The next DeepSeek moment? Chinese start-up Monica unveils ‘Manus', claiming world's first AI that can think like humans (VIDEO)
BEIJING, March 7 – Chinese start-up Monica has unveiled an artificial intelligence (AI) agent called Manus, sparking widespread attention and discussions online, with some media comparing its launch to the rise of DeepSeek.
Chinese state broadcaster CCTV has boldly described it as the world's first general AI agent, capable of autonomously and independently thinking, planning, and executing complex tasks.
'Manus is a general AI agent that bridges minds and actions: it doesn't just think, it delivers results. Manus excels at various tasks in work and life, getting everything done while you rest,' it said on its website.
Monica claimed the AI agent can be applied to diverse tasks, including trip planning and stock analysis.
It also asserted that in GAIA, a benchmark for evaluating general AI assistants, Manus achieved state-of-the-art results across all difficulty levels, surpassing OpenAI's models of the same level.
General AI refers to a type of AI that can perform any task a human can, whereas generative AI like ChatGPT is a specific tool designed mainly to generate text and answer questions within its trained knowledge.
A video introducing Manus by Ji Yichao, its co-founder and chief scientist, was viewed over hundreds of thousands times on X, formerly Twitter, within 20 hours of being posted.
'For the past year, we've been quietly building what we believe is the next evolution in AI, and today we're launching an early preview of Manus, the first general AI agent,' Ji reportedly said, as quoted by Beijing-based The Global Times.
The name 'Manus' is derived from the Latin phrase 'Mens et Manus,' meaning 'Mind and Hand,' reflecting the company's vision of applying knowledge to practical tasks.
Currently, access to Manus is restricted, requiring an invitation code. CCTV reported that the scarcity of these codes has driven users to seek them on a domestic secondhand marketplace, where prices range from 999 yuan (RM606) to 50,000 yuan (RM30,500).
The founding team of Monica includes Xiao Hong, a serial entrepreneur and a 2015 graduate of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, according to the South China Morning Post.
In January, Chinese firm DeepSeek's AI chatbot surged to the top of the Apple Store charts, surprising industry experts and challenging US tech giants like Nvidia and Meta in the competitive AI race.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business of Fashion
20 minutes ago
- Business of Fashion
Surprise! Why Apparel Prices Are Actually Falling
A little over a month into President Donald Trump's new tariff regime, the verdict is in: Clothes are getting cheaper. The US Bureau of Labor Statistics on Wednesday reported that apparel prices fell 0.4 percent between April and May, and were down 0.9 percent from a year prior. Inflation overall was estimated at 2.4 percent, in line with expectations. The data likely reflects pain delayed rather than avoided. Many retailers stocked up before Trump announced a 10 percent tariff on all imports, as well as an additional 30 percent levy on Chinese goods. Inflation figures also don't account for hikes that were announced but have yet to kick in. E.l.f. Cosmetics, LVMH, Nike and many others have said they plan to raise prices this summer. But the downward trend speaks to another truth about fashion's approach to pricing: The tariffs came at a time when brands were already working overtime to convince reluctant shoppers to keep spending. Rather than pass along costs, many companies' instinct is to explore every other option first. Urban Outfitters, Gap and Abercrombie & Fitch fall in that camp, saying they'll hold off on increasing prices even as they warn of shrinking margins. And for brands that engaged in years of post-pandemic price hikes, discounting even in the face of tariffs is still the best way to win back customers. Many luxury labels fall in this category, though plenty of mass-market brands are more expensive than they used to be, too. 'Retailers don't want to scare consumers or the market and suggest they're [raising] prices,' said Sonia Lapinsky, partner at retail consultancy Alix Partners. 'They're refraining as much as possible, they're not talking as much as possible.' Fashion's Falling Prices Apparel prices fell month on month between April and May, and nearly 1 percent in May year on year. The rate of price increases began slowing in 2023, and then declining early this year. This doesn't account for the full impact of tariffs on retailers' margins, which won't be realised until late summer or fall. That is when prices could get 'wildly volatile,' because of brands' individual approaches to pricing in the face of rising costs, said Michael Prendergast, managing director of Alvarez & Marsal Consumer and Retail Group. Some brands will look at this moment as a time to sacrifice margin to gain market share. With expanded margins, thanks to years of rising prices, many retailers are well positioned to absorb the impact. For now brands are doing everything in their power to keep people shopping and drive traffic, said Lapinsky, including upping discounting throughout April and May. Beyond categories like footwear that are highly susceptible to tariffs, brands will get specific about where they raise prices — fashion items may have elasticity, but shoppers would see a more obvious change in basic pieces, for example. Likely, after years of experimenting, brands have learned where their limits are. Planning for the rest of the year is filled with extra risk. Raise prices too much, and kill demand; plan for lower demand and potentially end up with empty shelves. That conundrum will likely come to a head for retailers during back-to-school shopping season. 'We're likely going to have an inventory issue on one end or the other,' said Lapinsky. 'Either we've got inventory in the stores that had to be priced at a point that they can't clear, or retailers may have pulled back and just don't have what customers are looking for.' Mood-Swing Shopping As they make inventory and pricing decisions for the rest of the year, retailers are watching consumer sentiment closely to try to determine whether they'll have the appetite to spend — and to what degree. 'You have to be cautious of exactly what inventory you're taking in, given consumer sentiment and how much they're shopping,' said Jessica Ramírez, co-founder of research firm The Consumer Collective. 'If you're just churning inventory that isn't a priority on your consumers' list, you're not going to do very well.' After falling to its lowest point in years, consumer sentiment got a slight boost in May. Part of that may be thanks to a comparative settling of the news cycle from April, when Trump first announced, and then temporarily paused, levies. But even just the feeling of rising prices and uncertainty can put a damper on shoppers' moods. Plus, more generally, price inflation in other categories will have an impact on consumer appetite to spend on apparel. 'Food and gas prices affect discretionary income,' said Prendergast. 'Gas prices are coming down, that's the good news. The not great news is food continues to rise — that pinches the wallet.' Trouble is Brewing Elsewhere The picture of softened demand is clearer in China, the second biggest fashion market after the US. Earlier this month, China reported consumer prices overall — not just apparel — fell for a fourth consecutive month in May, raising concerns that deflation is here to stay. Meanwhile, wage shrinkage and property value slumps continue. It's already having an impact on fashion, reported Reuters: Amid raging price wars, stores are putting merchandise on steep discount — $30 for a Coach handbag at Super Zhuanzhuan, for example. US-based apparel companies operating in China will face more uncertainty in an already challenged market. Trouble abroad could even be felt back home. 'The more that's happening in the macro, the more concerned the consumer in America is going to be,' said Lapinsky. 'We don't see any end to that in the next few months.' Though, starting in March, China began ramping up fiscal stimulus. And much remains to be seen about how the Chinese consumer will react, said Ramírez. Fashion is still in a wait-and-see phase when it comes to price hikes and planning, but the moment of truth could be getting closer. 'Overall retailers are underplaying the effect of what tariffs and inflation are going to do to their sales and EBITDA,' said Prendergast. 'We're advising clients, take the next two years of your revenue and margin plans down, like, take them down and again, use this opportunity to cut costs internally.'
Forbes
20 minutes ago
- Forbes
Japan's Largest Companies 2025: Rare Interest Rate Hikes Lead To A Volatile Year
Toyota and other Japanese automakers have been hampered by Trump's tariffs. Getty Images Japan's stock market has been on a roller-coaster ride over the past 12 months. Its benchmark Nikkei index reached an all-time high in July 2024, driven by corporate governance reforms and robust company earnings, then crashed more than 25% in less than four weeks on a surprise interest rate hike by the Bank of Japan. Though the index rebounded shortly after, its gains were trimmed in early 2025 as U.S. President Donald Trump ignited his trade war. Japan has 180 companies on this year's Forbes Global 2000 ranking of the world's largest public corporations, down slightly from 182 in 2024, making it the third most-represented country after the U.S. and China. The list weighs market value, revenue, profit and assets equally, using the latest 12 months of data as of April 25. Toyota Motor, the highest-ranking Japanese company, is in a sector particularly hard hit by Trump's sweeping tariffs. The U.S. in early April imposed a 25% tax on foreign-made cars, followed in early May by the same levy on auto parts, a blow to Japan's mainstay industry and its export-led economy. The world's top-selling carmaker slipped three places to No. 14 after its stock tumbled 22% over the year. Though its revenues and profits in the year through December were roughly flat at $309 billion and $34 billion, respectively, Toyota warned that the tariffs would result in a $1.3 billion hit to operating profit in April and May. Some of Toyota Motor's peers suffered even steeper declines. Nissan Motor, long plagued by deteriorating financials, sank 366 spots to No. 707 after its profit in the 12 months through December plunged 76% to $702.6 million. After the cut-off date for the list, the automaker posted a $4.7 billion loss for the three months ended March. Nissan is struggling to restructure after merger talks with larger rival Honda Motor collapsed in February. The failed tie-up, together with the tariffs, relegated Honda to No. 117 from No. 91 as its stock fell 17% over the year. Mitsubishi Motors, whose biggest shareholder is Nissan, tumbled 379 places to No. 1,562 as its shares skidded almost 10%. Companies in the AI space were a bright spot. Billionaire Masayoshi Son's SoftBank investment powerhouse climbed 331 spots to No. 130 on a 425% surge in 12-month profit through December to $5.6 billion, driven partly by increases in the value of portfolio companies such as ByteDance, the Chinese parent of TikTok. SoftBank is ramping up its AI bet, with plans to invest up to $30 billion in U.S.-based ChatGPT maker OpenAI while also investing $100 billion to build AI infrastructure stateside as part of its Stargate Project joint venture with OpenAI and Oracle. The AI boom also lifted Advantest, the world's largest semiconductor testing equipment maker by market share and a supplier to AI-chip giant Nvidia. It scaled 509 places to No. 1,231 as its profit in the year through March more than doubled to $1.1 billion on a 52% surge in sales to $5.1 billion. Other notable climbers included companies in the defense industry. IHI Corp, Mitsubishi Heavy Industries (MHI) and Kawasaki Heavy Industries (KHI) were among the best performers on the Nikkei over the year as Japan ramped up military spending. IHI, an engineering company that makes everything from turbines for power plants to rocket systems for space travel, debuted on the Global 2000 at No. 1,349 after its stock skyrocketed 176%. A more than doubling in MHI stock elevated the company 75 spots to No. 372 while KHI vaulted 513 places to No. 1,331 on a 52% share increase.
Fast Company
21 minutes ago
- Fast Company
Why companies implementing agentic AI before putting proper governance in place will end up behind, not ahead of, the curve
Agentic AI is the buzzword of 2025. Although technically an 'emerging technology,' it feels like companies of all sizes are quickly developing and acquiring AI agents to stay ahead of the curve and competition. Just last week, OpenAI launched a research preview of Codex, the company's cloud-based software engineering agent or its 'most capable AI coding agent yet.' And it's fair that people are interested and excited. Transforming industries From customer service to supply chain management and the legal profession, AI agents are set to transform industries across the board and are already showing us that they can be pervasive across both consumer and enterprise environments, bringing AI fully into the mainstream. Unlike chatbots and image generators, which provide answers, but require prompts, AI agents execute multistep tasks on behalf of users. In 2025, these autonomous software programs will dramatically change how people interact with technology and how businesses operate. This aligns with Forrester's latest findings, which had agentic AI at the top of its recent Top 10 Emerging Technologies for 2025, highlighting the power and potential of this emerging trend. However, as the report also points out, the rewards come with big risks and challenges. Let's dive into these as well as why companies must prioritize governance before development and implementation in order to stay ahead of, not behind, the curve and their competition. A Governance-First Approach In just three years, at least 15% of day-to-day work decisions will be made autonomously by AI agents—up from virtually 0% in 2024. This prediction by Gartner, while promising, sits alongside another key stat: 25% of enterprise breaches will be linked to AI agent abuse. As mentioned above, the rapid and widespread adoption of AI agents, while exciting, comes with complex challenges, such as shadow AI, which is why companies must prioritize a governance-first approach here. So what is it about AI agents that makes them particularly challenging to control? Short answer: their ability to operate autonomously. Long answer: this technology makes it difficult for organizations to have visibility over four things: Who owns which agent What department oversees them What data they have access to What actions the agent can take How do you effectively govern them A comprehensive approach This is where unified governance can step in. With a comprehensive governance framework, companies can ensure that AI agents operate responsibly and are aligned with organizational standards and policies. The alternative: a lack of governance framework for AI agents can mishandle sensitive data, violate compliance regulations, and make decisions misaligned with business objectives. Let's use a real-world example: you are a CEO for a major organization. Your company builds and introduces an AI-powered assistant to help automate workflows and save you time. Now imagine that the assistant gains access to your confidential files. Without guidance or governance, the assistant summarizes sensitive financial projections and closed-door board discussions and shares them with third-party vendors or unauthorized employees. This is definitely a worst-case scenario, but it highlights the importance for a solid governance framework. Here's a helpful governance checklist: Establish guidelines that clearly define acceptable use and assign accountability. Carry out regular reviews to help identify and mitigate potential risks and threats. Appoint the right stakeholder to foster transparency and build trust in how AI agents are used internally and externally. Blurred lines According to Sunil Soares, Founder of YDC, Agentic AI will drive the need for new governance approaches. As more applications include embedded AI and AI agents, the line between applications and AI use cases will become increasingly blurred. I couldn't agree more. Whether you develop AI agents internally or partner with a third-party vendor, this technology will unlock significant value. But the challenges are not one-size-fits-all and will not go away. And while the human element remains important, manual oversight on its own is not sufficient or realistic when it comes to scale and size. Therefore, when you build out your governance framework, ensure that you have automated monitoring tools in place that detect and correct violations of policies, record decisions for greater transparency, and escalate the complex cases that require additional oversight, such as a human-in-the-loop. A centralized governance framework ensures accountability, risk assessment, and ethical compliance. Like everything else in life, you need to create and establish boundaries. And don't worry—implementing a governance framework first won't slow innovation down. When you find the right balance between innovation and risk management, you stay ahead of the curve and competition, leaving room for more cutting-edge AI agents and fewer headaches. For a perfect pill, deploy a unified governance platform for data and AI, as it will be the key to managing and ensuring AI agents don't become the next shadow IT.
