South Koreans head to the polls to choose president
South Koreans head to the polls to choose president
A woman casts her vote at a polling station in Seoul. Photo: AFP
Millions of South Koreans are voting on Tuesday for a new president in a snap election triggered by the ouster of Yoon Suk Yeol, a conservative who now faces an explosive trial on rebellion charges over his short-lived imposition of martial law in December.
Pre-election surveys suggested Yoon's liberal rival, Lee Jae-myung, appeared headed for an easy win, riding on deep public frustration over the conservatives in the wake of Yoon's martial law debacle.
The main conservative candidate, Kim Moon Soo, has struggled to win over moderate, swing voters as his People Power Party remains in a quagmire of internal feuding over how to view Yoon's actions.
The winning candidate will immediately be sworn in as president on Wednesday for a single, full term of five years without the typical two-month transition period. The new president will face major challenges including a slowing economy, US President Donald Trump's America-first policies and North Korea's evolving nuclear threats.
The election commission says voting began at 6 am at 14,295 polling stations nationwide that will close at 8 pm. Observers say the winner could emerge as early as midnight. (AP)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South China Morning Post
2 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
South Korea's new leader faces tightrope act between US alliance and stronger China ties
Hours after Lee Jae-myung was sworn in as the president of South Korea early on Wednesday, Chinese President Xi Jinping extended a congratulatory message, emphasising that China placed 'great importance' on strengthening ties with its neighbour amid an increasingly uncertain global landscape. During his campaign, Lee pledged to repair strained ties with China and North Korea and underscored China's role as a vital trading partner. Analysts predicted more stable China-South Korea relations to come, saying Lee's foreign policy would be marked by 'pragmatism', flexibility and economic urgency – a departure from former president Yoon Suk-yeol, who steered the country to align more with the United States. However, diplomatic observers also cautioned that any improvement might be constrained by South Korea's delicate position within two 'triangles': the China-South Korea-Japan dynamic and the South Korea-Japan-US alliance. They said his ambition to maintain a balanced approach between Beijing and Washington would still be tested. Da Zhigang, researcher at the Institute of Northeast Asian Studies at the Heilongjiang Provincial Academy of Social Sciences, said Lee was likely to seek a more 'balanced and flexible' approach to China that pursued South Korean domestic interests, compared with Yoon's more ideological and nationalistic approach. Yoon joined initiatives such as the Chip 4 Alliance – a coalition of the US, Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan aimed at reducing dependence on mainland China for semiconductor supply chains.
RTHK
8 hours ago
- RTHK
Hang Seng Index ends up, in line with regional markets
Hang Seng Index ends up, in line with regional markets The Hang Seng Index ended the day up 141 points, or 0.6 percent, at 23,654. File photo: RTHK Shares extended a global rise on Wednesday following data indicating the US economy remained resilient, with South Korean equities and the won standing out as the election of a new president ended months of political paralysis. In Hong Kong, the benchmark Hang Seng Index ended the day up 141.54 points, or 0.6 percent, at 23,654.03 The Hang Seng China Enterprises Index rose 0.67 percent to end at 8,576.75 while the Hang Seng Tech Index rose 0.57 percent to end at 5,219.02. In the mainland, Chinese stocks closed higher, with the benchmark Shanghai Composite Index up 0.42 percent to 3,376.20. The Shenzhen Component Index closed 0.87 percent higher at 10,144.58 The ChiNext Index, tracking China's Nasdaq-style board of growth enterprises, gained 1.11 percent to close at 2,024.93. Speculation that President Xi Jinping and his US counterpart, Donald Trump, will speak this week stoked optimism for a soothing of US-China tensions, though Trump indicated in a social media post his counterpart was "hard to make a deal with". The US leader's ramped-up tariffs on aluminium and steel imports – announced on Friday – kicked in on Wednesday, highlighting the uncertainty caused by the White House's off-the-cuff policies. Traders in Asia took the baton from a positive Wall Street, where all three main indices were lifted by data showing US job openings unexpectedly rose in April, calming worries about the impact of Trump's tariff blitz on the world's number one economy. In Seoul, South Korean shares ended the day at their highest levels in 10 months, as liberal presidential candidate Lee Jae-myung's election victory raised hopes of swift economic stimulus policies and market reforms. The benchmark Kospi jumped 2.66 percent to 2,770.84, posting its biggest daily gain in nearly two months and closing at the highest level since August 1, 2024. Japanese stocks snapped a three-session skid after the yen weakened and hopes rose for a potential Sino-US trade deal that could reopen the technology markets with China. The benchmark Nikkei 225 Index closed 0.8 percent higher, while the broader Topix added 0.5 percent. Gainers outnumbered decliners on the Nikkei, with 138 stocks advancing versus 82 ending in the red. (AFP/Xinhua)
Asia Times
9 hours ago
- Asia Times
Lee Jae-myung takes the helm of a fractured and unmoored Korea
As Lee Jae-myung assumes South Korea's presidency after a decisive electoral victory, the left-leaning leader inherits not just a nation beset by economic distress and political fatigue but a region tilting precariously toward geostrategic recalibration. North Korea, often the most volatile player in this theater, has reason to quietly celebrate. For Pyongyang, the return of a progressive president in the Blue House is the best possible outcome short of Korean reunification on its own terms. Under conservative administrations—especially the now-impeached Yoon Suk Yeol—the North faced a hardline security posture, expanded joint military drills between the US and South Korea, and the near-collapse of any meaningful diplomatic dialogue. Yoon's flirtation with Japan on trilateral military coordination, his vocal hawkishness and alignment with Washington's China containment strategy further agitated the North. Lee, while no apologist for the North, has signaled an openness to resuming inter-Korean dialogue, humanitarian aid and economic cooperation projects. These preferences echo the Sunshine Policy-era instincts of earlier progressive leaders like Kim Dae-jung and Roh Moo-hyun, under whom North Korea was able to leverage peace overtures for both material gain and diplomatic legitimacy. For North Korean leader Kim Jong Un, Lee's victory is not just breathing space—it is a new strategic opening. Even modest overtures from Seoul could be used to pressure Washington into easing sanctions, to portray the North as a willing partner in peace and to sow division between the US and South Korea on policy direction. North Korea thrives not in alignment, but in asymmetry. Lee's presidency, therefore, offers precisely that: a fragmented strategic environment ripe for manipulation. China, too, has reasons to be quietly pleased. While Beijing publicly maintains a policy of non-interference, its preference for left-leaning South Korean governments is no secret. The conservative Yoon administration had drawn South Korea deeper into Washington's Indo-Pacific strategy, even hinting at South Korea's involvement in supply chain 'friend-shoring' that would exclude China. Lee, by contrast, has voiced skepticism about the over-militarization of regional diplomacy and hinted at recalibrating Seoul's strategic autonomy. His emphasis on economic revival, job creation and technological innovation aligns with Beijing's vision of a less confrontational regional order. Additionally, Lee's expected moderation on issues like Taiwan and the South China Sea—compared to Yoon's vocally pro-US stance—will make him more acceptable to Chinese policymakers. From Beijing's perspective, the best scenario is a South Korea that remains allied to the US in security terms but is economically interdependent with China and politically wary of strategic entrapment. Lee's presidency will likely fit that mold. Still, Lee's mandate is far from stable in a deeply polarized South Korea. Yoon's impeachment followed months of unrest, accusations of executive overreach and the final misstep of invoking martial law, which many South Koreans interpreted as a grave assault on democracy. Lee's victory represents a public demand for change, but not necessarily a blank check. His own reputation is under scrutiny. Accusations of corruption during his tenure as mayor of Seongnam and governor of Gyeonggi province still linger despite his denials. Legal proceedings will continue, casting a shadow over his presidency. The economy, too, is teetering. South Korea's projected 0.8% GDP growth in 2025 is alarming for a nation that once epitomized go-go economic development. A toxic mix of youth unemployment, housing unaffordability and stagnant wages has bred cynicism among younger voters—many of whom backed Lee not out of loyalty, but frustration. And then there is the healthcare crisis. The mass resignation of junior doctors over medical school reform—aimed at solving a looming doctor shortage—has left hospitals understaffed. Lee must broker a truce between a defiant medical establishment and a public desperate for accessible care. If mishandled, this issue could unravel his domestic credibility faster than any foreign policy stumble. Lee's most treacherous challenge will be in foreign affairs. His task is nothing less than redefining South Korea's role in a region fractured by US-China rivalry, destabilized by a bellicose North Korea and overshadowed by global economic fragmentation. Lee must recalibrate Seoul's policy toward Pyongyang without undermining deterrence. Missile provocations, cyberattacks and nuclear brinkmanship by the North will not abate simply because of Lee's willingness to engage. Any dialogue must be carefully constructed within the framework of UN Security Council sanctions and regional consensus. Kim Jong Un is likely to test Lee early—perhaps with a missile launch or a cyber operation—to assess whether conciliatory rhetoric translates into policy leniency. Lee must respond decisively enough to preserve domestic confidence, yet not so aggressively that he forecloses future dialogue. To be sure, President Donald Trump's return to power complicates Lee's balancing act. Trump has already demanded greater defense spending from allies and suggested reducing America's 28,500-strong troop presence in South Korea unless Seoul pays more. These transactional instincts run counter to the institutionalism that undergirds the US-ROK alliance. Lee must navigate these pressures without appearing submissive to Washington or vulnerable to Pyongyang. Managing the Combined Forces Command relationship and the extended deterrence commitment—especially nuclear—will require cool-headed and consistent diplomacy. Lee must also resist any impulse by Trump to weaponize trade, tariffs or technology against South Korea's economy. China, while economically vital, is diplomatically assertive. South Korea's THAAD deployment in 2016 led to punitive economic retaliation by Beijing, a wound still felt in the Korean tourism, retail and entertainment sectors. Mostly, Lee must avoid being drawn into a binary US-China choice. Instead, his administration should promote a 'strategic pivotal power diplomacy'—partnering more actively with ASEAN, with which Seoul enjoys a Comprehensive Strategic Partnership, allowing it to join minilateral forums such as the Mekong-Korea, and supporting multilateral digital governance that reduces dependence on either pole. These moves will signal autonomy without antagonism. Lee enters the Blue House with high expectations but little margin for error. His presidency must be one of pragmatism without paralysis, engagement without appeasement and reform without rupture. For Pyongyang, Lee's rise represents an opportunity. For Beijing, it marks a welcome shift. But for Lee himself, this is a moment of great peril disguised as promise. His legacy will ultimately be judged not by rhetoric but by his ability to stabilize a wounded nation, navigate great-power rivalries and restore the democratic spirit South Koreans so recently took to the streets to protect. Phar Kim Beng, PhD, is professor of ASEAN Studies at the International Islamic University of Malaysia and a senior visiting fellow at the University of Cambridge.
