Surge, which feels as if it has to tell all the nation-states out there: Your desperate plays to get ranked in the Surge by doing wars on Thursday nights will not work. What will work? Resigning from Congress while in Guyana. Being the national intelligence director and posting videos about how we're all going to die from nukes. Sending troops into Los Angeles, or responding to troops being sent into Los Angeles. Being disinvited from picnics. On a programming note, your regular Surge author will be out through Labor Day. For the next couple of months, Ben Mathis-Lilley will be authoring the newsletter, and he loves receiving unconstructive criticism in the form of email. As for this week: Where else to begin but with the latest 10-second clip of democratic backsliding! This week, some people protested Immigration and Customs Enforcement raids in Los Angeles, and the Trump administration responded by sending in thousands of California National Guard members, along with hundreds of Marines. It was an intentionally disproportionate and escalatory response, all to scratch an anti-immigrant, anti-leftist itch that top policy adviser Stephen Miller and 'border czar' Tom Homan have had for years. By Thursday, here's how things were going: While stepping into a press conference with figurehead Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, California Sen. Alex Padilla was physically removed from the room by federal agents when he began to ask her questions, then he was dropped to the ground and handcuffed. It was the week in a microcosm: normal politics—protest, even 'disrespectful' protest—met with showy force. Padilla meant to secure news clips of himself protesting Noem. This is something politicians do to call attention to a problem in their communities. Members of Noem's team took the bait and then some, because they are goons, and the administration seems to think goonism is a strong political posture in the abstract. Clips of it in practice, though, aren't so endearing. The California governor wants to be president so badly, but he hasn't quite figured out how to present himself. Laden with decades of baggage, Gavin Newsom has been hosting a podcast trying to sound himself out but hasn't landed on an answer. So while we're not going to say that Newsom has enjoyed Trump getting up in his state's business, it does seem to have focused his mind and given him the opportunity to serve as Trump's chief antagonist. He's managed that role well. He's mocked Trump's mental capacity, saying that 'he is not the same person that I dealt with just four years ago, and he's incapable of even a train of thought' and that he 'doesn't even know what day it is.' He described Trump's military parade in D.C. as a 'vulgar display of weakness' that you see 'with dictators around the world that are weak and just want to demonstrate strength, weakness masquerading as strength, to fete the dear leader on his birthday.' He even continued: 'What an embarrassment. Honestly, … that's about as small as it gets. How weak.' Trump, for his part, has an unusually manic posture toward Newsom, describing him alternately as 'Gavin Newscum' and 'a nice guy.' This is what codependency looks like. Donald Trump obviously loves sending in troops to a city full of libs and deporting people. But he doesn't quite share Miller's ideological fervor for ridding America of multiculturalism as the ultimate end goal. Trading economic growth for fewer Spanish-speaking people within the country is a deal Miller might take. Trump might not. So much of what Trump thinks in the moment is dependent on the most recent person he talked to. And there was one post of his this week making it clear he'd just talked to a business owner or two. 'Our great Farmers and people in the Hotel and Leisure business have been stating that our very aggressive policy on immigration is taking very good, long time workers away from them, with those jobs being almost impossible to replace,' he wrote. 'In many cases the Criminals allowed into our Country by the VERY Stupid Biden Open Borders Policy are applying for those jobs. This is not good. We must protect our Farmers, but get the CRIMINALS OUT OF THE USA. Changes are coming!' Are changes coming? Nothing's happened yet. But the 'mass deportation' program may not last long if Trump can't stomach the economic consequences. The libertarian-minded Kentucky senator is not on tremendous terms with the White House. He has opposed the GOP megabill since its inception, specifically citing its $5 trillion debt-limit increase (its best provision, the Surge would say) as the reason why he'd vote against it. He also chairs the committee overseeing the bill's proposed expansion of the southern border wall, and he wants to give the administration much less money for it than the White House is requesting. His unwillingness to bend has subjected him to occasional ridicule from Trump and a relentless barrage of attacks from Miller and other right-wing media influencers. Rand Paul had taken it in stride until Wednesday, when the White House told him that he and his family wouldn't be welcome at Thursday's annual congressional picnic. Paul ranted against the 'petty vindictiveness' of the move, how 'the level of immaturity is beyond words,' how he had lost 'a lot of respect' for Trump, and how it wouldn't stop him. He also took a shot at Miller, accusing him of directing a smear campaign against him and of being someone who 'casually would throw out parts of the Constitution and suspend habeas corpus.' By Thursday morning, Trump posted that 'of course Senator Rand Paul and his beautiful wife and family' were invited, and that he looked forward to talking to him there. It sounds, then, like the disinvitation was originally directed by his staff, not Trump himself—and we have a pretty good guess as to which staffer directed it. Only someone with a net worth of $400 billion would think that he can imply that the president is a pedophile one week and return to being his buddy the next. After last week's blow-up with Trump, Elon Musk reportedly saw the error of his ways. He deleted a number of his posts from the previous week, including the one saying that Trump was named in the Jeffrey Epstein files and the one endorsing Trump's impeachment. He spoke with Vice President J.D. Vance 'about a path to a truce,' and by late Monday night, Trump took a phone call with Musk. Who knows how that conversation went, but on Wednesday, at 3:04 in the goddamn ante meridiem, Musk posted: 'I regret some of my posts about President @realDonaldTrump last week. They went too far.' Trump, publicly, isn't saying much about the whole episode, having successfully diverted public attention away from the embarrassing feud by ordering the military to invade Los Angeles. It's been an interesting few years for this Tennessee Republican U.S. representative. Mark Green announced in early 2024 that he wouldn't run for reelection, saying, 'Our country—and our Congress—is broken beyond most means of repair,' but later changed his mind and ran. Later that year, we learned that it was actually his marriage that was broken beyond most means of repair, with his then wife claiming that 'Satan' had taken over Green (he wanted a divorce after having an affair with a 32-year-old reporter). In any event, he won his race and returned to Washington for another term as chair of the Homeland Security Committee. This week, Green announced that he would retire midterm—as soon as the reconciliation bill was done—after he was 'offered an opportunity in the private sector that was too exciting to pass up.' But he's refused to say what that opportunity is. According to NOTUS, though, 'Green has been pitching people on a foreign business opportunity in South America,' specifically in Guyana—where the money grows on trees. Per NOTUS, Green was actually in Guyana on the Monday when his retirement decision was announced. Is it maybe a bit unethical for a member to be working on business deals in a foreign country, and potentially pitching business execs, while he's still in public office occupying an important position? Yes. But are there rules in this dumb country anymore? No. Tulsi Gabbard is no longer an ex–member of Congress who just posts weird stuff. She is now a national intelligence director who still posts weird stuff. This week, she released a spooky video! 'As we stand here today, closer to the brink of nuclear annihilation than ever before, political elite warmongers are carelessly fomenting fear and tensions between nuclear powers,' she said, as A.I. slop images of nuclear waste and fire are shown behind her. 'It's up to us, the people, to speak up and demand an end to this madness. We must reject this path to nuclear war and work toward a world where no one has to live in fear of a nuclear holocaust.' What the hell is this? Why do 'the people' have to do this stuff? We've got other stuff to do. You, the government official, prevent the nuclear holocaust—and not just by giving Russia everything! Ooh, is that too hard? Figure it out. In general, over the next few months, we're asking everyone—you, us, Tulsi Gabbard, Stephen Miller, everyone—to cut it out. Enough with the funny business. Stop futzing around in Guyana. Invite Rand Paul to your picnics. Get your militaries out of Los Angeles. Don't post weird videos. Don't post anything. Stop it. Have a happy summer!
