logo
JD Vance account suspended, then quickly restored, on liberal X competitor

JD Vance account suspended, then quickly restored, on liberal X competitor

Fox News4 hours ago

Vice President JD Vance was briefly suspended Wednesday evening by liberal X competitor Bluesky within the first hour of the country's No. 2 leader joining the platform. The account has since been reinstated.
"We welcome the Vice President to the conversation on Bluesky," the company told Fox News Digital in an email response, noting, "There have been many past attempts to impersonate Vice President JD Vance on Bluesky as he is a public figure, and the jd-vance-1.bsky.social account was flagged as part of that pattern by our automated systems, and temporarily suspended."
"The account was quickly reinstated within 20 minutes of the suspension, and we've also added a verified badge to help users confirm the authenticity of the profile," the statement added.
Bluesky, a social media platform with a similar layout to X, has become a haven for many liberals fleeing X after Elon Musk bought the platform and began making changes. Despite its reputation as a liberal stronghold, Vance set up a profile on Bluesky Wednesday, making his first post at 4:50 p.m.
In the vice president's first post he said: "Hello Bluesky, I've been told this app has become the place to go for common sense political discussion and analysis. So I'm thrilled to be here to engage with all of you."
Within the post, he embedded a screenshot of Supreme Court Associate Justice Clarence Thomas' concurring opinion issued today in United States v. Skrmetti, which upheld a Tennessee law banning sex change surgeries on minors.
Thomas' concurrence listed off several problems he found with those challenging Tennessee's law, which included "there is no medical consensus on how best to treat gender dysphoria in children" and "leading voices in this area have relied on questionable evidence, and have allowed ideology to influence their medical guidance."
In his second and third posts, Vance said: "To that end, I found Justice Thomas's concurrence on medical care for transgender youth quite illuminating. He argues that many of our so-called 'experts' have used bad arguments and substandard science to push experimental therapies on our youth," and "I might add that many of those scientists are receiving substantial resources from big pharma to push these medicines on kids. What do you think?"
In response, Bluesky quickly suspended Vance's account. However, it was shortly reinstated after a brief period.
This prompted a firestorm of mockery from conservatives on X, who said the suspension evidenced the need for a free speech platform.
"Bluesky banned VP JD Vance 20 minutes after he joined the platform … The libs at Bluesky are so triggered," commented popular conservative account Libs of TikTok.
"OMG they banned him already," chimed in political commentator Eric Daugherty.
The suspension even garnered condemnation from Vance critics. Liberal reporter Billy Binion commented, "I can't stand JD Vance. But suspending the sitting vice president is exactly why Bluesky is unserious & doomed to fail."
"If you claim to care about real debate, you can't wall yourself off from everyone outside the progressive bubble—esp[icially] someone who might be president one day," wrote Binion.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

President Trump Announces Special Change To White House
President Trump Announces Special Change To White House

Yahoo

time12 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

President Trump Announces Special Change To White House

President Trump Announces Special Change To White House originally appeared on The Spun. President Donald Trump has officially made changes to the White House grounds. Well before Trump assumed office in 2017, presidents always had their say on what type of decorations would be added to the White House. That being said, the 47th president of the United States has elected to install a pair of nearly 100-foot-tall flagpoles. Trump shared this news on Tuesday night with his social media followers. "It is my Great Honor to announce that I will be putting up two beautiful Flag Poles on both sides of the White House, North and South Lawns. It is a GIFT from me of something which was always missing from this magnificent place," Trump wrote on Truth Social. "The digging and placement of the poles will begin at 7:30 A.M. EST, tomorrow morning. Flags will be raised at approximately 11 A.M. EST. These are the most magnificent poles made – They are tall, tapered, rust proof, rope inside the pole, and of the highest quality. Hopefully, they will proudly stand at both sides of the White House for many years to come!" The first flag was raised on the South Lawn this Wednesday afternoon. Several members of Trump's family were in attendance for this ceremony. "They've needed flagpoles for 200 years," Trump said, via Fox News. "It was something I've often said." Trump said he paid for these two flagpoles. He told reporters that each one cost about $50,000 each to complete. Apparently, that's how important this cause was to him. It'll be interesting to see if these flagpoles stick around after Trump's term is Trump Announces Special Change To White House first appeared on The Spun on Jun 18, 2025 This story was originally reported by The Spun on Jun 18, 2025, where it first appeared.

GOP senators back up Trump on Israel-Iran conflict as MAGA base splits on issue
GOP senators back up Trump on Israel-Iran conflict as MAGA base splits on issue

Yahoo

time25 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

GOP senators back up Trump on Israel-Iran conflict as MAGA base splits on issue

Senate Republicans largely lined up behind President Donald Trump's handling of the conflict between Iran and Israel and said they trusted Trump's judgment on whether the United States ought to involve itself. Trump said again Wednesday that he has not decided whether the U.S. should get more involved in the He signaled to reporters that he would decide at the last moment, stating he'd make the decision 'one second before.' The issue of getting more involved in the conflict has divided Trump's MAGA base, with some pointing to his campaign promise to keep America out of foreign wars. Sen. Lindsey Graham, a defense hawk who said he spoke to Trump last night, endorsed the use of force if diplomatic efforts fail. "Either you want them to have a nuclear weapon, or you don't," Graham said. "And if you don't, if diplomacy fails, you use force." MORE: Israel and Iran are waging an existential battle. What does it mean for the US?: ANALYSIS Most Republicans said that they agreed with Trump that Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon. "I think this is something on which the entire world can agree: Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon, or the ability to deliver a nuclear warhead, period," Sen. John Kennedy said. "American foreign policy is always a balance between ... between values and interests. The value here is obvious to everyone. Iran cannot have a bomb. It's just unthinkable, and I support the president unconditionally on that," Kennedy said. Sen. Mike Rounds said there is evidence that Iran was getting closer to building a nuclear weapon. "If Israel has a plan which is appropriate to take care of the problem, then we don't need to be there, but we should never take or eliminate options that are available to the president in exercising his authority as the commander-in-chief," Rounds said. Sen. Kevin Cramer said he would support Trump's decision if he decided to enter the conflict, but would also support a decision to instead "assist Israel in getting the job done." "Iran's made that really crystal clear. They pledged to wipe out the United States of America. I prefer not to let them get here," Cramer said. "I prefer preemptive prevention of war rather than having to end one after it gets to our soil, right?" MORE: Israel-Iran live updates Cramer said Trump has been handling the crisis "brilliantly"and applauded Trump's suggestion that he may or may not get involved. "I think that's pretty honest, right? I may or I may not. I think that that the element of of surprise, if you will, is maintained by an answer that doesn't tell you what he's going to do," he said. "It'd be crazy for the president to give a warning, if you will, of what he may do." Both Republicans and Democrats said they would like Congress to have a role in determining whether the U.S. gets involved in the conflict, but Republicans were much less forceful. "I would love to see Congress have a role, but we certainly don't have time in the midst of what we all see going on for Congress to sit and cogitate for six or eight months," Kennedy said. Democrats, on the other hand, said Trump should get Congress' approval before taking any military action. MORE: Trump on his 'unconditional surrender' demand to Iran: 'I've had it' "At some point, the president must come to Congress if there is to be active, kinetic military involvement that constitutes war. That's the Constitution, Sen. Richard Blumenthal said. "And I believe that the president has to face accountability at some point, for the use of military force in combat, in a war. And the question is, when that point is." Other Democrats said the U.S. should be trying to de-escalate the conflict rather than inflame it. "We don't need to escalate in Iran. That doesn't make anyone in the Middle East safer, and it certainly doesn't make the United States any safer right now, Sen. Elizabeth Warren said. "The role of the United States should be to help de-escalate, to push for negotiations, not to try to set more things afire."

Live updates: Israel-Iran conflict, ballistic missile attacks, Trump weighs US involvement
Live updates: Israel-Iran conflict, ballistic missile attacks, Trump weighs US involvement

CNN

time26 minutes ago

  • CNN

Live updates: Israel-Iran conflict, ballistic missile attacks, Trump weighs US involvement

Update: Date: 6 min ago Title: As the Iran-Israel conflict continues, Trump reviews US options. Here's what you should know Content: Iran and Israel continue to trade strikes as President Donald Trump's decision on whether the US would get involved looms large. Trump has reviewed attack plans for Iran but is holding off to see if Tehran steps back from its nuclear program, a person familiar with the matter told CNN. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu thanked Trump for 'standing by our side' as Israel pushes ahead with its fight against Iran. The US on Wednesday evacuated some embassy personnel and family members from Israel on a US military aircraft, three sources told CNN. The US Embassy in Israel said in its latest security alert Thursday local time that it has 'no announcement about assisting private U.S. citizens to depart at this time.' This came hours after US Ambassador Mike Huckabee said on X that the embassy was 'working on evacuation flights & cruise ship departures.' Here are the key headlines from Wednesday: CNN's Alejandra Jaramillo, Mohammed Tawfeeq, Jeremy Diamond, Tamar Michaelis, Gianluca Mezzofiore, Catherine Nicholls, Michael Rios, Jennifer Hansler, Oren Liebermann, Kylie Atwood and Hira Humayun contributed reporting. Update: Date: 1 min ago Title: Israeli envoy to US says Iran's ability to produce ballistic weapons must also be eliminated Content: Israel's ambassador to the US said Wednesday that Israel must eliminate not only Iran's ability to make nuclear weapons, but also its ability to produce ballistic missiles. 'They come cruising out of the sky and create incredible damage,' Yechiel Leiter told CNN's Kaitlan Collins, referring to Iran's missiles. 'That production capacity has to be eliminated as well.' 'They cannot have the weapons that can destroy Israel, which they claim and which they want to do every day,' he added. Asked about Israel's ability to destroy Iran's Fordow nuclear enrichment site, buried deep under a mountain near the city of Qom, Leiter said 'it might require multiple strikes, it might require something else or it might require one of our surprises,' without going into details. 'We have a few tricks up our sleeves,' he said, when asked about Israel's response if the US were not to get involved in the conflict. 'If we have to pursue this and prosecute this by ourselves, we're going to know what to do. We're not going to allow Iran to have a nuclear weapon,' he told Collins. Update: Date: 7 min ago Title: Trump has reviewed attack plans but is holding off to see if Iran steps back from nuclear program, source says Content: US President Donald Trump has reviewed attack plans for Iran but is holding off to see if Tehran steps back from its nuclear program, a person familiar with the matter told CNN. The plans were among an array of options the president's military advisers discussed with him in the Situation Room this week, though officials stressed no decision has been made, as Trump said publicly on Wednesday. 'I have ideas as to what to do, but I haven't made a final — I like to make the final decision one second before it's due, you know, because things change. I mean, especially with war, things change with war. It can go from one extreme to the other,' he told CNN's Kaitlan Collins in the Oval Office. 'As President Trump said himself today, all options remain on the table,' a White House official said Wednesday. CNN reported Tuesday that Trump was growing increasingly receptive to using US military assets to strike Iran's nuclear facilities. On Wednesday, CNN reported that discussions were underway among his top officials over how the US could do so without becoming embroiled in a full-scale war.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store