logo
Trump defends US strikes on Iran as intelligence assessment stirs debate

Trump defends US strikes on Iran as intelligence assessment stirs debate

Irish Examiner6 hours ago

President Donald Trump has insisted that US strikes delivered a crushing blow to Iran's nuclear programme despite a preliminary American intelligence assessment suggesting that the assault inflicted only a marginal setback.
'This was a devastating attack, and it knocked them for a loop,' Mr Trump said as his administration deployed a phalanx of top officials to defend his claims that Iran's nuclear programme was 'completely and fully obliterated'.
US defence secretary Pete Hegseth said the leaked intelligence assessment, which said Iran suffered a delay of only a few months, was 'preliminary' and 'low confidence'.
President Donald Trump speaks during a media conference at the end of the Nato summit as secretary of state Marco Rubio, right, and defence secretary Pete Hegseth listen, in The Hague, Netherlands (Alex Brandon/AP)
US secretary of state Marco Rubio said the officials who disclosed the findings are 'professional stabbers'.
The White House pointed to a statement from the Israel Atomic Energy Commission that said Iran faced a setback of 'many years'.
Drawing reliable conclusions about the impact of the US strikes is difficult, making the issue a breeding ground for competing claims that could determine how American voters view Mr Trump's risky decision to join Israel's attacks on Iran.
Also at stake are Mr Trump's next steps in the Middle East, where diplomatic efforts could be required to prevent Iran from rebuilding its nuclear program.
Iran maintains that its atomic ambitions are for peaceful purposes, while US and Israeli leaders have described the country's nuclear programme as the precursor to obtaining a nuclear weapon.
One of the targets of the US attack was Fordo, where nuclear infrastructure is buried deep underground.
Damage at Fordo enrichment facility after strikes in Iran (Maxar Technologies via AP)
The Israeli commission said in a statement that the bombing 'rendered the enrichment facility inoperable'.
The statement was distributed by the White House and the office of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.
The American strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities, combined with Israeli strikes on other parts of Iran's military nuclear programme, have 'set back Iran's ability to develop nuclear weapons by many years', the statement said.
In addition, Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Esmail Baghaei told Al Jazeera that there was significant damage from US bombers.
'Our nuclear installations have been badly damaged, that's for sure,' he said.
The episode has triggered some of Mr Trump's longstanding vendettas against leaks and intelligence officials, who he has often viewed as a part of a 'deep state' dedicated to undermining his agenda.
He also lashed out at media outlets that reported on the classified assessment, describing them as 'scum' and 'disgusting'.
President Donald Trump dismissed media reports (Piroschka Van De Wouw, Pool Photo via AP)
Mr Trump said questioning the effectiveness of the strikes was disrespectful to the military, which flew stealth bombers halfway around the world to attack the nuclear facilities with weapons designed to penetrate deep underground.
The reports, he said, were 'very unfair to the pilots, who risked their lives for our country'.
One critical question is whether enriched uranium, which could be developed into fuel for a nuclear bomb, was moved out of facilities before the US strikes.
'I believe they didn't have a chance to get anything out, because we acted fast,' Mr Trump said.
He added that 'it's very hard to move that kind of material, and very dangerous'.
Classified briefings for legislators, originally scheduled for Tuesday, are now expected to take place on Thursday and Friday.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Comparing US Iran strike to Hiroshima, Trump plays down US intelligence report
Comparing US Iran strike to Hiroshima, Trump plays down US intelligence report

Irish Examiner

time39 minutes ago

  • Irish Examiner

Comparing US Iran strike to Hiroshima, Trump plays down US intelligence report

US President Donald Trump compared the impact of American strikes on Iranian nuclear sites to the end of World War Two on Wednesday, arguing that the damage was severe even though available intelligence reports were inconclusive. His comments followed reports from several media outlets on Tuesday revealing that the US Defense Intelligence Agency had assessed that the strikes had set back Iran's nuclear program by just a few months, despite Trump and administration officials saying it had been obliterated. The intelligence was . . . very inconclusive," Trump told reporters at a NATO summit on Wednesday while meeting with Secretary General Mark Rutte. "The intelligence says, 'We don't know, it could have been very severe'. That's what the intelligence says. So I guess that's correct, but I think we can take the 'we don't know.' It was very severe. It was obliteration." This satellite photo from Planet Labs PBC shows Iran's Natanz nuclear site near Natanz, Iran, on April 14, 2023. File Picture: Planet Labs PBC via AP The Trump administration has not disputed that the DIA assessment exists, but Trump described it as preliminary. In a series of at-times testy exchanges at a press conference later in the day, Trump sharply criticized journalists for their reporting on the assessment. This ended a war in a different way He suggested the reports were an attack against the pilots who flew the bombing mission over the weekend targeting Iran's key nuclear sites. Trump said the US strikes were responsible for ending the war between Israel and Iran. "When you look at Hiroshima, if you look at Nagasaki, that ended a war, too," Trump said, referring to a pair of US nuclear strikes on Japan in 1945 that essentially ended World War II. "This ended a war in a different way." Success of Iran strikes critical for Trump Trump has an uneasy relationship with the US intelligence community, and the success of the strikes is politically critical to him. His right-leaning supporters had argued loudly beforehand that such military intervention was inconsistent with Trump's domestic-focused "Make America Great Again" agenda and his promise to avoid foreign entanglements. Trump has countered by insisting that Iran must never be allowed to obtain a nuclear weapon - a goal that an accurate, decisive attack would support. He was flanked at both appearances by Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, who also cast doubt on the reliability of the DIA assessment. Hegseth in particular cast much of his fury at the news media. US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth. Picture: AP Photo/Alex Brandon "When you actually look at the report - by the way, it was a top secret report - it was preliminary, it was low-confidence," Hegseth said in the appearance alongside Rutte. "This is a political motive here." He said the FBI was investigating a potential leak. Rubio suggested that those responsible for sharing the report had mischaracterized it, saying: "This is the game they play." - Retuers Read More Nato commits to higher spending sought by Trump and mutual defence

Trump meets Zelensky and says higher Nato spending may deter future aggression
Trump meets Zelensky and says higher Nato spending may deter future aggression

Irish Examiner

time39 minutes ago

  • Irish Examiner

Trump meets Zelensky and says higher Nato spending may deter future aggression

US President Donald Trump has met with Ukrainian leader Volodymyr Zelensky on the sidelines of the Nato summit and suggested that increased spending by the transatlantic alliance could help prevent future Russian aggression against its neighbours. Nato members agreed to raise their spending targets by 2035 to 5% of gross domestic product (GDP) annually on core defence requirements as well as defence- and security-related spending. That target had been 2% of GDP. 'Europe stepping up to take more responsibility for security will help prevent future disasters like the horrible situation with Russia and Ukraine,' Mr Trump said at the summit-ending news conference shortly after meeting with Mr Zelensky. 'And hopefully we're going to get that solved.' The US president also reiterated his belief that Russian President Vladimir Putin wants to end the war in Ukraine that began with Moscow's invasion in February 2022. 'He'd like to get out of this thing. It's a mess for him,' Mr Trump said. 'He called the other day, and he said, 'Can I help you with Iran?' I said, 'No, you can help me with Russia'.' Mr Trump's meeting with Mr Zelensky was their first face-to-face session since April when they met at St Peter's Basilica during Pope Francis's funeral. Mr Trump also had a major confrontation with Mr Zelensky earlier this year at the White House. Mr Zelensky, in a social media post, said The Hague talks were substantive and he thanked Mr Trump for the US assistance. 'We discussed how to achieve a ceasefire and a real peace. We spoke about how to protect our people. We appreciate the attention and the readiness to help bring peace closer,' Mr Zelensky added. Mr Trump left open the possibility of sending Kyiv more US-made Patriot air defence missile systems. Asked by a Ukrainian reporter, who said that her husband was a Ukrainian soldier, Mr Trump acknowledged that sending more Patriots would help the Ukrainian cause. 'They do want to have the antimissile missiles, OK, as they call them, the Patriots,' Mr Trump said. 'And we're going to see if we can make some available. We need them, too. We're supplying them to Israel, and, they're very effective, 100% effective. Hard to believe how effective. They do want that more than any other thing.' Over the course of the war, the US has routinely pressed for allies to provide air defence systems to Ukraine. But many are reluctant to give up the high-tech systems, particularly countries in Eastern Europe that also feel threatened by Russia. Mr Trump laid into the US media throughout his news conference but showed unusual warmth towards the Ukrainian reporter. 'That's a very good question,' Mr Trump said about the query about Patriots. 'And I wish you a lot of luck. I mean, I can see it's very upsetting to you. So say hello to your husband.' Ukraine has been front and centre at recent Nato summits. But as the alliance's latest annual meeting of leaders opened in the Netherlands, Mr Zelensky was not in the room. The Trump administration has blocked Ukraine's bid to join Nato. The conflict with Russia has laid waste to Ukrainian towns and killed thousands of civilians. Just last week, Russia launched one of the biggest drone attacks of the war. During Mr Trump's 2024 campaign for the White House, the Republican pledged a quick end to the war. He saw it as a costly conflict that, he claimed, would not have happened had he won re-election in 2020. Since taking office in January, he has struggled to find a resolution to the conflict and has shown frustration with both Mr Putin and Mr Zelensky. Mr Zelensky spent Tuesday in The Hague shuttling from meeting to meeting. He got a pledge from summit host the Netherlands for military aid, including new drones and radars to help knock out Russian drones. British Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer announced that the United Kingdom will provide 350 air defence missiles to Ukraine, funded by £70 million raised from the interest on seized Russian assets.

EU and US ‘knee deep' in talks to avert trade war, says McGrath
EU and US ‘knee deep' in talks to avert trade war, says McGrath

Irish Times

timean hour ago

  • Irish Times

EU and US ‘knee deep' in talks to avert trade war, says McGrath

The European Union's chief negotiators and their counterparts in the US are 'knee deep' in talks to avert a trade war , Ireland's EU commissioner Michael McGrath has said. Officials are involved in tense discussions to lay out the bare bones of a deal acceptable to both sides that would head off the crippling 50 per cent tariffs US president Donald Trump has threatened to levy on EU trade after a July 9th deadline . The EU wants tariffs charged on goods sold to the US to be 'zero or as low as possible', Mr McGrath said on Wednesday. 'It won't surprise anyone that negotiations are detailed, protracted and quite challenging.' A blanket 10 per cent levy on imports from the EU has been in place since early April. Mr Trump paused plans for higher tariffs on EU states and other trading partners following a backlash in the financial markets. READ MORE Officials in Brussels have privately begun to accept that a deal that avoids steeper tariff rates is likely to mean accepting 10 per cent import duties. 'We do not believe the tariffs are the solution, so we're not conceding that any particular level of tariff represents a new baseline, it's a negotiation which is ongoing,' Mr McGrath said. The former minister for finance said EU trade commissioner Maroš Šefčovič was 'knee deep' in talks with the Trump administration. A EU-US deal might not be fully worked out before Mr Trump's stated tariff deadline in two weeks' time, he said. 'It may not be possible to have the level of detail that you would normally have in a trade agreement completed by July 9th, but hopefully we can have the outline of an agreement that can provide the stability we need,' Mr McGrath said. The European Commission, the EU's executive arm that sets trade policy, was busy lining up trade deals with other countries, he said. However, those would never be enough to 'replace' the US, given it was Europe's biggest trading partner. [ EU readies retaliatory tariffs to secure better trade deal with Trump Opens in new window ] Separately, what was happening on the ground in Gaza was 'abhorrent and untenable', the EU commissioner for justice said. Thousands of trucks full of food and aid were blocked by Israel at the border, while images continued to emerge of Palestinian civilians who were 'clearly malnourished and emaciated', he said. The role of the commission when it came to foreign policy was often 'misunderstood', Mr McGrath said. The main obstacle to the EU taking firmer action against Israel was a lack of agreement between the EU's 27 national capitals. 'It isn't open to the commission to set a new position in relation to Israel and Gaza,' he said. 'Israel of course has the right to defend itself and has the right to respond to the horrific terrorist attack Hamas perpetrated on October 7th, [2023], but it has to do so in a manner that is consistent with international law,' Mr McGrath said. More than 55,000 Palestinians have been killed during Israel's 20-month invasion of Gaza, which followed attacks by Hamas militants in southern Israel, where about 1,200 people were killed and 250 taken hostage. International aid agencies continue to warn that Israel is blocking enough aid from getting into Gaza. Large numbers of people have been shot by Israeli forces while trying to pick up food and supplies at designated distribution points since Israel took over effective control of aid distribution in recent weeks. 'The international community has to work together to find a solution. We need an urgent ceasefire and we need the trucks that are waiting at the border to be allowed to enter Gaza,' Mr McGrath said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store