Lawmakers advance bill to raise price of Discover Pass
A bill that would raise the price of the Discover Pass is one step closer to becoming a reality.
On Thursday, lawmakers advanced Senate Bill 5390.
It passed into law, this would be the first time in 14 years that the price would increase.
The Discover Pass grants the holder unlimited access to over 100 state parks and other recreation sites.
The current cost is $30 annually.
SB 5390 would raise the price by 50% to $45.
Last week, the bill cleared the House Appropriations Committee on a 19-12 vote.
Day passes would remain $10 under the version of the bill that cleared the committee.
Revenue generated from Discover Passes helps keep the state's outdoor recreation sites open.
If passed into law, SB 5390 would take effect 90 days after the session adjourns on April 27.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
20 hours ago
- Yahoo
Rep. Lauren Boebert seeking $5m in federal funds to remove ‘toxic black sludge' from drinking water in tiny Colorado community
Colorado Republican Rep. Lauren Boebert visited a small community in Morgan County, in the eastern part of her state, promising to address a long-standing issue that has left locals with 'toxic black sludge' in place of clean drinking water. Boebert this week toured the Prairie View Ranch Water District, which lies 50 miles north of Denver, and told the residents: 'This is something that certainly needs to be addressed. I'm sorry it's been ignored for two decades. 'This is something that should upset and appall every single Coloradan.' To remedy the situation, she has pledged to ask the House Appropriations Committee for a $5 million grant to help overhaul the local water supply. Her request will be put before the committee later this month and, if it is approved, will then likely be folded into a larger appropriations bill that would have to pass through the House of Representatives and Senate before reaching President Donald Trump's desk for signing off. Boebert's office believes that could happen before the end of September, according to CBS News. Boebert has been notable in recent months over her outspoken support for Trump and Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), which has slashed federal budgets in a bid to reduce 'waste' expenditure and fraud. The Independent has reached out to Boebert's office for further comment. The water crisis in eastern Colorado has been in the making for almost 20 years, with the area's 150 residents saying they have been repeatedly let down by the people elected to protect them and left with houses that are worthless without reliable water. CBS reports that the Morgan County Board of County Commissioners allowed the district to be run as a for-profit private company for 16 years, a period during which the Colorado Division of Housing allegedly failed to stop unscrupulous developers from using an unregistered installer, using false credentials and faked signatures, to assemble houses and infrastructure on the cheap. The network adds that the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment's Water Quality Control Division failed to act for a decade after learning that the homes had been erected without valid state approval or proper regulatory oversight, resulting in contaminated water and widespread discontent. 'We have systems. We have policies. We have regulations that should never allow this, and it went by blind eyes and deaf ears,' resident Sam Belmonte told CBS. He challenged Colorado Attorney General Phil Weiser, a gubernatorial candidate, to follow Boebert's example and said he found her visit 'invigorating' after years of feeling ignored. 'It gave us some sense of hope that Congresswoman Boebert actually came,' Belmonte said. The representative left the site with a sample of the water, which she said she hopes to use to present to the House committee to persuade its members to hand over the funding. 'I'm happy to be here doing this but the state of Colorado should have stepped in years and years ago,' she said. 'Every Coloradan, every American, every person deserves clean drinking water. This is unacceptable.'
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
US Congress seeks to boost Navy and Air Force fleets in 2026 bill
By Mike Stone WASHINGTON (Reuters) -The House Appropriations Committee's Defense subcommittee released its draft bill for fiscal-year 2026 late on Tuesday, which aims to buy one additional F-35 jet versus the Pentagon's 2025 budget request and make investments in naval vessels, and missile defenses. The powerful committee's draft of its version of the 2026 purchasing bill was released ahead of any formal input from the Trump administration's Pentagon - which has been delayed. The language in the bill shows the Republican-controlled Congress' continued focus on modernizing the U.S. armed forces but sets up a tug of war with the Pentagon over what could be conflicting priorities. The bill, which still needs input from the full House and Senate, directs the Pentagon to buy 69 Lockheed Martin F-35 fighters for $8.5 billion, 15 Boeing KC-46 aerial refueling tankers for $2.7 billion, and three F-15EX aircraft for $345 million as well as $3.8 billion in funding for Northrop Grumman's B-21 stealth bomber program. The Pentagon's 2026 budget request, which has not been released, requests 47 F-35s, according to media reports. The Navy's non-fighter aviation procurement includes four E-2D Advanced Hawkeye aircraft for $1.2 billion and 19 CH-53K heavy transport helicopters for $2 billion. The bill also emphasizes missile defense, with approximately $13 billion to Missile Defense Agency and the Space Force program's support of the "Golden Dome" initiative. This money would be above the approximately $25 billion that Congress has earmarked for Golden Dome in its reconciliation bill. The committee's draft bill would also give military personnel a 3.8% increase in basic pay, effective January 1, 2026. The bill directs the Pentagon to procure 28 naval vessels, including two Virginia-class submarines made by General Dynamics at $6.2 billion. The Columbia-class submarine program would receive $5.3 billion. Both programs have additional funding for advance procurement underscoring the strategic importance of the United States' underwater fleet. Surface fleet additions would include two DDG-51 destroyers, refueling ships, towing and rescue ships and surveillance vessels.
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
House GOP K-12 budget targets DEI, wraps school meals, other programs into per-pupil funding
The Michigan House Appropriations Committee considers a Republican-introduced K-12 education budget. June 11, 2025 | Photo by Ben Solis Michigan House Republicans on Wednesday proposed one of the largest increases to per-pupil funding for public schools in years, but their Democratic colleagues argued that many key costs for school meal and at-risk programs would come out of classroom funding. It would also come with a 20% foundation allowance penalty if districts were noncomplaint with proposed boilerplate language prohibiting race, gender and DEI instruction or initiatives. That includes any curriculum that includes supposed race or gender 'stereotyping,' allowing transgender girls to participate in girls' sports or providing multistall unisex bathrooms. The school aid budget reported Wednesday by the House Appropriations Committee would allocate $21.9 billion with $69.9 million coming from the state's general fund, a 5.5% increase from last year's approved budget. Per-pupil funding in the House version of the school aid budget would be increased by $558 million gross funding to provide a $417 per-pupil increase, moving it to $10,025 per student. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX State Rep. Tim Kelly (R-Saginaw Township), chair of the House Appropriations Subcommittee on School Aid and Department of Education, said his subcommittee's budget aimed to redirect funds away from the 'expansion and explosion of categoricals' and to provide funding that Lansing Republicans felt was a 'more than adequate amount of money to provide a quality education to every Michigan student.' 'We are hoping to have the performance that our citizens demand,' Kelly said. State Rep. Ann Bollin (R-Brighton), chair of the House Appropriations Committee, said the House school aid budget proposed funding that was higher than the dollars proposed by Gov. Gretchen Whitmer in her executive recommendations released earlier this year and the Senate's version of the school aid bills passed months ago. The committee's Democratic members, however, said they had several concerns. State Rep. Natalie Price (D-Berkley) noted that the budget completely eliminates line item funding for the state's universal school meal program. Price said that when kids are hungry, they can't learn as well and do worse in school. 'I hear you saying that we want to improve education scores and we know this program has helped,' Price said. Kelly turned and asked Price if she had proof on whether school meals actually helped student performance, noting his belief that student performance was better before the universal school meal program was introduced. Price countered by noting that Kelly wanted to give districts the option on how they fund that program, but said that money will undoubtedly come out of classroom budgets, which she said would lead to lower test scores. Bollin again noted that the decision on how districts move forward with school meals would go back to them as opposed to Lansing bureaucrats. 'Nobody wants to see anybody go hungry,' Bollin said. State Rep. Donavan McKinney (D-Detroit) raised concerns about the cuts to at-risk funding. MKinney said without at-risk funding or afterschool programs, some children in impoverished areas with high crime would not even be attending class because their lives would be cut short outside of school walls. 'These programs saved my life as a child,' McKinney said before noting that the House school aid budget represents a major cut and completely zeros out funding for programs to help at-risk students. 'There's not a day that goes by that I don't hear a gunshot in my community. So what are we doing? And what are the considerations that you are taking to cut these programs?' Kelly was adamant that the school aid budget doesn't wrap up at-risk funding, but said House Republicans wanted to 'eliminate excuses, to try and provide as much as much money up front as we can to the classroom, the student, for the schools, to deliver what with think is a quality education.' 'We think it's adequately funded,' Kelly said. State Rep. Regina Weiss (D-Oak Park), who does not sit on the appropriations committee but appeared to testify in opposition to the budget bill, said she was alarmed to see a $2.5 billion hit in the House proposal to the school aid fund to fund other purposes, which she said is currently unknown because the House's general fund and other government spending budgets weren't yet completed. She mentioned the House Democrats school budget proposal released Tuesday as one that adjusts for inflation and offers stability. The Michigan Alliance for Student Opportunity in a news release said the House budget proposal for K-12 schools ignores student needs. 'The House Republicans' education budget proposal leaves behind the most vulnerable students in our state and underscores the urgent need for Michigan to prioritize true equity in funding for students with the greatest needs,' said Peter Spadafore, executive director of the Alliance. 'While we're encouraged to see the foundation allowance proposal reach $10,025, the highest of the three budgets this cycle, that's unfortunately where the good news ends.' Spadafore also questioned if the plan, which holds at-risk funding flat, is a functional cut when inflationary pressures are factored in. More concerning for the Alliance were the targeted eliminations of certain programs designed to address unique student needs. 'The new categorical introduced by the House – which provides about $1,975 per pupil – might seem like a step forward. But it comes at the expense of targeted funding for student supports,' Spadafore said. 'Without any increase in the [School Finance Research Collaborative]-recommended weights for students in poverty, English learners, or special education, this proposal fails to recognize the higher costs of educating students with the greatest needs.' The House budget would also erase the Michigan Public School Employee's Retirement System, or MPSERS, savings achieved last year, and shift school aid funding for classrooms that comes from lottery proceeds to universities. 'We know that funding alone doesn't close opportunity gaps, but it is the foundation for smaller class sizes, mental health supports, wraparound services, and other resources that help level the playing field,' Spadafore said. 'This proposal misses the mark by ignoring the fundamental reality that it costs more to educate economically disadvantaged students because of what poverty means in real terms. Our students need more than a flat increase; they need a commitment to funding equity.'