Madurai has 38,000 stray dogs, shows corporation census
MADURAI: There are over 38,000 stray dogs in Madurai city, according to the results of the dog census released by the Madurai City Municipal Corporation on Tuesday.
Compared to the data revealed by the civic body to an RTI query filed by TNIE, the number is at least 15,000 less. According to the RTI reply, there were 47,573 stray dogs as per 2012 census and 53,826 dogs as per 2020 census.
Stray dog menace has been one of the major issues raised across the city. According to health department sources, on an average 1,200 to 1,500 dog bite cases are reported within the city limits. The city corporation carried out stray dog census in the city between 17 - 23 March 2025 to ascertain the exact numbers. A private firm was engaged to scientifically survey all 100 wards three times. The corporation released the results of the census on Tuesday.
As per the results, the number of stray dogs in all 100 Wards is 32,755 with a 95% confidence interval ranging from 27,162 to 38,348 dogs. While activists said the numbers are inaccurate, corporation officials attributed the dip in numbers to several factors. Dr P Indira, city health officer of Madurai city corporation said ,
"In the earlier census, the number of stray dogs were calculated based on a random basis which could have been inaccurate. However, at present the city corporation carried out the census in a scientific manner where every dog sighting was documented properly. It is accurate.
The private firm which conducted the study has conducted stray census in various other corporations in Tamil Nadu. Based on the survey reports the city corporation will devise plans to address the stray dog issues in the city."
Also, she said many dogs may have died during Covid pandemic as people remained indoors due to the lockdown and hence could not feed the animals.
Census result
Total number of stay dogs in the city: 38,348
Dog abundance: 7.26 dogs per km
Dog density: 54.17 dogs per km2
Overall sterilization/ Neuter coverage: 12%
Human:dog ratio: 58.36 (1.71 dips per 100 humans)
RTI data
Stray Dog population in Madurai city
2012: 47,573 dogs
2022: 53,826 dogs
Source: City Corporation
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Indian Express
19 hours ago
- New Indian Express
Kakatiya-era sculpture of warriors unearthed in Telangana's Polasa
JAGTIAL: A rare sculpture dating back to the Kakatiya period, depicting two warriors locked in horseback combat, came to light following the recent rains in Polasa village, about seven kilometres from the Jagtial district headquarters. Villagers discovered the half-buried artefact under a bush near Sri Poulastheswara Swamy temple during their early morning farm work on Monday. The partially damaged stone shows a warrior overpowering another in battle. Speaking to TNIE, historian Sankepalli Nagendra Sharma urged the government to initiate excavations in the area, stating, 'There is a treasure trove of history buried here. The sculpture belongs to the Kakatiya period. Further excavation will reveal valuable insights for future generations.' Assistant archaeologist S Raviteja told TNIE that the region, especially Polasa, is rich in historical remnants, many of which date back to the 11th century and could be linked to the Kakatiya dynasty. 'Polasa has seen the rule of several dynasties, including the Chalukyas and Kakatiyas.' An inscription was found etched on the stone beside the sculpture. Though the script appears faded, early observations suggest it could be in Devanagari, although this is yet to be confirmed. Nagendra Sharma said they have informed the epigraphy department, which will ascertain the excavation and provide a detailed report. 'We will visit the site to study and attempt to decipher the script,' Raviteja said. In 2021, research scholar Pyata Srilatha of Potti Sreeramulu Telugu University presented a paper identifying Polasa as once being the capital of Polavasadesa, ruled by chiefs affiliated with the Rashtrakutas. The village still bears ruins of ancient temples, sculptures and a mud fort with a surviving moat. (With inputs from Akhil Kumar)
Indian Express
20 hours ago
- Indian Express
Only 7% of target area under DSR behind water-saving method's slow growth, a big roadblock: free power
Punjab has brought 14,574 hectares (ha) under direct-seeded rice (DSR) by June 5, way below the target of 2.02 lakh hectares (5-lakh acres) it has set for this year. Last year, 1.02 lakh hectares (2.53 lakh acres) were under DSR, against the target of 2.83 lakh hectares (7 lakh acres). Despite being promoted for the past over a decade by the state government and the Punjab Agricultural University (PAU), the area under DSR — a cultivation method in which paddy seeds are planted directly into the soil, while doing away with the traditional preparing of nurseries and then transplanting the saplings — has remained marginal making for a fraction of the total area under paddy. This year's target of 2.02 lakh hectares under DSR makes for only 6 per cent of the total expected area under paddy. Soil texture the key According to PAU, approximately 80% of Punjab's land is suitable for DSR. The state has about 25% heavy-textured soil, 55% medium-textured, and 20% light-textured soil. Heavy and medium-textured soil — richer in clay and lower in sand — are most suitable for DSR. These soil types are well distributed in state — Majha region has a higher proportion of heavy-textured soil, Doaba predominantly has medium to heavy soils, and Malwa contains a mix of all three. Farmers are generally aware of their soil types. Yet after years of training, promotion, and incentives — such as the Rs 1,500 per acre offered by the government and claims by progressive farmers who say they have recorded 3–5% higher yield compared to traditional methods — DSR has not seen broader adoption. DSR over the years The cultivation method was formally recommended in 2010. In the first two years, only a select few farmers adopted DSR, bringing a few hundred hectares under it. The method began to gain traction in 2012, with 8,922 hectares (22,037 acres) under DSR. The following three years saw steady growth: 38,900 hectares (96,083 acres) in 2013, 1.15 lakh hectares (2,84,050 acres) in 2014, and 1.65 lakh hectares (4,07,550 acres) in 2015. However, its popularity waned due to a lack of technical knowledge. Many farmers faced yield losses because they were unaware of soil suitability, nutrient deficiencies, and weed control. As a result, the area under DSR shrank: 19,660 hectares in 2016; 9,440 hectares in 2017; 6,200 hectares in 2018; and 23,300 hectares in 2019. A labour shortage, triggered by Covid-19 induced lockdowns in 2020, pushed DSR adoption with area under it expanding to over 5 lakh hectares — about 18% of the total area under paddy. It further expanded to 5.62 lakh hecatres the next year, which witnessed the second wave of Covid-19. The surge, however, was short-lived. In subsequent years, the area declined again: 69,230 hecatres (1.71 lakh acres) in 2022, 70,040 hectares (1.73 lakh acres) in 2023, and 1,02,429 hectares (2.53 lakh acres) in 2024. Stumbling blocks to adoption While discussions often focus on technical issues such as soil type or lack of knowledge about the technique, one of the biggest and yet the one of the most under-discussed barrier remains the free power policy for agricultural tube wells. Punjab has close to 14 lakh agriculture tubewells. The state is estimated to spend Rs 20,500 crore on power subsidies in 2025-26 fiscal. Of this, Rs 10,000 crore will go towards the farming sector, the subsidy bill being the highest for any category. This subsidy, while intended to ease the financial burden of farmers, has taken a huge toll on the ground water. DSR, which does not require flood irrigation during sowing, need the first irrigation around three weeks after seeding. This method helps save approximately 15–20% of water compared to the traditional puddled transplanting of rice (PTR). According to PAU, the traditional method consumes between 3,500 to 4,125 litres of water to produce just one kilogram of rice, depending on the variety. However, with irrigation effectively free due to subsidised electricity, farmers have little economic incentive to adopt a more water-efficient technique like DSR. In traditional puddling, farmers often over-irrigate, flooding fields excessively because they bear no cost for power or water. DSR, by contrast, demands carefully timed irrigation and efficient water management, making it economically less attractive under current conditions. Dr MS Bhullar, Principal Agronomist at PAU and head of the team that developed the DSR technique, said, 'The tar-wattar technique (as DSR is known) not only saves water but also labour and time, maturing 7–10 days earlier and easing post-harvest straw management. Yet, despite these benefits, most of the paddy area in Punjab is still cultivated through the puddling method'. Experts argue that unless the free electricity policy is revisited, DSR — and other water-saving practices — will face an uphill battle. Free power has encouraged groundwater over-extraction and locked Punjab into water-intensive paddy farming. 'The current flat-rate incentive structure does not encourage long-term change. When water and power are free, why invest in DSR equipment or adopt a technique requiring greater precision and planning,' asked an expert. Soil suitability only part of the story Technical barriers such as low yield on light soil, iron deficiency in the Upper table soil, and weed issues are real. DSR performs poorly on sandy soil that doesn't retain moisture well and in areas lacking plant-available iron, leading to yield losses. Such experiences have caused many farmers to abandon DSR after initial trials. 'The larger issue, however, is structural and policy-driven. Even in areas with ideal soil (Majha, Doaba, and parts of Malwa), adoption remains low. This indicates that while technical challenges exist, they don't fully explain the resistance,' said an expert. What needs to change Beyond awareness drives, Punjab must reconsider its free power policy. A gradual shift to metered electricity or direct cash transfers could encourage more responsible water use without politically alienating farmers. Incentives should be targeted, not flat-rate, based on soil suitability, proper training, and long-term adoption. Mandatory training supported by real-time technical assistance and comprehensive soil testing is essential to prevent failures that damage DSR's credibility. Farmers need full-cycle handholding, from sowing to harvest. As a senior PAU scientist, requesting anonymity, said:'The lukewarm response to DSR is not simply a matter of ignorance, unsuitable soil, or traditional preferences. At its core lies a deeper economic contradiction: a method designed to save water cannot succeed in a system where water costs nothing. Unless the state revisits its approach to free electricity for agriculture and aligns its incentives accordingly, both DSR and the broader effort to reduce paddy area in Punjab will continue to falter'
New Indian Express
a day ago
- New Indian Express
Safety compromised? Second ship mishap in two weeks raises concerns
KOCHI: Two weeks after MSC Elsa 3 sank into the depths of the Arabian Sea around 14.6 nautical miles off the Kerala coast, the state's coastal waters have witnessed another mishap involving a container ship. Wan Hai 503, a Singapore-flagged vessel that set sail from Colombo on June 7 to its next port of call, Nhava Shara in Mumbai, encountered a massive fire on board after an explosion in one of the containers. While four crew members went missing and five others sustained burns, the incident raises many questions regarding maritime safety, precautionary measures while transporting hazardous cargo, and shipping of undeclared or misdeclared cargo. 'Apart from polluting the marine environment, these incidents have brought humiliation to our maritime sector,' former Coast Guard director general Prabhakaran Paleri told TNIE. 'After the MSC Elsa 3 incident, there was total confusion on the procedure to follow during such accidents. We should have a contingency plan. DG (Directorate General) Shipping, Kerala government, and the Kerala Maritime Board should work in coordination.' He said the government should form an inquiry commission to look into various aspects of the incident.
