logo
Erin Patterson says she picked and ate wild mushrooms

Erin Patterson says she picked and ate wild mushrooms

1News2 days ago

A woman accused of three murders by serving a toxic mushroom dish has admitted she foraged for the fungi and enjoyed eating them as "they taste good and they're very healthy".
"The first time I noticed them, I remember it was the dog eating some," Erin Patterson, 50, told a Supreme Court jury on Tuesday, about finding wild mushrooms growing at her property.
"I picked all the mushrooms that I could see. I was trying to figure out what they were to see if they were a problem for him."
Woman accused of killing three people with poisonous mushrooms in beef Wellington testifies in her defence. (Source: 1News)
During her second day in the witness box in Morwell, in regional Victoria, Patterson admitted she developed an interest in picking wild mushrooms in early 2020, during the first Covid-19 pandemic lockdown.
ADVERTISEMENT
She said, when Victorians were allowed outside for an hour a day, she would "force the children" to get away for their devices.
"For an hour or so, we would go to Korumburra Gardens for the rail trail and I first noticed them popping up then," she said.
"Have you always liked eating mushrooms?" her defence barrister Colin Mandy SC asked.
"Yeah, I had. They taste good and they're very healthy," Patterson said.
She said she would buy "all the different types that Woolies would sell" and would also purchase mushrooms from local farmers' markets and grocers.
"I'd use them in curries, or pasta dishes, or soup, spaghetti," Patterson said.
"They just taste more interesting. There's more flavour."
ADVERTISEMENT
But she said she discovered it was hard to figure out "what a mushroom is" when she began picking them.
"One species I was particularly worried about, I believe they were called Inocybe," Patterson said.
She would use Facebook groups for mushroom lovers to identify different types, including ones she found on her 1.2ha property in Korumburra.
"I identified the ones that were growing in the paddocks where I had the animals, to a degree was confident of them," she said.
"There were field mushrooms and horse mushrooms in those paddocks."
Asked by her barrister about the process of consuming wild mushrooms, she said she got to a point over several months where she "was confident about what I thought they were".
"I cut a bit off one of the mushrooms, fried it up with some butter, ate it and then saw what happened," Patterson said.
ADVERTISEMENT
"They tasted good and I didn't get sick."
Patterson and her children ate the wild mushrooms she picked and she "chopped them up very, very small".
Don and Gail Patterson. (Source: Supplied)
Regrets saying she wanted 'nothing to do with' her in-laws
Earlier, Patterson grabbed a tissue and wiped her eyes as she apologised for sending Facebook messages to her online friends about her estranged husband Simon's family.
One of those messages, which Patterson sent in December 2022, said "this family, I swear to f***ing god".
"I wish I'd never said it, I feel ashamed for saying that and I wish the family did not have to hear that I said that. They didn't deserve it," she said.
ADVERTISEMENT
Another one read to Patterson said, "I'm sick of this shit, I want nothing to do with them" and she said she regretted that language.
"I needed to vent, I needed to get my frustration off my chest and the choice was either to go into the paddock and tell the sheep or vent to these women," she said.
"I knew they would rally around me and I probably played up the emotion of it a bit to get that support."
She said she did not mean those words, and she was "frustrated" with her estranged husband Simon at the time.
"It wasn't Don and Gail's fault. It wasn't the family's fault. It wasn't even entirely Simon's fault. I played a part in the issue too," she said.
'Overanxious mother'
Earlier Patterson detailed how doctors felt she was an "overanxious mother" as she described losing trust in the medical system.
ADVERTISEMENT
Patterson explained how she thought she had ovarian and brain cancer and was investigating autoimmune diseases.
"I think I wasted a lot of time," she told the jury, shaking her head.
"Not only my time but medical people's time, through all my Dr Googling.
"It's hard to justify it but, with the benefit of hindsight, I can see that I just lost so much faith in the medical system."
She explained issues with her children's health, including when her daughter developed an ovarian cyst before eight months old that was not picked up earlier, and how her son had an X-ray taken of the wrong knee.
"Right from when she was born, I thought there was something wrong — she cried a lot but not a normal cry," Patterson said of her daughter.
"I took her to a lot of doctors and even the hospital, and what they commented to me was I was an overanxious mother, to relax and she's just a normal baby."
ADVERTISEMENT
Patterson said in August 2014 she was giving her baby a belly massage one day when she felt "a mass" and took her to the doctor, but she was dismissed.
"They still dismissed me even then. They said she just had a very full bladder and we should wait," she told the jury sitting in Morwell, in southeast Victoria.
There was not a spare seat in the regional court room, with the public filling most rows and two rows of the victims' families, including sole lunch survivor Ian Wilkinson.
Patterson said her experiences with medical professionals "considerably damaged" her faith in the health system and she was left in a "hyper state of anxiety after".
She also detailed her own battle with getting tests done after experiencing weight gain, fatigue, headaches, and swelling in her hands and feet.
Patterson said her wedding ring "suddenly wouldn't fit" and she took it to a jeweller for resizing, but her hands had grown again when she picked it up.
"I consulted Dr Google," she said.
ADVERTISEMENT
She said she eventually realised "doctors have medical training" and she could not solve it herself.
"Not every headache is a brain tumour," she said.
Patterson said she had a family history of ovarian cancer on both sides, but admitted she had never had a needle biopsy, nor been diagnosed with ovarian cancer.
Earlier, she spoke about her estranged husband's parents Don and Gail Patterson and twice referred to them as "nana and papa".
She said after she separated from Simon in 2015 her relationship with them "never changed".
"I was just their daughter-in-law, they just continued to love me," she said and then cried.
Patterson also became emotional as she described how Gail's sister Heather Wilkinson would "always go out of her way to sit with me and make sure that I had company".
ADVERTISEMENT
Patterson wore a navy and white spotted top, black pants and sandals when she entered the witness box for a second day.
The 50-year-old has pleaded not guilty to three counts of murder and one attempted murder charge over a poisonous beef Wellington lunch she made for her former husband's family in July 2023.
Her former in-laws, Don and Gail Patterson, 70, and Gail's sister Heather Wilkinson, 66, died in hospital days after eating the dish, while Ian Wilkinson was the only surviving guest.
The trial before Justice Christopher Beale continues.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

'You knew they were death caps': Prosecution grills Erin Patterson
'You knew they were death caps': Prosecution grills Erin Patterson

1News

time7 hours ago

  • 1News

'You knew they were death caps': Prosecution grills Erin Patterson

The prosecution has launched a blistering cross-examination of Erin Patterson, accusing her of knowingly preparing deadly death cap mushrooms for a lunch that left three people dead and a fourth critically ill. Patterson has pleaded not guilty to three counts of murder and one attempted murder charge over a poisonous beef Wellington lunch she made for her former husband's family in July 2023. The 50-year-old has spent days giving evidence in her own defence. But, on Thursday, the tone in the courtroom shifted dramatically as prosecutor Nanette Rogers SC began questioning Patterson over what she knew, what she did, and what she lied about. 'You were keen to get rid of the evidence, correct?' Patterson admitted earlier in the week that she threw out her food dehydrator days after the fatal lunch and factory reset her phone to delete photos of mushrooms and the machine itself. ADVERTISEMENT 'I panicked and didn't want [the detectives] to see them,' she told the court. 'It was a stupid kneejerk reaction… I was just scared. But I shouldn't have done it.' Erin Patterson (Source: Nine) But the prosecution argued that her actions were not about fear — they were about concealment. 'You knew that they were death cap mushrooms that you'd been dehydrating, correct?' Rogers asked. 'No, I didn't know that,' Patterson replied. 'You were very keen to dispose of any evidence that might connect you with the possession of death cap mushrooms?' ADVERTISEMENT 'No, I didn't,' she said again. Photos, scales, and a possible 'fatal dose' The court was then shown photos found on Patterson's phone — images of mushrooms sitting on a dehydrator tray, balanced on kitchen scales. Rogers said expert evidence from mycologist Dr Thomas May suggested the mushrooms were consistent with Amanita phalloides — the toxic species commonly known as death caps. 'I suggest you were weighing these mushrooms so you could calculate the weight required for... a fatal dose,' Rogers said. 'I disagree,' Patterson replied. She also rejected the claim that she had foraged those mushrooms after seeing a post online showing where they were growing, saying simply: 'That's not correct.' ADVERTISEMENT Cancer lie under new scrutiny The prosecution also turned its focus to Patterson's admitted lie about having cancer — a claim she made during the lunch to explain an upcoming medical procedure. Earlier this week, Patterson said the lie was a cover for planned gastric bypass surgery and that she had felt ashamed. Now, the court has been shown images and internet searches related to ovarian and brain cancer, allegedly accessed in May 2023. "I suggest this information from the internet would allow you to tell a more convincing lie," Rogers said. "That's theoretically true, but it's not what I did," Patterson replied. She said she had previously feared she might have cancer in late 2021 or early 2022, but not in 2023. ADVERTISEMENT Religious tension, emojis and messages Patterson was also questioned over Facebook messages that the prosecution claimed mocked her in-laws'religious advice, particularly her use of emojis such as 🙄 and 😐 when referring to prayer. Patterson denied mocking Don and Gail Patterson, saying she was "frustrated" and didn't even know how to describe the emoji she used. Don and Gail Patterson. (Source: Supplied) "All I can say is it's a face with a straight line for a mouth." Rogers suggested the tone of her messages combined with her claim she was an atheist in a religious household reflected deeper resentment. Patterson denied making those posts publicly. Trial timeline extended ADVERTISEMENT Justice Christopher Beale told jurors on Thursday the trial was now likely to stretch into late June. Erin Patterson was expected to remain on the stand into next week, with court sitting Tuesday to Friday due to the King's Birthday public holiday in Australia. Once her testimony concluded, legal discussions would take place behind closed doors before closing arguments and final jury directions began. "Take all the time you need," Justice Beale told the jury. Patterson has pleaded not guilty to all charges and continued to maintain her innocence.

Auckland University ordered to pay Siouxsie Wiles more than $200,000
Auckland University ordered to pay Siouxsie Wiles more than $200,000

1News

time8 hours ago

  • 1News

Auckland University ordered to pay Siouxsie Wiles more than $200,000

The University of Auckland has been ordered to pay scientist Siouxsie Wiles $205,059.94. The payout – revealed in an Employment Court decision today – is towards Wiles' legal costs, after a three-week hearing in the Employment Court last year. In that case, the court found the university breached its contractual obligations to protect Wiles as harassment against her intensified during the Covid-19 pandemic. However, it did not find the university had breached Wiles' academic freedom, or claims related to Te Tiriti. In her decision today, Judge Joanna Holden said the parties were encouraged to agree to costs, but due to the university's response Wiles found it necessary to return to court. ADVERTISEMENT Wiles had said she spent $349,450.67 to fight her case last year but would accept $175,000 from the university towards costs. "The University's response was that it considered it was entitled to claim significant costs from Associate Professor Wiles … which would likely be in excess of $500,000 plus GST. It initially offered, on a without prejudice save as to costs basis, to settle costs on the basis that they lay where they fell, but later offered $65,000 (plus GST) as a contribution to Associate Professor Wiles's costs." The key issue appeared to be whether Wiles won her case last year or not. She claimed she had been the successful party. The university said there had been 'no winning party' last year, and that Wiles conduct of her case had increased costs. Judge Holden agree that there was significant time and effort spent on the issues of academic freedom and Te Tiriti at the hearing last year, which would have contributed to the $349,450.67 Wiles spent. However, on balance, the judge was satisfied that the starting costs figure of $176,182.30 was a fair one for costs in the circumstances of the case. In the end, Judge Holden awarded $180,582.30 for costs and $24,477.64 for disbursements.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store