Vote to retain trans comment MSP risks undermining trust in Holyrood, say Tories
The Conservatives have said the vote to keep Maggie Chapman in her committee position 'risks undermining trust in Holyrood', after the Green MSP survived an attempt to oust her as deputy convener.
The motion to remove Ms Chapman as deputy convener of the Equalities Committee was defeated after the three SNP members on the committee backed her.
Conservative Supreme Court gender ruling made her position 'untenable'.
On April 16, the UK's highest court ruled the terms 'woman' and 'sex' in the Equality Act 2010 'refer to a biological woman and biological sex'.
During a subsequent transgender rights rally in Aberdeen, Ms Chapman had condemned what she called the 'bigotry, prejudice and hatred that we see coming from the Supreme Court'.
Other political leaders have said these remarks were wrong, while the Dean of the Faculty of Advocates branded them 'appalling'.
After Ms Chapman survived the committee vote on Tuesday morning, MSPs discussed the Supreme Court ruling in the chamber during the afternoon.
She said: 'Maggie Chapman has shown contempt for the rule of law and has brought the committee into disrepute.
'The SNP's decision to keep her in post on the committee risks undermining trust in Holyrood itself.'
Responding on behalf of the Government, Social Justice Secretary Shirley-Anne Somerville said: 'We respect the rule of law and we respect the judgment of the Supreme Court.
'It is important that everyone in this matter is aware of their tone and their temperament during this.
'It is very important that Scottish ministers do not take a view on what happens on a parliamentary committee, I think that is inappropriate for Government ministers to opine on such a matter.'
Ms White's motion was the first item of business when the Equalities Committee met on Tuesday.
It was supported by her Conservative colleague Pam Gosal and was eventually backed by Labour's Paul O'Kane – who first invited Ms Chapman to withdraw her remarks about the Supreme Court.
The motion fell after it was opposed by the three SNP MSPs on the committee – including convener Karen Adam – along with Ms Chapman herself.
The SNP's Marie McNair argued the committee could have no control on what members say in a personal capacity.
Ms Chapman attended the committee remotely on Tuesday, saying: 'I will not stop being a vocal trans ally.'
The Green MSP declined to apologise for her remarks, but said she would 'reflect and consider what people have said' at the meeting.
Following the meeting, she released a statement saying: 'I am grateful that the committee has rejected this motion and the attempt to remove me.
'I am also very grateful to the many trans and non-binary people and allies who have been in touch with me over the last two weeks to tell me their stories.
'It's been devastating to hear about the exclusion and prejudice they or their loved ones have faced, and how worried they are for the future.
'The focus should not be on me, it should be on the outcomes of the ruling and the serious threat that is being posed to the rights of trans and non-binary people.'
While Ms White's motion has been defeated, the Conservatives have indicated they will explore other ways to bring the matter before the full Parliament.
Even if the committee had agreed the motion, it would have to be approved in a vote of the full parliament before Ms Chapman could be removed from her position.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scottish Sun
3 hours ago
- Scottish Sun
John Swinney insists he will not quit despite Nats' Holyrood by-election disaster
The First Minister doesn't intend to resign after losing the formerly safe seat of Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse Going Nowhere Going Nowhere John Swinney insists he will not quit despite Nats' Holyrood by-election disaster JOHN Swinney yesterday insisted he will not quit despite Nats' Holyrood by-election disaster. The First Minister shrugged off calls from SNP grandees to resign after losing the formerly safe seat of Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse to Labour. 2 The First MInister did hint that a long-rumoured cabinet reshuffle is imminent Credit: PA 2 Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar accused Mr Swinney of pushing voters to Reform UK. Credit: Getty Former deputy leader Jim Sillars and ex-Cabinet minister Alex Neil urged him to end his year-long reign. But Mr Swinney claimed Nats are making 'real progress' on key policies. He said: 'Twelve months ago, the party turned to me at a moment of real jeopardy. "It asked me to use all my skills and experience to bring people together. 'We will win again.' But he did signal a long-rumoured cabinet reshuffle is imminent, saying: 'I'll have to look at the team.' And he failed to rule out a fresh coalition with Greens if the SNP fall well short of a majority at next year's Holyrood election, as polls suggest. Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar accused Mr Swinney of pushing voters to Reform UK. His deputy Jackie Baillie said: 'Far from steadying the ship, John Swinney has sailed the SNP into another iceberg.'
Scottish Sun
4 hours ago
- Scottish Sun
Nigel Farage U-turns on plan to scrap all MSPs and put Scottish MPs in Holyrood instead
The Reform UK leader once wanted a watered down parly when he bossed the Ukip party U-TURN Nigel Farage U-turns on plan to scrap all MSPs and put Scottish MPs in Holyrood instead Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) NIGEL Farage has U-turned on a plan to scrap all MSPs and put Scottish MPs in Holyrood instead. The Reform UK leader wanted a watered down parly when he bossed the Ukip party — but now concedes 'devolution is here to stay'. 1 Nigel Farage says devolution is here to stay Credit: Getty But he told The Scottish Sun: 'I don't think you can turn the clock back. We're not going to reverse devolution.' Mr Farage previously wanted to axe our parliament as we know it and put Scotland's Westminster politicians in there when they decide on Scottish-only matters. Reform surged to third in last week's Hamilton by-election — fewer than 1,500 votes behind winners Labour. Farage — bookies' favourite to be the next PM — hit out at 'excesses of the Scottish Parliament' such as whopping construction costs and 'the fact that it's really failed quite badly to deliver on some of its key objectives — education in particular, and health'. He said: 'The job now is to make sure it's done better.' Reform grabbed 26.1 per cent of the vote last week, the SNP 29.4 per cent and Labour 31.6 per cent. Farage's party is tipped to grab at least a dozen MSPs at the 2026 election — but has been criticised for a lack of devolved policies. Asked how his party would spend £10billion if they had power in Scotland, Mr Farage said: 'What about creating money? What about creating wealth and jobs? What about upping the average income of people living in Scotland? That's my priority.' Reform has published a one-page, 200-word 'position paper' which states: 'We have a vision where personal liberty and free speech are respected and promoted, support is available when needed, but life is largely untrammelled by government interference.' It also plugs 'traditional Scottish values' like 'integrity, thrift, hard work and tolerance'. Dark curse ravaging 'UK's best high street' On independence, it says Scotland should stay as a 'full and respected member of the UK
The National
4 hours ago
- The National
Farage's proposal is just the latest undermining of the Barnett system
This, according to senior criminologists and ex-police officers, is not just a failure of admin, it's the result of austerity-era cuts that stripped police forces of capacity, dismantled the state-run Forensic Science Service in 2012, and left fragmented, underfunded systems to cope with ballooning evidence demands. Austerity didn't just weaken institutions; it disassembled infrastructure. READ MORE: Nigel Farage could cut the Barnett Formula. Here's what devolution experts think of that While these failings may seem like an English and Welsh concern, they tell a broader UK-wide story. Because when public services are cut in England, the Barnett formula translates those cuts into reduced budget allocations for Holyrood, too. Scotland has long borne the dual burden of being denied full fiscal autonomy while also seeing its devolved budget squeezed by decisions made for entirely different priorities south of the Border. Cuts to police, criminal courts, housing, public health, and local government in England have systematically eroded the spending floor on which Scottish services rest. So when justice collapses in England, it affects Scotland financially – even if the governance is separate. And now, against this backdrop of UK-wide budgetary degradation, Nigel Farage has called for the scrapping of the Barnett formula entirely. It's a move that's politically convenient, historically illiterate, and economically reckless. But more than anything, it's a distillation of what's already happening by stealth. Successive UK governments have undermined the foundations of the Barnett system – and devolution itself – for more than a decade. READ MORE: Furious Anas Sarwar clashes with BBC journalist over Labour policies It's obvious to every Scot that Farage's view relies on a mischaracterisation of Barnett as a subsidy, when in fact it simply ensures Scotland receives a proportional share of changes to spending in England for devolved services. It doesn't calculate entitlement or need, it mirrors policy shifts at Westminster. If England increases education or health spending, Scotland sees a relative uplift. If England cuts deeply, Scotland's budget falls, even if demand remains or rises. This has led to an absurd and punitive dynamic where Scotland loses funding not by its own decisions, but because England spends less. And when Scotland chooses to maintain higher standards in public services, it must do so from a proportionately smaller pot. Perversely, it doesn't stop there, though. Since the 2016 Brexit vote, Westminster has begun bypassing devolved governments directly. Funds like the Levelling Up Fund and Shared Prosperity Fund are allocated by UK ministers to local authorities, often bypassing Holyrood entirely. Promises made in The Vow on the eve of the 2014 independence referendum to deliver near-federal powers and respect Scottish decision-making have unravelled. READ MORE: SNP must turn support for independence into 'real political action' The Internal Market Act has overridden devolved laws under the banner of market 'consistency'. Powers that returned from Brussels in areas like food standards, procurement, and agriculture were supposed to go to Holyrood, but in many cases they were retained by Westminster. The Sewel Convention, once a safeguard of devolved consent, has been treated as optional. Farage's proposal to scrap Barnett isn't an outlier, it's the natural conclusion of a decade-long pattern: cut services in England, shrink the Barnett allocation, bypass devolved institutions, and then blame the devolved nations for 'taking more than their share'. There's no consideration of fairness, or implementation of a needs-based analysis, it's a strategy of erosion; one that gouges out the Union from the centre while draping itself in the flag. The failures of justice in England, catastrophic as they are, expose a deeper injustice: the systematic unravelling of the constitutional promises made to Scotland. Ron Lumiere via email
